![[Linked Image]](http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/07/08/opinion/sunday/the-strip-slide-NWG0/the-strip-slide-NWG0-jumbo.png)
Maybe if the guy in the last picture would color within the lines of the law and start following the constitution, he wouldn't get "attacked" for what he does.
I assume that this guy is the same Obama that proudly displayed the parents of Bergdahl in the Rose Garden, and wanted everyone to know that he "owned" being the president that brought back this POW...??
When you publically display yourself like that, you have to "Own" the repercussions as well as the glory.
I assume that this guy is the same Obama that proudly displayed the parents of Bergdahl in the Rose Garden, and wanted everyone to know that he "owned" being the president that brought back this POW...??
When you publically display yourself like that, you have to "Own" the repercussions as well as the glory.
This trumps your bullshite cartoon.
![[Linked Image]](http://youngcons.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Screen-Shot-2014-06-03-at-10.32.40-AM.png)
![[Linked Image]](http://youngcons.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/12.jpg)
Pretty sure if you trade 5 high profile, "keyman" position terrorists for a deserter, you got taken, at the very least. Since NOBODY is that stupid, it must have been on purpose. Ya makes yer choices, ya drinks yer medicine. I doubt Obama loses any sleep over it.
Originally Posted by rte
This trumps your bullshite cartoon.
I hope somebody sends that picture to the White House every day.
Still trying to knock the fly's off your boy eh? To late he's a pile of chit 
People are innocent until proven guilty.
But we traded a deserter for 5 really bad guys, who are now laughing their asses off at the stupidity of our leader. And who are now planning to kidnap/attack Americans, and do all the things radical Islamists do...
I suspected O getting re-elected would make me angry from time to time. Right now, I am just very sad, and fearful for what's to come...
But we traded a deserter for 5 really bad guys, who are now laughing their asses off at the stupidity of our leader. And who are now planning to kidnap/attack Americans, and do all the things radical Islamists do...
I suspected O getting re-elected would make me angry from time to time. Right now, I am just very sad, and fearful for what's to come...
Actually, it doesn't trump anything. But it is a perfect piece of internet propaganda.
Review the picture, three components. A very sympathetic veteran, clearly disabled, an attractive woman, and a cute kid.
Now some text, which purports to be from the wife.
States a direct action cause and effect, which is unlikely, unless she is saying Bergdahl shot her husband. States Bergdahl is a traitor, which the wife, IF she said this, would have no way of knowing, (other than the unimpeachable internet).
She is purporting to blame Bergdahl, but not Osama Bin Laden, not Mullah Omar, not George Bush, Not Dick Cheney, all of whom had more influence on her husband being in Afghanistan in 2009 than Bergdahl.
There are 3 generations in this country raised on television. They are easy pickings for the internet.
You will be told what to think, and what to believe, and you will be made to believe that your true enemy is right next door, right down the street, in the next county, or school district, or state.
Sycamore
Review the picture, three components. A very sympathetic veteran, clearly disabled, an attractive woman, and a cute kid.
Now some text, which purports to be from the wife.
States a direct action cause and effect, which is unlikely, unless she is saying Bergdahl shot her husband. States Bergdahl is a traitor, which the wife, IF she said this, would have no way of knowing, (other than the unimpeachable internet).
She is purporting to blame Bergdahl, but not Osama Bin Laden, not Mullah Omar, not George Bush, Not Dick Cheney, all of whom had more influence on her husband being in Afghanistan in 2009 than Bergdahl.
There are 3 generations in this country raised on television. They are easy pickings for the internet.
You will be told what to think, and what to believe, and you will be made to believe that your true enemy is right next door, right down the street, in the next county, or school district, or state.
Sycamore
Ah; so its a conspiracy against obama. I'll bet its cause he's black.
As an injun, do you feel like everyone's out to get ya?
As an injun, do you feel like everyone's out to get ya?
Originally Posted by Sycamore
You will be told what to think, and what to believe, and you will be made to believe that your true enemy is right next door, right down the street, in the next county, or school district, or state.
Sycamore
Sycamore
Or in the Whitehouse.
But nobody had to tell me to believe that. I see his deeds and records, and they speak louder than anything any talking head could ever say.
Originally Posted by benchman
Pretty sure if you trade 5 high profile, "keyman" position terrorists for a deserter, you got taken, at the very least. Since NOBODY is that stupid, it must have been on purpose. Ya makes yer choices, ya drinks yer medicine. I doubt Obama loses any sleep over it.
Benchman,
FIRST, I NEVER assume "nobody is that stupid".
smart people do dumb stuff all the time, dumb people even more often. These 5 guys WERE high profile, I bet they are not anymore. They've been out of circulation for 10 years. There is somebody in their job right now. Plus, whatever being in prison does to you for 10 years.
We never tried these guys for anything, chances are they were enemy combatants, not terrorists. They were in the Army of their country, or the government. We invaded their country, kicked their asses and took them prisoner. That makes them POW not terrorists. (I'm assuming, I don't know their particulars)
IF we are smart, CIA/DIA will track their movements, their coms, and learn even more about Taliban.
