I hate to agree with you cuz Mopar is junk but.... Them old Barracudas with the big 429 Hemi sure put the power on the ground. Corvettes are timeless except for the late 70's models that had those big assed smog pumps. I say top of the line Vetts,no matter what year,gots plenty of muscle.
My first car was GTO Judge with the VOE option. Spent many a Friday and Saturday night making all windows rattle at the local Sonic. Sold it to buy a BOSS Mustang...
Oh the memories and the cars I wish I had kept... The Judge will always be on the top 10 list in my mind.
Picking the biggest most powerful engine is not my criteria. The looks of the car, with big performance, not necessarily the biggest, is what is important to me. These were the hottest and most memorable cars to me back in high school:
I ain't much into cars at all, but for some reason I like 442s. If I ever, it would be a 442. Instead my midlife crisis cost us 2 airboats....can do a lot more with the airboats anyway...
I have always been partial to the 1968-70 SS Chevelles... with the top end 396, or the LS 6 454 in the 70 Model year... especially love them, when someone has pulled the original engine and installed an LS 7 version of the 454...
but hate to see it when they came thru with a bench seat and an automatic on the steering column...
and then there is always the 67-69 Z 28s...
along with the 64 to 67 Vettes, with a big block...the penical being the 67 with the 427 Tri Power....got a thing for 3 two barrels for some reason...
as usual tho, Shrapnel shows why he is the Montana version of Chuck Norris as described by deFlave....
and Field Grades 57 Ford F100 is every bit as cool as many true muscle cars....
restored old trucks, especially in 4 x 4 guise are definitely 10 for 10 on the Cool Factor also...
although ANY muscle car is definitely COOOOOL!, I prefer the Chevys during those years....
Great car, especially the GNX, of which only 547 were made. My last Hagerty monthly report had the GNX version from '87 at $40-$81K value. ($37K was msrp) Pontiac put the same engine in the '89 TA 20-year anniversary pace car.
I just can't find much to argue with on that list. Maybe go 69-70 Boss 302 in place of the GT 500, but only because I like cars that can turn too. Adds variety to the list...
Looking through this thread, what comes to mind is that there are a lot more than 7 great muscle cars. I had a '65 GT Mustang (289 K-Code) and a plain '69 Fastback with a 351.
I really like the tri power GTOs and a 1970 Camaro Z28 LT1 350 was a bad azz small block but I liked the looks of 69 Z28 better. The 1970 AAR 340 six pack Cuda was also wicked small block.
One car that hasn't been metioned and just for the cool factor alone is a 1976 455 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am. It wasn't a go fast king but a T top in black with the gold firebird on the hood was very cool.
Of the one's I've owned , the 68 , 440 R/T Charger was the best as a daily driver ( once you gave the Carb a lot more air to breathe ) and would go head-to-head with the Hemi up to about 80 mph . I also liked the Style best . Had too much trouble with a 66 , 427 Vette . The 64 Tri-power GTO was slick until you tried to stop ( that could be improved with Ceramic-Metallic Linings that did'nt work so good in Cold weather ) and the same goes for a Ram-Air 350 GS Buick ...a real sleeper ! Hmmmm .... just remembered an 84 Camaro HO V8 that ties the Charger for Style IMO . It's nice to think of the good old days ! Nowadays , it looks like most of the Designers went to the same Schools .
Any Goat makes my list. Along with either one of Northern Dave's rebuild cars!!!!
You gotta love it every time shrapnel posts a picture of his. Maybe I can get a ride if I'm ever in his locale...
I feel fortunate that my first car was a GTO- a '65 tri-power convertible (it needed work, but I was eager). I also was fortunate that I scored a job for a short time with PMD at a very young age in their marketing/program group. I've had a bunch of Pontiacs in my life, including a couple of Judges. Hardly needs saying that I wish I still had some of those older muscle cars I took for granted way back when. I'm restoring a '69 GTO convertible now, and hope to add an SJ Grand Prix in the near future.
Some great choices, but I find it hard to believe that no one has mentioned my favorite.........66 and 67 Nova SS with the 350 horse 327 and a muncie 4 speed. My daily driver now is a fully restored '63 Nova Wagon with a transplanted 250 C.I. Inline under the hood, and a Powerglide trans. Blood red body with an off-white top.
Lots of great cars listed from a great era for cars.
To me, the best one is the one sitting in my garage. Not the fastest or biggest motor, but I've owned it since 1978. Hear guys always saying, "I used to have one of those", or "Wish I kept mine". Been thru divorces and lean times and always resisted the urge to sell. I don't take it out much and it's almost time for another do-over, but I'm glad I kept it. Wish I had kept my '64 Goat or 302 Maverick Grabber, LOL.
I don't know exactly when they started but in 1956 when I graduated college I bought the hottest thing I could find and it turned out to be the first in the state. It was a Plymouth Fury with a humping big hemi. They were actually chopped and channeled Furies and you could have any color you wanted as long as it was white with the full length embossed gold panel down each side. It had push button transmission and would run circles around my buddies new 56 Vette. In 1971 after a transfer I bought a fire breathing red hemi Barracuda that I really liked to drive to the races in Mid-Ohio. Marriage and family pulled me out of that into a 4 door Chevy Malibu. When I moved to Arizona I bought a 'western' muscle car - a 440 Magnum Dodge Charger. It would go straight up a mountain while idling. I always liked performance cars whatever they were called.
