I'm old enough to recognize the "painless" reference
Someone in one of the other thread mentioned a relative that rarely used chemical inputs on their farm, except when "nuking" particular weed species and then they might use 4x the recommended amount (maybe it was 10x?)
That's a common occurrence unfortunately, not usually for big applicators as they look at it in economic terms too, and possible fines if/when caught. But the happy homeowners and their weed and feed, sheesh. The line of thought that if one bag states it will cover the lawn I have imagine how green and weed free it will be if I use two or three, it's not the expensive after all. And then it rains, or they water, and then it's in the gutter and into the local creek, and down the river to the estuary. Or it gets into the ground water.
Oh well, having had 2 different types of cancer so far, I'll not be surprised if a third shows up. Sun likely caused one of mine. A good chance all the chemicals I've absorbed caused the other. Including all those cigarettes I smoked, starting back when Drs were still telling patients they could help calm their nerves and such. And the tobacco companies were lying to us about how safe their product was.
Them gold courses like nice green, weed free courses too. No telling how much product gets used on them. I wonder what golfers did before Monsanto and Dow???? Live with some weeds and a somewhat yellower fairway?