That war is winding down, prisoners were going to be exchanged.
Sycamore
Too many people assuming Obama:
1)Didn't understand the repercussions of the trade,
2)Didn't understand the carnage the exchanged prisoners are capable of,
3)Didn't mean to hurt the families of other enlisted soldiers,
4)Didn't understand he was breaking the law,
5)and a thousand other examples made up by apologists.
Barak Hussein Obama is a practicing radical Muslim. His intent was to free operatives vital to the radical Muslim cause. He intended to give a big boney finger to, and insult the families of, injured and dead U.S. servicemen and members of the United States Congress who do not share his zealot beliefs. He is an enemy of the United States Constitution, an enemy of the United States of America and my personal enemy. Barak Hussein Obama has taken away any and all veils of camouflage from his true and committed intent to support the radical Muslim cause in the U.S., in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya, in Egypt, in the West Bank, and wherever else it may arise.
1)Didn't understand the repercussions of the trade,
2)Didn't understand the carnage the exchanged prisoners are capable of,
3)Didn't mean to hurt the families of other enlisted soldiers,
4)Didn't understand he was breaking the law,
5)and a thousand other examples made up by apologists.
Barak Hussein Obama is a practicing radical Muslim. His intent was to free operatives vital to the radical Muslim cause. He intended to give a big boney finger to, and insult the families of, injured and dead U.S. servicemen and members of the United States Congress who do not share his zealot beliefs. He is an enemy of the United States Constitution, an enemy of the United States of America and my personal enemy. Barak Hussein Obama has taken away any and all veils of camouflage from his true and committed intent to support the radical Muslim cause in the U.S., in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya, in Egypt, in the West Bank, and wherever else it may arise.
They were Taliban. You don't think Taliban are terrorists?
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Still trying to knock the fly's off your boy eh? To late he's a pile of chit
I haven't said anything about him, except that he's an American.
I have said, bring him home, investigate him, if you find something, prosecute him, if he is guilty, punish him.
What part of that do you disagree with?
Sycamore
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
They were Taliban. You don't think Taliban are terrorists?
You might be able to correct me, but I thought Taliban was the government of Afghanistan before we invaded and put Karzai in power.
I don't know of Taliban fighting anywhere but Afghanistan, or NW Pakistan, maybe you have?
Al Quaeda are terrorists, and the govt of Mullah Omar gave bin laden sanctuary.
Sycamore
Sycamore, this is harsh and a shame to say but you're a fool. You have Muslims coming across your own state border because your Muslim POTUS and his collegues wish it so. And they're not coming here to love and cuddle us. They along with the hispanic insurgents are illegally changing the demographics of the United States and you sympathise with Husseins mode of operation.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
You might be able to correct me, but I thought Taliban was the government of Afghanistan before we invaded and put Karzai in power.
I don't know of Taliban fighting anywhere but Afghanistan, or NW Pakistan, maybe you have?
Al Quaeda are terrorists, and the govt of Mullah Omar gave bin laden sanctuary.
Sycamore
Quote
Terrorism against civilians
According to the United Nations, the Taliban were responsible for 76% of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2009, 75% in 2010 and 80% in 2011.[36][168]
According to Human Rights Watch, the Taliban's bombings and other attacks which have led to civilian casualties "sharply escalated in 2006" when "at least 669 Afghan civilians were killed in at least 350 armed attacks, most of which appear to have been intentionally launched at non-combatants."[169][170] By 2008, the Taliban had increased its use of suicide bombers and targeted unarmed civilian aid workers, such as Gayle Williams.[171]
The United Nations reported that the number of civilians killed by both the Taliban and pro-government forces in the war rose nearly 50% between 2007 and 2009.[172] The high number of civilians killed by the Taliban is blamed in part on their increasing use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), "for instance, 16 IEDs have been planted in girls' schools" by the Taliban.[172]
In 2009, Colonel Richard Kemp, formerly Commander of British forces in Afghanistan and the intelligence coordinator for the British government, drew parallels between the tactics and strategy of Hamas in Gaza to those of the Taliban. Kemp wrote:
Like Hamas in Gaza, the Taliban in southern Afghanistan are masters at shielding themselves behind the civilian population and then melting in among them for protection. Women and children are trained and equipped to fight, collect intelligence, and ferry arms and ammunition between battles. Female suicide bombers are increasingly common. The use of women to shield gunmen as they engage NATO forces is now so normal it is deemed barely worthy of comment. Schools and houses are routinely booby-trapped. Snipers shelter in houses deliberately filled with women and children.[173][174]
�Richard Kemp, Commander of British forces in Afghanistan
The Taliban has often targeted health officials that work to immunize children against polio due to fears of the vaccine, including the fear that it is used to gather intelligence about their organization.[175] Polio vaccines were banned in the North Waziristan region of Pakistan in June 2012[176] and in December 2012, Taliban assassins killed four female UN polio-workers in Pakistan because they were thought to be spies.[177] The Afghan government was forced to suspend vaccination efforts to eliminate polio from the Nuristan province in March 2013 because of a large Taliban influence in the province.[178] Taliban leaders changed their stance on polio vaccination in early May 2013, saying the vaccine is the only way to prevent polio and that they would work with immunization volunteers so long as polio workers are "unbiased" and "harmonized with the regional conditions, Islamic values and local cultural traditions."