64 goat 67 firebird 400 My brother bought a 70 F150 ranger with a 390 some guy built up for local track racing... in 74 soon after chevy put the 454 in their trucks... saturday nights we would go to town and 'put them to shame on main'... LOL
We couldn't afford to keep tires on the truck, kept burning them off.
Some great choices, but I find it hard to believe that no one has mentioned my favorite.........66 and 67 Nova SS with the 350 horse 327 and a muncie 4 speed. My daily driver now is a fully restored '63 Nova Wagon with a transplanted 250 C.I. Inline under the hood, and a Powerglide trans. Blood red body with an off-white top.
While the old muscle cars were cool,for as much power as they made,they really weren't all that fast.
A late model V6 Toyota Camry or Honda Accord will be neck and neck with any of the old muscle in the 1/4 mile.
Yea, but the old irons are more funner. Crappy tires, brakes, steering, carburetors. No computers and a gaggle of hoses. A thumping Big Block or a screaming small block. Sitting at a light with the car shaking from the bumpy cam. Good Times!
The 66 and 67 Chevy IIs with the L-79 option. 327-350HP motor and 4 speed trans. Novas didn't appear til 68. I sold my L-79 several yrs ago. Went really fast, didn't stop very well and would not corner at all.
Kamo said 70 Torino GT, that's funny cause that was my first car. I sure miss it.
If I built one today I'd go with a stroked sbf, possibly as much as 460 cubes. A late model 5 or 6 spd trans, 4 link/coil over 9" rear. Upgraded front suspension, low stance, 17" wheels, big disk brakes front and back....
Kamo said 70 Torino GT, that's funny cause that was my first car. I sure miss it.
If I built one today I'd go with a stroked sbf, possibly as much as 460 cubes. A late model 5 or 6 spd trans, 4 link/coil over 9" rear. Upgraded front suspension, low stance, 17" wheels, big disk brakes front and back....
Paint it black.
One of my high school buddies bought a 1970 Ford Torino 429 SCJ (Super Cobra Jet), 4.11 gears, shaker hood scoop, factory double pumper Holley 4 Barrel, for $1400.00 and never realized WTF he had.
He drove for for a month thinking it was only a 3 speed. He never found 1st.
I tried to tell him how special what he had was ... but he never listened.
Oh it ain't that bad. I tell ya what, I sure like it at cruise speeds.
Buddy of mine tried to slingshot me on a cruise run last summer with a blown sbc 4.11's in a short box C-10. I saw him comin hard in my rear view mirror. I hammered it and sure enough he ran out of gears and RPMs and I left him back there, in the passing lane.... Fading further and further behind me until he was just all by himself in the wrong lane, all strung out and maxed out at not much more than 100 mph. Lol!
And it ain't terrible off the line, not embarrassingly so anyways.
WOW - thanks - some great cars noted and exclaimed on this thread. Always thought that the mid 60s GMs were the best overall - muscles and looks combined. Not many mentions here of this one - have had it since 1971 - it sure ate a lot of wannabees. Maybe still can.
My dad had a TVR Griffith. He sold it before I was old enough to drive and probably a good thing too. It looked like hell when he first bought the car and it garnered many a confused look, until he hit the gas. I have fond memories of driving with him through Montana when there was no day time speed limit. The acceleration was very impressive and for a little kid it was like a rocket ship. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmzgPzS47ss
WOW - thanks - some great cars noted and exclaimed on this thread. Always thought that the mid 60s GMs were the best overall - muscles and looks combined. Not many mentions here of this one - have had it since 1971 - it sure ate a lot of wannabees. Maybe still can.
Oh it ain't that bad. I tell ya what, I sure like it at cruise speeds.
Buddy of mine tried to slingshot me on a cruise run last summer with a blown sbc 4.11's in a short box C-10. I saw him comin hard in my rear view mirror. I hammered it and sure enough he ran out of gears and RPMs and I left him back there, in the passing lane.... Fading further and further behind me until he was just all by himself in the wrong lane, all strung out and maxed out at not much more than 100 mph. Lol!
And it ain't terrible off the line, not embarrassingly so anyways.
100 ain't schit.
Nail it at 85 + and leave whoever follows at 110 in the dust and then you're talkin'.
WOW - thanks - some great cars noted and exclaimed on this thread. Always thought that the mid 60s GMs were the best overall - muscles and looks combined. Not many mentions here of this one - have had it since 1971 - it sure ate a lot of wannabees. Maybe still can.
I doubt it, a Honda Accord or a Toyota Camry would beat it...
WOW - thanks - some great cars noted and exclaimed on this thread. Always thought that the mid 60s GMs were the best overall - muscles and looks combined. Not many mentions here of this one - have had it since 1971 - it sure ate a lot of wannabees. Maybe still can.
I doubt it, a Honda Accord or a Toyota Camry would beat it...
Interesting comment - too bad we can't try that at 440 yards.
I've had Benzs, Audis, Volvos, Jeeps, you-name-it, but my 87 Buick Grand National was the all time favorite.
I loved telling people that I drove a Buick. Most thought that was a boring choice. Few followed up to find out that in 1987, it was the fastest production car after a special edition Porsche. No joke, my kids were afraid to drive it.
Almost forgot to mention, the informal motto of the brand was "We brake for Corvettes."
I think current cars are much better, but not as nostalgic, at least until current youngsters get old. My current ride is faster than most 60/70 muscle cars. It is a 2013 Audi S6 with V8 twin turbo and all wheel drive. It has 420 hp, 406 lb-ft torque from 1500 rpm to around 5400 rpm. Car & Driver ran 0-60 in 3.7 seconds, 1/4 mile in low 12's and top speed claimed around 190 without the electronic limiting at 155. There are faster. I am looking at the Nissan GTR, 0-60 in 2.9 seconds... But 60s/70s muscle cars are cool, especially the Ford GT-40!
