Home
Posted By: Rock Chuck Abortion - 06/22/22
Biden has said that if the SC tosses Roe-Wade, he'll protect women's rights via EO. That's clearly illegal. If he tried it, is it possible that the SC could shut down the president's illegal use of EO's? That could nullify a bunch of laws made by presidents for decades.
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Biden and Co. obviously don't care about what is lawful or constitutional.

When it comes down to a showdown of that, all you need to do is look at what branch of govt controls the enforcement of anything federal.

The Supreme Court may issue a ruling... But who will enforce it? whistle
Posted By: STRSWilson Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
The use of EO's is out of hand and clearly exceeds the Executive Branch's Constitutional authority. Time to shut down this nonsense.
Posted By: Riverc Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Joe Biden wants to be a Dictator everything he doesn't like he tries to find a EO he can use to stop it.
Posted By: Wannabebwana Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Simply setting a trap for the next Republican President. Kick the abortion can down the road, get votes for the mid-terms and set this time-bomb for someone else to deal with.
Posted By: Tarbe Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
The country whose Constitution I swore an oath to defend 46 years ago no longer exists.

We have become something unrecognizable to the founders, I am certain.
Posted By: Rock Chuck Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
FDR was the king of EO's, issuing over 3000. Of course it was war time and some issues had to be dealt with immediately. Congress has never done anything immediately.
The original intended purpose of EO's was to help implement laws passed by congress. The weren't laws themselves but orders to help put congress's laws into affect. It didn't take long for presidents to step outside of that intent and to use EO's to pass laws themselves in spite of what the constitution says. The SC should have shut down that practice immediately 200 years ago. They failed to do so and now we have a long series of illegal laws.
Posted By: 45_100 Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Sleepy jo is not doing anything on his own. This is all orchestrated by the WEF/NWO people and carried out through George Soros and his soldiers, Valerie Jarret, Susan Rice and the magic knee grow. There are probably others I have left out. But yes they do what they want regardless of the Constitution and then challenge anyone to oppose it. The Supreme Court will not rule on anything unless it is brought before them which is a drawn out process and very expensive. Then the SC decides whether or not they want to decide the case. So even if an executive order is eventually determined unconstitutional, it remains in effect for several months minimum before it is overturned. Normally the SC decision is so narrow it creates more questions than it answers.
Posted By: Middlefork_Miner Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Biden has said that if the SC tosses Roe-Wade, he'll protect women's rights via EO. That's clearly illegal. If he tried it, is it possible that the SC could shut down the president's illegal use of EO's? That could nullify a bunch of laws made by presidents for decades.


Why is it that when the abortion issue comes up, the owner of the other half on the DNA that created that child, is not consulted? When a woman willingly has sex, doesn’t she know what the possible result may be? There’s a schittload of ways to prevent pregnancies and unless there was a good faith effort put forth at trying to prevent it in the first place, why should she now have the option to snuff out that life?
Posted By: Rock Chuck Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Biden has said that if the SC tosses Roe-Wade, he'll protect women's rights via EO. That's clearly illegal. If he tried it, is it possible that the SC could shut down the president's illegal use of EO's? That could nullify a bunch of laws made by presidents for decades.


Why is it that when the abortion issue comes up, the owner of the other half on the DNA that created that child, is not consulted? When a woman willingly has sex, doesn’t she know what the possible result may be? There’s a schittload of ways to prevent pregnancies and unless there was a good faith effort put forth at trying to prevent it in the first place, why should she now have the option to snuff out that life?
My opinion: something like 70% of the abortions in the US are on black women. Black men screw 'em and leave 'em. They don't acknowledge that the kids are theirs leaving the women to make all decisions.
Posted By: rainshot Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
During the VP debate with Sarah Palen long ago Biden quipped "the constitution is what I say it is" or something to that effect. They don't care about the Constitution. None of them do. Republicans are in on it too. It's only about who gets to distribute the money they steal from the public.
Posted By: Papag Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
I have arrived at the conclusion that Brandon hasn't a clue what he wants. He parrots or reads what he is told to read. When he goes off script is when TSHF an his handlers have to cover his stinking piles. Susan Rice, Zero's left hand muzzie and others are driving this travesty. We are in deep schitt.
Posted By: Teal Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by Papag
I have arrived at the conclusion that Brandon hasn't a clue what he wants. He parrots or reads what he is told to read. When he goes off script is when TSHF an his handlers have to cover his stinking piles. Susan Rice, Zero's left hand muzzie and others are driving this travesty. We are in deep schitt.

He's just spent time talking about those unpatriotic oil refiners/gas companies and how they're gouging the American consumer and now is talking about removing the gas tax (18 cpg) - which would increase demand as people drive more - giving more revenue and gouging profits (sic) to those same unpatriotic refiners/gas companies.

The man is an idiot but also evil.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Biden has said that if the SC tosses Roe-Wade, he'll protect women's rights via EO. That's clearly illegal. If he tried it, is it possible that the SC could shut down the president's illegal use of EO's? That could nullify a bunch of laws made by presidents for decades.


