Breaking now.

Even though expected .... GREAT NEWS ..... MORE WINNNG!

Breyer dissents, joined by Kagan. Sotomayor dissents, joined by Ginsburg.

HURRY UP RUTH!

MAGA

Court says Proclamation is "squarely within the scope of Presidential authority under the INA."

Four Black Robes that just spit on the Constitution.

This first travel BAN should never have been overturned.

Couldn't agree more. Time for a "two-fer" .... McStain + Ginsburg. Hell ... if they go on the same day I'm for making it a National Holiday.

Time for the "Ghoul - Pool."

Copied from SCOTUS Blog

Says the proclmation is based on legistimate purposes, without saying anything about religion. Proclamation is result of a "worldwidereview process" by multiple cabinet agencies. Notes taht it doesn't apply to Iraq, "one of the largest predominately Mulsim countries in teh region."

5-4 ----- again... Replace the prune and K with conservatives..

Voting or not has consequences.

Again, from SCOTUS Blog;

This, from the majority, is notable:

Finally, the dissent invokes Korematsu v. United States, 323 U. S. 214 (1944). Whatever rhetorical advantage the dissent may see in doing so, Korematsu has nothing to do with this case. The forcible relocation of U. S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority. But it is wholly inapt to liken that morally repugnant order to a facially neutral policy denying certain foreign nationals the privilege of admission. See post, at 26–28. The entry suspension is an act that is well within executive authority and could have been taken by any other President—the only question is evaluating the actions of this particular President in promulgating an otherwise valid Proclamation. The dissent’s reference to Korematsu, however, affords this Court the opportunity to make express what is already obvious: Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history, and—to be clear—“has no place in law under the Constitution.” 323 U. S., at 248 (Jackson, J., dissenting).

Nyrifleman: I think this is wonderful news!
How about you?
GO TRUMP!
MAGA
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy

I may have to turn on CNN and MSNBC just to see a few liberal / progressive talking heads EXPLODE! Maybe we will see a few more tears from Rachael Madcow ??

My biggest problem with this decision is it’s really narrow scope.

Wonderful news without a doubt!

I did just that.

They are having a fit.

Also is my problem with John Roberts. He really is another waffling Anthony Kennedy. That is a problem that needs to be rectify with 4 more year and more SCOTUS picks.

They're pissing and moaning about the Supreme Court seat that McConnell stole from Obama.

Laffin.

who's the black guy on MSNBC who is siding with the Republicans?

More MAGA please!

We need to get shucked of a couple more libbies on the court!!!

Corey Booker... another dangerous seditious traitor to our Country.

The former RNC Chairman.

They ALL need to go away.

Four more years and the need to keep the House and Senate.

Steele, right?

A narrow margin, but great news.

Yup Micheal Steele

Representative Keith Ellison is another traitorous scum.

If you Minnesotans let this scumbag win the Attorney General you have lost your State Like the way of KOMMIEFORNIA.

Sorry for my double post.

I suggest that you folks that live in liberal urban chit holes wear hearing protection for the next few days because a lot of heads will be exploding over this decision.

Some liberal [bleep] from Hawaii was bloviating on and on about who's next Mexico and Honduras?

To which I reply hopefully and add El Salvador to the list!

Build the damn wall and shut it all down.

Whats really telling is that I was with a bunch of familial Libtards at a party on Saturday and not one peep about Trump, immigration and all the BS from the media about it. And that’s here in Kommiefornia.

That tells me that all this crap is mostly media created and since everyone is working making money they really don’t give a crap.

Michael Steele certainly would be considered a moderate, he's fairly anti-Trump on most subjects.

Another Swamp Creature.

I think he's retired from politics, just a know-it-all commentator now....wonder what those guys make a year ?

F*u*c*k Yah! MAGA!

IF??? Too late, my friend...

I don’t believe Minnesota is a lost cause yet. At a tipping point though.

This is the single most important reason that I voted for Trump. He is in a position to put another badly needed Conservative on the SCOTUS.

There are a lot of things about him that I do not like to see in someone that is the most important person in the world.......but, that's on a personal level, and if he does the right thing on a business and political level, and so far he has, then I'll continue to support him.

Most of the really important things affect our country usually end up, in one form or another, in the hands of those 9 Supreme Court judges. If the balance of the court ever tips in the favor of the Liberals.....and it very easily could.....you can kiss America as we have known it goodbye. Hopefully Trump will have the opportunity to appoint some more judges to the SCOTUS.

And the response from the WH:

Subject: Statement from the President Regarding Supreme Court Ruling

poolreports

Today 11:28am


THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


June 26, 2018

*Statement from the President Regarding Supreme Court Ruling*

Todays Supreme Court ruling is a tremendous victory for the American People and the Constitution. The Supreme Court has upheld the clear authority of the President to defend the national security of the United States. In this era of worldwide terrorism and extremist movements bent on harming innocent civilians, we must properly vet those coming into our country. This ruling is also a moment of profound vindication following months of hysterical commentary from the media and Democratic politicians who refuse to do what it takes to secure our border and our country. As long as I am President, I will defend the sovereignty, safety, and security of the American People, and fight for an immigration system that serves the national interests of the United States and its citizens. Our country will always be safe, secure, and protected on my watch.

*###*

See:

https://publicpool.kinja.com/subject-statement-from-the-president-regarding-supreme-1827136468

Sovereignty lol, there's the word they hate as much as any!

Kill Three more and take the whole week off.

Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that the highly publicized "Caravan" came to the wall in CA?

They let how many in?

It ain't a wall that gonna stop anything. It's the loopholes in the law they need to go away.

All encompassing term "Shut it all down".

MAGA. Hasbeen

Liberal's hair is on fire this afternoon after this ruling!




https://www.yahoo.com/news/marker-s...ourts-travel-ban-decision-172209635.html

I really liked Sotomayor's dissent, joined by Notorious RBG:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/26/us/sonia-sotomayor-dissent-travel-ban.html

I heard it ...lol hahahahahahahahahHH ...ha !

The SC ruling on "standing" on an issue they have no standing on.

What a [bleep] joke.

A bigger [bleep] joke is the dissenters. They think they are above the Constitution, and the Executive.

I harbor NO faith in the Judicial branch whatsoever. Its the weakest branch Constitutionally, but everyone, even on our side, thinks our direct representation takes a back seat to their "opinions".

It absolutely does not.....and its not just my opinion.

LOL OK... You do you.

And Guatemala, Nicaragua.

Costa Ricans are not pouring in, tho they are a highly socialist country. They have their chit together, and are making it work... Of course WE are their military...and do jack all except loom over the neijghbors......I kinda think it's a bargain!

Well, there was that Noregia. thing....

You do realize the SC rarely ruled on anything prior to 1900 and when they did, it was a joke then as it is now. I give you Dred Scott, for all the states rights wonks. Let's not forget the Plessy v. Ferguson/Brown V. Board debacle. They have no clue what is or isn't "Constitutional", only to rule in derelict to how laws are made.

The President has every power granted by the Constitution to do what he did, or wants to regarding people who have no rights, Constitutionally, to be here. The only branch that can have recourse on the matter is the Legislative branch, who, like many, are all too eager to be absentia and give powers that do not exist to the SC.


No surprise. Minnefuckingsota…...

The resident beta cuck paddler runs his cockholster.

It was lost long before that. But it will never be like Kalifornia.

Of course you did. You are an idiot.