Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Even when it comes down to national security? I despise government overreach as much as anyone but this to me is just common f u c k i n g sense.
You don't unlock the back door to your house when a serial killer is on the porch do you?
I don't care how much money I was offered, I'd tell them to get f u c k e d.
How, exactly, do you know who the actual buyer is when his lawyer hands you the check?
Yes, in a free country, he who has the money can buy whatever he wants, where ever he wants. Socialists would have it otherwise. Many Conservatives become otherwise when it's their ox getting gored.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
You do have that right, but I don't agree with selling to the fugging Chinese who are our enemy or to a ass like Bill Gates.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Even when it comes down to national security? I despise government overreach as much as anyone but this to me is just common f u c k i n g sense.
You don't unlock the back door to your house when a serial killer is on the porch do you?
So let's just crap on the constitution again? What about individual rights? What are they going to do? Pack it up and take it back to China? What is the national security risk? They can't put a military base or intelligence base there. When it comes to intelligence they can do that from home or rent some place.
We all know that China (and commie, Bill Gates) continue to purchase farm land and real estate in the US.
China now owns land near the Grand Forks, ND AFB. That is a tad unnerving.
How is this not raising more eyebrows than it is and why are Americans selling to them?
I don't care how much money I was offered, I'd tell them to get f u c k e d.
Well I guess you don't know why Joe took Hunter with him to China back in his VP days. The billion and a half the CCP handed over to Rosemont Seneca for "management" was specifically to be used for the acquisition of companies and land for the CCP. What is not widely known is that the CCP has handed another 5 billion dollars to Rosemont Seneca for land and other purposes.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Even when it comes down to national security? I despise government overreach as much as anyone but this to me is just common f u c k i n g sense.
You don't unlock the back door to your house when a serial killer is on the porch do you?
So let's just crap on the constitution again? What about individual rights? What are they going to do? Pack it up and take it back to China? What is the national security risk? They can't put a military base or intelligence base there. When it comes to intelligence they can do that from home or rent some place.
Showcasing the low IQ levels of many from Minnesota?
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
You do have that right, but I don't agree with selling to the fugging Chinese who are our enemy or to a ass like Bill Gates.
Good, don't. But don't go crapping on the constitution.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Even when it comes down to national security? I despise government overreach as much as anyone but this to me is just common f u c k i n g sense.
You don't unlock the back door to your house when a serial killer is on the porch do you?
So let's just crap on the constitution again? What about individual rights? What are they going to do? Pack it up and take it back to China? What is the national security risk? They can't put a military base or intelligence base there. When it comes to intelligence they can do that from home or rent some place.
Showcasing the low IQ levels of many from Minnesota?
Showing the lack of knowledge of the constitution in Texas
What is wrong, is not that foreign entities can purchase real estate in the USA. What is wrong, is that so many countries forbid purchase of their land to say folks from the USA…
Then there is China, which forbids private land ownership entirely… Foreign or domestic… I’d think that NK would be similar, maybe Vietnam and Cuba as well?
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
I hate to see it myself. Remember Japan buying urban real estate?
Somehow though, nobody has complained about all the property Aisa has gobbled up along I-85. And in Kentucky. Many brag about It. Makes them proud.
I don't care how much money I was offered, I'd tell them to get f u c k e d.
How, exactly, do you know who the actual buyer is when his lawyer hands you the check?
Well, the guys pictured in this article, sure as hell don't look like Walt Anderson's son's from down the road, looking to expand the family farm by 300 acres...
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Everybody around here loves to throw out the word patriot. Let's think about how the REAL patriots thought about the right to property.
Property: The Foundation of All Rights
It is no accident that a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to justice for all protects property rights. Property is the foundation of every right we have, including the right to be free. Every right claim, after all, is a claim to some thing — either a defensive claim to keep what one is holding or an offensive claim to something someone else is holding. John Locke, the philosophical father of the American Revolution and the inspiration for Thomas Jefferson when he drafted the Declaration of Independence, stated the issue simply: “Lives, Liberties, and Estates, which I call by the general Name, Property.” And James Madison, the principal author of the Constitution, echoed those thoughts when he wrote, “as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.”
