24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
Originally Posted by TheBlueMountainApe
[quote=txhunter58]In a word........No



The old timers must have been dang near insomniacs shooting piles of elk with 87gr bullets in their 250-3000's!!!!


The old timers didn't care that much or lose any sleep if they lost an elk, they would just go shoot another one. I am sure they shot and shot and shot until he went down too. And if they had a bigger gun/bullet, they would have used it.


Venor ergo sum
GB1

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 194
T
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by txhunter58
Originally Posted by TheBlueMountainApe
[quote=txhunter58]In a word........No



The old timers must have been dang near insomniacs shooting piles of elk with 87gr bullets in their 250-3000's!!!!


The old timers didn't care that much or lose any sleep if they lost an elk, they would just go shoot another one. I am sure they shot and shot and shot until he went down too. And if they had a bigger gun/bullet, they would have used it.


I'm curious as to what you base your knowledge on....


------------------------------

The APE

"But resist we much...we must...and we will much...about...that...be committed." - the "Reverend" Al Sharpton
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,777
W
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,777
Laker, I have used the 115 BTBT a bunch of deer/antelope/coyotes.. If I were taking my .25/06 for an elk hunt, I would use my supply of 115 gr. Part.. I am certain a 115 BTBT behind the shoulder would kill and elk.. But I would like the added insurance of the Part. or Accubond.. That Ackley sounds like a winner.. Have thought of having mine punched out, but doubt I ever do it..


Molon Labe
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,777
W
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,777
tx58 has a point.. One of the guys in our valley told of shooting at 5 elk as they jumped the fence near his upper pasture.. He used a 99 .243.. The last elk stumbled and fell with in sight.. He loaded his elk and went home.. End of story..


Molon Labe
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
"I'm curious as to what you base your knowledge on...."

History: read about shooting buffalo, etc

My own experiences: At 57 years old, I remember a time with it was "just an animal"

I think it is a good thing that today, we consider all life to be worth something. No, I don't go out and hug trees, but I lose sleep if I wound and don't recover game.


Venor ergo sum
IC B2

Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 194
T
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by txhunter58
"I'm curious as to what you base your knowledge on...."

History: read about shooting buffalo, etc

My own experiences: At 57 years old, I remember a time with it was "just an animal"

I think it is a good thing that today, we consider all life to be worth something. No, I don't go out and hug trees, but I lose sleep if I wound and don't recover game.


You must have some dang interesting books if they tell stories of thinning down the buffalo herds with .250-3000's!!!!!


------------------------------

The APE

"But resist we much...we must...and we will much...about...that...be committed." - the "Reverend" Al Sharpton
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
Reread my post, it has nothing to do with what gun they used. I said in the past they didn't lose any sleep if they lost an an animal and you asked me how I knew this. History reveals wanton shooting of buffalo with little regard to wounding/ losing an animal. That is no longer the case

And you make my point for me. Of corse they didn't use such a small bullet for a buffalo. Just like I won't use the bullet in question for elk. With expert marksmen and within certain limitations the elk will die quickly with this bullet. I just won't take a limiting bullet on my personal hunts

Last edited by txhunter58; 04/29/15.

Venor ergo sum
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 194
T
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by txhunter58
Reread my post, it has nothing to do with what gun they used. I said in the past they didn't lose any sleep if they lost an an animal and you asked me how I knew this. History reveals wanton shooting of buffalo with little regard to wounding/ losing an animal. That is no longer the case

And you make my point for me. Of corse they didn't use such a small bullet for a buffalo. Just like I won't use the bullet in question for elk. With expert marksmen and within certain limitations the elk will die quickly with this bullet. I just won't take a limiting bullet on my personal hunts


Just as I suspected, no concrete information to base you claims on.


------------------------------

The APE

"But resist we much...we must...and we will much...about...that...be committed." - the "Reverend" Al Sharpton
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
LOL. If you say so. We will obviously never agree so I will stop trying smile I wish you well on your hunts. Really. I normally head to the Colorado elk woods shooting a 350--460 gr conical out of my 50 cal muzzleloader. This fall for the first time in 20 years I will be hunting with a centerfire rifle. I will be shooting a 165 gr trophy copper bullet out of my 30-06 and know it will come through for me for any reasonable shot presentation out to 400 yards. Last time I used a rifle I had a 160 gr nosler partition out of a 7 mm rem mag. Plenty of concrete out there on those being elk killers. We each have to go with our own comfort level. There really is no right or wrong. Only what works for you

Last edited by txhunter58; 04/30/15.