According to the United Nations, the Taliban were responsible for 76% of civilian casualties in Afghanistan in 2009, 75% in 2010 and 80% in 2011.[36][168]
According to Human Rights Watch, the Taliban's bombings and other attacks which have led to civilian casualties "sharply escalated in 2006" when "at least 669 Afghan civilians were killed in at least 350 armed attacks, most of which appear to have been intentionally launched at non-combatants."[169][170] By 2008, the Taliban had increased its use of suicide bombers and targeted unarmed civilian aid workers, such as Gayle Williams.[171]
The United Nations reported that the number of civilians killed by both the Taliban and pro-government forces in the war rose nearly 50% between 2007 and 2009.[172] The high number of civilians killed by the Taliban is blamed in part on their increasing use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs), "for instance, 16 IEDs have been planted in girls' schools" by the Taliban.[172]
In 2009, Colonel Richard Kemp, formerly Commander of British forces in Afghanistan and the intelligence coordinator for the British government, drew parallels between the tactics and strategy of Hamas in Gaza to those of the Taliban. Kemp wrote:
Like Hamas in Gaza, the Taliban in southern Afghanistan are masters at shielding themselves behind the civilian population and then melting in among them for protection. Women and children are trained and equipped to fight, collect intelligence, and ferry arms and ammunition between battles. Female suicide bombers are increasingly common. The use of women to shield gunmen as they engage NATO forces is now so normal it is deemed barely worthy of comment. Schools and houses are routinely booby-trapped. Snipers shelter in houses deliberately filled with women and children.[173][174]
�Richard Kemp, Commander of British forces in Afghanistan
The Taliban has often targeted health officials that work to immunize children against polio due to fears of the vaccine, including the fear that it is used to gather intelligence about their organization.[175] Polio vaccines were banned in the North Waziristan region of Pakistan in June 2012[176] and in December 2012, Taliban assassins killed four female UN polio-workers in Pakistan because they were thought to be spies.[177] The Afghan government was forced to suspend vaccination efforts to eliminate polio from the Nuristan province in March 2013 because of a large Taliban influence in the province.[178] Taliban leaders changed their stance on polio vaccination in early May 2013, saying the vaccine is the only way to prevent polio and that they would work with immunization volunteers so long as polio workers are "unbiased" and "harmonized with the regional conditions, Islamic values and local cultural traditions."
http:/
Originally Posted by shootem
Sycamore, this is harsh and a shame to say but you're a fool. You have Muslims coming across your own state border because your Muslim POTUS and his collegues wish it so. And they're not coming here to love and cuddle us. They along with the hispanic insurgents are illegally changing the demographics of the United States and you sympathise with Husseins mode of operation.
Out of the park! Great post.
Originally Posted by shootem
Sycamore, this is harsh and a shame to say but you're a fool. You have Muslims coming across your own state border because your Muslim POTUS and his collegues wish it so. And they're not coming here to love and cuddle us. They along with the hispanic insurgents are illegally changing the demographics of the United States and you sympathise with Husseins mode of operation.
Shootem,
I doubt that he is a muslim.
He's probably in way over his head, and doesn't have a very talented group of advisers.
It's scarier to think he is a genius, bent on destroying the country from within, so that makes an easier sell, on the internet, on TV, and in the papers (for those who still read the papers)
He's no more my president than yours.
Muslims coming across the borders in my state are probably outnumbered by the muslims earning PhDs in your state universities.
The muslims coming across the border in my state probably want to start a liquor store in Phoenix.
Hispanics having been coming across the border here since before there was a border, in 1848. They founded Tucson in 1776, actually a double whammy , Hugo O'Connor, a Filthy Irishman and a Filthy Hispanic!
Lately, since World War II, they have been coming over with the full knowledge and support of the Arizona Republican Party in order to provide lower wages in agriculture, construction, gardening, and maid service.
You can look it up if you don't believe me.
I may be a fool, but not because of the points you raised.
Sycamore
"Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense." - Robert Frost
I wonder who he was speaking about...
I wonder who he was speaking about...
The stupid runs strong in this one.
Tucson was part of Mexico when Tucson was founded, so they weren't coming across the border - they were in Mexico. just like everything south of the Arkansas River was part of Mexico until the end if the Mexican American War and the signing of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty in 1848.
And now, illegal alien children from many countries are streaming across the border in the tens of thousands every month because their parents and their home countries expect Obama to unilaterally give amnesty to alien children.
