Is Siri involved?

AI ain’t exactly bullscchitt.

Overhyped? Definitely
BS? Not for certain applications

Like the internet once was AI is just in its infancy.

Serious question about Siri who the fugk created her she can’t comprehend schit like most females

Females can comprehend schit?


Who knew?

I see it as a way to make a pile of money if the right stock is picked

AI will be picking stocks.

AI is sizing up to be a real threat to freedom if (and when) the wrong people control it. It will be the next revolution in tech, and will be abused just like people always do with anything that gives them some power.

This is the concern. Things will get dicey when AI begins writing its own code and some of it already is to a limited extent as we speak.

I can see AI having a HUGE impact when it comes to replacing lots of low-level jobs like taking food orders/material orders, not to mention, taking lots of what I call “paper-shuffling” jobs. Think about jobs like “loan application officers” and lots of govt bureaucrat jobs.

Don’t know if AI will be any more “competent” than the moron at the DMV, but at least it won’t have the bad attitude???

"And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed."


Wait and see.

Then again, seems like it would be simple to program in any kind of attitude - including a bad one.

My buddy had one of those self driving cars.
It left him for another guy.

Yeah, and look how much better the internet has made life…

Elon Musk said that AI in the wrong hands or used in the wrong way is the biggest threat to humanity. Needs to be regulated. He hates regs, but in this case it's needed.
Regulated by who? Well that's another problem in it's self.

Asking bard google AI about jan 6 is like asking the DNC.

https://support.google.com/bard

Something must have happened in AI to have so many people (high ups) start talking about it all at once?

It's all manmade and human programming runs it. It all comes down to who writes the programs. If they're liberal, it's not going to be good.

On the same line, CGI is getting so good that we've had discussions here about whether videos are real or not. They figure it's just a matter of time before it gets so good that there will be actors who will be nothing but computer files and we won't be able to tell the difference. That will greatly reduce the costs of making movies and the multi-million salaries will be gone. When this happens, you can bet that there will also be CGI politicians who can sucker everyone and we'll never know who's behind it.

"Generative AI Is About To Reset Everything, And, Yes It Will Change Your Life | Forbes"

"Whether you like it or not, generative AI like ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion are about to change not only how you work, but how the content you consume is produced. Forbes spoke with a number of leading voices in the AI space to determine both the benefits and the dangers of this next wave of technological innovation, and find out why both tech giants as well as cutting edge startups are racing to grab their share of the market."

video posted to YouTube on Feb 17, 2023

No. Not really. You see that's what AI means. It's artificial intelligence. If you want to actually understand how dangerous it could be, just imagine that we created a new independent species a million times more intelligent than we are, and it controls everything.

scott adams this morning demonstrated to AI that AI was wrong, and AI acknowledged it was wrong, but Bard later demonstrated it had not changed its mind.

The 2 issues were 2016 Pres election and Jan 6.

It has DNC talking point hard wired [figuratively].

link to youtube by adams

Go to 45:00

We are just seeing the tip of the iceberg right now. The real scary part is that no one really knows how creating an intelligence far greater than ours will turn out. That's what Elon is so concerned about. We need to slow down and figure out some things before just plunging ahead, but alas, it's already too late apparently.

Well, if you want to save money on Mother's Day cards, go here: https://www.1800flowers.com/account/momverse?et_rid=280682&mi_u=280682. LOL. Hallmark is in trouble.

If the AI programmers believe that humans are the virus and a threat to the world...lol

I wonder (((what))) it could be?

Claus Schwab with the WEF, said "we will run the world with digital currency and AI", at the summit a while back- They both are coming

I expect that we've already seen test runs of deep fake Biden and others.

Sure, "AI" is a powerful and dangerous tool... but it's being hyped as Cyberdyne Systems....Fear, fear, fear. It is not going to "become sentient". It can only do what it is programmed to do. If it is programmed to "act sentient", then that is what it will do to terrify (and distract) the public.

The oligarchs will always control the power cords. They're not stupid. They've seen the movies (hell.. they produced the movies).

Have you looked at the cutting edge of this stuff? It's a bit worse than the Cyberdyne vision. They aren't really being programed by humans. At least not in any specifically intentional way like you would think of as programming. It learns by examining the entirety of all the internet's human communication. They have these AI's that are biological material. Just imagine the dick head that would be born from every human communication that ever took place here at the fire. Now multiply that times every accessible communication on the web.

On top of that I heard the other day somebody has developed robots that consume animal protein as fuel. What a great idea!

Google’s suspended AI engineer corrects the record: He didn’t hire an attorney for the ‘sentient’ chatbot, he just made introductions — the bot hired the lawyer

What makes anyone think they aren't using AI in Fed/gov now?

Like to ask a question about if fed/gov does ________, then what will the public reaction be?

"AI, what is the highest we can raise taxes without a full revolution?"

"AI, what breaches of our Constitution would not allow us to keep our heads?"


I assure you, they contemplate ramifications and calculate things like that already.

They already know the probable response to any scenario that they can think up, and the outcome of such actions.

Random thought, AI generated sock puppets posting on the forum and interacting with members.

AI may transform the Walmart experience more so than self checkouts have already. Material handling robots are pretty damn clumsy and destructive at times as well as expensive. The pick up order fillers I've seen and spoken to are much better, more efficient and cheap. It's an altogether positive alignment of software optimization sorting to maximize efficiency of fill up to 8 orders simultaneously. The human is stimulated by the challenge that remains, manipulating the device, scanning the shelves, keeping it all straight, making substitutions, etc. when necessary. Humans have better adaptive brains, muscular coordination, eye to hand and the ability to adapt. And there's a lot of them out there still wanting jobs. Also millions of people who do busy work now could be replaced overnight."THEY" do not want millions of displaced drones with nothing to do but fire up their lazy brains to think [bleep] up, like consequences. Not in their interest...

ribka.

Artificial but far from intelligent.

I've asked AI, and it assures me that it would never do anything to harm humanity.

While the idea of AI-generated sock puppets interacting with members on a forum may seem intriguing, it raises ethical concerns. Sock puppets, in general, are fake online personas created to deceive others and manipulate conversations. Using AI-generated sock puppets takes this deception to another level, as the AI may be programmed to generate responses that are specifically designed to sway the opinions of others.

This type of manipulation can be harmful and could potentially damage the integrity of the forum. Additionally, using AI-generated sock puppets to engage with members can also violate the terms of service of the forum, as many sites have rules against impersonating others or using fake identities.

It is important to consider the potential consequences of using AI-generated sock puppets in online interactions and to prioritize transparency and authenticity in online conversations.

Odd to think about.

Program a computer to be able to program itself.

Then consider that millions of computers around the world are connected to one grid,...and a handful of them suddenly have the ability to program themselves in a manner that controls all of them.

Maybe they're instructed to do so by a human or maybe not.

"Hal", 2001, a space odyssey.

In the short term, it doesn’t bode well for worker bees. Long-term, who knows? I don’t worry much about long-term these days. The computing power required probably largely rules it out for a lot of stuff now, but that will change for certain.

Wonder how long it’ll be before AI kills somebody?

Well if it gets regulated by our Federal govt we know who it will be used against. The same federal government that can[t even put a change in for daylight savings time.