Hadn't seen this before, pretty interesting.
Randy Garrett posted on Marlin Owners forum the following message several years ago. I recently came across it and am wondering if this might be part of my problem with inconsistent accuracy with my Marlin 1895.
Garrett said this, "There is a subject I haven't seen addressed on the forum that is worthy of consideration. This subject may have already been dealt with by others, but if not it definitely deserves discussion. The issue is the relative frequency of underpowered hammer springs in Marlin lever-guns, and their effects on ammo performance.
I recently had a 1895SS turned into something special by Jim Brockman, and as he was finishing the project, he called to report that he just couldn't get the gun to shoot well at all. He was using my ammo exclusively. He reported erratic accuracy, with groups varying rather widely in their size. He even reported that one round didn't go off. At this point I knew that he had a rifle that had a weak hammer spring, and I suggested that he replace the spring and try again. He called the next day to report that after replacing the spring, and doing nothing else to the gun, he was able to shoot some of the best groups he had ever shot with the 45-70."
I have had 3 misfires/failure to fire since getting this gun (over about 600 rounds fired). I bought a reduced power Wolf Spring kit before coming across Garrett's post and had planned to install them in order to make it easier to work the lever and possibly reduce the trigger pull a bit but after reading his post I am thinking I should get a more powerful hammer spring instead. It does kind of surprise me that a weak spring could affect accuracy. It seems to me if the hammer hits hard enough to fire the cartridge what more do you need? Why would a weak spring impact accuracy so long as the cartridge fires? Just trying to learn. Thanks, Rufous