Home
Fox news reporting for 3 days now, Iowa farmers about evenly split. One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China equals prosperity. Another crusty old pro Trump farmer says, "I want to be inspired by my leaders, not given a handout". I have always held people who work the land, generally in higher regard, thinking they hold traditional values....once again, maybe I made a mistake.
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/523809-poll-trump-leads-biden-by-7-points-in-iowa

Quote
President Trump has gained a 7-point lead over Democratic nominee Joe Biden in the battleground state of Iowa just three days before the Nov. 3 election, according to a new Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa poll released Saturday.

According to the survey, conducted by Selzer & Co.of Des Moines, the president garnered 48 percent support while Biden garnered 41 percent support. Trump's lead is outside of the survey’s 3.4 percent margin of error.

The poll could be an indicator that Trump is pulling ahead in the state after recent polls in Iowa — a battleground that Trump won by 9.4 points in 2016 — showed him neck and neck with the former vice president.
China is already buying a crap ton of ag products despite the tariffs and Trump is bigly in favor of the ethanol boondoggle so he should be in good shape with them.

One of the few things I disagree with Trump on, but I am willing to buy fuel stabilizer and seek out pure gas when necessary in order to keep communism at bay.
Idiot
Out
Wandering
Around

More trade with China.... And no fracking and $4 plus dollar a fuel....
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Fox news reporting for 3 days now, Iowa farmers about evenly split. One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China equals prosperity. Another crusty old pro Trump farmer says, "I want to be inspired by my leaders, not given a handout". I have always held people who work the land, generally in higher regard, thinking they hold traditional values....once again, maybe I made a mistake.

Not around here. My guess is that “young farmer” had it all handed to him he didn’t earn it thought he was big roller rented high dollar ground built big house took wife to Mexico for the winter , now reality of farming hits wife still wants to go to Mexico and he can’t afford nothing. This is a world market, I repeat world market. If China doesn’t buy someplac3 else will. I want to see mr young farmer dry corn with a windmill( Biden= less fossil fuels like natural gas) wanna see him plow a field with an electric tractor( Biden ending big oil) and trying to grow crops without chemistry(Biden more restrictions) . He also maybe be near Des Moines a liberal leaning city as well
Democrats will usually vote for who will give them the most welfare subsidies...

Just sayin'.
And...it was on Fox, how much time did they devote to researching and polling the farmers?
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Fox news reporting for 3 days now, Iowa farmers about evenly split. One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China equals prosperity.


Does this idiot really think he will prosper under a president who is in the pocket of the Chinese? Biden will regulate idiots like him into bankruptcy so the Chicoms or a Biden family member can buy up their farms.
From what I've seen that "one young farmer" may be the only farmer in Iowa voting commie.
Originally Posted by flintlocke
.........One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China....

.
They interview two people and it makes a headline?

“One YOUNG farmer”

Probably will never be an old farmer
Originally Posted by flintlocke
And...it was on Fox, how much time did they devote to researching and polling the farmers?


Well, we both know they found half for and half again. Fair and Balanced you know.
Plenty of closet Democrat farmers in Montana living(getting/gotten rich) off subsidies.

Jon Tester thanks them for his senate seat.
Originally Posted by hatari
Originally Posted by flintlocke
.........One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China....

.
They interview two people and it makes a headline?

“One YOUNG farmer”

Probably will never be an old farmer


Fox is just as bad as other outlets for this.

Journalism is dead amount the old time standard bearers. They’re bought & paid for.
Originally Posted by muleshoe
From what I've seen that "one young farmer" may be the only farmer in Iowa voting commie.


Thats good!

However.....half the country is liberal fellas....

Lotsa liberal farmers and ranchers.

When you depend on a handout to survive.....it tends to sway your vote
We have them here. As we talked about mainly Catholics.
Drove 60 miles on hyway 34 today and from the signs in the yards the split is TRUMP.... GARAGE SALE... and some [bleep] no one trusts.
Saw one news outlet some time ago interview a "farmer" that didn't like Trump. Pretty obvious he was at best a hobby farmer, but the media sure tried to make him look big time riding around on his 20 horse Kubota pulling a finish mower...........

I have to say I never thought the time would come when you simply cannot put a single iota of trust in anything those people say. If they told me it was daylight outside at 9:00a.m., I'd have to walk to the window to verify, and at this point, I can't even understand why they would bother being honest about that. They will simply make crap up when it's even easier to tell the truth. They'll lie when the truth would fit their agenda even better. Unbelievable.
Family farms here in PA are loaded with Trump signs.
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Fox news reporting for 3 days now, Iowa farmers about evenly split. One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China equals prosperity. Another crusty old pro Trump farmer says, "I want to be inspired by my leaders, not given a handout". I have always held people who work the land, generally in higher regard, thinking they hold traditional values....once again, maybe I made a mistake.