And yes, you are a fool. You can look it up if you don't believe me.
Tucson was part of Mexico when Tucson was founded, so they weren't coming across the border - they were in Mexico. just like everything south of the Arkansas River was part of Mexico until the end if the Mexican American War and the signing of the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty in 1848.
And now, illegal alien children from many countries are streaming across the border in the tens of thousands every month because their parents and their home countries expect Obama to unilaterally give amnesty to alien children.
And yes, you are a fool. You can look it up if you don't believe me.
Actually, New Spain, Mexico didn't try to proclaim independence until 1810, and wasn't recognized as independent by Spain until 1836.
I don't know about your numbers, but there are definitely a lot of kids showing up now at the border. Obama is going to have to deal with, or ignore, the un-inteneded consequences of his policies.
like every president.
Sycamore
I don't know about your numbers, but there are definitely a lot of kids showing up now at the border. Obama is going to have to deal with, or ignore, the un-inteneded consequences of his policies.
like every president.
Sycamore
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Actually, it doesn't trump anything. But it is a perfect piece of internet propaganda.
Review the picture, three components. A very sympathetic veteran, clearly disabled, an attractive woman, and a cute kid.
Now some text, which purports to be from the wife.
States a direct action cause and effect, which is unlikely, unless she is saying Bergdahl shot her husband. States Bergdahl is a traitor, which the wife, IF she said this, would have no way of knowing, (other than the unimpeachable internet).
She is purporting to blame Bergdahl, but not Osama Bin Laden, not Mullah Omar, not George Bush, Not Dick Cheney, all of whom had more influence on her husband being in Afghanistan in 2009 than Bergdahl.
There are 3 generations in this country raised on television. They are easy pickings for the internet.
You will be told what to think, and what to believe, and you will be made to believe that your true enemy is right next door, right down the street, in the next county, or school district, or state.
Sycamore
Review the picture, three components. A very sympathetic veteran, clearly disabled, an attractive woman, and a cute kid.
Now some text, which purports to be from the wife.
States a direct action cause and effect, which is unlikely, unless she is saying Bergdahl shot her husband. States Bergdahl is a traitor, which the wife, IF she said this, would have no way of knowing, (other than the unimpeachable internet).
She is purporting to blame Bergdahl, but not Osama Bin Laden, not Mullah Omar, not George Bush, Not Dick Cheney, all of whom had more influence on her husband being in Afghanistan in 2009 than Bergdahl.
There are 3 generations in this country raised on television. They are easy pickings for the internet.
You will be told what to think, and what to believe, and you will be made to believe that your true enemy is right next door, right down the street, in the next county, or school district, or state.
Sycamore
You have a point even if I get my azz handed to me.
I never could figure out why a man would be a mercenary with a beautiful wife especially for peanuts. I can understand my friend doing it for hundreds of thousands but peanuts?
Is that really how you see our armed forces. With your background I'll admit I'm surprised you'd use such a broad brush.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by shootem
Sycamore, this is harsh and a shame to say but you're a fool. You have Muslims coming across your own state border because your Muslim POTUS and his collegues wish it so. And they're not coming here to love and cuddle us. They along with the hispanic insurgents are illegally changing the demographics of the United States and you sympathise with Husseins mode of operation.
Shootem,
I doubt that he is a muslim.
He's probably in way over his head, and doesn't have a very talented group of advisers.
It's scarier to think he is a genius, bent on destroying the country from within, so that makes an easier sell, on the internet, on TV, and in the papers (for those who still read the papers)
He's no more my president than yours.
Muslims coming across the borders in my state are probably outnumbered by the muslims earning PhDs in your state universities.
The muslims coming across the border in my state probably want to start a liquor store in Phoenix.
Hispanics having been coming across the border here since before there was a border, in 1848. They founded Tucson in 1776, actually a double whammy , Hugo O'Connor, a Filthy Irishman and a Filthy Hispanic!
Lately, since World War II, they have been coming over with the full knowledge and support of the Arizona Republican Party in order to provide lower wages in agriculture, construction, gardening, and maid service.
You can look it up if you don't believe me.
I may be a fool, but not because of the points you raised.
Sycamore
Yes, he is a Muslim.
Yes, he does have good advisors. Just not the advisors with the best interest of the United States in mind.
No, he is far from genius material but is content to contribute whatever he can toward the goals and objectives of the radical Muslim movement.
Well, if he isn't your president you hide the fact well.
Illegals and insurgents living freely in the United States belittle and insult the Constitution AND the Bill of Rights.
Yes, if the Muslims are coming across the Arizona border in order to open liquor stores in Phoenix, well I guess that's OK.
The couldn't POSSIBLY have smuggled themselves across a national border with evil intent in mind.
ANYONE, including hispanics, coming illegally across the U.S./Mexico border is a CRIMINAL. All else is irrelevant.
The Republicans, Democrats and Republicrats who support the illegal importation of pro-socialist agenda insurgents are violating their oath of office and should be dismissed.
