Home
He's the guy who used a bike lock like the one illustrated below (heavy steel in roughly the shape and size of a small war hammer) to sneak attack (striking to the head) multiple Trump supporters, then run away into the Antifa crowd, causing serious injury and head trauma. Well, he was sentenced to three years of probation (no prison time) for multiple counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Link

[Linked Image]

Looks like, if one is opposed to Trump, one can virtually get away with attempted murder in today's America.

Here's what happened.


[Linked Image]
Someone needs to find that antifa pluck and put him in the ICU for about 90 days, he's still laughing.
He should have gotten twice as much time and all of it served.
Originally Posted by RickyD
He should have gotten twice as much time and all of it served.


We most certainly would have had we beat an obama supporter.
A felony deadly-force attack reduced to a misdemeanor and probation. A slap on the wrist.

Wouldn't want to send the wrong message to Antifa...……...that they will be held accountable for their actions.
And he retains his right to vote, buy firearms, etc, etc.
His address needs to be posted
Originally Posted by Oldelkhunter
His address needs to be posted


Maybe Kingston or one of the other I.T. guys here can dig it up.
I read this a few days ago.

That Judge needs to be impeached and removed from office.
So now that precedent has been set, thousands of Trump supporters can show up with baseball bats and beat the living fuqk out of all Anarchists and their Socialist cucks?
Here's who identified him and how:

https://madworldnews.com/lib-beating-trump-supporter/
Originally Posted by Bristoe


You can run but you can't hide.LOL
Originally Posted by FatCity67
So now that precedent has been set, thousands of Trump supporters can show up with baseball bats and beat the living fuqk out of all Anarchists and their Socialist cucks?

Yep. All it will cost them is three years probation.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by FatCity67
So now that precedent has been set, thousands of Trump supporters can show up with baseball bats and beat the living fuqk out of all Anarchists and their Socialist cucks?

Yep. All it will cost them is three years probation.


I hope you have the ice cream, all i see is cake ;]
The Real Hawkeye: Thanks for the update on that anti-American asswhole!
There is just a glaring fact of life becoming more and more apparent of recent here in America.
There are two tiers of justice here in Americas judicial systems - one that very soft on anti-American liberals and one that is just the opposite of "soft" on traditional valued Americans and God help you should the prosecutors and judges find out you are a Republican or traditional valued American!
Sad!
I agree with a previous poster - some one should find the exact same lock and bash the "good professor" in his head with it!
Then see how "justice" is meted out.
I dealt with (from the inside) the criminal justice system professionally for 29 years and I have never seen prosecutorial and judicial bias like what is now and has been going on for the last few years!
Again SAD!
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
Quote
Someone needs to find that antifa pluck and put him in the ICU for about 90 days, he's still laughing.



Antifa is easy to manipulate,..as was done with the fake gathering of Unite The Right in D.C. a couple of days ago.

Virtually nobody showed up except Antifa. But they rioted anyway,...gave the police and the media a hard time.
Well hopefully the people that were assault by this POS put him in the poor house and he ends up on the streets as the broke drugged up waste of human flesh that he is.
FatCity67: You make an excellent point - he could still be held financially responsible for his criminal actions - depending of course on the political make-up of the civil court judge and the jury.
Hope for the best in that regard.
Hold into the wind
VarmintGuy
This was a premeditated assault, with a weapon intended for gross injury, and this was not a single event. He bought 14 locks, most likely handed out to other vicious animals. This verdict is a joke.

"The Gateway Pundit reports that after internet users matched Clanton’s facial features up with the partially-masked attacker, they hacked into the professor’s Amazon account. That’s when they discovered that he had recently purchased 14 bike locks with one-day shipping."
Wow! Sounds like he got maybe a stern look from the judge. That will teach him for sure.
this makes me sick


Just a point.

There as here, the people are going to take the commission of justice in to their own hands because the courts are either inept or corrupt.


And from where I am standing it is looking increasingly like the police are rapidly becoming redundant as well.
Originally Posted by JSTUART


And from where I am standing it is looking increasingly like the police are rapidly becoming redundant as well.


In some locations. Antifa knows where it can get away with its nonsense and where it can't. There's a lot of police forces across America that won't put up with things like that.
Originally Posted by JSTUART


Just a point.

There as here, the people are going to take the commission of justice in to their own hands because the courts are either inept or corrupt.


That’s what this guy did.

Reform has to take place from within the system or all we’re going to have is a bunch of these vivilantes running around enforcing their own version of “justice”.

Which, by the way, is exactly what ANTIFA is aiming for. They want a complete dissolution of the current order.

Scary how many people who claim to be Conservative are sounding too willing to help them.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by JSTUART


And from where I am standing it is looking increasingly like the police are rapidly becoming redundant as well.


In some locations. Antifa knows where it can get away with its nonsense and where it can't. There's a lot of police forces across America that won't put up with things like that.



In the news here a group of some fifty-some sudanese threw rocks at Melbourne coppers and not a single one of the filth were arrested, as always coppers only go after soft targets, which is what you get when you recruit from universities and let touchy-feelies be in charge.

My feeling on the matter is since the african bastards don't want to be Australians they can be shot with impunity when they kick up...or leave. I am good with either solution.
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by JSTUART


And from where I am standing it is looking increasingly like the police are rapidly becoming redundant as well.


In some locations. Antifa knows where it can get away with its nonsense and where it can't. There's a lot of police forces across America that won't put up with things like that.



In the news here a group of some fifty-some sudanese threw rocks at Melbourne coppers and not a single one of the filth were arrested, as always coppers only go after soft targets, which is what you get when you recruit from universities and let touchy-feelies be in charge.