How can you rank them? They were all cool in their own way. Some had the look, some had the stance, some had the big cool engines, but they all had that special sound.
I was two years old in 1965 when my father pulled up in his brand new factory lightweight 1965 Coronet 426 hemi from Mr. Norm's Grand Spaulding Dodge in Chicago, Illinois.
I remember hiding under the picnic table when he trottled the factory-built race car. Without question the factory lightweight Dodge hemi was the hottest of all hot rods ever made by the big three. The car would be worth a fortune now...
WOW - thanks - some great cars noted and exclaimed on this thread. Always thought that the mid 60s GMs were the best overall - muscles and looks combined. Not many mentions here of this one - have had it since 1971 - it sure ate a lot of wannabees. Maybe still can.
I doubt it, a Honda Accord or a Toyota Camry would beat it...
2013 Accord is suppose to have it's best 1/4 mile time at 14.2, exactly what a stock 1965, 327, 300HP Chevelle I had would run through the lights with no mods outside of air cleaner removal.
yeah, that in a green or blue.... not Hugger Orange...
seeing that 61 Chevy in the background...the old man bought an Impala new in Jan 61, with a 409 with the 2 4 Barrels on it..
sold it in August 63 when he was transferred to England, figured it wouldn't be a good car to have in Europe with the narrow road and the price of fuel off base....
sold it and we ended up getting a 63 VW Squareback with right hand drive to replace it...
even as an 11 yr old, I was pretty disappointed....
it was nothing for that old 409 to get up to 90 mph back in those days, which was pretty fast and scarey on those narrow 2 lane US Routes there in Virginia...
not a muscle car, but that old 409 was pretty darn cool...
I hammered it and sure enough he ran out of gears and RPMs and I left him back there, in the passing lane.... Fading further and further behind me until he was just all by himself in the wrong lane, all strung out and maxed out at not much more than 100 mph. Lol!
WOW - thanks - some great cars noted and exclaimed on this thread. Always thought that the mid 60s GMs were the best overall - muscles and looks combined. Not many mentions here of this one - have had it since 1971 - it sure ate a lot of wannabees. Maybe still can.
As far as looks, it doesn't get much better, IMO. That is beautiful!
While the old muscle cars were cool,for as much power as they made,they really weren't all that fast.
A late model V6 Toyota Camry or Honda Accord will be neck and neck with any of the old muscle in the 1/4 mile.
I'm guessing you are well under 40 years old and have never ridden in one of those old slow muscle cars...
LOL..I was thinking the same thing! Too much Fast & Furious or whatever that show is called that made kids now days think they can put a big ugly can on their little rice burner and "go fast"
While the old muscle cars were cool,for as much power as they made,they really weren't all that fast.
A late model V6 Toyota Camry or Honda Accord will be neck and neck with any of the old muscle in the 1/4 mile.
A lot of those � mile times you see for a stock car was misleading, or at least did not represent the potential that the car had. The narrow hard rubber tires that came on these cars sucked at best.
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9� slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90�s. This was in the 60�s.
While the old muscle cars were cool,for as much power as they made,they really weren't all that fast.
A late model V6 Toyota Camry or Honda Accord will be neck and neck with any of the old muscle in the 1/4 mile.
A lot of those � mile times you see for a stock car was misleading, or at least did not represent the potential that the car had. The narrow hard rubber tires that came on these cars sucked at best.
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9” slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90’s. This was in the 60’s.
Do that in an almost stock Camry.
Good Point, click my link on the Ford Thunderbolt above and look at the ET's when it was introduced in 64 and look at the current times for a stock T-Bolt on modern slicks. Here is the quote...
"However, these modifications resulted in a car which, as tested with a four-speed transmission at Lions Drag Strip in November 1963, ran 11.61 seconds at 124.8 MPH (200.8 km/h). Best 1/4-mile pr.01.01.2011 for an authentic Thunderbolt on today's slicks are 9.23secs/243kmh
Ray Paquet set SS/A record of 8.55 @ 154 mph October 2013 NHRA Indy Nationals"
I've had Benzs, Audis, Volvos, Jeeps, you-name-it, but my 87 Buick Grand National was the all time favorite.
I loved telling people that I drove a Buick. Most thought that was a boring choice. Few followed up to find out that in 1987, it was the fastest production car after a special edition Porsche. No joke, my kids were afraid to drive it.
Almost forgot to mention, the informal motto of the brand was "We brake for Corvettes."
One of my great-uncles helped build the 1950s Buick Wildcat concept cars. Would have been an awesome car had Chevy not nixed it.
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9� slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90�s. This was in the 60�s.
Do that in an almost stock Camry.
If it's really a "stock" 427 Camaro set up , then it pretty much has to be either an L-88 or ZL-1 engine. Either of those had enough compression (12 or 12.5 to 1) to require leaded gas, either racing fuel or high octane avgas. They also had long duration cams with a lot of overlap which produced little idle vacuum and weren't much for low end torque. A 4.56 rear gear makes daily driving interesting as well. Never mind getting ticketed all the time for slicks on a roadway.
Using that to represent a "1969 muscle car" compared to a nearly stock anything, old or new, doesn't mean much.
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9” slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90’s. This was in the 60’s.
Do that in an almost stock Camry.