Much moral and legal confusion would be avoided if we understood that all of our rights — all of the things to which we are “entitled” — can be reduced to property. That would enable us to separate genuine rights — things to which we hold title — from specious “rights” — things to which other people hold title, which we may want for ourselves. It was the genius of the old common law, grounded in reason and custom, that it grasped that point. And the common law judges understood a pair of corollaries as well: property, broadly conceived, separates one individual from another; and individuals are independent or free to the extent that they have sole or exclusive dominion over what they hold. Indeed, Americans go to work every day to acquire property just so they can be independent.
I don’t like to see “the Chinese” (however we identify that entity) buying up US farmland. On the other hand, I tend to associate laws restricting who may own property or run businesses with some of the third world schitholes I’ve seen (that also restrict such things as firearms ownership and where the police are known to set up what amount to “tollbooths” on public highways in the name of crime fighting.)
This situation also begs the question, “Why aren’t Americans buying these properties?”
I think this is an issue that requires some attention and publicity.
It would seem there would be no issue if the letter agencies actually hunted down and spied on the actual enemies instead of true Americans. There was a time when queers and commies hid under rocks . Kenneth
There is no legal avenue to sell your real estate to a dog, or a tree. The same should apply to chinks and communists.
I know you define Liberty as the ability to sell rope to the people who would hang you. I advocate saving you, and by extension your people and your country, from your own greed.
It is debatable, but my view is that it doesn't apply to communists either, regardless of where they were born.
You dumb fug. The constitution applys to the citizen that wants to sell THEIR property to whoever THEY want to. Damn you're slow
So can a private citizen use there 1/4 acre suburban lot as a nuclear waste site or pump chemicals at will into there section of a river? Obviously not. Banning foreign countries, especially one that is communist and as hostile to ours as what China is from owning our land should be a given. We should never have allowed Nixon to reopen trade with them either.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
The government doesn't allow certain things to be sold to hostile countries. Why should this be any different?
Sure, let them start nationalizing anything held by a citizen of another nation. It worked well for Cuba didn't it? 70 years later, Cuba is still the same schitthole it was in 1963.
Next they will seize our farmlands in the interest of national "Food Security". Then it will be the "mansions" of the wealthy, so they can give them to the "party elites". Eventually, it will be rental units and apartment buildings, all in the name of "rent equalization. Finally they will be seizing all of our "over funded" 401K accounts. to be redistributed among those who either worked and failed to save, or never worked at all.
Any American should have the right to sell to the highest bidder.
It is much like the 1'st amendment. Since the mid 50s, the commies have used their right of free speech to destroy what America was.
Had we abrogated Freedom of Speech, America would have been destroyed even faster.
I suppose if Chinese ownership of American property becomes a real concern, we can just round up every slanted eyed individual in the nation and toss them in a concentration camp, then seize all of their assets.
I wish it were against the law for NYC, LI, NJ and Mass. residents to buy property in rural upstate NY. Fuuck the Chinks. They're almost as communist as those NYC ass holes.
Anytime I start feeling warm and fuzzy and maybe Americans are waking up, all I need to do is log in here and read threads like this.
America first! (Unless an enemy national wants to buy up my land, then it’s America last, gold first).
Sad but true.
When you consider that this site has a more conservative and patriotic following then most of society and yet is still full of people that think selling American ag land and businesses to the Chinese communist government is a good idea. Or flooding our borders with brown people in a race to see how quickly we can make our culture a minority and leave our children and grandchildren as racial minorities for slave wages so that we can get cheap labor today. Americans are mostly clueless.
The same people that claim to be fiercely 2A are unable to connect the dots that it’s mostly the blacks and then the browns in Congress as a percentage of the population that want to take those rights away. For every Karen gun grabber, Caucasians especially the dreaded white Christian males are still by the far the most pro gun/gun culture and US Constitution people in our society. Or that for all of these super hardworking Christian browns that we hear about (as though that should be a reason to displace our own national identity and culture). Browns trail only backs in this country for prison rates, welfare benefits, street gangs, and children out of wedlock.
(as though that should be a reason to displace our own national identity and culture).
So, does that mean we need to all haul our asses back to Britain, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Italy, or wherever our ancestors might have hailed from? So we don't pollute the culture, heritage, or identity of the indigenous peoples who were here before us.
