|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,229
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,229 |
Does anyone have any opinions on differences between these two scopes? Looking at setting up a light weight rifle and wondering if the cost difference between the vx2 and vx3 is worth it
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565 |
I'm a Leupold fan, but have models that I like and dislike. Personally, I'd rather the 2-7X33 even if the 1.75-6X32 were the same price.........
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,758 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 |
Same here.
The 4.5-14, 2.5-8 and 1.75-6x are my least favorite Leupold scopes (not counting the UL 2-7 and 3-9).
The 4x, 6x36/42, 2-7x and 3.5-10x my favorites.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,088
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,088 |
Of the VX-3's, the 3.5-10x40 is my pick of the litter and I have several.
Recently, I mounted a VX-2 3-9x40 on a rifle for a friend. I was amazed at the quality, it's pretty close to the VX-3.
Of the scopes mentioned, I'd probably go with the 2-7 and I have a 1.75-6. It's a great scope, I think I'd go with a VX-2 if I was buying one right now.
Go check them out and compare side by side. VX-2's have such a sleek profile and they're really light. What's not to like...
DF
Edited to add, the reason I suggested my buddy get the VX-2 3-9 instead of the 2-7 was his long action .300 WM. It's harder to mount a short 2-7 on a LA rifle. It can be done, just harder to do. And, he and I like our scopes back a bit, not forward like some stock crawlers prefer...
And to agree with Steelhead, of the scopes on his least favorite list, I'd put the 4.5-14 at the top. Something about that scope I just don't like. I don't have one, another buddy does. His is the LR 30mm version. Don't like that one, either.
Last edited by Dirtfarmer; 10/16/14.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,997
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,997 |
As I understand it the VX-2 of today are pretty much the same optics as the VX-III of a few years ago. I recently upgraded 3 of my rifles, 2 to VX-2 3-9 UL(sorry Steelhead) and 1 to a VX-3 2.5-8. While the difference from my old VX-II's is obvious, the difference between the VX-2's and VX-3's is subtle. That said the new 2.5-8 is hard to beat for a light weight scope.
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884 |
The 2-7x is easier to use than the 2.5-8x. Now that the optics are so close, you might as well save money and have the easier usage.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 |
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,114
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,114 |
I have a vx3 in 1.5 x 5 I hunt in the east we dont take long shots . I also have a vx2 in 2 x 7 and I like it a little better than the vx3
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,229
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,229 |
wow guys, looks like the vx2 is getting the nod. Thanks for all the input!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 591
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 591 |
Lately been using a VX-2 2-7x33 on my Sako 85 .308 in low Leupold ring mounts and like the scope a lot.
"The 257 Roberts, some people like to call it the “.257 Bob.” I think these people should be hung in trees where crows can peck at them." - David Petzal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 563
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 563 |
I have a VX-3 1.75-6x36 with heavy duplex. As far as Leupold's go, it is an excellent scope. Good low light performance, decent low light reticle, small, light, and decent image quality.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,690
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,690 |
I have and am pleased with both. That said I cannot see spending the extra duckets for the VX3.
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 486
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 486 |
The 2-7x is easier to use than the 2.5-8x. Now that the optics are so close, you might as well save money and have the easier usage. Question is how is it easier from one to the other?
Nothing like a Remington 700xcr.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,093
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,093 |
I have a 2.5-8 with B&C reticle that I absolutely love, it is easy to use and has a great eye box. I also have three 4.5-14s and 3.5-10s. I don't favor one over the other. I don't have any issues with the 4.5-14.
I do not have a 2-7 so can't make that comparison but I do have a couple of 3-9s and they pale compared to the 3.5-10 and even the 2.5-8.
Only reason I would get a 2-7 would be for the weight savings.
NRA Benefactor Member
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,690
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,690 |
You are comparing different series of scopes so the 3-9x should pale.
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,208
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,208 |
I have three 2x7s spanning about 25 years: a new VX-2, a VX-II and a Vari-X IIc. They just keep getting better. They're pretty light without paying extra for "lightweight" versions, well proportioned for short actions, reasonable price, and a very useful magnification range.
Just set up and sighted-in the new VX-2 a couple of weeks ago (Rem 700 Classic 300 Savage). Was alternating it with the VX-II (Kimber Montana .308) while letting rifles cool. Very nice, noticeably sharper, and easier to focus with the new focus ring. May have to switch it over to the Kimber since that's my main deer rifle.
My opinion, the 2x7 is just about perfect for a lightweight bolt action. Have never used the VX-3 1.75x6, didn't see the point in spending the extra $$. Have never found any of the 2x7s wanting. I do have a couple of Vari-X III 1.5x5 (Savage 99F .308, Rem 700 Classic 350 Rem Mag). If I was buying a scope for the 350 today it would be a VX-2 2x7 (existing scope is from 1986 - when you could buy a Vari-X III for under $200!). Not the Savage - any scope messes with the aesthetics, so less is better as far as I'm concerned!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 32,074
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 32,074 |
wow guys, looks like the vx2 is getting the nod. Thanks for all the input! Good call. My VXII 2X7 is at least 25 years old and going strong. It's been on several different rifles- right now the Rem725 .260.
The only true cost of having a dog is its death.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884 |
The 2-7x is easier to use than the 2.5-8x. Now that the optics are so close, you might as well save money and have the easier usage. Question is how is it easier from one to the other? I find it easier to use in the following ways: -more mounting length, easier to position while mounting -eyebox is more "forgiving", easier to pick up quickly -the look seems "fuller" to me, all the way to the edges with no tunneling
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,088
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,088 |
The VX-2 is better than the VX-II.
Reportedly close to the VX-III.
DF
|
|
|
|
56 members (14idaho, 3dtestify, 6mmCreedmoor, 10gaugemag, 406_SBC, 11 invisible),
1,843
guests, and
782
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,387
Posts18,469,727
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|