Home
Surprising this dumb bastard can put even this much thought into a speech.

Question: Who brushes this idiot's pearly white teeth? He obviously isn't capable of it himself.



Link to article


by JORDAN MICHAELS on JULY 22, 2021


There are certain advantages to having a senile president, not the least of which is his tendency to unintentionally let the cat out of the bag.

President Joe Biden bumbled through a CNN “town hall” event last night, and along with his usual word salads, he appeared to voice support for a nationwide handgun ban.

“I’m the only guy that ever got passed legislation, when I was a senator, to make sure we eliminated assault weapons. The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether — whether it’s a .9 millimeter pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous,” he said, adding: “I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things.”

It’s unclear whether by “those things” the president means rifles and pistols or magazines that hold “20, 30, 40…” rounds. Biden’s gun control plan does not express support for a handgun ban, but he does call for a ban on “high-capacity” magazines. Given that state-level “high-capacity” magazine bans outlaw anything that can hold more than 10 rounds, it seems likely that Biden would want the same ban nationally if given the chance.

SEE ALSO: Biden’s Nominee for ATF Director, David Chipman, Insults Gun Owners
Banning handguns outright would be a far riskier political move. Support for gun control in general has waned in the past year, and opposition to a handgun ban has grown steadily since the 1950’s. Last year, a full 74 percent of Americans opposed such a ban, while only 25 percent supported it, according to Gallup. That’s the second-highest opposition ever recorded since Gallup started asking the question in 1959.

Suggesting a handgun ban wasn’t the president’s only questionable gun-related comment. At the beginning of his comments on firearms, he made a distinction between “crime” and “gun violence” to argue that guns are to blame for the spike in murders over the last year.

“As you know, because you’re so involved, actually crime is down, gun violence and murder rates are up. Guns,” he said.

He also appeared to claim sole responsibility for the 1994 “assault weapons” ban.

“I’m the only guy that ever got passed legislation, when I was a senator, to make sure we eliminated assault weapons,” he said.

In reality, Biden was joined by 47 other senators in voting for the legislation, and three former presidents, including Ronald Reagan, voiced support for the ban to get it through Congress.

SEE ALSO: Fact Checkers Call Out President Biden for ‘False’ Statement on 2A
Biden also reiterated his commitment to going after gun dealers across America and made a vague reference go “ghost guns.”

“I’ve gotten ATF out, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. I have them increase their budget and increase their capacity, along with the Justice Department, to go after the gun shops that are not abiding by the law of doing background checks,” he said. “We’re going to do major investigations and shut those guys down and put some of them in jail for what they’re doing, selling these weapons.”

Biden also admitted (apparently unintentionally) that criminals almost always acquire their guns illegally.

“The people who, in fact, are using those weapons are acquiring them illegally. Illegally,” he said.

If Biden knows criminals acquire guns illegally, it’s unclear why he has spent so much of his career supporting gun control measures that only affect law-abiding citizens.

Not surprisingly, neither the attendees nor the moderator, Don Lemon, thought to ask about this clear contradiction. Even if they did, it’s unlikely Biden would be able to form a coherent response.
Fuggers need to read my sig line.
Quote
three former presidents, including Ronald Reagan, voiced support for the ban


Subtle, but well noted.
Originally Posted by Stickfight
Quote
three former presidents, including Ronald Reagan, voiced support for the ban


Subtle, but well noted.


Wasn’t that after he and Brady got shot?...
According to the Constitution, Biden does not have the authority. Nobody does.
Not a chance.

