Debating on a couple of stocks here. I have a Rem SA classic edge with a Hart #3. I really like the feel and balance of the combo. I'm now piecing together a Rem LA with a Brux #3.

Since I like the feel of the classic I was thinking of going that route, but for a short time I did have a hunter's edge on a Winchester that was also nice. Now I'm debating. Classic edge vs. Hunter's edge? I'm wondering about balance being roughly the same between the two and if the #3 will seem beefy with the Hunter?

Let the debate begin........Now

Tough choice and I don't know that either one would be wrong. I'm a huge fan of the Classic Edge, but my next stock might be the Hunters Edge.

Blackdog1 here on the campfire has a Hunters Edge stocked .280 I think it is. His has a Lilja #3 finished at 25" and fluted. Its sure a nice rifle and I was surprised at how well it balanced. The Brux is a little beefier but should be OK, I don't know that either would be a wrong answer. Although with the Brux it screams Classic IMHO.

I've had both and prefer the Hunters Edge myself. Most of the 'fire will probably disagree.

A Hart 3 will not be too beefy. I love them both.

I like both but generally prefer the Hunter's Edge. That said, with the #3 I would probably go Classic.

Don't overlook the Manners SL !
Very comfortable stock from all shooting positions and I favor it more prone than my Edge stock. Built tough !

School me... Isn't the Hunters Edge a McMillan Rem Classic stock with Edge Technology?

What's the difference between the Hunters Edge and Classic Edge then?

Classic is a specific stock pattern, so is the Hunters Edge or I think its also called the Compact?? Anyway, any stock can be made in an Edge - its the material used to make it. So you can have a Classic Edge, Hunters Edge, Mountain rifle Edge and so on. Or they can all be built in standard fill/fiberglass construction.

gled, I have both also. My Hunter's Edge (away being repainted right now) is paired with a Win 70 and Rock #2 barrel. One of my Classics is paired with a Rem 700 LA with a Rock #3, and the other is paired with a Stiller Predator SA with a Brux #3.

I would personally choose the Classic over the HE about every time, but only because I really like the Classic. I think the HE is the best stock McMillan makes for a Winchester.

Thanks! I knew you could do any in Edge, but I thought the Hunters Edge was based on Classic specs.

Hunters Edge is equal to the Compact but in Edge fill. The Compact is same pattern but standard fill.

I have both in Edge fill and love both. If I were doing a long action with a 23" or longer barrel, I'd do the Classic. The Hunter's Edge is shorter in the forearm and looks right at home on short actions with 22" or shorter barrels. I'll post some pics of both stocks on 2 long actions in a minute.

Left is Classic Edge with a Brux #3 on a long action.

Right is a Hunters Edge on a factory long action 700 Ti (mountain rifle barrel contour).



Hunter's Edge on top......Classic Edge on bottom:

Nice! Thanks for the pics.

Thanks everyone for you input. Those pics sure help Steve.

I'll probably stick with the Classic between the two.

Tell me more about the manners. Is their wait time about the same as with McM?

My last three Manners took four months
My last McM took 7.5 months

All I buy is Manners now ! Best customer service there is. Highly recommend Tom and crew... He is a member here and listens to what his customers ask for.

This industry needs more people like Tom Manners in my opinion !

Check out his website...

Proud to call him a friend.

Check out this thread.... Tom replies there

https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbth.../8429117/Manners_Story_Board#Post8429117

Can you please save me a half hour or two (trying to read that thread) and let me know what Tom's username is?? Thanks.

Tmanners

Thanks. Read through 3 or 4 pages and read the last page and didn't see anything that could have been him.

Page ten and earlier

Tmanners

257,

Would you say the forearm on the Classic Edge is wider than an SPS SS stock? I like the ergos of the SPS, it looks like the Classic Edge is wider. My stock will go on a LA at 23-24".

If I were building on a Rem 700 LA with a #2 or #3 Brux this is the first stock I'd look at:

http://echolsrifles.com/collections/products/products/remington-700-shrike-sporter-stock

I'll try to check when I get home.

For comparison:
My McMillan Remington Classic short action ADL is very slightly wider in the forearm than my factory short action SPS stock.
At the front sling swivel my McMillan is 1.630. As near as I can measure at the same point from the tip(sling swivel is in a slightly different place) the factory is 1.500.
At the front action screw the McMillan Classic is 1.830 while the factory is 1.810-very close.
I know these are short actions and you were asking about a LA-just for reference.
Maybe the McMillan Mountain Rifle would be another option for you-especially if you like a slimmer forend and a cheekpiece.

I have a Hunters Edge on my .240 HS Precision SPL, which is almost a M-700 clone with a clip. I really like it. I got it from McM, unpainted, glassed it and sent it back for paint. Glad I did, as they had the bolt handle cutout way too big for my taste. I glassed filled it and shaped it like I wanted. The ballance and handling are great. It weighs 26 oz.
With an Edge fill, be sure to order it with pillars.

DF

DF that's a great looking rifle. It looked good even before the paint job.

Now that you've had a chance to play around with it a bit, how do you like the bottom metal? I've thought about replacing my Rem 700 DBM, and it seems the HS DBM is about my only choice. How does it feel in hand? Feeding?

It's a good system. You have three rounds down with this set up, instead of five down in a conventional box mag for '06 sized ctgs. It feeds great, a center feed of course. And the mag is long enough for about any bullet seating COAL.

I haven't handled a Rem. DBM, so can't compare. The HS bottom metal isn't flat. It is concave at the mag, the factory stocks are cut up to facilitate this feature. With the McM stock, the bottom is flat, so I cut a mag well type bevel to accommodate the clip. Here's a view of the bottom, pre paint job. To me, I like this better than HS's version, just looks better. Some may say the HS clip isn't as easy to extract, but it pops down when loaded as the trigger guard latch is pushed. When empty, sometimes I open the action to push it out with my finger. As I recall seeing photos of the Rem DBM system, you have buttons on each side to release and extract the box. Empty box, that system may be easier. Full box, probably a wash.

HS's stuff isn't cheap, so I don't know if it would be worth the expense. IMO, you need to handle an HS before spending what it would take to swap it out.

DF

Thanks for the help JSH!

Thanks DF. You're right about the expense, I think around $300 for the different bottom metal. And then I would need a new McMillan. And I would at least think about a new barrel, since I was getting everything else done...

That puts you at around $1,500 for aftermarket stuff by my count. You may want to think about selling the Rem DBM and starting over...

DF

Oh, I'll never get rid of the rifle. My dad didn't hunt, and I only started when I was in my early 20s. My wife and I were recently married and she bought it for me for one of our first Christmas holidays together.

I could also just continue use of the Rem DBM. It's not failed me in more than 10 years of use in the field. Even worked this year.



Edited: But I keep thinking about changing the bottom metal for more "100% positive" feeding. The Rem DBM works, but I don't think it works as positively as ADL/BDL. A center feed mag would alleviate some concerns. I don't know that I'll ever get to the point that I don't watch my first round go into the chamber, and even though I normally chamber a second round I make the first one count.

I would have thought the DBM would be center feed.

Guess I need to check one out so I'll know.

DF

The Rem DBM is a staggered (alternating) stack magazine.