Home
St. Louis couple Mark, Patricia McCloskey pay fines, lose guns in guilty plea over encounter with rioters

https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-couple-mark-patricia-mccloskey-pay-fines-lose-guns

Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.
Obvious violation of our 2nd Amendment Rights! 😡
Shoulda let the BLM trespass, destroy the property, burn it down, and murder them. Just like England.
Originally Posted by Fireball2
Shoulda let the BLM trespass, destroy the property, burn it down, and murder them. Just like England.


That’s JUST what the Libertard DemoRat’s like that Prosecutor want to happen!
Those two were Libtards until the rubber met the road. But Be Well, RZ.
Probably should have stayed in the house and let them break in. Probably would have had a better outcome once they were inside.
Paul B.
And the OP eats Nestle Crunch and chocolate milk all day

😂
At least, it is just a misdemeanor and they can still own guns. What a ridiculous charge, and conviction. Sickening.
Wonder how that will affect his senate run ?
I'd do a lot of things before I'd admit I did anything wrong when defending my own property and life against a mob.

Mark McLoskey is running for public office now too. After this, I doubt he gets far out the starting gate.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Mark McLoskey is running for public office now too. After this, I doubt he gets far out the starting gate.


Lol, I don't know why, they're all criminals and we vote for them anyways......... wink
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
I'd do a lot of things before I'd admit I did anything wrong when defending my own property and life against a mob.

Mark McLoskey is running for public office now too. After this, I doubt he gets far out the starting gate.


Yep.....he lost my vote
Guilty plea ?

WTF ?
Probably a judgment call on their part. The wrong jury panel would've crucified them.
Originally Posted by auk1124
Probably a judgment call on their part. The wrong jury panel would've crucified them.


There is that and it’s a big one considering their location but there’s also appealing to a higher court.
Did they sell their house and move out of that Liberal hell hole to a more Conservative section of the state where such prosecutions won’t happen in the future?

Doubt it.

The way they handled it tells me he is running as a Dem?

Originally Posted by PJGunner
Probably should have stayed in the house and let them break in. Probably would have had a better outcome once they were inside.
Paul B.


The smart thing to do would have been to stay in house and let the crowd pass. Coming out with guns and yelling at the crowd on the street and sidewalk was dumb. Video camera would have been better choice than firearms, except I suspect in this case video would not help property owners cause.
All this could have been avoided by posting BLM and Joe Biden for President signs in front yard.


Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by auk1124
Probably a judgment call on their part. The wrong jury panel would've crucified them.


There is that and it’s a big one considering their location but there’s also appealing to a higher court.


Pinning your hopes on a successful appeal in an extremely high profile case, while you and wifey are both tossed to the animals in the slam, is not a pleasant prospect to think about.

Not saying what they did was necessarily right, just saying I can understand where they're coming from.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by auk1124
Probably a judgment call on their part. The wrong jury panel would've crucified them.


There is that and it’s a big one considering their location but there’s also appealing to a higher court.


By pleading they made a sound financial decision.
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.


And give up their firearms.

Doesn’t mention being possibly red flagged.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.


And give up their firearms.

Doesn’t mention being possibly red flagged.


They didn't give up their firearms. They only surrendered the two they used. Hers looked like a Jennings. They did her a favor by making her surrender it.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.


And give up their firearms.

Doesn’t mention being possibly red flagged.


They didn't give up their firearms. They only surrendered the two they used. Hers looked like a Jennings. They did her a favor by making her surrender it.


Surrendered is different from giving up?
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.


And give up their firearms.

Doesn’t mention being possibly red flagged.


They didn't give up their firearms. They only surrendered the two they used. Hers looked like a Jennings. They did her a favor by making her surrender it.


Surrendered is different from giving up?


They have others and can buy as many as they want. It’s not a big deal. They have plenty of money.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ma...s-senate-run-ill-defend-the-people-of-mo
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.


Originally Posted by Slavek
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.




You can buy an AR for about $450.
St. Louis is a chit hole ran by chit heads. Best avoided if at all possible.
Kids,
They handed in the actual "guilty" guns which were obviously in cop custody anyway. Probably have much nice replacements already in hand. Or on order, just wanted to clear the decks. Besides, he's running for US Senate and a trial, especially on politically stupiditized charges, costs way too much time and money. Pleading to a misdemeanor with a face-saving surrender makes sense -- look how many of YOU are fooled into thinking they "surrendered."
No, they advanced in reverse.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Slavek
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.




You can buy an AR for about $450.


Whereabouts for 450$ ?
It's sad to say this, but that was a good deal fro them given the whole of the circumstances.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Slavek
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.




You can buy an AR for about $450.


Whereabouts for 450$ ?