We not only have Heller, but other court decisions have overturned magazine capacity limits and other Lib nonsense inflicted on us. It’s piecemeal, but they are losing this fight for the most part. Doesn’t stop them from trying, or playing to the donors, and it helps keep the lawyers busy and well provided-for.
Is that why Hunter had one.
Originally Posted by benchman
According to the Constitution, Biden does not have the authority. .
True - but since when did these a-holes abide by the Constitution??
The problem is not just the immediate future of handguns and all gun ownership it's after people like us are gone. Most here can't be indoctrinated into going along with the communist/leftist idea of no guns but our grandkids can and are being taught that guns are bad. You give these people no more than 2 more generations and they will be asked to ban all gun ownership. If these future Americans are to have freedom it's us that need to step up and do something. Forget about being a coward and let your mind wander on the idea of what that "something" is. Here's a hint, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. God help us!
Originally Posted by Jim1611
The problem is not just the immediate future of handguns and all gun ownership it's after people like us are gone. Most here can't be indoctrinated into going along with the communist/leftist idea of no guns but our grandkids can and are being taught that guns are bad. You give these people no more than 2 more generations and they will be asked to ban all gun ownership. If these future Americans are to have freedom it's us that need to step up and do something. Forget about being a coward and let your mind wander on the idea of what that "something" is. Here's a hint, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. God help us!





Jim, that is the fear I have. That those who come after us will not have the fortitude, or initiative for that matter, to continue to push back against the gun grabbers.

Without guns in the hands of citizens, the future of our country is a foregone conclusion. Not a mystery novel.
Originally Posted by local_dirt

Jim, that is the fear I have. That those who come after us will not have the fortitude, or initiative for that matter, to continue to push back against the gun grabbers.

Without guns in the hands of citizens, the future of our country is a foregone conclusion. Not a mystery novel.



I'd rather take care of business now, before I'm too old to do so, than leave that duty to our kids and grandkids.

Make enough of an impression, and maybe it won't rear it's ugly, Marxist head for awhile.
Originally Posted by viking
Is that why Hunter had one.

Hunter needed protection from all the crack dealers he associated with.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Jim1611
The problem is not just the immediate future of handguns and all gun ownership it's after people like us are gone. Most here can't be indoctrinated into going along with the communist/leftist idea of no guns but our grandkids can and are being taught that guns are bad. You give these people no more than 2 more generations and they will be asked to ban all gun ownership. If these future Americans are to have freedom it's us that need to step up and do something. Forget about being a coward and let your mind wander on the idea of what that "something" is. Here's a hint, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. God help us!





Jim, that is the fear I have. That those who come after us will not have the fortitude, or initiative for that matter, to continue to push back against the gun grabbers.

Without guns in the hands of citizens, the future of our country is a foregone conclusion. Not a mystery novel.


The left has no restraint. Remember in the past how they masked their true intentions? They've quit doing that for the most part. I used to think it was our side that would start a shooting war in this nation but I was wrong. If they had restraint they'd leave us alone but it's getting harder for them to do that. No they will let their lust overcome them and they will force our hand. It's somewhat like what happened in Kenya with the Mau Mau Uprising. The leaders were secretly training the tribes and these people were to wait until everything was in place for the all out attack on the whites. The problem was the lust for the killing overcame the "generals" and a few jumped the gun. That gave the whites an insight and a little time to react. I hope our enemies overplay their hands toward us.
Those town halls are some of the creepiest, Orwellian events I’ve ever seen.

But this morning’s Olympics ceremony came pretty close.
He has been a babbling mouthed anti-gunner his entire 40+ years in the Swamp. No big surprise.
F uck Biden and the horse he rode in on !
The the current administration has bowed to the UN.This was the home page photo for the UN in 2020.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by Jim1611
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Jim1611
The problem is not just the immediate future of handguns and all gun ownership it's after people like us are gone. Most here can't be indoctrinated into going along with the communist/leftist idea of no guns but our grandkids can and are being taught that guns are bad. You give these people no more than 2 more generations and they will be asked to ban all gun ownership. If these future Americans are to have freedom it's us that need to step up and do something. Forget about being a coward and let your mind wander on the idea of what that "something" is. Here's a hint, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. God help us!