In reality there are few family farms left that are not hundreds of acres large. But, the large producers seem to be 2 to 1 for Mr. Trump over defendant Biden. As for what few family smaller farms are left I would say they are 60/40 for Mr. Trump. The smaller farmer tend to have a separate "job in town" and depend more on government hand outs. Although, folks who work the land and put in a lot of effort doing so tend to vote for folks who value hard work. Joe Biden does not fit that description. Just my observations.

kwg
obama\biden $4.60 a gallon for tractor fuel sounds great, don't it?
Who needs food anyways?

EWG's Farm Subsidy Database EWG's Farm Subsidy Database
Are these people so desperate that they will blindly vote for an old guy with Alzheimers, going down hill fast with a back up VP, who is Indian, claiming to be black... lies about every thing, openly hates this nation....will walk over anyone for her own benefit, and is a full blown communist, and hates pretty much anything connected with anyone white...

They think this is going to be for their financial security and doing any good in the long run?

does Iowa have farmers who are that stupid? They might as well sign over their possessions to the DNCC now, and start looking for work, and get a big jump on those that wait for another 2 years to be totally wiped out...

Biden vs Trump isn't even an intelligent choice... a vote for democRATS is about as good for your future and the future of this country, as just putting a gun to your head and pulling the trigger...especially someone who owns a farm...
If the Fox News reporter was Chrissie Wallace, do not believe her/him.
Curiosity compelled me to look at USDA map of CRP enrollment, Ioway is just about solid green. If I read it right, the 2018 farm bill has 23.7 billion earmarked for the taxpayers to rent ground to take it out of production? Like Sgt Schultz, I know nothing...but it looks like you vote for Republicans, get money for growing nothing...vote for China Joe, make money selling to a world market. Other than the morals or ethics thing, how can an aspiring agri-businessman go wrong?
When I was in Iowa I saw a fair number of Hillary signs on barns, and of course the college towns are solid blue.

Iowa politics are a mixed bag, always have been.


Very interesting. The guy who rents our property is 4th and we are 356th. My deceased mother is 699.

kwg
I am not hopeful, then again that is my nature. Not only is the glass half empty, but someone took a piss in it...
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Fox news reporting for 3 days now, Iowa farmers about evenly split. One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China equals prosperity. Another crusty old pro Trump farmer says, "I want to be inspired by my leaders, not given a handout". I have always held people who work the land, generally in higher regard, thinking they hold traditional values....once again, maybe I made a mistake.


You saw, what they wanted you to see.
Originally Posted by muleshoe
From what I've seen that "one young farmer" may be the only farmer in Iowa voting commie.

Nice!
Farming is all about subsidies and price supports. That's definitely Democrat territory.

Drive through SE MO cotton field country... you will see Biden signs.
Fox News “reporters” are evenly split for Trump and Biden too, with the Biden supporters probably having a slight edge.
I believe a lot of the reporting on Fox as much as I believe all the reporting on CNN. Not at all.
Originally Posted by flintlocke
And...it was on Fox, how much time did they devote to researching and polling the farmers?

They just asked Mike Bloomberg
Paging Wabigoon?!

What is the pulse of the woke Iowa farmers?
Vote republican for everything. Then the USA stays alive and free. Otherwise, the democrat anti-American/socialist/communist/marxist/liberals win and freedom will be gone along with anything which was the USA. That will include our guns, much higher taxes, Constitution, and our way of freedom in our life. You can kiss the churches goodbye too. Then get ready to learn to speak chinese. The democrat anti-American/socialist/communist/marxist/liberals should be removed from office and off all the ballots for they offer nothing for America or the American people to help make the country better.
The problem I see is that the US farming industry (my country's farming industry as well, for that matter) has been built around producing and exporting as much grain as possible.
When a big market like the chinese one suddenly disappears, a drop in prices is unavoidable. This makes it unprofitable, especially for smaller farmers, to produce the same crops.
In the current climate, cost minimization is king. That's why we're seeing less and less small farms and more and more corporations getting into farming: They profit the most from fixed cost digression.
Here in Germany you need a minimum of 500 acres to make regular grain farming profitable for one farmer and his family. That's a pretty sad picture in my opinion.

So, the question I want to ask is: How do we keep farming profitable for farmers who own their land and aren't just corporate employees? And all that without sucking up to the Chinese.
The only options I see at this point are:
1. Subsidizing the downsizing of big corporate farms
2. Continual subsidizing of small farms
3. A minimum price for grain

t. Grew up on a farm and currently learning the trade officially.