If it's really a "stock" 427 Camaro set up , then it pretty much has to be either an L-88 or ZL-1 engine. Either of those had enough compression (12 or 12.5 to 1) to require leaded gas, either racing fuel or high octane avgas. They also had long duration cams with a lot of overlap which produced little idle vacuum and weren't much for low end torque. A 4.56 rear gear makes daily driving interesting as well. Never mind getting ticketed all the time for slicks on a roadway.
Using that to represent a "1969 muscle car" compared to a nearly stock anything, old or new, doesn't mean much.
The point was that these cars had a lot more potential than a 14 sec quarter that was shown in the old magazines or documentaries.
The factory tires sucked, and was the main reason for the slow quarter mile times from the factory.
Let�s say you took one of the big block muscle cars and put street legal Mickey Thompson street slicks, and a 3:73 to 4:10 gear and you could easily run low 13�s or high 12�s and be very streetable.
This is just what we did when I was in my late teen�s.
a 427 Rated at 425 HP to satisfy the insurance industry and a few other complainers.... but rated the engine more along the lines of 600 plus HP....
In something that probably weighs in as much as ( or as little as) a Camry... that is a lot of HP!
there is a lot of fine cars made out there these days, that can rival a lot of the muscle car era....
but just like Harleys today, vs Japanese Motorcycles...
the sophisticated stuff of today, don't have the pure thunder put out by the American Iron of days gone by....
also heard this from a Regional Manager one night sharing a dinner table at a Restaurant....
of all of the Harleys that are picked up at the factory on a tourist delivery program, where Harley arranges to ship the bikes back to the buyers home country after they have toured the USA with them... over 50% of them were shipped back to Japan....
the rest of the world, still loves good old American "Thunder"....
I've had Benzs, Audis, Volvos, Jeeps, you-name-it, but my 87 Buick Grand National was the all time favorite.
I loved telling people that I drove a Buick. Most thought that was a boring choice. Few followed up to find out that in 1987, it was the fastest production car after a special edition Porsche. No joke, my kids were afraid to drive it.
Almost forgot to mention, the informal motto of the brand was "We brake for Corvettes."
One of my great-uncles helped build the 1950s Buick Wildcat concept cars. Would have been an awesome car had Chevy not nixed it.
Here's one you probably didn't see coming: '69 Buick Skylark Grand Sport.
That was the car that taught me the value of tires...
There use to be an old timer around here that had a '70 GSX he bought off the floor of the New York auto show. Those Stage-1 cars were torque monsters.
I was two years old in 1965 when my father pulled up in his brand new factory lightweight 1965 Coronet 426 hemi from Mr. Norm's Grand Spaulding Dodge in Chicago, Illinois.
I remember hiding under the picnic table when he trottled the factory-built race car. Without question the factory lightweight Dodge hemi was the hottest of all hot rods ever made by the big three. The car would be worth a fortune now...
In my somewhat misspent youth I had a chance to get a 66 (I think) satellite with the 426 hemi/4 speed for less than $2000, but didn't! Another should have/could have/didn't. Had a 70 Torino Cobra with the 429CJ, pretty nice car but a bit heavy. Also had a 71 Ranchero GT with the 429CJ and 3.25 gears. A bit slow to get moving but I had it up over 135 mph one sunny afternoon! Then I discovered street bikes!! Buddy has a 70 1/2 Z28 warmed over, that was a really nice car and handled well to boot. Quickest 1/4 miler I ever rode in was a 68 Nova with a 425hp/396 with a little work and 4.56s, that thing pulled hard in all 4 gears! If I had one to get now (aside from the vettes) I'd probably choose a 69 Camaro, either the ss/rs 396, or perhaps the z/28.
Had a '69 Barracuda "Cuda 340" that was fun to tool around in. Looked like this but with mags instead of these factory stock wheels.
What's funny looking at all of these old muscle cars is that my little 1970 Honda CB350 would beat all but the fastest of them from stoplight to stoplight. Power to weight, baby...
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9� slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90�s. This was in the 60�s.
Do that in an almost stock Camry.
If it's really a "stock" 427 Camaro set up , then it pretty much has to be either an L-88 or ZL-1 engine. Either of those had enough compression (12 or 12.5 to 1) to require leaded gas, either racing fuel or high octane avgas. They also had long duration cams with a lot of overlap which produced little idle vacuum and weren't much for low end torque. A 4.56 rear gear makes daily driving interesting as well. Never mind getting ticketed all the time for slicks on a roadway.
Using that to represent a "1969 muscle car" compared to a nearly stock anything, old or new, doesn't mean much.
FYI
Leaded gas isn't for high compression.....it is for the valve seats. It acts as somewhat of a "cushion" when the valve hits the head. Newer engines have hardened seats already installed, hence the use of unleaded gas. Older heads can be re-machined, such as in my 1967 Camaro; which also has 12.5:1 compression, in a 327, fuelie head engine.
How about the first "real" muscle car: 1957 Corvette 283 FI
1963 Impala Z-11 427 1965 Sting Ray 327/375 FI 1968 Camaro Z-28 302, factory Dual Quads & headers 1969 Baldwin Motion Phase III Camaro and Corvettes 1967 Sting Ray L-88 427 1970 LS-6 Chevelle 454 1966 Nova SS396
Hmmm......interesting. Almost ALL of you don't have adequate "seat time" to make a TRUE guess.
In no particular order...