I didn't need to look anything up. I knew it already. And if you support this illegal POTUS, then yes you are a fool.
Originally Posted by ScottM
Is that really how you see our armed forces. With your background I'll admit I'm surprised you'd use such a broad brush.
I don't have the time or band width to give a complete history lesson but since the Spanish American War the US government has been trying to build a world empire for the capitalist profiteers. To build a world empire the government needs a world class military of professionals. Up to the Vietnam War to fill the ranks of the professional military a draft was used. After Vietnam the draft was ended although young men over the age of eighteen still have to sign up. Today, any person who signs up is a mercenary for the world class professional military necessary to maintain a world empire. Unfortunately, I listen to way too many people of both sexes say the reason for joining is for some monetary advantage that can't be gotten in the civilian world yet they try to say it's for patriotic reason. No doubt some do do it patriotic reasons but not many. At least my friend admitted he work for a military contractor for the money not some patriotic reason. And he was in combat as a military contractor.
If we followed the Constitution we would have a world class Army and Air Force to defend the sovereignty of the USA and it's territories and a world class Navy to keep the sea lanes open for our maritime commerce and that's it.
So yes I meant what I said.
Derby,
I disagree. I believe that most volunteers truly believe in duty, honor, country. They, like me, were taught from the earliest age, that to put one's life on the line for your country, was the epitome of service, and what it means to be a man, and to take ones place among men.
By the same token, I hold all of our politicians to a very high standard, not to use our military in any foolish, wasteful, or un-necessary conflict.
Not that they give a schidt what I think.
this generation has seen so many deployments, and stayed in, its a warrior generation like we haven't seen in this country in a long time, maybe since the Marines were deployed every few years in the 20s and 30s.
Sycamore
I disagree. I believe that most volunteers truly believe in duty, honor, country. They, like me, were taught from the earliest age, that to put one's life on the line for your country, was the epitome of service, and what it means to be a man, and to take ones place among men.
By the same token, I hold all of our politicians to a very high standard, not to use our military in any foolish, wasteful, or un-necessary conflict.
Not that they give a schidt what I think.
this generation has seen so many deployments, and stayed in, its a warrior generation like we haven't seen in this country in a long time, maybe since the Marines were deployed every few years in the 20s and 30s.
Sycamore
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Derby,
I disagree. I believe that most volunteers truly believe in duty, honor, country. They, like me, were taught from the earliest age, that to put one's life on the line for your country, was the epitome of service, and what it means to be a man, and to take ones place among men.
By the same token, I hold all of our politicians to a very high standard, not to use our military in any foolish, wasteful, or un-necessary conflict.
Not that they give a schidt what I think.
this generation has seen so many deployments, and stayed in, its a warrior generation like we haven't seen in this country in a long time, maybe since the Marines were deployed every few years in the 20s and 30s.
Sycamore
I disagree. I believe that most volunteers truly believe in duty, honor, country. They, like me, were taught from the earliest age, that to put one's life on the line for your country, was the epitome of service, and what it means to be a man, and to take ones place among men.
By the same token, I hold all of our politicians to a very high standard, not to use our military in any foolish, wasteful, or un-necessary conflict.
Not that they give a schidt what I think.
this generation has seen so many deployments, and stayed in, its a warrior generation like we haven't seen in this country in a long time, maybe since the Marines were deployed every few years in the 20s and 30s.
Sycamore
Maybe you are right. States can't exist without useful idiots.
All I see is more passive aggressive liberal bullshiite.
how 'bout them broncos!
Now some text, which purports to be from the wife.
Bergdahl left his weapon, gathered his gear and deserted. Noone mad him volunteer for the military. The draft ended long ago. Nobody made him go to Afghanistan. He agreed to assignment as part of his voluntary service. He left behind his commitment to duty. He was in agreement with his peers and combat brothers to bear his weight and yield the support to them that they yielded to him. He violated that commitment of his own free will. There are reputable testimonies this man went to the other side because of his personal beliefs. All this, and yet his companions in battle still went out facing death to try and rescue him who appears now to be a traitor. His companions did not choose desertion. Some chose permanent disability or death over desertion in misguided support of a traitor they considered to be one of them.
And it does not end with the soldier. His despicable father had the inhuman gall to praise the false god Allah while standing with your president at the White (but defiled) House. This soldier, his family, your president and even his family, all together are unfit to bear one hair of the head from even one loyal soldier that died or was injured because of these acts. This is a disgusting chapter in the history book of the United States of America and I pray the one true and living God take revenge on those responsible.
Quote
........States a direct action cause and effect, which is unlikely, unless she is saying Bergdahl shot her husband. States Bergdahl is a traitor, which the wife, IF she said this, would have no way of knowing, (other than the unimpeachable internet).
She is purporting to blame Bergdahl, but not Osama Bin Laden, not Mullah Omar, not George Bush, Not Dick Cheney, all of whom had more influence on her husband being in Afghanistan in 2009 than Bergdahl.
