One of those "constitutional Sheriff" candidates we here about

This guy sounds like Rovering's type of cop

http://www.rightwingnews.com/top-ne...le-shut-fck-youre-violent-people-planet/

What a freakin' moron...

Ah, Baltimore...

To odd for words

What a smuck

Community policing at its finest....

If Rovering does not fully support this azz clown, solely based on his own past posts on police, it proves he is a brain dead hypocrite

Well he is a Republican.....

Wow, what a nut job.
An OWS'er Mumia clone with an AR. Perfect closing of the tinfoil circle.

I'm at a bit of a loss as to why the THREAD Title.

That dizzy SOB has jack diddly chit to do with a real Constitutional Sheriff.

Using it in this context is rather DEMEANING of a very valid, and very American concept.

.....so, WTF Over ?

Do you have some sorta' PROBLEM with that concept ?

GTC

Nope I don't. I chose that title to show some of the Kooks here that solely being a sheriff does not automatically make them any more "constitutional" than any other LEO

Well, I'd say you failed on that attempt. A sheriff does have greater Constitutional authority than other cops. That retard isn't a sheriff, and he's not constitutional.

Originally Posted by 4ager

Well, I'd say you failed on that attempt. A sheriff does have greater Constitutional authority than other cops. That retard isn't a sheriff, and he's not constitutional.

He is very clearly a racist though...

Clearly, though he and the Dear Leader and those like them will swear that blacks can't be racist.

Originally Posted by gitem_12

Nope I don't. I chose that title to show some of the Kooks here that solely being a sheriff does not automatically make them any more "constitutional" than any other LEO

Yup, you certainly did fail, and seem to be dead set on continuing to fail to understand something pretty [bleep] VITAL.

Richard really failed in coherency recently, up at that Bundy Ranch fiasco. Disappointing, and I think he regrets letting fatigue and heavy stress cloud his usually sound judgement.

Nonetheless, you should perhaps have a listen to some sage council he put down some years ago. Cause THIS is bang phuggin' ON.

I'd be really interested to hear your riposte to this clip, if you have one.

That was exactly my point...but he is exactly the type of cop people like TRH and rovering would support

Originally Posted by gitem_12

That was exactly my point...but he is exactly the type of cop people like TRH and rovering would support

He may drive a green pickup - that could be a problem.

Originally Posted by gitem_12

That was exactly my point...but he is exactly the type of cop people like TRH and rovering would support

Wrong, you have not MADE any kinda' "Point", and the thread title sucks the bone.

GTC

Originally Posted by crossfireoops

Originally Posted by gitem_12

That was exactly my point...but he is exactly the type of cop people like TRH and rovering would support

Wrong, you have not MADE any kinda' "Point", and the thread title sucks the bone.

GTC

Well, no, he has made a few points. Just not the one's he desired or intended to make.

I also don't get the hullabaloo with Sheriffs.but thats a regional thing. They just arent that big of a deal here.

Originally Posted by gitem_12

I also don't get the hullabaloo with Sheriffs.but thats a regional thing. They just arent that big of a deal here.

Right, The American Constitution is not that big of a "deal" ?

....Jesus wept.

GTC

If you had a greater grasp of their Constitutional authority, perhaps you' understand.

Then again, you might be right in that it's a regional thing.

Originally Posted by 4ager

If you had a greater grasp of their Constitutional authority, perhaps you' understand.

Then again, you might be right in that it's a regional thing.

Don't confuse your States, wherever that may be, with others. In most States, a "Sheriff" has no more legitimate authority than any other LEO. In Texas, for instance, all LEO's have EXACTLY the same authority and jurisdiction. The difference is that a Sheriff is tasked, by law, with jailing prisoners.

Originally Posted by ltppowell

Originally Posted by 4ager

If you had a greater grasp of their Constitutional authority, perhaps you' understand.

Then again, you might be right in that it's a regional thing.

Don't confuse your States, wherever that may be, with others. In most States, a "Sheriff" has no more legitimate authority than any other LEO. In Texas, for instance, all LEO's have EXACTLY the same authority and jurisdiction. The difference is that a Sheriff is tasked, by law, with jailing prisoners.

It doesn't take the "Constable of Precinct 1" to arrest him either.

That's a huge myth in Texas. I'm sure some constables have gotten elected because of it...