24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,306
S
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,306
So, do I have this right; I assume if the accubond LR is designed to perform at extreme long distance that it is probably a little softer than the regular accubond? If so, what makes it different from the Ballistic tips that are more fragile than the accubonds (aside from being bonded).

Which one if likely more fragile up close (inside a hundred yards) the Ballistic tip or the accubond LR. Or, will the BT blow completely apart and the LR will just deform greatly....just wondering about all this.

Dan

HR IC

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 4
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 4
What cartridge are you loading for, and how far do you expect to shoot?


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,306
S
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,306
Not loading any just yet. Will prolly load 264 win and 300 win.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,306
S
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,306
Want to shoot be able to shoot up close if it happens that way. I assume the LR are softer for down range performance.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
D
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
They are portrayed in their catalog as "softer" in that the jacket is designed to be less heavy at the front end, with a very different core shape that allows the bullet to open even at lower velocity.

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 4
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 4
Slidellkid, the few field reports we have where someone hit something up close our of a magnum...well...yea....they (the LRAB's) kind of made a mess of things, but since they are designed to open at 1200 fps, that's kind of to be expected.

In the .264, I'd stay away from the LRAB, since it's only offered in the 129gr flavor. I'd opt for the standard 140gr AB is close was a possibility.

In the .300 the 210's are probably worth a try. The large size will help moderate muzzle velocity, and mass provides a quality of it's own. I'd think that combination could be formidable across a wide range spectrum.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
A fellow I know fire 7mm ABLR into a block of soft wood at north of 3000 ft/s and weight retention of the bullet was about 30%. Not overly scientific but gives an indication they're going to come apart some at close range.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
F
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,423
Main diff is design the lr has a more efficient bt . a bit softer but it's a bullet design all it's own not a new copy of old tec it has a diffrent form factor than ballistic tips.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

537 members (007FJ, 10ring1, 1badf350, 12344mag, 1beaver_shooter, 160user, 49 invisible), 2,215 guests, and 1,243 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,107
Posts18,502,243
Members73,987
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.166s Queries: 30 (0.009s) Memory: 0.8261 MB (Peak: 0.8725 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-10 15:02:13 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS