7 Aussie Police Assault Pregnant Woman for breathing on a beach without a mask and for the crime of leaving the 5 kilometer detention zone from her house.


Article:

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/more...veling-outside-her-permitted-5km-radius/

Where are the Crocodile Dundees when you need them?

Coming soon to America..... Probably already that bad here in some places.

Scumbags

The biggest employer must be the crews spying on every person with the phone app along with the armed gangsters hunting every man woman and child that sets off the 5k alarm.

She wasn't pregnant and she posted on social media of her intention to break the curfew before she left her house, as retaliation to the state premier - not the smartest move. Maybe she could've snuck out and gotten away with it if she maintained a low profile. The shutdown is draconian but the post doesn't accurately reflect what happened. Oddly there were New Zealander accents in the clip, but it was on a Victorian beach.

It's already here.
Crowds determining that the police are doing something wrong. The scumbags are you boys, siding with that crowd with no more evidence's than a small part of a video.
Antifa on the beach.

Mauserand 9mm,

You must have access to the Australian news paper. You may be correct. I am unaware of your sources.
I was going from the sources posted. The article stated:

"Local Channel 7 News Australia also confirmed that “Police took the woman into custody at Altona Beach on Saturday after she allegedly failed to wear a mask and travelled outside her permitted 5km radius.”

And there you have it, these cops get right in your personal space, not social distancing, arresting people who aren’t committing a crime and assault them. If you don’t think that’s what this is, then just wait for your turn because you are of a statist mindset.

I think I remember a woman saying that she pushed a pregnant woman. The camera panned to the lady on the ground.

Is New Zealand still immunity-free?

Not sure of all the details but this is the article I saw:

https://7news.com.au/news/vic/polic...ramatic-melbourne-beach-arrest-c-1363423

The woman publicly broadcast her curfew defiance before the event for the purpose of inciting something - maybe she had been drinking or something?

I'm not sure what you mean

I can't tell her motive from the social post. It sounded like she was defiant toward someone since she said, "f. Somebody"
Then the picture of her license and car. Maybe they investigated and found out from the plate where she lived? I don't know what we can conclude as to her motive or inciting, or drunkeness. I hope she wasn't if she was with children.
The one thing I may have gotten wrong along with the first article is that the arrested woman might not have been pushed down and been the pregnant one. There may have been two women assaulted instead.

Channel 7 news
Headline:
Police accused of pushing pregnant woman during dramatic Melbourne beach arrest
Copy:
"Police were out in force at Melbourne beaches over the weekend, making sure residents were adhering to lockdown restrictions.

On Sunday, police said they had handed out 104 fines, including 17 for failing to wear a face mask."

It's way out of hand regardless of any particular case. Chairman Dan doesn't seem inclined to ease up any time soon

Oh yeah. That's the name she used when she posted that she was off to the beach.
Yup, you know it's bad when the politicians are searching locals to see if they're being dissed .

Hopefully the good police working in other Australian states are trying to do their best preparing to disobey orders when the time comes. I like Australians and hate to see them under this rule.

Ok. I saw the post she had. I didn't know her name, I mean his name was Dan. They did make an example of her. Lots of other arrests that day too.

Aren't you from Australia? Do you think this will ever get this way at the other coasts and cities?

I'm in Brisbane, Queensland. We've had our share of lockdowns and border closures. Victoria has had it worse because they've had higher case numbers and had a "relapse" a couple of months ago that caused them to go back into lockdown, so can understand why they would be so annoyed. Things are easing off now and borders are starting to open up but each state is to it's own.

I'm not sure of the mix but some people have believed all the hype and agreed with the lockdowns & closures, and others have put up with the situation just to go with the flow until it blows over, with the expectation that things (freedoms) will go back to the way they were. It's just fear to believe that we are going into a new era of constant restriction - ultimately nobody will put up with that and it can't be sustained. Although I can see that further lockdowns will probably occur

(Australia has handled the situation very badly IMO - we went from "flattening the curve" to trying to stop COVID completely, at huge economic cost. New Zealand has done the same. The politicians think that low case numbers are some sort of badge of honour and the states are competing against and sledging each other. We haven't let COVID run it's course and it's still out there, and we're relying on a vaccine and treatment to be developed.)