Venor ergo sum
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 915
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 915
165gr by .308 wide seems very optimum for flat, with some zap when it gets there!

Favoring the upper end, it don't matter what I do to my 7mmRM does not like 160s, no how. To the extent of playing with the length of the bedding under the chamber, piller-block tension and playing with barrel supports, nothing. Load up some 140s and it's like adding a $thousand bucks to the rifle!

Took elk with 140gr nbts, gold results. Same exact data under 140gr Accubonds shoots just the same. But yet to take an elk. I would like to see little more penetration.

This rifle bullet subject seems to come up as often as best personal defense load for a .380 handgun.
Always the same answer, hard to pick a good .380 round, just as it's hard to pick a bad round for a .45acp .

Imo:
There is no replacement for displacement.

Last edited by K_Salonek; 05/01/15.

Clinging to my God, and my guns!
IC B3

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,282
G
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,282
I haven't seen Flinch post for several years but I knew he had some 1st hand experience with the 115 BT and elk/deer. I search back a few years and found this.

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/5950975/1

I killed a fat doe last October with my Bob and the 115. Worked quite well at 100; DRT.

[Linked Image]

Alan

Last edited by GSSP; 05/01/15.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,755
Originally Posted by GSSP

[Linked Image]

Alan

Beautiful rifle!


He who joyfully marches in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would suffice.

- Albert Einstein
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
G
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
Last fall's buck, .25-06, 115 Nosler Ballistic Tip. One of several over the years:

[Linked Image]

For elk though, well, that's why Partitions are available, no?

Regards, Guy

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 830
Yep, I own a 25-06 too and it is one sweet deer rifle

Last edited by txhunter58; 05/04/15.

Venor ergo sum
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,859
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,859
I love my 25-06 and have taken a pile of Deer with it but I think there are a lot of better calibers for taking Elk out there. I have always believed bigger is better.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
I've shot the 257Ackley for 30years now and have killed a ton of deer w/it. I have always used the 115gr BT and it's always got the job done. If I was forced to hunt elk w/it I would use the 120gr Partition. The sheer mass of an elk would be my guiding reason behind my choice. Even though my gun is a 25-06 practically speaking...the heavier, tougher bullet would still be my choice. A lot of difference between a 150lb deer and a 600lb elk. powdr

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 819
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 819
I tried the 115 bt's about 10 years ago. They were not tough at all - didn't like bone. I shot the rest of them into song dogs. They make a real good mess out of em. The Hornady 120 was the toughest I've used but starts dropping like a rock past about 250. I settled on the Sierra 120 because it really shoots well and falls right between the Nosler and Hornady for tuff. If I wasn't going to shoot a premium bullet for Elk I'd shoot the Hornady. I also heard a few good things about the 120 partition but never could get them to shoot worth a squat. Whatever you choose, just shoot strait and you'll do fine.

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,825
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,825
257: I agree with you that the 120 gr Hornady and Sierras are good bullets, accurate and good terminal performance. But am confused that you picked the Sierra after commenting that the Hornady drops fast past 250 yds, since the Sierra's BC is worse than the Hornady's.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,325
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,325
There seems to a game with hunters to see who can kill an elk with the most inadequate bullet/caliber. The idea is to choose a bullet not recommended by the manufacturer and shoot it from a small caliber gun to see who can kill an elk without wounding too many. Nosler recommends the BT for deer and antelope, not elk. Their engineers have put in a lot of time testing it to know what it's good for. For elk they have AB's and PT's but those are too well built for the game players. To play the game, it's necessary to use the BT and hope it doesn't fail like Nosler predicts it will.

Have a heart. Elk are too great to wound. Use a bullet designed for the job.


β€œIn a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 819
J
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 819
The b.c of hornadys 120 flat base h.p is better than the sierra 120 boat tail ? I wouldn't have thought that. All I'm going on, is what I've seen. Try the test, sighted at two, shooting at four, with the same load of powder. I'm interested if you'll get the same result.

Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

647 members (160user, 10gaugemag, 06hunter59, 10ring1, 007FJ, 10gaugeman, 78 invisible), 2,702 guests, and 1,298 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,477
Posts18,471,652
Members73,936
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.105s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.9014 MB (Peak: 1.0402 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-27 00:46:45 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS