Home
Posted By: KFWA Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
for the life of me I don't understand why Sessions lied to congress about meeting with a Russian ambassador - if what is being said is true.

At this point based on the released information and confirmed by multiple news outlets. - nevermind if its not related to the presidential campaign or not, he told them he never met with one.

That leaves us with 3 choices.

1. The media/spooks are lying and Sessions never met with them. At this point I guess its possible given our News but I doubt they are. It would be a huge credibility stain to release this without backing it up.

2. Sessions felt that the "spirit" of the question was did you meet with them on behalf of Trump. I can sort of buy that, but this is the guy stepping into the role of AG. There are no nuanced answers when you are asked point blank did you meet with a Russian official. Its yes or no

3.Sessions lied

you guys can bash away at me for posting this, that's fine, but you can't have a double standard. We can't lamblast Eric Holder for hiding information, etc

and then shrug your shoulders about Sessions just because he's on our side.

for the record, I don't think Sessions should resign, but I also didn't think Flynn should resign either.

But I'm frustrated that Sessions felt he needed to lie about this, especially in light of knowing that Obama holdovers are going to release any and all information they can to sabotage this administration.
IMHO, he didn't lie...
From FOX News: (verbatim)


"When contacted by Fox News late Wednesday, Sessions said, "I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign. I have no idea what this allegation is about. It is false."

A White House statement said the story was "the latest attack agaisnt the Trump Administration by partisan Democrats."

The Justice Department said late Wednesday that one of the discussions between Sessions and Sergey Kislyak was an office visit that occurred in Sessions' capacity as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. The second conversation took place in a group setting with other ambassadors following a Heritage Foundation speech.

Reports about the meetings appeared to contradict a statement Sessions made during his confirmation hearing in January.

Sessions was asked by Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., how he would respond "if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign."

“I’m not aware of any of those activities,” answered Sessions, one of Trump’s earliest and most prominent supporters during the campaign. “I have been called a surrogate a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians, and I’m unable to comment on it.”

The Justice Depoartment said Wednesday that "there was absolutely nothing misleading about [Sessions'] answer [to Franken]. He was asked during the hearing about communications between Russia and the Trump campaign--not about meetings he took as a senator and a member of the Armed Services Committee."

Sessions had meetings last year with more than 25 foreign ambassadors, the Department said."
_____________________________________

Pay close attention to the exact wording of his answer..
OOOooo.... a sitting senator spoke to a Russian ambassador twice....

GMAFB.

The entire Russia conspiracy theory is nothing more than a figment of the Globalists imagination.

They have been blaming their loss of the election on this, but nobody has even seen ONE document of proof. Not one...

Just a liberal smoke and light show.

But it was fine for Bill Clinton to meet with the AG in a private meeting while his wife was under FBI investigation for numerous felonies.

The hypocrisy is a bit rich with this one.
From what I understand:
He met with the Russian Amb. as a 'senator and in a senate' capacity. Isn't that how he answered? Or did he say flat out: NO?
He also apparently 'shook his hand' in passing?
"I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign.


I think he told the truth with that statement. Every last presidential transition team meets with their international counterparts.
Are we to believe fake news?
Just another Pelosi witch hunt.

Between the two of them, I am pretty sure who the enemy to my country is.
The OP is correct. You can't have a double standard. The Obama administration and ALL the demorats set the standard for 8 years. No special prosecutor, no recusal, ever. The Trump administration and the republicans need to follow it. This means you, McCain, Graham, and Issa.
The Democrats started this Russian horsecrap a while ago, as a bit of theater to use as insurance, should it be needed. All you have to do is start a rumor, and it is viewed as truth. The rebuttal isn't even heard. Yes, Sessions did meet with the Russians. The fact that it was above board, and in a bona-fide official capacity NOT connected to the campaign, seems to be ignored. I think its time to call the Democrats out on a few things. The first should be Hillary Clinton's unsecured server, containing classified material. She is guilty of that, and of lying about it. Period. Indict her.
Posted By: KFWA Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign

I hope that is as far as it goes.

I don't want to lose Sessions as AG



Just more distortion and outright lies from the MSM. Why in hell does anyone listen to these charlatans anymore?
The democraps need an external boogieman. Russia just happens to be a convenient one because the democraps are allied with the real enemy (Muzz Horde) they won't have to suffer any consequences for talking schitt about them.
Posted By: KFWA Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by RiverRider
Just more distortion and outright lies from the MSM. Why in hell does anyone listen to these charlatans anymore?


its more than that though - They aren't making this up, they are being fed this by the Justice Department.

now of course they're putting their spin on it, but more disturbing is someone in the justice department released this on their AG.
Posted By: RWE Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
During confirmation he was asked if he had discussed campaign issues with foreign dignitaries or employees and he said no.

Di anyone ask him if, in the course of his duties as members of senate subcommittees did he talk to foreign nationals?