P.S. voting away my freedoms by choosing someone like ol' Joe is not an option
Originally Posted by Boomer454
The problem I see is that the US farming industry (my country's farming industry as well, for that matter) has been built around producing and exporting as much grain as possible.
When a big market like the chinese one suddenly disappears, a drop in prices is unavoidable. This makes it unprofitable, especially for smaller farmers, to produce the same crops.
In the current climate, cost minimization is king. That's why we're seeing less and less small farms and more and more corporations getting into farming: They profit the most from fixed cost digression.
Here in Germany you need a minimum of 500 acres to make regular grain farming profitable for one farmer and his family. That's a pretty sad picture in my opinion.

So, the question I want to ask is: How do we keep farming profitable for farmers who own their land and aren't just corporate employees? And all that without sucking up to the Chinese.
The only options I see at this point are:
1. Subsidizing the downsizing of big corporate farms
2. Continual subsidizing of small farms
3. A minimum price for grain

t. Grew up on a farm and currently learning the trade officially.

P.S. voting away my freedoms by choosing someone like ol' Joe is not an option

They diversify the crops grown. Around here almost every farm now has acres of hemp! Who knows what comes next! If farmers are growing grain and not making bank, they need to research and find crops that will make bank! No different than any other business. Feed the supply and demand.
You must be a top Fargo detective.

Or, a PostMaster.

.
Originally Posted by viking
Idiot
Out
Wandering
Around

More trade with China.... And no fracking and $4 plus dollar a fuel....

Asking Wagiboon? Really?

Originally Posted by BobBrown
Paging Wabigoon?!

What is the pulse of the woke Iowa farmers?
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Fox news reporting for 3 days now, Iowa farmers about evenly split. One young farmer admitted he was voting his wallet, a vote for Biden was a vote for increased trade with China equals prosperity. Another crusty old pro Trump farmer says, "I want to be inspired by my leaders, not given a handout". I have always held people who work the land, generally in higher regard, thinking they hold traditional values....once again, maybe I made a mistake.


You sure did.

My uncles were all S Dakota farmers and were Democrats, always looking for some kind of government hand out. It's not all that uncommon.
Maybe a tax structure that favors family operations and taxes big ag corporate operations? For instance, if you reside on the land you farm, you pay a minimal rate to maintain roads and schools. If you are an absentee landowner/ farmer you pay a higher rate. Maybe a 100% machinery tax write off for family operations? In the past, tinkering with price controls and crop subsidies has not had a very good track record of saving small farmers. It's been a boom/bust cycle for as long as I remember. And big ag has the money to "influence" congress, frequently to the detriment of the small farmer.
[quote=Boomer454]
When a big market like the chinese one suddenly disappears, a drop in prices is unavoidable. This makes it unprofitable, especially for smaller farmers, to produce the same crops.
In the current climate, cost minimization is king. That's why we're seeing less and less small farms and more and more corporations getting into farming:
First of all I have been in agriculture my entire life between crop consultanting/ retail ag sales and small farm
I’m 53
First we have continued to raise higher yielding crops especially corn and soybeans. I mean when each yea4 your break the previous years record we have over produced hence supply demand. 10 yrs ago most guys raised 60 bu beans and 210 bu corn now it is 70-80 bu beans and 240-250 bu corn. Some not all of the guys I deal with associate with whine and moan all the time about prices. I have literally watch these guys “ well it is going to go up I’m not selling “ and boom the next thing you know price has tanked. The good farmer whether big or small know what their break even is and sell when they make money
Secondly small farms are profitable too because for the first thing most everything is paid for and they tend to use older equipment (not the brand new hottest th8ng) as compared to bigger more corporate farms. Around here and I mean what larger farms I know or have dealt with. They live for the government help as they are over extended with their big show they put on.
And last if China doesn’t buy from us and say buys from Brazil, the countries that was buying from Brazil buy from us hence a world market
all trump in our county...
years ago I liked farmers but between their welfare payments and the disaster that ethanol wreaked among small engines I have no use for them at all.
you know the old saying....how does a farmer double his income?
Puts up another mailbox
Originally Posted by Heym06
They diversify the crops grown. Around here almost every farm now has acres of hemp! Who knows what comes next! If farmers are growing grain and not making bank, they need to research and find crops that will make bank! No different than any other business. Feed the supply and demand.

That's a good point. We've started growing spelt for exactly this reason. Emmer and Einkorn are also becoming popular and thus profitable.
A problem I see is that for one retooling can become very expensive and secondly every market will only be profitable for so long.
We're seeing this with organic farming here in Euroland. It was once considered a farmsaver and many jumped on it only for the prices to star dropping for organic stuff, too. Guess people just love cheap stuff.

Originally Posted by flintlocke
Maybe a tax structure that favors family operations and taxes big ag corporate operations?

All in favor of cutting taxes. Even moreso than subsidies I suppose, since with tax cuts you can't do all that much harm.