1967 Nova with 327/350 hp 69 or 70 Road Runner with 440 Mag Six Pack (the hemis actually don't do as well in street trim) 1969 ZL1 Corvette 1970 Buick GSX 455 Stage 1 1965/6/7 Olds 442 with 400 1970 Olds 442 455 W31 option 1969/70 Dodge Dart GTS with 383 or 440 (440 is a BIT much on the street!!!) Make mine an automatic and 3.91 sure grip please
I know a Ford did not make my list. But, would swap a 63 1/2 Galaxy with Medium or Hi Riser 427 for the 69 ZL1 Vette without hesitation.
I have seat time in all but two that I mentioned (69 ZL1 or 63 1/2 Galaxy.
The Buick does not feel fast, until you are lined up with something that you have driven or have time slips from. A little work, some sticky tires and this is a LOW 13 second car or high 12 second car.
The little Nova flat gets with it. Nothing like listening to a high winding small block getting it done.
65/6/7 Olds 442 were always overlooked, because they look like Dad or Grandpa's car. I have a 65 Holiday Club Coupe with 442 option that was purchased with a hurt engine. Of coincidence, the 400 and 425 blocks of this vintage, share the same block. Mine will, technically be a 425 engine when finished (370 hp 400 ci factory rating).
70 Olds 442 W31 - Big Block with an aluminum intake that weighs the same as a SBC? What is not to like. Again, some tires in the rear...and GO!
Road Runner - again, don't really feel like they are always "getting it done", add some tires, proper gears..and they do rather well. Easy 425 hp with a set of headers & jet change...if not more.
Dart GTS - if you ever want a WILD ride....THESE are for you. The 383 is not slouch - add tires (and a drive shaft loop!!!). 440 Magnum in one of these....well...you REALLY can't grab the $100 bill off of the dash.
...What's funny looking at all of these old muscle cars is that my little 1970 Honda CB350 would beat all but the fastest of them from stoplight to stoplight...
Sorry but that just isn't true. Even though they were great bikes (I had one) they would cross the 1/4-mile finish line seconds behind the muscle cars. Not even close.
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9� slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90�s. This was in the 60�s.
Do that in an almost stock Camry.
If it's really a "stock" 427 Camaro set up , then it pretty much has to be either an L-88 or ZL-1 engine. Either of those had enough compression (12 or 12.5 to 1) to require leaded gas, either racing fuel or high octane avgas. They also had long duration cams with a lot of overlap which produced little idle vacuum and weren't much for low end torque. A 4.56 rear gear makes daily driving interesting as well. Never mind getting ticketed all the time for slicks on a roadway.
Using that to represent a "1969 muscle car" compared to a nearly stock anything, old or new, doesn't mean much.
FYI
Leaded gas isn't for high compression.....it is for the valve seats. It acts as somewhat of a "cushion" when the valve hits the head. Newer engines have hardened seats already installed, hence the use of unleaded gas. Older heads can be re-machined, such as in my 1967 Camaro; which also has 12.5:1 compression, in a 327, fuelie head engine.
How about the first "real" muscle car: 1957 Corvette 283 FI
1963 Impala Z-11 427 1965 Sting Ray 327/375 FI 1968 Camaro Z-28 302, factory Dual Quads & headers 1969 Baldwin Motion Phase III Camaro and Corvettes 1967 Sting Ray L-88 427 1970 LS-6 Chevelle 454 1966 Nova SS396
Yes, I am a Bowtie Man......
FYI, tetraethyl lead is in fact an excellent octane booster.
I have an old article at home that shows were someone took a stock 69 Camaro 427 added 9� slicks, headers, and a 4:56 rearend gear and ran 11:90�s. This was in the 60�s.
Do that in an almost stock Camry.
If it's really a "stock" 427 Camaro set up , then it pretty much has to be either an L-88 or ZL-1 engine. Either of those had enough compression (12 or 12.5 to 1) to require leaded gas, either racing fuel or high octane avgas. They also had long duration cams with a lot of overlap which produced little idle vacuum and weren't much for low end torque. A 4.56 rear gear makes daily driving interesting as well. Never mind getting ticketed all the time for slicks on a roadway.
Using that to represent a "1969 muscle car" compared to a nearly stock anything, old or new, doesn't mean much.
FYI
Leaded gas isn't for high compression.....it is for the valve seats. It acts as somewhat of a "cushion" when the valve hits the head. Newer engines have hardened seats already installed, hence the use of unleaded gas. Older heads can be re-machined, such as in my 1967 Camaro; which also has 12.5:1 compression, in a 327, fuelie head engine.
How about the first "real" muscle car: 1957 Corvette 283 FI
1963 Impala Z-11 427 1965 Sting Ray 327/375 FI 1968 Camaro Z-28 302, factory Dual Quads & headers 1969 Baldwin Motion Phase III Camaro and Corvettes 1967 Sting Ray L-88 427 1970 LS-6 Chevelle 454 1966 Nova SS396
Yes, I am a Bowtie Man......
Sackett,
I won't even begin to claim to be all that knowledgable about the unique and first muscle cars, but I found this one kind of cool. It's one of the first BB Chevys and they only made about 200 the first year. I'm rebuilding a clone of it w/a 396 and Muncie 4-speed.
right behind ya on that one... in green or blue.. white strips and black interior, 4 speed and buckets...
I hate to see those with bench seats and an automatic on the column....
Whats wrong with the bench seat and auto on the column? It allowed your girl to snuggle right up next to you and left your right arm free to curl it around her neck and dangle down around her . . .
A 2012 V6 Camry runs 0-60 in 5.8 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 14.1 at 100 mph.
Must suck to lose a 1/4 mile run to a stock 4 door family sedan...lol
You said neck and neck against any of the old muscle. You want to bet a bowl of rice on that? It must suck to be so inexperienced. You are under 40 aren't you.