Probably not, but it would have been a rhetorical question because of course he had.

My only concern was if those meetings occurred outside of committee or other participants, which they didn't.

Tell Pelosi to suck it...
Originally Posted by KFWA
Originally Posted by RiverRider
Just more distortion and outright lies from the MSM. Why in hell does anyone listen to these charlatans anymore?


its more than that though - They aren't making this up, they are being fed this by the Justice Department.

now of course they're putting their spin on it, but more disturbing is someone in the justice department released this on their AG.
Eight years of totally politicized hiring by the Zero administration has left a lot of liberal hacks in all these .gov jobs and they know their time is short under Trump. They are pulling out all the stops.
Originally Posted by benchman
The Democrats started this Russian horsecrap a while ago, as a bit of theater to use as insurance, should it be needed. All you have to do is start a rumor, and it is viewed as truth. The rebuttal isn't even heard. Yes, Sessions did meet with the Russians. The fact that it was above board, and in a bona-fide official capacity NOT connected to the campaign, seems to be ignored. I think its time to call the Democrats out on a few things. The first should be Hillary Clinton's unsecured server, containing classified material. She is guilty of that, and of lying about it. Period. Indict her.


You can add all the Obama appointees at the IRS that targeted Conservative groups to the indict list.
Is it any wonder why nothing ever gets done in Washington?
When Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch with no one watching and talked about "grand children" the media gave it just enough attention to cover it's azz. Pelosi sure was mute then!
Posted By: RWE Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by jdunham
Is it any wonder why nothing ever gets done in Washington?


This is the dems only card right now, to tie up the Administration and its officers with bullshit so they have no time to administer.

They need to [bleep] off.
Posted By: KFWA Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
here are the two questions.

Actually I think Sessions is going to be OK

----------------------

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.
SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
DATE: January 10
--------------------------

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY: Several of the President-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?" the Vermont Democrat asked in a questionnaire.
SESSIONS: No.
Posted By: RWE Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by KFWA
here are the two questions.

Actually I think Sessions is going to be OK

----------------------

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.
SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
DATE: January 10
--------------------------

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY: Several of the President-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?" the Vermont Democrat asked in a questionnaire.
SESSIONS: No.


Exactly,

both questions directly related to the campaign, and his visits with Russian and other ambassadors were in regards to his subcommittee work.

Again, Pelosi and the rest of the bitches can FOAD.
Posted By: byc Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
How so very convenient for the leak to come out a day after what was a great speech and is all the buzz.

Staged to the max!!
Originally Posted by KFWA
I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign

I hope that is as far as it goes.
t be
I don't want to lose Sessions as AG





This deal ain't hard to figure out. Session's answer was a calculated move on his part.... and a smart one.

If he answered with complete candor in the hearings, he would not be confirmed. If you are explaining, you are losing.

Better to fight from your position as A G than as a Nominee.

He can simply refuse to appoint a S P and wait on the Dems to attack someone else.

We will see four years of this.
Posted By: KFWA Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by Dave_in_WV
When Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch with no one watching and talked about "grand children" the media gave it just enough attention to cover it's azz. Pelosi sure was mute then!


as a side note to that

Some people may not realize this but because of that meeting and the fallout from critics, Lynch said she would not discuss the investigation with Comey.

Because of that, Comey made the decision on his own to release the notice to congress that he was reopening the case due to Wieners laptop.

As I understand it, Lynch would have normally had a say on whether Comey should have released it (and protocol would have normally prevented him from doing so).

If you believe that played a role in Hillary losing the election - I don't believe it did, but some do, then one can argue that Bill Clinton cost Hillary the election
Republicans just don't get it. The lib's and their allies in the media play for blood.
The problem is that the snowflakes will believe it, true or not. miles
Originally Posted by curdog4570
We will see four years of this.


Hopefully 8.
Originally Posted by byc
How so very convenient for the leak to come out a day after what was a great speech and is all the buzz.

Staged to the max!!


Time to start firing and prosecuting the leakers.
Posted By: byc Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Plus this is just a warmup lap for the real prize. Especially, with Obama saying he is on his way back.

It's on and will never end!!
Originally Posted by MagMarc
Originally Posted by byc
How so very convenient for the leak to come out a day after what was a great speech and is all the buzz.

Staged to the max!!


Time to start firing and prosecuting the leakers.


Time to start killing the enemies of freedom, and our country.

It's coming.

Soon.
It's certainly interesting to observe the selective indignation at play.

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
This whole Democrat Russian charade unbelievably parallels Dr. Strangelove, is quite humorous.

" Am I to understand, the Russian ambassador is to be admitted entrance to the War Room.? Are you aware of what a serious breach of security that would be, he'll see Everything. He'll see the Big Board.! "
They need to hold their ground on this one. He was doing his job when he met with them. Plus, I don't even think he had any official capacity in the campaign anyway.