The police attempted to arrest someone who advertised that they were going to break the law and then blatantly breached the Chief Medical Officers directive, she resisted arrest and got cuffed.
From what I've seen the officers exercised a measured response, they didn't use excessive force and showed restraint
She wasn't the first to be arrested, there been a few in recent weeks; just another bogan looking for their 10 minutes of fame.
The vast majority of Victorian are in support of the restrictions we have in place, we've gone from 700 new case a day down to 10 in a few weeks, no one likes the restrictions but they're working.

She was going for a swim with her kids ......yeah right! Water temp is probably around 8 deg celcius - that's COLD.

In NZ there are no active case in the community and three at the border who are in quarantine. Auckland is at level 2 going to level 1 at midnight tonight rest of country is at level 1. You don't have to wear a mask at level 1 or 2.

" It's just fear to believe that we are going into a new era of constant restriction - ultimately nobody will put up with that and it can't be sustained"

That was probably what many said in 1996 about Firearm Restrictions that everyone was talking about than also.

her case screams out for the death penalty

Often it's enough to tell people it keeps them safe...."It's for your own good."

That's not the same thing for comparison - one's a life time ban and the other is an "emergency health order". No-one believed that the bans would ever be reversed.

They have to play things carefully - people are sick of the shutdowns, and cost versus benefit become more apparent as time goes on (and the "nanny" kneejerk reaction starts being realised by a majority). The shutdown strategy could backfire - people could stop getting tested even though they feel unwell and suspect that they have COVID, just to avoid a government imposed shutdown. Whatever the government would try to impose to prevent this happening would involve further large costs to an already crippled economy - it's not going to fly. Shutdowns are going to be harder to control and enforce, at least that's how it should be, and statistics are going to back that up. The hardest hit countries are going to be on the road to economic recovery quickest - are we going to continue to cripple our economy over the next couple of years as there are flare ups and no vaccine in sight? I don't think people are going to tolerate that - the mortality rate doesn't justify the cost to prevent it.

It's insane. The cost of lock downs will felt for many years. It's not Ebola or Bubonic Plague.

I think the clinical name for people simply following the orders of the elected officials is "Obedience to Authority". Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual acts in response to a direct order from another individual, who is usually an authority figure. It is assumed that without such an order the person would not have acted in this way. Be careful, people in Australia have already been influenced by this in 1996, and very well may fall victim again.

And China is loving your lockdowns. Fire sale prices to purchase your small remote island. Amazed that your dumbed down populace dont realize this. And yet Australia main goal is still green energy while you grow weaker and weaker by the day while China stays pretty much open.

Huh??? China's investments in Australia has been decreasing and continues to do so, part due to tensions caused by COVID in more recent times:

https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/resou...s/statistics-on-who-invests-in-australia

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-13/chinese-investment-in-australia-takes-nosedive/12657140

Doubt it - people "hurt" by the 1996 event are few and far between. It wasn't a landmark event that has fried itself into the general public's brains to make us think any different. We have our share of those disobedient with authority, as this original post identifies, and a mix of all sorts of beliefs on the issue, to suggest otherwise is just "tin hat" talk.

If that same ruling that happened in 1996 in Australia would happen in the USA, and it might someday, I would consider every law abiding gun owner “hurt” or at least myself. I enjoy hunting with my old A5s, M12s, M42 and Ithaca 37. It would be considered landmark by every American member on this board except of course the trolls. I doubt any of us would consider it “tin hat” like to think otherwise, but I understand different cultures have different values and I’m alright with that. I just don’t want other values and cultures imposed on me by others “because they know what’s best for me”.