Why is it that when the abortion issue comes up, the owner of the other half on the DNA that created that child, is not consulted? When a woman willingly has sex, doesn’t she know what the possible result may be? There’s a schittload of ways to prevent pregnancies and unless there was a good faith effort put forth at trying to prevent it in the first place, why should she now have the option to snuff out that life?
My opinion: something like 70% of the abortions in the US are on black women. Black men screw 'em and leave 'em. They don't acknowledge that the kids are theirs leaving the women to make all decisions.

All heathen women try to make the decisions and reject Gods plan.

LBJs welfare plan just helped the women be able to afford to kick their husbands out.

Now lowyers get paid to do the same.

It's called Womens Liberation but is really designed to destroy our nation.

Now the satanic minions are trying to push CRT, homosexuality and gender manipulation, all for the same reason.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Posted By: Rock Chuck Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by Papag
I have arrived at the conclusion that Brandon hasn't a clue what he wants. He parrots or reads what he is told to read. When he goes off script is when TSHF an his handlers have to cover his stinking piles. Susan Rice, Zero's left hand muzzie and others are driving this travesty. We are in deep schitt.
It's only a matter of time before Harris is in there. I think she'll ignore her handlers and try to run it herself. Then we're in REAL trouble.
Posted By: Teal Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by Papag
I have arrived at the conclusion that Brandon hasn't a clue what he wants. He parrots or reads what he is told to read. When he goes off script is when TSHF an his handlers have to cover his stinking piles. Susan Rice, Zero's left hand muzzie and others are driving this travesty. We are in deep schitt.
It's only a matter of time before Harris is in there. I think she'll ignore her handlers and try to run it herself. Then we're in REAL trouble.

Except I don't biden gets anything done without the handlers either - putting pressure on the rest. Harris goes off script - she can't get a thing done either. Probably the only person more toxic to the Dems and Congresscritters right now than Joe. So if he's gone and replaced by Harris - it can't get worse - she doesn't have the machine to make it worse. In fact - her toxicity might make it better because they'd simply do nothing which is better than the "something" they're doing with Joe.
Posted By: Garandimal Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by Middlefork_Miner
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Biden has said that if the SC tosses Roe-Wade, he'll protect women's rights via EO. That's clearly illegal. If he tried it, is it possible that the SC could shut down the president's illegal use of EO's? That could nullify a bunch of laws made by presidents for decades.


Why is it that when the abortion issue comes up, the owner of the other half on the DNA that created that child, is not consulted? When a woman willingly has sex, doesn’t she know what the possible result may be? There’s a schittload of ways to prevent pregnancies and unless there was a good faith effort put forth at trying to prevent it in the first place, why should she now have the option to snuff out that life?
My opinion: something like 70% of the abortions in the US are on black women. Black men screw 'em and leave 'em. They don't acknowledge that the kids are theirs leaving the women to make all decisions.

All heathen women try to make the decisions and reject Gods plan.

LBJs welfare plan just helped the women be able to afford to kick their husbands out.

Now lowyers get paid to do the same.

It's called Womens Liberation but is really designed to destroy our nation.

Now the satanic minions are trying to push CRT, homosexuality and gender manipulation, all for the same reason.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Pronouns: He/She/It.

Same as they've always been.




GR
Posted By: 7mm_Loco Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
This issue being pushed at this time by the "Right"... Will hurt the big "Red Wave" in November... Just as the Deep State planned it...
Posted By: rainshot Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Various court slap downs on emigration enforcement have been ignored by the administration. Why would it be any different with abortion?
It’s like Andrew Jackson stated. “You have made your law, now enforce it”
Nobody has done anything. No bench warrants fog arresting administration officials. Nothing.
Posted By: RIO7 Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
The right needs to forget the social issues, and STFU, till they have the right people in place, to achieve real changes, all this pissin and moan'in ain't going to change a damn thing. Rio7
Posted By: WAM Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Planned Parenthood was allegedly founded to keep the groid numbers in check. Not a bad idea, just a shameful way to go about it.
Posted By: jdm953 Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Originally Posted by STRSWilson
The use of EO's is out of hand and clearly exceeds the Executive Branch's Constitutional authority. Time to shut down this nonsense.
https://ballotpedia.org/Joe_Biden%27s_executive_orders_and_actions
Posted By: JeffA Re: Abortion - 06/22/22
Sometimes I gotta wonder how much you guys paid attention in history class.

Today's use of executive orders is no where near what it once was in this country.

Theodore Roosevelt hit it hard starting back in 1901 and the use of EOs didn't really ramp back down much until John F. Kennedy took office in 1961.
Posted By: Tarbe Re: Abortion - 06/23/22
Originally Posted by JeffA
Sometimes I gotta wonder how much you guys paid attention in history class.

Today's use of executive orders is no where near what it once was in this country.

Theodore Roosevelt hit it hard starting back in 1901 and the use of EOs didn't really ramp back down much until John F. Kennedy took office in 1961.

Personally, I am much less concerned with how many, than with what they do.
Posted By: Burleyboy Re: Abortion - 06/23/22
Someone needs to tell Biden that if he would have curtailed abortion 10 years ago he'd have more 10 year Olds around now to sniff and growp.

Bb
© 24hourcampfire