It doesn't matter, let's see how my slow GTO looks against your Camry in about another 50 years and who will notice that jap POS.
Greatest American Muscle Car of all time; 1965 Mustang GT350 (although I prefer the '66). It's one of the only American muscle cars that will corner decently.
#2 is the Corvette, and I give my vote to the '63 split window. #3 is the '71 Cuda #4 is the current Ford GT40 #5 is The Goat #6 is the Shelby Cobra #7 is the Dodge Viper
FWIW . . . my first experience (and ride in the back seat) in a true American muscle car was my uncle's 1962 Chevy Biscayne 409. He was an engineer with Phillips 66 in New Mexico (refinery near Artesia) and my cousin and my older brother took us out for a ride in his 409. We were on one of those obscure, out in the middle of nowhere black top roads in SE NM and my cousin saw some crows on the road eating some road kill, about a half mile ahead. He hit the long black one on the right and I was thrown back in my seat as that 409 wound up and rocketed down that long straight away, trying to hit those crows. (They always fly away right at the last second, right?) I was hooked on muscle at the young age of 12.
...What's funny looking at all of these old muscle cars is that my little 1970 Honda CB350 would beat all but the fastest of them from stoplight to stoplight...
Sorry but that just isn't true. Even though they were great bikes (I had one) they would cross the 1/4-mile finish line seconds behind the muscle cars. Not even close.
That's why I said "stoplight to stoplight" and not "through the 1/4 mile". Yes, after about 200 yards the higher top end speed of the cars would let them start to pull away, but racing two blocks from a standing start to the next stoplight that little Honda could beat or stay neck and neck with most all the Roadrunners, Camaros and Mustangs I came across in S. Florida at that time.
A good driver with a good car who knew how to keep the tires from spinning and get his horsepower to the ground could beat it but a lot of them (most of them) would burn rubber and waste time while I pulled ahead. You also had to keep the motorcycle above 6000 RPM where the power band really took off, but if you knew how to get a good start that little 36 HP engine with 5 gears on a light frame would hold its own against 350 HP in a heavy car.
Just as a FWIW, I remember reading an article of the fastest three bikes of that time. The Kawaski 500 had the fastest 1/4 mile since it took off like a bullet. A Norton Commando 750 had the highest top end speed but slowest time through the 1/4 and a Honda 750 was right between them both - second fastest time and second highest top end. This is IIRC but having a Norton Commando at the time it was interesting to read. That Norton had an almost flat power curve, (again IIRC) it started at 42 ft/lbs at around 2000 rpm and went to 47 ft/lbs at top RPM which was only around 6500*.
The little Honda 350 was a pig under 6000 rpm. It would go, but when that tach needle hit the magic 6000 mark you could feel it almost pull out from under you as it came into its real power range.
*Wikipedia is not to be trusted. They list the 750 Commando's top speed as 115 mph. I know for a fact it will do 130 on a stretch of Florida Turnpike before its rider chickened out...
FWIW . . . my first experience (and ride in the back seat) in a true American muscle car was my uncle's 1962 Chevy Biscayne 409. He was an engineer with Phillips 66 in New Mexico (refinery near Artesia) and my cousin and my older brother took us out for a ride in his 409. We were on one of those obscure, out in the middle of nowhere black top roads in SE NM and my cousin saw some crows on the road eating some road kill, about a half mile ahead. He hit the long black one on the right and I was thrown back in my seat as that 409 wound up and rocketed down that long straight away, trying to hit those crows. (They always fly away right at the last second, right?) I was hooked on muscle at the young age of 12.
OO,
Man, that's cool. I still remember digging around in the attic of my dad's shop and finding a pair of chrome valve covers stamped 409 on them....back in the day my friend!
No wonder Chrysler started crying and got the 427 banned. By the way this is the pass mentioned in the Wikipedia article I posted. 9.23 for a stock T-Bolt on modern slicks.
I got it second hand and the previous owner had replaced the stock exhaust pipes with Dunstalls which greatly improved performance. I put the stock "reverse cone" pipes back on it (which were included in the deal) and you could feel performance drag, it wouldn't accelerate nearly as promptly. It really needed those Dunstalls.
Also, there were at least a couple of options for the rear chain sprocket back then and I'm not sure if he didn't replace the stock one with a smaller one, giving slightly slower acceleration but higher rear wheel RPM's at the top end engine RPM level, i.e. higher top speed. It wasn't a drag racer by any means but with that flat power curve would accelerate very smoothly through all four gears and get to going really fast before you realized it. Got stopped by a cop doing 70 in a 35 MPH zone and honestly didn't realize I had gotten up to that speed.
It was a 1970 model based on 1940's technology but it had Class with a capital C. It handled better than any bike I've ever ridden and cornered like it was on rails, had crappy electronics and an almost useless rear brake. With all that torque you had to adjust the chain tension about every three days, and the ride was accompanied by the smell of hot oil and gears and widgets and what-nots all thrashing around down there. For a 19 year old kid it was great!
Here's one you probably didn't see coming: '69 Buick Skylark Grand Sport.
That was the car that taught me the value of tires...
There use to be an old timer around here that had a '70 GSX he bought off the floor of the New York auto show. Those Stage-1 cars were torque monsters.
They were badass, pure and simple. Actually, checking back, mine was a '70 Gran Sport 455. Not so great in corners, but it would flat pin people to their seat backs for quite a distance if I so desired. Got more than a few speeding tickets in that one... and burned out more than a few tires. Young and dumb and all that...