She is purporting to blame Bergdahl, but not Osama Bin Laden, not Mullah Omar, not George Bush, Not Dick Cheney, all of whom had more influence on her husband being in Afghanistan in 2009 than Bergdahl.
Bergdahl left his weapon, gathered his gear and deserted. Noone mad him volunteer for the military. The draft ended long ago. Nobody made him go to Afghanistan. He agreed to assignment as part of his voluntary service. He left behind his commitment to duty. He was in agreement with his peers and combat brothers to bear his weight and yield the support to them that they yielded to him. He violated that commitment of his own free will. There are reputable testimonies this man went to the other side because of his personal beliefs. All this, and yet his companions in battle still went out facing death to try and rescue him who appears now to be a traitor. His companions did not choose desertion. Some chose permanent disability or death over desertion in misguided support of a traitor they considered to be one of them.
And it does not end with the soldier. His despicable father had the inhuman gall to praise the false god Allah while standing with your president at the White (but defiled) House. This soldier, his family, your president and even his family, all together are unfit to bear one hair of the head from even one loyal soldier that died or was injured because of these acts. This is a disgusting chapter in the history book of the United States of America and I pray the one true and living God take revenge on those responsible.
I just can't believe anyone with more than two brain cells continues to give any cover to the Traitor. In case you are confused I am talking about the the traitor in chief. As for the deserter short trial long rope sounds about right.
Sycamore, like all liberals, doesn't give two chits about bergdahl; he's trying to wipe the wet poop off his presidents face. Liberals hate the troops, regardless.
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/10426647_716806168356046_7707549632225266462_n_zps680cfc8a.jpg)
Quote
Actually, it doesn't trump anything. But it is a perfect piece of internet propaganda.
I thought the cartoon was lame, featuring a bunch of straw men while ignoring the facts. IOW typical Liberal propaganda.
And if the photo portrays what it says, it trumps rather a lot.
JMHO
Birdwatcher
I think it's more of an IQ test than a Rorschach.
Obama is, was, and always has been F'ed up. He never came down from his marijuana high - and it's obvious he DID inhale (unlike Billy-boy)
We will suffer the repercussions for decades.
Mark
We will suffer the repercussions for decades.
Mark
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Sycamore, like all liberals, doesn't give two chits about bergdahl; he's trying to wipe the wet poop off his presidents face. Liberals hate the troops, regardless.
In 2 sentences, you've crammed in a bunch of falsehoods, par for you.
I don't know Bergdahl, as he is an American, I am glad he is out of the grasp of the Enemy.
As for what he did, or didn't do, I want him to be investigated, prosecuted if warranted, and punished if convicted.
Nothing I could do or say, here, or from the highest mountain, would ( or should) excuse anything Obama has done, or not done. Like many a president before him he sought the office out of pride, and self-conceit , and was found wanting. I include him in with a bunch of them.
I doubt if liberals hate the troops. What would you call people who use the troops for short term political advantage? Supporters, or Haters?
I'm still glad bin Laden is dead, and I wish Mullah Omar was dead as well.
Somehow, I missed your sig photo when you posted, it showed up when I quoted you.
Is that supposed to be Fasl?
http:/
Or just a photo-shop?
Originally Posted by Sycamore
We never tried these guys for anything, chances are they were enemy combatants, not terrorists. They were in the Army of their country, or the government. We invaded their country, kicked their asses and took them prisoner. That makes them POW not terrorists. (I'm assuming, I don't know their particulars)
That war is winding down, prisoners were going to be exchanged.
Sycamore
That war is winding down, prisoners were going to be exchanged.
Sycamore
A couple of them are wanted for war crimes. They all provided aid to Al Qaeda which makes them terrorists. Furthermore, the war isn't winding down. Your just repeating Tyrant Obama the Liar's propaganda. We are still fighting Al Qaeda and Afghanistan is still fighting the Taliban.
Originally Posted by rte
This trumps your bullshite cartoon.
I'm thinken it does
Obwan just needs to follow the laws like the rest of us
Snake
Quote
A couple of them are wanted for war crimes. They all provided aid to Al Qaeda which makes them terrorists.
We had them in GTMO for 10 years and didn't charge them with schidt!
Half the cops and firemen in Boston and New York sent money to the IRA for 80 years.
Does that make them terrorists?
Sycamore
Originally Posted by temmi
Originally Posted by rte
This trumps your bullshite cartoon.
I'm thinken it does
Obwan just needs to follow the laws like the rest of us
Snake
It wasn't my cartoon.
I doubt if it was put together by the sergeant's wife, or even with her permission.
You won't get any argument from me about having the government follow the law.
Sycamore
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/10410463_1432855576977506_3889471407400481001_n_zpsfc5fd2ae.jpg)
more made up stuff off the internet.
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/10390076_1432823823647348_6635997953911360379_n_zpsf3aec526.jpg)
Hey sycamoore, are you really john kerry?
