|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,691
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,691 |
Not a 2-7, but my Burris 3-9 FF ended up on a .223. Reason, eye relief is not on par with Leupold, Zeiss, Swarovski, and others. Otherwise, I like it and ER is no problem where it is mounted.
jack
"Do not blame Caesar, blame the people...who have...rejoiced in their loss of freedom....Blame the people who hail him when he speaks of the 'new, wonderful, good, society'...to mean ,..living fatly at the expense of the industrious." Cicero
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,611
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,611 |
Love my 2-7 Bushnell 3200 Elite and it has become my favorite scope. I bought it online and the super heavy reticule spooked me when I first saw it but now love it. Fine crosshairs in the middle. Haven't tried the Leupold nor Vortex but am sure I would like them. If I had only one scope for all of my hunting, it would be one of those in 2-7, even though animals are too close sometimes for the 2 power to focus on them. 1-6 would probably be perfect for my style of hunting but I've got the 2-7 and it works.
My first scope was a Redfield 2-7 and I used it for 20 years as my only scope. Went to 3-9 and have tried 3.5-10, a 6-18 briefly, and have come back to my roots. My big game 30-06 wears a 3-9 Leupold I now wish was 2-7 and my .243 predator calling rifle wears the Bushnell 2-7. I am trying a one power illuminated reflex sight on my .22 rimfire which I use only for grouse.
|
|
|
|
334 members (12savage, 204guy, 12344mag, 16gage, 1lessdog, 01Foreman400, 39 invisible),
2,490
guests, and
1,284
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,499
Posts18,490,472
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|