Originally Posted by IA_fog

First we have continued to raise higher yielding crops especially corn and soybeans. I mean when each yea4 your break the previous years record we have over produced hence supply demand. 10 yrs ago most guys raised 60 bu beans and 210 bu corn now it is 70-80 bu beans and 240-250 bu corn. Some not all of the guys I deal with associate with whine and moan all the time about prices. I have literally watch these guys “ well it is going to go up I’m not selling “ and boom the next thing you know price has tanked. The good farmer whether big or small know what their break even is and sell when they make money
Secondly small farms are profitable too because for the first thing most everything is paid for and they tend to use older equipment (not the brand new hottest th8ng) as compared to bigger more corporate farms. Around here and I mean what larger farms I know or have dealt with. They live for the government help as they are over extended with their big show they put on.
And last if China doesn’t buy from us and say buys from Brazil, the countries that was buying from Brazil buy from us hence a world market

I guess the rule of selling 1/3 per preliminary contract, 1/3 during the harvest and 1/3 in winter holds true today more than ever.
Using old equipment sadly is a kind of vicious circle. Yes, you may save on investing in a new tractor or combine, but you're essentially giving away money by overseeding, overfertilization and overspraying.
All that fancy stuff like area-specific seeding, fertilizing, etc is off-limits if your equipment is not up to date.

I guess it all comes back to being the government's fault once again. I'm not up to date on the specifics in america so I'll use an example from here I'm fairly familiar with.
Since the 50s or so, sugarbeets have been the crop to grow here if you had enough topsoil. This was due to an import ban on sugar by the German government, so basically all German sugar was "home grown".
Few years ago the German government figured that south america is a great market for all those cars we produce and in turn they'll let them export, you guessed it, cheap cane sugar.
And just like that, the whole German sugarbeet growing and processing industry has been pretty much wrecked. Farmers are scrambling to find something profitable and the sugar factories are shutting down en masse.
Oh the joys of globalization.
Originally Posted by cowman
all trump in our county...

You're obviously not in Johnson or Story County.

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/s...PjA-COf4ZMCAtqa_cVrnZekGTHWVy9qqvwyQIWCc

Quote

Iowa Poll: Donald Trump takes over lead in Iowa as Joe Biden fades
Brianne Pfannenstiel
Des Moines Register

© Copyright 2020, Des Moines Register and Tribune Co.

Republican President Donald Trump has taken over the lead in Iowa as Democratic former Vice President Joe Biden has faded, a new Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll shows just days before Election Day.

The president now leads by 7 percentage points over Biden, 48% to 41%. Three percent say they will vote for someone else, 2% aren't sure and 5% don't want to say for whom they will vote.

In September's Iowa Poll, the candidates were tied at 47% to 47%.

The poll of 814 likely Iowa voters was conducted by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines from Oct. 26-29. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points.

J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co., said while men are more likely to support Trump and women to support Biden, the gender gap has narrowed, and independents have returned to supporting the president, a group he won in 2016.

"The president is holding demographic groups that he won in Iowa four years ago, and that would give someone a certain level of comfort with their standing," she said. "There's a consistent story in 2020 to what happened in 2016."

But, she said, “Neither candidate hits 50%, so there’s still some play here.”

Trump carried Iowa by 9.4 percentage points in 2016, but his chances at a repeat 2020 win here appeared to be in doubt in recent polling. The June Iowa Poll showed Trump leading by just 1 percentage point before Biden climbed into the September tie.

Biden, though, does not appear to have given up on the state. He was in Des Moines Friday for a drive-in rally where he told voters: "I'll work as hard for those who don't support me as those who do. In my administration, there will be no red states or blue states, just the United States of America."

Trump was in Iowa earlier this month and has scheduled another rally in Dubuque on Sunday.

But the universe of persuadable voters is rapidly diminishing. Ninety-four percent of likely voters say their minds are made up, including 98% of Biden’s supporters and 95% of Trump’s supporters. Just 4% of likely voters say they could still be persuaded, and 2% say they have no first choice for president.

In fact, many of their votes have already been cast. As early and mail-in voting surges because of the pandemic, 51% of likely voters say they have already voted, surpassing previous milestones.

Among those who have already voted, Biden leads 55% to 32%. And among those who have yet to vote, Trump leads 64% to 28%.
Trump wins back independents; Biden loses ground with women

Both candidates largely hold onto voters within their own parties. Ninety-three percent of Democrats support Biden, along with 4% of self-described Republicans. And 89% of Republicans support Trump, along with 2% of Democrats.

But Trump has regained an edge with those who identify as independents — a bloc key to his 2016 win in Iowa. According to National Election Pool exit polling published by CNN, independent voters favored Trump 51% to 38% over Democrat Hillary Clinton that year.

