Home
Posted By: AKA_Spook Presumption of Innocence ? - 10/08/22
With regard to the ATF and their position on pistol stabilizing braces .....

They also function perfectly fine on a rifle , how can they assume just because someone purchased one , that it is affixed to a pistol, that they once declared was legal, and not a rifle, on which its perfectly legal?

Isnt this an assumption of guilt which violates both the 5th and 14th Amendments having to do with Due Process?

I am not a Constitutional Scholar but I frequent Holiday Inn Express'.
Just another step in the direction of calling your deer rifle a sniper rifle. Abolish the BATFE now!
PJ
© 24hourcampfire