Home
The sad fact is, the politicians have the power to make all gun owners criminals. With all the corrupt election BS, guns are the only freedom fighters left. When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.
It seems like I’ve heard that before 😊
Nah... I started early. smile
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
The sad fact is, the politicians have the power to make all gun owners criminals. With all the corrupt election BS, guns are the only freedom fighters left. When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.
NO, THEY DON'T. The highest law of the land forbids the government any power to legislate the right to keep and bear arms. It's just that simple. It isn't about what the SCOTUS says, either. This is a republic, and rights, as defined by the Declaration of Independence, are Creator-endowed, certain, and unalienable (meaning you can't give them up).

But if you believe the horseshit you posted, you have no rights, no power, and no property, including yourself.
It is illegal to outlaw arms of any kind in the USA. We have accepted limitations, but they are not legal.
No, a lot of bad laws are passed. They should all come with a sunset clause.
Huntnshoot you are entirely correct...but being in the right doesn't keep you out of a jam. If you have the right of way riding a bike...and insist "I'm going to do it because I'm right" and get flattened by a dump truck, you are right...but dead. If a restrictive unconstitutional (they are all unconstitutional in the purest sense of interpretation) gun law is passed...and you come to their attention, they raid you, throw your ass in the can, bankrupt you with legal fees, yes...you are in the right, but you are in jail. The only way to fight 3 letter agencies is passive civil disobedience.
In 1989, good old Calif, Roberti Roos Assault weapons bill was signed by Republican governor Deukmajian, soon tens thousands of Calif citizens and NRA competitors were criminals...nobody showed up to register their weapons or surrender them as required. At the time I think the San Francisco Chronicle claimed it was the largest act of civil disobedience since the civil war. Passive civil disobedience was the key...waay more criminals than badged police and Calif DOJ realized, Hey we got the headline for banning assault weapons, let's just take it easy here in the Capitol until we can retire. Knocking on doors of mostly well trained marksmen would not have ended well...and the suits knew it.
Originally Posted by HuntnShoot
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
The sad fact is, the politicians have the power to make all gun owners criminals. With all the corrupt election BS, guns are the only freedom fighters left. When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns.
NO, THEY DON'T. The highest law of the land forbids the government any power to legislate the right to keep and bear arms. It's just that simple. It isn't about what the SCOTUS says, either. This is a republic, and rights, as defined by the Declaration of Independence, are Creator-endowed, certain, and unalienable (meaning you can't give them up).

But if you believe the horseshit you posted, you have no rights, no power, and no property, including yourself.
Rights to a free and fair election? Power to do as I please not as I'm told, like the mask and vaccine mandate? Property is only rented, stop paying illegal taxes and the government takes it. Guns are our only freedom and the politicians want them.
Once the Republic falls, then the Constitution is no longer the law of the land

That is the ultimate goal of the progressives

They progressively chip away to undermine the Republic until it collapses
Being an outlaw is a state of mind.

I follow the law and if they change the law AFTER the fact that does NOT change my status. If I’m legal at the time then I’m legal irregardless of future laws. I also ignore laws that are stupid and unconstitutional.
© 24hourcampfire