In the Register’s September Iowa Poll, Biden led with independents 50% to 38%. But today, Trump wins them back and leads 49% to 35%.

“I think that the key to what's happening with President Trump is that he is leading with independents,” Selzer said. “That is a group that in Iowa in our September poll looked like it was swinging to Joe Biden, and it's come back to be a Trump asset.”

In addition to fading with independents, Biden has lost ground with women. In September, he held a 20-point lead among women, which balanced out Trump’s 21-point lead among men. But today, Biden’s lead with women has shrunk to 9 percentage points, 50% to 41%.

“We saw a huge gender gap that benefited Biden in September,” Selzer said. “And while there is still a big gap among men — they’re going for Trump by a 24-point margin — it's just a 9-point margin for Biden with women. And so there's just an imbalance there. Before, we saw mirror images of each other.”

Related:Here's who women, men are donating to in Iowa's US Senate, House races

Biden is leading with two groups of voters that Trump carried in 2016: those with a college degree (50% to 40%) and women without a college degree (49% to 43%). Biden is also leading in the suburbs (47% to 43%).

But Trump has mostly maintained the support of demographic groups he carried in Iowa in 2016. Today, he leads with men 56% to 32%; with whites 48% to 43%; with those without a college degree 54% to 35%; and with white evangelicals 72% to 20%.
Economy is top of mind for many Trump voters

Trump’s supporters are most likely to say the economy and taxes are on their minds as they think about how to vote for president, with 37% naming it as their top issue. Just 7% of Biden supporters say the same.

Iowa has regained about 60% of the jobs it lost after the pandemic shut down businesses earlier this year. The state’s unemployment rate improved to 4.6% in September, the fifth-lowest in the country.

Among all likely voters supporting either Trump or Biden, 23% say they’re thinking most about a candidate’s proposals for the economy and taxes, 22% say a candidate’s “ability to restore what’s good about America;" 19% say a candidate’s “demonstrated leadership;" 9% say his approach to the pandemic; 7% say his vision for how to address future challenges; 4% say his approach to Supreme Court appointments; and 10% say something else. Five percent are not sure.

Also on Trump supporters' minds: a candidate's ability to restore what’s good about the country (19%), a candidate’s demonstrated leadership (18%), his approach to the Supreme Court (5%), his vision for the future (4%) and his approach to the pandemic (2%). Nine percent say something else, and 5% are unsure.

Sonja Bloomquist, a 77-year-old Fort Dodge resident and poll participant, identifies as a Republican and already has cast her vote for Trump. Bloomquist, who is a farmer, said Trump has been a big improvement over his predecessor.

“Our country, as far as I was concerned, was going in the wrong direction with (Barack) Obama,” she said. “You don’t go around bowing to other countries’ leaders and apologizing for our country like he did.”

Bloomquist said Trump is a strong leader who has regained respect around the world for the United States.

“He takes pride that this is America,” she said.

She said the president has done what he could to control the coronavirus pandemic. Critics are unfairly placing all the blame on him, she said.

“China’s at fault — no doubt about it," she said.
GOP preferred in 3 of 4 U.S. House races; Finkenauer appears at risk
Donald Trump takes over lead in Iowa as Joe Biden fades
Ernst pulls ahead of Greenfield in closing days of U.S. Senate race
More Iowans disapprove than approve of Reynolds’ handling of COVID-19

The issue most on Biden supporters' minds is a candidate’s “ability to restore what’s good about America” (26%). That’s followed by a candidate's demonstrated leadership (20%), his approach to the pandemic (18%), his vision for the future (11%), his proposals for the economy and taxes (7%) and his approach to the Supreme Court (3%). Eleven percent say something else, and 5% are unsure.

Kay Leary, a 63-year-old Waterloo resident and poll respondent, is a Democrat who already has voted for Biden. The retired sixth-grade teacher believes Biden would bring a welcome change from Trump-induced turmoil.

“He’s civil,” Leary said of the former vice president. “He’s able to talk with people rather than talking to people.”

Leary said Biden listens to others and reads people well. She thinks he could engage productively with other foreign leaders.

She knows that others have questioned electing someone as old as Biden, who is 77. She doesn’t think his age is an issue now, “but if it becomes one, then I think Kamala Harris would be fine to fit right in,” she said, referring to the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee.
About this poll

The Iowa Poll, conducted October 26-29, 2020, for the Des Moines Register and Mediacom by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines, is based on telephone interviews with 814 Iowans ages 18 or older who say they will definitely vote or have already voted in the 2020 general election for president, U.S. Senate and other offices.

Interviewers with Quantel Research contacted 941 Iowa adults with randomly selected landline and cell phone numbers supplied by Dynata. Interviews were administered in English. Responses were adjusted by age, sex and congressional district to reflect the general population based on recent census data.

