|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606 |
I'm 29, been using my marlin 336 since it was the first gun I ever bought brand new. killed lots of critters with it, but I've noticed I'm not as accurate with it anymore, and I'm squinting to discern the sights and I'm debating on putting a new sight/scope on it.
what would you all recommend?
I'm leaning towards a 2-7 power scope, but that would mean I need mounts and rings and a scope.
what scope would be best?
is there a place to get one on a tight budget? prefer used
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,106
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,106 |
You might need glasses. miles
Look out for number 1, don't step in number 2.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606 |
I have glasses, but I hate to hunt with them
thanks for the insight though!
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,189
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,189 |
If you enjoy, and are accustomed to used the irons, coat your glasses with a fog proof lens coating and rock on. Why change what works for you already...??? Mike... http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZrgr223calQ2aQQfrppZ50QQfsopZ2QQfsooZ2QQrdZ0
All said, the Savage 99 is a genius of a rifle. Although no longer produced, it remains highly revered, as it was the foundation from which Arthur Savage built one of America's great gun companies. >> (Jon Y. Wolfe) <<
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 270
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 270 |
Weaver V3 1-3x20 is a popular choice. You'd have less than $200 in the scope, rings, and mount brand new. If you're concerned about aesthetics I can't think of a better match than an El Paso Weaver k2.5. Steel tube, great glass, and around $60 on ebay. You could do it all for less than $100.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,106
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,106 |
I have glasses, but I hate to hunt with them I have been wearing glasses for fifty years and I hate to hunt in them too. But, since I like seeing what I am doing, I wear them. miles
Look out for number 1, don't step in number 2.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,025
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,025 |
any quality 4x scope and weaver mounts would serve you well-I currently have a nikon UCC 4x40 on mine, but the Weaver classic's you can get new for around $100, and the old steel tube weavers work as well. I shot my first with a 336 wearing a tasco scope...wish I still had it!!
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,718
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,718 |
At 29 you don't need reading glasses yet, sooo, I'd recommend getting contact lenses.I've worn contacts for about 35 years, they work very well and don't fog. What sucks is that I need reading glasses now!When it gets to where you need reading glasses, I'd suggest a good recever sight or scope, open sights won't cut it anymore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606 |
I have glasses for reading and driving at night. I can see objects without problem, unless they are small. I can focus on the front sight, or the rear sight but not both at the same time. I use scopes on all my other rifles, so it seemed a logical choice. I have an astigmatism so contacts aren't an ideal solution, besides I can't stand putting something in my eyes.
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,284
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,284 |
I have been wearing glasses since I was in the 7th grade (I'm 53 now). Glasses are not optionial for me as I have poor vision and astigmatism (the contacts did not work for me years ago). I mount a scope on each rifle and ensure it is focused while I am wearing my glasses - works well and never have to even think about it again. I have a Marlin M1895 that I just removed the Lyman peepsight from (getting to hard to aim accurately with it) and have obtained (off the 24 Hour CampFire classifieds) a Leupold VXII 1-4 scope to mount on my Marlin. I also bought a Weaver Grand Slam mount #48928, which is supposed to fit all 336 based receivers, using standard windage rear and dovetail front style rings. I think it should work out fine.
One of the sanest, surest, and most generous joys of life comes from being happy over the good fortune of others. Archibald Rutledge
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,080
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,080 |
Ditto on the Weaver 1-3 or Leupold 1-4. More than enough power for a levergun, short, and lightweight. You'll never look back. Stick a larger scope on it and one the reasons(lightweight) for the lever will gone. IMHO.
Qtip Soli Deo Gloria!
"It's not a matter of legislating morality; it's a question of whose morality gets legislated"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 711
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 711 |
I've put a 4x Nikon on my 1894 and find it's all I need. If you are set on a variable, Burris makes a nice compact 2x7 that's not too big for the 336.
Don
__________________________________________________ "America�s most precious metals are Gold, Silver, and Blued Steel." - Frank in Maine
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606 |
i've been lookin at the burris 2-7
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 120
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 120 |
I have a Weaver 1-3* 20 on my 30-30 and a Bushnell 3200 2/7*32 on my 45-70. Both rifles have a 1 piece DNZ mount. Both scopes look good on the rifles, neither is too big and overpowering. I would recommend the Bushnell, it gives good field of view at 2times and still has the extra little magnification when needed. The 3200 has rainguard and they test to 10,000 shots of 375.
|
|
|
|
163 members (2ndwind, 10gaugemag, 338reddog, 450yukon, 1_deuce, 45_100, 28 invisible),
2,126
guests, and
1,030
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,387
Posts18,469,704
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|