OK so far it's a collection of one, but i'm considering doubling it.

This is the specimen in question. It's ser:543xxx - i don't understand what those mounts are.



It's purpose would be as a deer and elk rifle for my wife here in Western Oregon.

Can anyone tell me about these mounts? Far far from a model 99 expert, but i don't recall seeing those before.

Thanks!
Anti

Can't see the picture and also have to be a member to even go to that site and see the picture.

Thanks mad dog - i'll host it on my picassa account and re-post.

*edit* should be fixed!

Simple weaver mounts I am not a purist but several here would say stay away, I would like to see a few more picts.

Looks like common Weaver scope bases from that angle.

Looks like that to me as well.

Thanks guys. It's going to be a hunter, so i'm not too worried about collectibility.

I have my great-grand dad's 1964 model 99 that i'm refraining from drilling and tapping. Granted, it's not a rare specimen, but it's beautiful, so i'm not going to molest it.

I appreciate the replies!

One more question. Does that appear to be an aftermarket stock?

There's a more zoomed out pic i could post if that's helpful.

Stock is definitely aftermarket , forearm looks to be as well

that is NOT factory wood

Hrrmmm.

Thanks.

The ad says it's a "sweet shooter", comes with 100rds hornady 150's. 2 boxes core lokts, i think 50 pieces of brass and a set of rcbs dies for $420.

Not super excited about the stock. I actually like that it already has scope mounts since it's going to be a meat getter. barrel looks like it could use some re-bluing.

I'm kinda iffy at this point but there must be well over $100 in extras there.

If it was built in 1964 it is factory drilled for scope mounts. Is it not??

Perhaps a mistaken birth date?

The wood looks well done, plus the extras, it's ready to go, I would snag it for a hunter absolutely! 300 Savage I'll assume.

Yes, it's in .300 savage.

I'll check my serial on mine and get back to you. I could be wrong on it. Definitely not drilled & tapped. Has a marble rear peep.

From one I can see, it should be a fine shooter and hunter. It may not be a collector gun but it ain't an ugly rifle either. A fine one to use for what it was intended.

Welcome to the forum!

I find that the Monte Carlo stocks are a nice feature if using a scope. Keeps me from sort of resting my jawbone against the wood to get a good scope picture, because the crosshairs sit so much higher than the regular iron sights regular stocks were designed for. Ladies might find this to be even more pronounced a problem. If you are just using iron sights, the regular stocks are great. I think that quoted price for $60 worth of bullets, $35 worth of dies, a rifle set up to shoot a scope, and some brass, which does not seem to be too beat up, is just fine.