Questions based on the sample of 814 Iowa likely voters have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. This means that if this survey were repeated using the same questions and the same methodology, 19 times out of 20, the findings would not vary from the true population value by more than plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. Results based on smaller samples of respondents — such as by gender or age — have a larger margin of error.

Republishing the copyright Iowa Poll without credit to the Des Moines Register and Mediacom is prohibited.

Des Moines Register reporter Tony Leys contributed to this report.


Iowa Poll: Donald Trump takes over lead in Iowa as Joe Biden fades
Brianne Pfannenstiel
Des Moines Register

© Copyright 2020, Des Moines Register and Tribune Co.

Republican President Donald Trump has taken over the lead in Iowa as Democratic former Vice President Joe Biden has faded, a new Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll shows just days before Election Day.

The president now leads by 7 percentage points over Biden, 48% to 41%. Three percent say they will vote for someone else, 2% aren't sure and 5% don't want to say for whom they will vote.

In September's Iowa Poll, the candidates were tied at 47% to 47%.

The poll of 814 likely Iowa voters was conducted by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines from Oct. 26-29. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points.

J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co., said while men are more likely to support Trump and women to support Biden, the gender gap has narrowed, and independents have returned to supporting the president, a group he won in 2016.

"The president is holding demographic groups that he won in Iowa four years ago, and that would give someone a certain level of comfort with their standing," she said. "There's a consistent story in 2020 to what happened in 2016."

But, she said, “Neither candidate hits 50%, so there’s still some play here.”

Trump carried Iowa by 9.4 percentage points in 2016, but his chances at a repeat 2020 win here appeared to be in doubt in recent polling. The June Iowa Poll showed Trump leading by just 1 percentage point before Biden climbed into the September tie.

Donald Trump's lead over Joe Biden is his largest since March
Likely voters in Iowa have been polled four times since March 2020 about which candidate they would vote for in the election for president. In the most recent

Iowa Poll, 48% of likely voters say they would vote for Donald Trump, 41% say they would vote for Joe Biden, 3% say they would vote for someone else, 2% are not sure, and 5% have already voted but don't want to tell.

Biden, though, does not appear to have given up on the state. He was in Des Moines Friday for a drive-in rally where he told voters: "I'll work as hard for those who don't support me as those who do. In my administration, there will be no red states or blue states, just the United States of America."

Trump was in Iowa earlier this month and has scheduled another rally in Dubuque on Sunday.

But the universe of persuadable voters is rapidly diminishing. Ninety-four percent of likely voters say their minds are made up, including 98% of Biden’s supporters and 95% of Trump’s supporters. Just 4% of likely voters say they could still be persuaded, and 2% say they have no first choice for president.

In fact, many of their votes have already been cast. As early and mail-in voting surges because of the pandemic, 51% of likely voters say they have already voted, surpassing previous milestones.

Among those who have already voted, Biden leads 55% to 32%. And among those who have yet to vote, Trump leads 64% to 28%.
Trump wins back independents; Biden loses ground with women

Both candidates largely hold onto voters within their own parties. Ninety-three percent of Democrats support Biden, along with 4% of self-described Republicans. And 89% of Republicans support Trump, along with 2% of Democrats.

But Trump has regained an edge with those who identify as independents — a bloc key to his 2016 win in Iowa. According to National Election Pool exit polling published by CNN, independent voters favored Trump 51% to 38% over Democrat Hillary Clinton that year.

In the Register’s September Iowa Poll, Biden led with independents 50% to 38%. But today, Trump wins them back and leads 49% to 35%.

“I think that the key to what's happening with President Trump is that he is leading with independents,” Selzer said. “That is a group that in Iowa in our September poll looked like it was swinging to Joe Biden, and it's come back to be a Trump asset.”

In addition to fading with independents, Biden has lost ground with women. In September, he held a 20-point lead among women, which balanced out Trump’s 21-point lead among men. But today, Biden’s lead with women has shrunk to 9 percentage points, 50% to 41%.

“We saw a huge gender gap that benefited Biden in September,” Selzer said. “And while there is still a big gap among men — they’re going for Trump by a 24-point margin — it's just a 9-point margin for Biden with women. And so there's just an imbalance there. Before, we saw mirror images of each other.”

Related:Here's who women, men are donating to in Iowa's US Senate, House races

Biden is leading with two groups of voters that Trump carried in 2016: those with a college degree (50% to 40%) and women without a college degree (49% to 43%). Biden is also leading in the suburbs (47% to 43%).

But Trump has mostly maintained the support of demographic groups he carried in Iowa in 2016. Today, he leads with men 56% to 32%; with whites 48% to 43%; with those without a college degree 54% to 35%; and with white evangelicals 72% to 20%.
Economy is top of mind for many Trump voters

Trump’s supporters are most likely to say the economy and taxes are on their minds as they think about how to vote for president, with 37% naming it as their top issue. Just 7% of Biden supporters say the same.