From California to Texas was part of Mexico, and full of Mexicans before people with less Native American ancestry started moving in to pollute their identity and culture.
Cultural identities come and go. It has been that way since Moses. Since ancient Persia. Since Babylon. Since the Hebrews went to Egypt. Since the Roman Legions. Since the Crusades. And since European Kings began expanding their empires into the Western Hemisphere and into Africa.
Racial profiles of the effected regions change just as rapidly. What are you gonna do? Stop the world and get off?
(as though that should be a reason to displace our own national identity and culture).
So, does that mean we need to all haul our asses back to Britain, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Italy, or wherever our ancestors might have hailed from? So we don't pollute the culture, heritage, or identity of the indigenous peoples who were here before us.
From California to Texas was part of Mexico, and full of Mexicans before people with less Native American ancestry started moving in to pollute their identity and culture.
Cultural identities come and go. It has been that way since Moses. Since ancient Persia. Since Babylon. Since the Hebrews went to Egypt. Since the Roman Legions. Since the Crusades. And since European Kings began expanding their empires into the Western Hemisphere and into Africa.
Racial profiles of the effected regions change just as rapidly. What are you gonna do? Stop the world and get off?
They do but typically not voluntarily and it isn’t a win for the current society. It’s only Caucasians going wholesale giving up our nations to Muslims and browns. It isn’t happening in Asia, Africa, or South America. The native Americans and Mexicans were not dumb enough to just give away their nations. They lost and it didn’t work out well for them. Especially not for the Native Americans.
Our forefathers ran them out at gun point. It wasn’t right but it’s history and did not end well for them. Our dumb asses are voluntarily just handing it back over to browns and blacks here and blacks and Muslims throughout Europe. Name a culture that thrives through losing its culture and identity? European culture advanced and shaped the modern world that we live in. Giving it away throughout the Caucasian world so that our grandkids can be racial and cultural minorities is beyond stupid.
When you no longer have any gun rights and live in a third world crap whole. Look in the mirror because you were all on board with becoming a minority in your own country to people that have different values.
It isn’t Caucasians voting AOC, Corey Booker, or Maxine Waters into office. Plenty of stupid whites voted for Biden but even with the cheating if not for the minority votes in key major cities that you seem to be all for he wouldn’t be in office either. The worst of the worst nearly all got elected through minority votes.
(as though that should be a reason to displace our own national identity and culture).
So, does that mean we need to all haul our asses back to Britain, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Italy, or wherever our ancestors might have hailed from? So we don't pollute the culture, heritage, or identity of the indigenous peoples who were here before us.
From California to Texas was part of Mexico, and full of Mexicans before people with less Native American ancestry started moving in to pollute their identity and culture.
Cultural identities come and go. It has been that way since Moses. Since ancient Persia. Since Babylon. Since the Hebrews went to Egypt. Since the Roman Legions. Since the Crusades. And since European Kings began expanding their empires into the Western Hemisphere and into Africa.
Racial profiles of the effected regions change just as rapidly. What are you gonna do? Stop the world and get off?
Chinese are agents of the CCP, and required by law to answer to the party. If they renounce their affiliation and become U.S. citizens, then by all means, enjoy property ownership. That's not the scenario being objected to.
At the very least we should have reciprocal laws regarding things like foreign land ownership. If a country limits land or business ownership by Americans then we should do the exact same to their nationals.
At the very least we should have reciprocal laws regarding things like foreign land ownership. If a country limits land or business ownership by Americans then we should do the exact same to their nationals.
Because we have a free market. Do you really want the government to tell you WHO you can sell your property to? I'll sell my property to whoever I want to.
Even when it comes down to national security? I despise government overreach as much as anyone but this to me is just common f u c k i n g sense.
You don't unlock the back door to your house when a serial killer is on the porch do you?
So let's just crap on the constitution again? What about individual rights? What are they going to do? Pack it up and take it back to China? What is the national security risk? They can't put a military base or intelligence base there. When it comes to intelligence they can do that from home or rent some place.
Showcasing the low IQ levels of many from Minnesota?
Showing the lack of knowledge of the constitution in Texas
Sec. 23. RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. Every citizen shall have the right to keep and bear arms in the lawful defence† of himself or the State; but the Legislature shall have power, by law, to regulate the wearing of arms, with a view to prevent crime.