Jim, that is the fear I have. That those who come after us will not have the fortitude, or initiative for that matter, to continue to push back against the gun grabbers.

Without guns in the hands of citizens, the future of our country is a foregone conclusion. Not a mystery novel.


The left has no restraint. Remember in the past how they masked their true intentions? They've quit doing that for the most part. I used to think it was our side that would start a shooting war in this nation but I was wrong. If they had restraint they'd leave us alone but it's getting harder for them to do that. No they will let their lust overcome them and they will force our hand. It's somewhat like what happened in Kenya with the Mau Mau Uprising. The leaders were secretly training the tribes and these people were to wait until everything was in place for the all out attack on the whites. The problem was the lust for the killing overcame the "generals" and a few jumped the gun. That gave the whites an insight and a little time to react. I hope our enemies overplay their hands toward us.






Jim, I agree.. and am old enough to remember how the left masked their true intentions in the past. They no longer do so, either because they think they're close enough and strong enough now to push their totalitarian agenda (socialist, communist; call it whatever you want) over the top, or they feel they must get it done now during this period of opportunity with their control of the 3 branches.

Like you, I also believe their reckless lust for "the final solution" has removed any restraint from their minds and clouded their ability for strategic thinking.

In other words, their hubris is ill-founded and they are prime for the picking, if and only if, we can get the ballot and Dominion problems resolved.
if these liberal snowflakes are reading our comments ,read this > i just ordered a new Ruger Super Redhawk 44 mag. today ! > we need President Trump back as president soon , i hope this August 2021 is when it happens !
Some are old enough to remember ordering firearms off shotgun news. They were delivered right to your house.
I would say we are losing ground.
Biden just told you the long term plan.
Big companies have 10,20 and 30 year plans. The commies do too. Hasbeen
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Jim1611
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Jim1611
The problem is not just the immediate future of handguns and all gun ownership it's after people like us are gone. Most here can't be indoctrinated into going along with the communist/leftist idea of no guns but our grandkids can and are being taught that guns are bad. You give these people no more than 2 more generations and they will be asked to ban all gun ownership. If these future Americans are to have freedom it's us that need to step up and do something. Forget about being a coward and let your mind wander on the idea of what that "something" is. Here's a hint, our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor. God help us!





Jim, that is the fear I have. That those who come after us will not have the fortitude, or initiative for that matter, to continue to push back against the gun grabbers.

Without guns in the hands of citizens, the future of our country is a foregone conclusion. Not a mystery novel.


The left has no restraint. Remember in the past how they masked their true intentions? They've quit doing that for the most part. I used to think it was our side that would start a shooting war in this nation but I was wrong. If they had restraint they'd leave us alone but it's getting harder for them to do that. No they will let their lust overcome them and they will force our hand. It's somewhat like what happened in Kenya with the Mau Mau Uprising. The leaders were secretly training the tribes and these people were to wait until everything was in place for the all out attack on the whites. The problem was the lust for the killing overcame the "generals" and a few jumped the gun. That gave the whites an insight and a little time to react. I hope our enemies overplay their hands toward us.






Jim, I agree.. and am old enough to remember how the left masked their true intentions in the past. They no longer do so, either because they think they're close enough and strong enough now to push their totalitarian agenda (socialist, communist; call it whatever you want) over the top, or they feel they must get it done now during this period of opportunity with their control of the 3 branches.

Like you, I also believe their reckless lust for "the final solution" has removed any restraint from their minds and clouded their ability for strategic thinking.

In other words, their hubris is ill-founded and they are prime for the picking, if and only if, we can get the ballot and Dominion problems resolved.


You last sentence explains the first.

"They" have perfected Election Fraud. It has been there for decades, but now they have complete and total control of "Who Counts The Votes". Nothing is left to chance, every election is now a selection.

"They" no longer need to hide behind the curtain disguising their true agenda as they no longer need or want constituents.