PSA. You can get one of their kits and assemble it yourself.
They suck azz and will suck a willie for a dollar. Some of y'all are pathetic, you need to fight for what's right and don't give in.
For 2 hours of lawyer billables, you could buy another really nice AR.

I see what happened here. They gonna be fine.
Originally Posted by chlinstructor
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Slavek
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.




You can buy an AR for about $450.


Whereabouts for 450$ ?


PSA. You can get one of their kits and assemble it yourself.


Okay.
I was thinking over the counter. Looking at these for sale in the Louisiana Sportsman classifieds you may can find one for 750-800$ and if priced that way they don’t last long.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.


And give up their firearms.

Doesn’t mention being possibly red flagged.


They didn't give up their firearms. They only surrendered the two they used. Hers looked like a Jennings. They did her a favor by making her surrender it.


Surrendered is different from giving up?


You ARE RETARDED to the 100th power !
.LMAO
It's cheaper to agree to stupidity than to pay out 20-100x the cost to prove innocence. Sad, but True, as it's the way the system is now; they are lowyers they know how to play the game...

Personally I'd find that a HARD BIT to chew, morally... but I ain't got much, so yee haw Capt'n.
Originally Posted by tedthorn
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
I'd do a lot of things before I'd admit I did anything wrong when defending my own property and life against a mob.

Mark McLoskey is running for public office now too. After this, I doubt he gets far out the starting gate.


Yep.....he lost my vote


Never had mine to begin with, but sure didn’t sway me to vote for him today.
IIRC, the gun she was holding at the time was inoperable anyway. I'd bet that the replacement won't be, in spite of them being liberal democrats before, because you'd think they'd realize that some antifa/ blm type might come after them for retribution at some point since they've had a lot of national attention.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Slavek
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.





Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Slavek
[quote=EthanEdwards]I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.




You can buy an AR for about $450.

Originally Posted by Slavek
Originally Posted by EthanEdwards
I'd hate losing my AR, but I'd just go to my safe and get another one. I need to get my wife another gun. Her Magnum Carry is collectible.


That only works if one is worth many millions. How much does one have to be worth to even consider running for American senate minimum $20 million? If you did something equally foolish you would not be able to get another one from safe, because they would confiscate your entire safe. If you are a multimillionaire please forget what I wrote.


I seldom even read what you write, so I don't have to worry about forgetting it, generally speaking. You're a trolling f u c ktard with multiple identities, NGAF what you write.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
I'd do a lot of things before I'd admit I did anything wrong when defending my own property and life against a mob..
THAT!
If I remember correctly the A hats claimed to be democrats and supporters of BLM when this first went down. If that's the case Screw em.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by JoeBob
That’s a great deal. I’d sign up for a misdemeanor and pay the fine in advance to do what they did. Not a big deal at all and a sound decision on their part. In reality is about like speeding and not giving a damn when you get stopped because you have the money to pay the fine and would rather pay a fine and do as you please than drive thr speed limit.


And give up their firearms.

Doesn’t mention being possibly red flagged.


They didn't give up their firearms. They only surrendered the two they used. Hers looked like a Jennings. They did her a favor by making her surrender it.


Surrendered is different from giving up?


You’re officially Old Tard

LMAO
Looks like he got another AR-15 to replace the one they confiscated:

St. Louis couple touts new AR-15 after guns seized over BLM encounter

https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-couple-touts-new-ar-15

Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.
Originally Posted by efw
Did they sell their house and move out of that Liberal hell hole to a more Conservative section of the state where such prosecutions won’t happen in the future?

Doubt it.

The way they handled it tells me he is running as a Dem?

I think he is running as a republican for the US Senate
Being legally martyred ahead of an election campaign doesn't sound too bad.
Can you flip to the other party and not cost any political hay that easily? I suspect they are both "lawyers". I think I read that. If so maybe my friend's comment the everyone should get one lawyer tag a year.
Originally Posted by BALLISTIK
It's cheaper to agree to stupidity than to pay out 20-100x the cost to prove innocence. Sad, but True, as it's the way the system is now; they are lowyers they know how to play the game...

Personally I'd find that a HARD BIT to chew, morally... but I ain't got much, so yee haw Capt'n.


I think you're right about that. They are lawyers so they've spent quite a bit of time being trained not to see things morally but in terms of billable hours and the easiest way to reach the least bad outcome.

I love it when a lawyer does think morally and stands on principle but the legal system is largely broken especially in left leaning areas and being in the right doesn't guarantee a win. They know better than I what they were up against and maybe they see it as 1 battle not the whole war. They are leftists so I'm not sure how they tic but I'm pretty sure they've spent a bit of time reconsidering their political leanings.

Bb
Edmund Burke once said that what one generation tolerates the next embraces. As a Missouri resident I can't see any future in voting for this guy. He'd be part of the swamp in no time. St. Louis is lost to the libs and have been for years.
© 24hourcampfire