FYI Leaded gas isn't for high compression.....it is for the valve seats. It acts as somewhat of a "cushion" when the valve hits the head.
Hits the head - really? I did know that lead additive does help avoid wear, but darn - I always thought that tetraethyl lead was an ignition control compound to deal with pre-ignition issues in higher compression situations - thought it raised the octane rating. Like - in Sunoco 260.
After the Honda CL-350 and a Kawasaki Bighorn 350 and a bunch of dirt bikes, I wanted a bigger, faster road bike. I test rode the Kawasaki 500 triple and it scared me when it suddenly came on the pipe and unexpectedly wheelied. Instead I got a used 1970 Honda 750-4, an awesome good bike.
For awhile, in my younger days, I had a lot of powerful cars (300+hp): 1957 Mercury Turnpike Cruiser (310 hp/368) 1959 Chrysler New Yorker convertible (350 hp/413) 1961 Cadillac convertible (304 hp/389) 1962 Impala ht (300 hp/327 3-speed) 1963 Pontiac Catalina/Ventura (303 hp/389 4-speed) 1964 Impala wagon (300 hp/327 4-speed) 1967 Riviera Gran Sport (what a car! 360 hp/430)) 1970 Pontiac Formula 400 (335 hp/389) 1972 Eldorado convertible (365 hp/500)
The B-body mopars of 68, 69, 70 (GTX, Sport satellite, Road runner, Coronet, Super bee, Charger) with 383 magnum and an auto trans, good street cars.
Plenty of 383 and 440 4 speed cars fell prey to the 383 magnum and an automatic.
It was a job beating that combo on a quarter mile of county road.
Armed with a 383M/727 auto trans B body, a dork with a pocket protector and a pair of birth control glasses could take lunch money from a gear head in the same car with a 440/4 speed.
maybe, but i am going to split the wheel well's and move the inner side out to the frame, will give me 3 more inches of room. its going to get blasted ad primed after Xmas. one of my new duck hunting buddy's owns a paint/body shop.
going to run caltrac bars and springs http://www.calvertracing.com/index.php i'll move the spring mounts inline with the frame or on the inside of the frame.
Brother in law in MN has one of those.... but the 426 in it was not straight from the factory with one...I think it was equipped with a 413 with 2 4V's on it....
Chev 427 came out in 1965...........there were some 409's left over that made their way into a few hundred 65's. A friend has a 65 Impala convertible with a 409 and four speed. Has every power option offered. Pretty rare car.
A special 427 cubic inches (7.00 L) version of the 409 engine was used in the 1963 Chevrolet Impala Sport Coupe ordered under Chevrolet Regular Production Option (RPO) Z11.[2] This was a special package created for drag racers, including aluminum engine and body parts and a cowl-induction air intake system, along with the 427 engine. The aluminum body parts were fabricated in Flint, MI at the facility now known as GM Flint Metal Center.[3] Unlike the later second generation 427, it was based on the W-series 409 engine, but with a longer 3.95 in (100 mm) stroke. A high-rise two piece aluminum intake manifold and dual Carter AFB carbs fed a 13.5:1 compression ratio to produce an under-rated 430 hp (320 kW) and 575 lb�ft (780 N�m). 50 RPO Z11 cars were produced at the Flint plant. GM Documents exist that show 50 Z11 engines were built at the GM Tonawanda engine plant for auto production, and 20 partial engines were made for replacement/over the counter use. No evidence from GM has been found that show 57 cars were built.
I've had Benzs, Audis, Volvos, Jeeps, you-name-it, but my 87 Buick Grand National was the all time favorite.
I loved telling people that I drove a Buick. Most thought that was a boring choice. Few followed up to find out that in 1987, it was the fastest production car after a special edition Porsche. No joke, my kids were afraid to drive it.
Almost forgot to mention, the informal motto of the brand was "We brake for Corvettes."
One of my great-uncles helped build the 1950s Buick Wildcat concept cars. Would have been an awesome car had Chevy not nixed it.
going to run caltrac bars and springs http://www.calvertracing.com/index.php i'll move the spring mounts inline with the frame or on the inside of the frame.
dart wheel well widened
Weld ya a 'anti roll device' off the rearend to Roger, helps contain a lot of power, bucking about on the street.
Z11 is still the W headed motor. Considered to be the Mark II big block. BUT, there were some Mark III big block heads that found their way on the 409 block, that was punched/stroked to 427 CI or bigger.
Remember....it was the 60's....if you were cheatin' (or bending the rules), you were not winning.
Originally Posted by lngrng
I stand corrected..........per Wikipedia:
A special 427 cubic inches (7.00 L) version of the 409 engine was used in the 1963 Chevrolet Impala Sport Coupe ordered under Chevrolet Regular Production Option (RPO) Z11.[2] This was a special package created for drag racers, including aluminum engine and body parts and a cowl-induction air intake system, along with the 427 engine. The aluminum body parts were fabricated in Flint, MI at the facility now known as GM Flint Metal Center.[3] Unlike the later second generation 427, it was based on the W-series 409 engine, but with a longer 3.95 in (100 mm) stroke. A high-rise two piece aluminum intake manifold and dual Carter AFB carbs fed a 13.5:1 compression ratio to produce an under-rated 430 hp (320 kW) and 575 lb�ft (780 N�m). 50 RPO Z11 cars were produced at the Flint plant. GM Documents exist that show 50 Z11 engines were built at the GM Tonawanda engine plant for auto production, and 20 partial engines were made for replacement/over the counter use. No evidence from GM has been found that show 57 cars were built.
going to run caltrac bars and springs http://www.calvertracing.com/index.php i'll move the spring mounts inline with the frame or on the inside of the frame.
dart wheel well widened
Weld ya a 'anti roll device' off the rearend to Roger, helps contain a lot of power, bucking about on the street.