Now that The Ballot Box, The Judicial System, The Justice System are gone, truly gone, they only have one obstacle left and that is The Second Amendment.

After "they" steal the 2022 elections and add a few more Democrats to the US Senate, the Filibuster rule will be rescinded and soon after Legislation, supported by the courts will render millions of Americans instant felons. It is going to be interesting whether or not we fight, or fail and whether or not LEO and NG will do their bidding.
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by benchman
According to the Constitution, Biden does not have the authority. .
True - but since when did these a-holes abide by the Constitution??



Exactly.

Any my reading of his words is basically any semi auto with a detachable mag because he says “anything that can”.

Gonna get sporty…
Been listening to the gun control paranoia since RFK was assassinated in 1968, fast forward to 2021 we still have our guns in spite of all the gun control proponents myriad efforts.
Originally Posted by gunswizard
Been listening to the gun control paranoia since RFK was assassinated in 1968, fast forward to 2021 we still have our guns in spite of all the gun control proponents myriad efforts.


Not altogether true; we don’t have the same freedoms in that arena that we did back then.

Furthermore there are many areas of the country where the right to bear arms has been very much infringed upon.

We’re frogs in a heating pot and as fewer people use firearms for themselves the rationale for the 2nd amendment fades in the minds of the electorate.
Originally Posted by gunswizard
Been listening to the gun control paranoia since RFK was assassinated in 1968, fast forward to 2021 we still have our guns in spite of all the gun control proponents myriad efforts.

Well, in the past, much of the call for Gun Control on the Federal Level was just campaign fodder on both sides.

Actually passing legislation, would have removed a key arrow from their campaign quiver.

Today is a different story. Now that they have complete control over elections, “ they” no longer need to rally support, kiss babies and make promises they have no intention of keeping. The ballot box is dead.

So now the call for Gun Control is real, it is no longer campaign fodder claiming it’s needed for a “safer” America and “for the children”. Our right to keep and bear arms is the only obstacle left to further “their “ communist agenda.

They have complete control of elections, our justice system, our judicial system and of course the media, all that’s left is to control The People, all the people and they can’t accomplish that as long as we are armed.
Friends, you need to listen to the actual speech, check context and draw your own conclusions. The OP links to Guns America Digest. I am guessing their "bread and butter" are high level of gun sales and related equipment? Remember, there are tons of extra money to be made when people rush in to buy guns and ammo.
Originally Posted by Slavek
Friends, you need to listen to the actual speech, check context and draw your own conclusions. The OP links to Guns America Digest. I am guessing their "bread and butter" are high level of gun sales and related equipment? Remember, there are tons of extra money to be made when people rush in to buy guns and ammo.


The broader context is he, like you, either ignores or is ignorant of the purpose & meaning of the second amendment.

Just because the publisher of the article has a vested interest in the content doesn’t mean it’s false.
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by benchman
According to the Constitution, Biden does not have the authority. .
True - but since when did these a-holes abide by the Constitution??



Mark my words, the day will come when they will 'ratify' and modify, if no re-write a new version of the constitution.

It usually happens as socialism takes over...
Originally Posted by ingwe
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by benchman
According to the Constitution, Biden does not have the authority. .
True - but since when did these a-holes abide by the Constitution??



Mark my words, the day will come when they will 'ratify' and modify, if no re-write a new version of the constitution.

It usually happens as socialism takes over...


Naw, they will just burn it.

Kinda like back in the day when a homeowner would through a party and burn their home mortgage after it was paid off.
And of course our military, law enforcement agencies, and their security details will follow suite.
Originally Posted by Slavek
Friends, you need to listen to the actual speech, check context and draw your own conclusions. The OP links to Guns America Digest. I am guessing their "bread and butter" are high level of gun sales and related equipment? Remember, there are tons of extra money to be made when people rush in to buy guns and ammo.


We’re not your friends you commie fugk.
© 24hourcampfire