Iowa has regained about 60% of the jobs it lost after the pandemic shut down businesses earlier this year. The state’s unemployment rate improved to 4.6% in September, the fifth-lowest in the country.

Among all likely voters supporting either Trump or Biden, 23% say they’re thinking most about a candidate’s proposals for the economy and taxes, 22% say a candidate’s “ability to restore what’s good about America;" 19% say a candidate’s “demonstrated leadership;" 9% say his approach to the pandemic; 7% say his vision for how to address future challenges; 4% say his approach to Supreme Court appointments; and 10% say something else. Five percent are not sure.

Also on Trump supporters' minds: a candidate's ability to restore what’s good about the country (19%), a candidate’s demonstrated leadership (18%), his approach to the Supreme Court (5%), his vision for the future (4%) and his approach to the pandemic (2%). Nine percent say something else, and 5% are unsure.

Sonja Bloomquist, a 77-year-old Fort Dodge resident and poll participant, identifies as a Republican and already has cast her vote for Trump. Bloomquist, who is a farmer, said Trump has been a big improvement over his predecessor.

“Our country, as far as I was concerned, was going in the wrong direction with (Barack) Obama,” she said. “You don’t go around bowing to other countries’ leaders and apologizing for our country like he did.”

Bloomquist said Trump is a strong leader who has regained respect around the world for the United States.

“He takes pride that this is America,” she said.

She said the president has done what he could to control the coronavirus pandemic. Critics are unfairly placing all the blame on him, she said.

“China’s at fault — no doubt about it," she said.
GOP preferred in 3 of 4 U.S. House races; Finkenauer appears at risk
Donald Trump takes over lead in Iowa as Joe Biden fades
Ernst pulls ahead of Greenfield in closing days of U.S. Senate race
More Iowans disapprove than approve of Reynolds’ handling of COVID-19

The issue most on Biden supporters' minds is a candidate’s “ability to restore what’s good about America” (26%). That’s followed by a candidate's demonstrated leadership (20%), his approach to the pandemic (18%), his vision for the future (11%), his proposals for the economy and taxes (7%) and his approach to the Supreme Court (3%). Eleven percent say something else, and 5% are unsure.

Kay Leary, a 63-year-old Waterloo resident and poll respondent, is a Democrat who already has voted for Biden. The retired sixth-grade teacher believes Biden would bring a welcome change from Trump-induced turmoil.

“He’s civil,” Leary said of the former vice president. “He’s able to talk with people rather than talking to people.”

Leary said Biden listens to others and reads people well. She thinks he could engage productively with other foreign leaders.

She knows that others have questioned electing someone as old as Biden, who is 77. She doesn’t think his age is an issue now, “but if it becomes one, then I think Kamala Harris would be fine to fit right in,” she said, referring to the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee.
About this poll

The Iowa Poll, conducted October 26-29, 2020, for the Des Moines Register and Mediacom by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines, is based on telephone interviews with 814 Iowans ages 18 or older who say they will definitely vote or have already voted in the 2020 general election for president, U.S. Senate and other offices.

Interviewers with Quantel Research contacted 941 Iowa adults with randomly selected landline and cell phone numbers supplied by Dynata. Interviews were administered in English. Responses were adjusted by age, sex and congressional district to reflect the general population based on recent census data.

Questions based on the sample of 814 Iowa likely voters have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. This means that if this survey were repeated using the same questions and the same methodology, 19 times out of 20, the findings would not vary from the true population value by more than plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. Results based on smaller samples of respondents — such as by gender or age — have a larger margin of error.

Republishing the copyright Iowa Poll without credit to the Des Moines Register and Mediacom is prohibited.

Des Moines Register reporter Tony Leys contributed to this report.

Joe Biden leads among women; Donald Trump leads more among men
Likely voters were asked: "If the general election were held today, for whom would you vote?"

In addition to fading with independents, Biden has lost ground with women. In September, he held a 20-point lead among women, which balanced out Trump’s 21-point lead among men. But today, Biden’s lead with women has shrunk to 9 percentage points, 50% to 41%.

“We saw a huge gender gap that benefited Biden in September,” Selzer said. “And while there is still a big gap among men — they’re going for Trump by a 24-point margin — it's just a 9-point margin for Biden with women. And so there's just an imbalance there. Before, we saw mirror images of each other.”

Biden is leading with two groups of voters that Trump carried in 2016: those with a college degree (50% to 40%) and women without a college degree (49% to 43%). Biden is also leading in the suburbs (47% to 43%).