My feeling on the matter is since the african bastards don't want to be Australians they can be shot with impunity when they kick up...or leave. I am good with either solution.


The State police across America are generally no nonsense kind of people. Some of the big city police, particularly in the northeast are well known for being very rough. In places like Chicago, Baltimore, and St. Louis, where violent blacks are killing each other, you might think that the cops are soft. But the truth is, the police in those areas have largely stopped policing them. They can't do anything without the media making a circus out of it, so they just turn their back on it and let it happen.

The Chicago city police have a longstanding reputation for being very rough. But I think their attitude is, "Why work to fix a situation that's fixing itself?"
Originally Posted by JSTUART


Just a point.

There as here, the people are going to take the commission of justice in to their own hands because the courts are either inept or corrupt.


And from where I am standing it is looking increasingly like the police are rapidly becoming redundant as well.

I dunno. The so-called and horribly mis-titled "justice system" is extremely proud of themselves and their "duties".

So much so, that if you or I try to institute justice they have not ordained, we will pay dearly, if found to be playing in their sandbox.

For most, it's not worth it, unless it's close to home as in child or close relative. Even then, most folks are cowards.
What we need is less criminal justice & more victim justice!!


Jim
Monetary judgments don't usually mean too much. Sound good but...

I got a $5000 judgment from a guy that trashed a rental property of mine. Told me and the judge he would work under the table the rest of life.

Took him back to court a second time, he never showed, still not a cent.

If he ever does aspire to have anything in his life, I'll own it. So it's on him and his committment to be a $10 hour shlt shoveling deadbeat. Glad I own real estate in his head.
Bristoe, your take on the Chicago police is spot on. I know a lot of Chicago cops. Why put oneself in the media spotlight and suffer all the "social justice" consequences as a result?
Originally Posted by RickyD
He should have gotten twice as much time and all of it served.



No, he should have stood in front of a firing squad.
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.

Looks like the little bitch is wearing a burqa while cowardly swinging a deadly weapon, pos needs the same to happen to him.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.


She would have more luck with that if he had been a representative of government of some sort.

I'm not sure a private individual can violate many Constitutional Rights.

The Constitution protects the people from the federal government (or should...)

If anyone violated the victim's rights, it was the judge.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.


She would have more luck with that if he had been a representative of government of some sort.

I'm not sure a private individual can violate many Constitutional Rights.

The Constitution protects the people from the federal government (or should...)

If anyone violated the victim's rights, it was the judge.

Hate and bias crimes don't require that the criminal be employed by the government for the Feds to pursue charges if local courts refuse to take action. Seems to me that attacking someone for their political views, or because they were attempting to merely exercise their right of free speech should be counted among hate or bias crimes. It could also be argued that it was race motivated, i.e., anti-white, despite the fact that the attacker was also white. You don't need to be non-white to criminally act on the basis of a hatred of white people. We see it all the time form the left.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.


She would have more luck with that if he had been a representative of government of some sort.

I'm not sure a private individual can violate many Constitutional Rights.

The Constitution protects the people from the federal government (or should...)

If anyone violated the victim's rights, it was the judge.

Hate crimes don't require that the criminal be employed by the government for the Feds to pursue charges if local courts refuse to take action.



Yeah, but those only go one way.

Liberals can't be prosecuted for Hate Crimes. They are all about tolerance and acceptance, don'tcha know... wink
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.


She would have more luck with that if he had been a representative of government of some sort.

I'm not sure a private individual can violate many Constitutional Rights.

The Constitution protects the people from the federal government (or should...)

If anyone violated the victim's rights, it was the judge.


You are correct, an individual cannot violate a constitutional right.

What's Wrong here is another dumb ass comment by TRH.

Here is what dumb ass TRH posted,
Quote
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.


When we actually listen to the video we will note that Ann NEVER said and such thing. She was talking about CIVIL RIGHTS violations and Civil Rights laws, NOT Constitutional Rights.

Leave it up to TRH to confuse Civil Rights and Civil Rights laws with Constitutional Rights, again.
Looks like the biggest problem here is the judicial system. A lot of judges like this one are turning a blind eye. Others one are making laws from the bench. Hasbeen
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Ann Coulter wants Trump to get him Federally prosecuted for violating his victim's constitutional rights.


She would have more luck with that if he had been a representative of government of some sort.

I'm not sure a private individual can violate many Constitutional Rights.

The Constitution protects the people from the federal government (or should...)

If anyone violated the victim's rights, it was the judge.

Hate and bias crimes don't require that the criminal be employed by the government for the Feds to pursue charges if local courts refuse to take action. Seems to me that attacking someone for their political views, or because they were attempting to merely exercise their right of free speech should be counted among hate or bias crimes. It could also be argued that it was race motivated, i.e., anti-white, despite the fact that the attacker was also white. You don't need to be non-white to criminally act on the basis of a hatred of white people. We see it all the time form the left.

No they don't, but you went full retard and are confusing "LAWS" and Civil Rights with Constitutional Rights.

An individual cannot violate a Constitutional Right, only the government or it's actors can.
Originally Posted by JSTUART



In the news here a group of some fifty-some sudanese threw rocks at Melbourne coppers and not a single one of the filth were arrested, as always coppers only go after soft targets, which is what you get when you recruit from universities and let touchy-feelies be in charge.

My feeling on the matter is since the african bastards don't want to be Australians they can be shot with impunity when they kick up...or leave. I am good with either solution.



I wish to make a correction to my previous post as it appears that the Victorian Police are not sitting on their hands at all, they took the time to identify the african bastards and went after them in a more efficient manner.


Page 4 of the Herald Sun today.

[Linked Image]



Apparently our coppers can do the job when the lefty politicians let them.
© 24hourcampfire