Gunner
Ole Roger being a mopar guy, is likely a pinion snubber fan.
Of course that's what the caltracs are for too so... maybe not.
I had a 65 Impala SS with the higher HP option (375HP if I recall correctly). I drove it up 140+MPH twice. The front end started to lift off the ground and it was difficult keeping in two lanes. There were a few 1965 Chevelles the factory made with 396's. I recall 8, but it could be as much as a dozen. I heard That Dan Blocker (Bonanza) had one of these, I never heard where the others went. I drove my car Interstate 29 from Kansas City to SD when I was in the Marines (The interstate wasn't complete in MO at the time but it was in Iowa and SD). I passed a foreign sports car, I was doing over 120MPH at the time. He passed me shortly thereafter like I was sitting still. Some miles later, I see a lot of red lights in the distance. There were four Iowa HP cars and the foreign sports car at the side of the road (near Council Bluffs). I waved and smiled at the driver of the car that saved me a very expensive ticket.
going to run caltrac bars and springs http://www.calvertracing.com/index.php i'll move the spring mounts inline with the frame or on the inside of the frame.
dart wheel well widened
Weld ya a 'anti roll device' off the rearend to Roger, helps contain a lot of power, bucking about on the street.
Gunner
Ole Roger being a mopar guy, is likely a pinion snubber fan.
Of course that's what the caltracs are for too so... maybe not.
LOL, 10-4 on the snubbers, have squashed a few of those flat over the years .
The anti roll bar kits are sold by S&W racing and keep the rearend square with the body [frame/subframe] of the car, STX wants to run 1000 HP on pump gas, he gonna need an anti-twist em up device.
LOL, 10-4 on the snubbers, have squashed a few of those flat over the years .
The anti roll bar kits are sold by S&W racing and keep the rearend square with the body [frame/subframe] of the car, STX wants to run 1000 HP on pump gas, he gonna need an anti-twist em up device.
Gunner
He's going to need a lot more than that. I can't wait to see/hear that thing.
LOL, 10-4 on the snubbers, have squashed a few of those flat over the years .
The anti roll bar kits are sold by S&W racing and keep the rearend square with the body [frame/subframe] of the car, STX wants to run 1000 HP on pump gas, he gonna need an anti-twist em up device.
Gunner
He's going to need a lot more than that. I can't wait to see/hear that thing.
LMAO T, 1000 elelphant headed HP will twist up a factory car like a barber pole.
I had a 65 Impala SS with the higher HP option (375HP if I recall correctly). I drove it up 140+MPH twice. The front end started to lift off the ground and it was difficult keeping in two lanes. There were a few 1965 Chevelles the factory made with 396's. I recall 8, but it could be as much as a dozen. I heard That Dan Blocker (Bonanza) had one of these, I never heard where the others went. I drove my car Interstate 29 from Kansas City to SD when I was in the Marines (The interstate wasn't complete in MO at the time but it was in Iowa and SD). I passed a foreign sports car, I was doing over 120MPH at the time. He passed me shortly thereafter like I was sitting still. Some miles later, I see a lot of red lights in the distance. There were four Iowa HP cars and the foreign sports car at the side of the road (near Council Bluffs). I waved and smiled at the driver of the car that saved me a very expensive ticket.
Good story. I remember working in a gas station in Oklahoma City and was putting gas in a purple 1970 426 Hemi Road Runner and a Porche 911. Both drivers jawed back and forth a bit, and before you know it they had pulled out onto the four-lane street in front of the station and lined up for a drag race. I saw them take off but could not see who won. I could certainly see the smoke from the hemi and heard him clearly as he shifted through the gear, out of sight.
Last summer when I was headed back east, I stopped to get fuel in Des Moines IA, and in pulled this immaculate 1969 SS Impala with a 427 under the hood.... there was an old black guy driving it...
I went over and complimented him on it, and he told me he bought it brand new when he returned from Vietnam in 1969... and has been its only owner... and it was all original...
The 427 had a pair of 4 barrels on top, and headers installed....
I asked him if he ever got it out and stood on the gas pedal...
was funny how he answered as he had a very laid back personality... " oh I gets on it when da poleese ain't a lookin real close... and if ones does get after me... I gets it out here on I 80 and deys can't catch me... but I think most of the polesse around here really likes dis old gal as much as I do's..."
Dark Blue, mags all the way around, bucket sets ( black) center shift automatic.... this thing was PERFECT!
when he started it up, it had a wonderful low grumble to it as it idled....
This one belongs to my best friend, 427 aluminum block, Shelby Cobra SC, 600 horsepower, Las Vegas built, and Carroll Shelby signed car... thing is kinda nuts to drive:
This one belongs to my best friend, 427 aluminum block Shelby Cobra SC 600 horsepower Las Vegas built Carroll Shelby signed car... thing is kinda nuts to drive:
Brad your going to get Mopar and Chevy fans upset by bring up the baddest engine ever, Ford's mighty 427. Note my post at the top of page 15 with the Ford Thunderbolt...
ladder bars and coil overs on the back, on the front it still had the factory K member but modified to use a rack and pinion and allow the use of a millodon dragster pan.
I've known more than a few Plymouths that could (should) have had that on the hood (grille). (backwards to be read in rear view mirror) Two ways to look at it!