But Trump has mostly maintained the support of demographic groups he carried in Iowa in 2016. Today, he leads with men 56% to 32%; with whites 48% to 43%; with those without a college degree 54% to 35%; and with white evangelicals 72% to 20%.
Economy is top of mind for many Trump voters

Trump’s supporters are most likely to say the economy and taxes are on their minds as they think about how to vote for president, with 37% naming it as their top issue. Just 7% of Biden supporters say the same.

Iowa has regained about 60% of the jobs it lost after the pandemic shut down businesses earlier this year. The state’s unemployment rate improved to 4.6% in September, the fifth-lowest in the country.

Among all likely voters supporting either Trump or Biden, 23% say they’re thinking most about a candidate’s proposals for the economy and taxes, 22% say a candidate’s “ability to restore what’s good about America;" 19% say a candidate’s “demonstrated leadership;" 9% say his approach to the pandemic; 7% say his vision for how to address future challenges; 4% say his approach to Supreme Court appointments; and 10% say something else. Five percent are not sure.

Trump supporters cite the economy as top factor in their support; Biden supporters say their top factor is Biden's ability to restore what is good about America
Likely voters in Iowa were asked: "Which one of the following have you been thinking about most in your decision to support (your candidate)?"

Also on Trump supporters' minds: a candidate's ability to restore what’s good about the country (19%), a candidate’s demonstrated leadership (18%), his approach to the Supreme Court (5%), his vision for the future (4%) and his approach to the pandemic (2%). Nine percent say something else, and 5% are unsure.

Sonja Bloomquist, a 77-year-old Fort Dodge resident and poll participant, identifies as a Republican and already has cast her vote for Trump. Bloomquist, who is a farmer, said Trump has been a big improvement over his predecessor.

“Our country, as far as I was concerned, was going in the wrong direction with (Barack) Obama,” she said. “You don’t go around bowing to other countries’ leaders and apologizing for our country like he did.”

Bloomquist said Trump is a strong leader who has regained respect around the world for the United States.

“He takes pride that this is America,” she said.

She said the president has done what he could to control the coronavirus pandemic. Critics are unfairly placing all the blame on him, she said.

“China’s at fault — no doubt about it," she said.

The issue most on Biden supporters' minds is a candidate’s “ability to restore what’s good about America” (26%). That’s followed by a candidate's demonstrated leadership (20%), his approach to the pandemic (18%), his vision for the future (11%), his proposals for the economy and taxes (7%) and his approach to the Supreme Court (3%). Eleven percent say something else, and 5% are unsure.

Kay Leary, a 63-year-old Waterloo resident and poll respondent, is a Democrat who already has voted for Biden. The retired sixth-grade teacher believes Biden would bring a welcome change from Trump-induced turmoil.

“He’s civil,” Leary said of the former vice president. “He’s able to talk with people rather than talking to people.”

Leary said Biden listens to others and reads people well. She thinks he could engage productively with other foreign leaders.

She knows that others have questioned electing someone as old as Biden, who is 77. She doesn’t think his age is an issue now, “but if it becomes one, then I think Kamala Harris would be fine to fit right in,” she said, referring to the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee.
About this poll

The Iowa Poll, conducted October 26-29, 2020, for the Des Moines Register and Mediacom by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines, is based on telephone interviews with 814 Iowans ages 18 or older who say they will definitely vote or have already voted in the 2020 general election for president, U.S. Senate and other offices.

Interviewers with Quantel Research contacted 941 Iowa adults with randomly selected landline and cell phone numbers supplied by Dynata. Interviews were administered in English. Responses were adjusted by age, sex and congressional district to reflect the general population based on recent census data.

Questions based on the sample of 814 Iowa likely voters have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. This means that if this survey were repeated using the same questions and the same methodology, 19 times out of 20, the findings would not vary from the true population value by more than plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. Results based on smaller samples of respondents — such as by gender or age — have a larger margin of error.




THE DES MOINES REGISTER/MEDIACOM IOWA POLL

We're seeing this with organic farming here in Euroland. It was once considered a farmsaver and many jumped on it only for the prices to star dropping for organic stuff, too. .[/quote]

Some people would say that's a case of supply growing way faster than demand causing prices to drop
Originally Posted by kwg020


Very interesting. The guy who rents our property is 4th and we are 356th. My deceased mother is 699.

kwg




I just looked myself up.


Way, way down the list of Olson's in the state of MT.

But then again I'm a small timer.


Got $3377 in 2018.

The year it NEVER rained.

Took my g'ment cheese and bought a $4200 insulated stock tank.



And to be completely honest I've done better under Trump than Obama when it comes to cheese.

Like a bunch of small business I have taken in some covid 'assistance'.

And the way I look at it is we work for our welfare not to mention Trump said the $$$ came from the Chinese tariffs, aka the trade war which certainly didn't do the markets any favors.
© 24hourcampfire