BTW...A mind is a terrible thang to waste
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/09/l...d-accepts-25-million-from-koch-brothers/
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/09/l...
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Hey sycamoore, are you really john kerry?
I was thinking Sean Penn...
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Quote
A couple of them are wanted for war crimes. They all provided aid to Al Qaeda which makes them terrorists.
We had them in GTMO for 10 years and didn't charge them with schidt!
Half the cops and firemen in Boston and New York sent money to the IRA for 80 years.
Does that make them terrorists?
Sycamore
Syc., your defending the Taliban is very telling.
What I can't figure out is whether your defending Obama's actions, or you trying to convince us that Taliban are not terrorists is more offensive to Americans.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Quote
A couple of them are wanted for war crimes. They all provided aid to Al Qaeda which makes them terrorists.
We had them in GTMO for 10 years and didn't charge them with schidt!
So what? With Terrorists, Habeus Corpus doesn't apply. And neither does the Geneva convention. You don't wear a uniform, you're [bleep].
Half the cops and firemen in Boston and New York sent money to the IRA for 80 years.
Does that make them terrorists?
No, it makes them terrorist sympathizers if the US listed the IRA as a terrorist group.
Sycamore
OH and here's your "proof". Holder is working to with Americorps to recruit hundreds of lawyers to represent all the children flooding across the border. Instead of deporting them, they are hiring them pro bono attorneys.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/8/holder-seeks-legal-team-for-children-on-border/
http:/
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Quote
A couple of them are wanted for war crimes. They all provided aid to Al Qaeda which makes them terrorists.
We had them in GTMO for 10 years and didn't charge them with schidt!
Half the cops and firemen in Boston and New York sent money to the IRA for 80 years.
Does that make them terrorists?
Sycamore
Syc., your defending the Taliban is very telling.
What I can't figure out is whether your defending Obama's actions, or you trying to convince us that Taliban are not terrorists is more offensive to Americans.
As far as I can tell, I'm not defending the Taliban. They are the enemy.
I'm not defending many of Obama's actions, but I agree with getting our own back, and I agree with raiding the house that bin Laden was in.
that doesn't seem like overwhelming support to me.
If you think for one minute, we were going to snuff those guys in GTMO, you're nuts. Holding them forever doesn't buy us anything.
Getting our guy back, and then following the returnees, electronically, or otherwise, might pay huge dividends, way more than feeding them forever in Cuba.
Sycamore
W4B,
more made up stuff off the internet.
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
more made up stuff off the internet.
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
Quote
more made up stuff off the internet.
makes your butthole pucker, don't it gut eater?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
Sycamore
How do you wipe the feces off your pwesident?
Friggin liberals 
http://www.westernjournalism.com/find-absurd-reasons-obama-letting-terrorists-guantanamo-bay/
Quote
Osama bin Laden�s former bodyguard, is on the fast track to freedom because he insists his only plans for the future involve starting a �milk and honey farm� in Yemen.
http:/
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/10460729_642154452543594_7962053781444691957_n_zps14745f46.jpg)
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/10394053_540578816048906_6745399722878661529_n_zps2081fa5c.jpg)
Originally Posted by watch4bear
![[Linked Image]](http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e98/watch4bear/996064_631612510232215_568935654_n_zpsf2d6c07a.jpg)
Well, ain't they???
Sycamore
W4B,
more made up stuff off the internet.
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
more made up stuff off the internet.
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
If you could have passed the math part of the apprentice program, you'd be ready to retire from the power-plant about now.
Sycamore
Originally Posted by Sycamore
W4B,
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
Sycamore
you're kind of the cut-n-paste kid, aren't ya?
Sycamore
Pot, meet kettle....
Originally Posted by Sycamore
RWE, hows your 'rithmetic?
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
Tough being a liberal ain't it?
Originally Posted by Sycamore
RWE, hows your 'rithmetic?
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
Somehow, as a father of 3, and a grandfather of 3, I had a feeling you would go that route.
To quote a fav of yours, "At this point, what difference does it make?"
disregard the pun on 'rithmetic and difference
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Tough being a liberal ain't it?
Another mis-statement of fact.
You would have a boat paid off on Powell right now, 2 more years to go at the plant!
If only you could have taken algebra, with the Navajos!
Sycamore
Originally Posted by RWE
Originally Posted by Sycamore
RWE, hows your 'rithmetic?
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
Somehow, as a father of 3, and a grandfather of 3, I had a feeling you would go that route.
To quote a fav of yours, "At this point, what difference does it make?"
disregard the pun on 'rithmetic and difference
Since you knew it was a fake statement when you made it?
Sycamore
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by RWE
Originally Posted by Sycamore
RWE, hows your 'rithmetic?
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
count up the cut and pastes W4B put in this post, and the one(s) I put up, and lets us know the ratio.
Thanks,
Sycamore
Somehow, as a father of 3, and a grandfather of 3, I had a feeling you would go that route.
To quote a fav of yours, "At this point, what difference does it make?"
disregard the pun on 'rithmetic and difference
Since you knew it was a fake statement when you made it?
Sycamore
No, sick-o-more.
Since kids are likely to say, "Well, so and so had 5 cookies, and I only had one [therefore I am not as bad]."
Still a cookie thief.
Keep up.
well if one picture is the same as 7 or 10, you might need to be in remedial math with W4B.
Sycamore
Sycamore
or you one of those Common Core guys?
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
"Forgive me my nonsense, as I also forgive the nonsense of those that think they talk sense." - Robert Frost
I wonder who he was speaking about...
I wonder who he was speaking about...
You're making it too hard for him DD, so I'll help out" Hey Sycamore he's talking about YOU. And while I'm at it, might as well get this out too: Even if these five TERRORITS have been out of circulation for over ten years, the PR gains by the Taliban are already evident in the Arab World, but even more so, even if we accept your (and the marxist's) ludicrous theory they pose no danger, the fact is the marxist circumvented the law HE SIGNED as well as fullfilling his promise to you and the rest of the left to close Guantanamo...
"So what? With Terrorists, Habeus Corpus doesn't apply. And neither does the Geneva convention. You don't wear a uniform, you're [bleep]."
True, but what is a uniform? At one time, US Generals were permitted (still?) to design or adopt their own personal uniform; hence, the Eisenhower Jacket or, Patton's wearing non-issued pistols. If some "army" or military force adopts normal local civilian attire and calls it their uniform, who is to complain?
I don't know international law, but who is the arbiter "Habeus Corpus doesn't apply"? I know the Bush Administration said this, but what does international law actually say regarding Habeus Corpus and terrorists>
The American Constitution Society has an article re this at:
https://www.acslaw.org/acsblog/habeas-corpus-and-the-%E2%80%9Cwar-on-terror%E2%80%9D
True, but what is a uniform? At one time, US Generals were permitted (still?) to design or adopt their own personal uniform; hence, the Eisenhower Jacket or, Patton's wearing non-issued pistols. If some "army" or military force adopts normal local civilian attire and calls it their uniform, who is to complain?
I don't know international law, but who is the arbiter "Habeus Corpus doesn't apply"? I know the Bush Administration said this, but what does international law actually say regarding Habeus Corpus and terrorists>
The American Constitution Society has an article re this at:
https://www.acslaw.org/acsblog/habeas-corpus-and-the-%E2%80%9Cwar-on-terror%E2%80%9D
Originally Posted by Sycamore
well if one picture is the same as 7 or 10, you might need to be in remedial math with W4B.
Sycamore
Sycamore
you seem to be getting fairly defensive about the irony in calling someone out for cut and pastes in a thread where the OP starts with a cut and paste.
Let me know when you've got a scapegoat to blame this on.
Originally Posted by RWE
Originally Posted by Sycamore
well if one picture is the same as 7 or 10, you might need to be in remedial math with W4B.
Sycamore
Sycamore
you seem to be getting fairly defensive about the irony in calling someone out for TEN cut and pastes in a thread where the OP starts with ONE cut and paste.
Let me know when you've got a scapegoat to blame this on.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Actually, New Spain, Mexico didn't try to proclaim independence until 1810, and wasn't recognized as independent by Spain until 1836.
I don't know about your numbers, but there are definitely a lot of kids showing up now at the border. Obama is going to have to deal with, or ignore, the un-inteneded consequences of his policies.
like every president.
Sycamore
I don't know about your numbers, but there are definitely a lot of kids showing up now at the border. Obama is going to have to deal with, or ignore, the un-inteneded consequences of his policies.
like every president.
Sycamore
We will be those who suffer and pay for it. That's why he's doing it. They are not 'showing up at the border'. They are crossing and turning themselves in to BP. If they are under 18 they are considered children by BP and can not be sent back due to ze ro's exec orders so BP is having to baby sit them a while, until they become victims of predators who prey on the poor and homeless.
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Ah; so its a conspiracy against obama. I'll bet its cause he's black.
As an injun, do you feel like everyone's out to get ya?
As an injun, do you feel like everyone's out to get ya?
is Sycamore an Indian? as in native American?
Originally Posted by eyeball
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Actually, New Spain, Mexico didn't try to proclaim independence until 1810, and wasn't recognized as independent by Spain until 1836.
I don't know about your numbers, but there are definitely a lot of kids showing up now at the border. Obama is going to have to deal with, or ignore, the un-inteneded consequences of his policies.
like every president.
Sycamore
I don't know about your numbers, but there are definitely a lot of kids showing up now at the border. Obama is going to have to deal with, or ignore, the un-inteneded consequences of his policies.
like every president.
Sycamore
Can you really not read? Or do you just pretend to not read?
Sycamore
p/s I mis-spelled unintended, unintentionally.
So, you think ze ro is ignoring the destruction he is wreaking on this country!
You're a bigger fool than I thought.
You're a bigger fool than I thought.