I think they screwed up with Flynn. They should have told the Dems and the MSM to shove it.
[Linked Image]

CASE CLOSED!
Originally Posted by MagMarc

Time to start firing and prosecuting the leakers.


Time to fire every single holdover that Trump can legally fire and start fresh.

Let God sort them out.
Posted By: KFWA Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
they have to find those leakers and shut them down

Sessions should be on the warpath right now.
That news article was the first one I read this morning when I turned on the computer... Pelosi was calling for his resignation...For Lying To Congress wink

IIRC, didn't their candidate for PRESIDENT also get caught lying??? Not only to congress but the FBI??? IIRC, their candidate readily admitted to destruction of evidence that was under subpoena, because HER lawyers deemed it irrelevant to the case...

Trump needs to follow up on one of the last campaign promises he made...appoint a special prosecutor to look into pursuing charges...justice for ALL...
Posted By: bugs4 Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
. . . . Islamic governments funded as much as 20% of Hillary Clinton's campaign (The Saudi Government in particular)

. . . . Tell me again about Russian involvement in the election.
Posted By: byc Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Schumer (glasses and all) is now press conference babbling on and on calling for Sessions to resign.

Can someone please drive over to the Hill and smack him down. PLEASE!! Gunsmoke style!!

Update...Now Pelosi is about to hold yet another press conference. Guess this will go on all day. Who's next…Franken? Obama!?
Originally Posted by FlaRick
Originally Posted by MagMarc

Time to start firing and prosecuting the leakers.


Time to fire every single holdover that Trump can legally fire and start fresh.

Let God sort them out.
THAT!!!!
Originally Posted by KFWA
At this point based on the released information and confirmed by multiple news outlets.


That would settle it for me. Whatever the news outlets confirm I don't believe.
It's not the "potential" crime that is the issue, it is the perceived "cover up" that gets people in trouble.

With that said, this "news" story will take Sessions out of the picture in investigating the Russian meddling into the election. It's almost like this "news" story was designed to do just that.
HELLOOO! He was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He met with over 30 Ambassadors last year. Shocker.
Originally Posted by WyColoCowboy
HELLOOO! He was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He met with over 30 Ambassadors last year. Shocker.


Stop it!

Never let facts get in the way of good propaganda.
I want to see Trump support his AG. Nothing wrong occurred if Sessions was acting in his professional capacity as a government representative. Flynn was a gimme that should not have occurred and serves to further illustrate the methods the Socialist Democrats will use in the foreseeable future. It's time for a REAL line in the sand. The battle will continue. If Trump and Sessions give in now this activity will only get worse. FIGHT!!
Need to investigate illegal leaks of classified info, which is a felony.

And you could throw in fake news and misinformation, crafted to divert attention from those who have committed and are committing felonies.

There are real crimes and there are faux crimes, smoke and mirrors, obfuscating the truth.

You'd think this was the swamp resisting drainage.

DF
Someone PLEASE show me just ONE single page of anything even remotely proving that Russia had anything to do with our elections.

Just one.

Or STFU.
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Need to investigate illegal leaks of classified info, which is a felony.

And you could throw in fake news and misinformation, crafted to divert attention from those who have committed and are committing felonies.

There are real crimes and there are faux crimes, smoke and mirrors, obfuscating the truth.

You'd think this was the swamp resisting drainage.

DF


Trump will end up blanket firing the "career servants" in place from the Hussein administration. Otherwise, and he knows this now, it will never end. Get em out. If collusion can be proved prosecute.
Originally Posted by byc
Schumer (glasses and all) is now press conference babbling on and on calling for Sessions to resign.

Can someone please drive over to the Hill and smack him down. PLEASE!! Gunsmoke style!!

Update...Now Pelosi is about to hold yet another press conference. Guess this will go on all day. Who's next…Franken? Obama!?


soap and bone meal...

It's the best use of these traitors.
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by FlaRick
Originally Posted by MagMarc

Time to start firing and prosecuting the leakers.


Time to fire every single holdover that Trump can legally fire and start fresh.

Let God sort them out.
THAT!!!!


What leak?

Wasn't no need for a leak for this.

Sessions' answer to F agken was on the record.

Sessions' answer on the questionnaire was part of the record.

Sessions' meetings as a senator, and who he met with, are in the public record.

If a leak is mentioned, it must be cause the fake news people put it in to try and make it sound more "juicy".
Now Clair McCaskell says she never met with russians.

Oh no, twitter accounts prove otherwise.
First off he said he never talked to them about the campaign.

HE NEVER SAID HE DID NOT TALK TO THEM OR ANYBODY ELSE!!!!!!!

Folks got to quit believing what them bastards on tv say.

The dems should have done the special investigator route back when o got into office.

You really need to temper what they say with what is the truth.
Originally Posted by KFWA
I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign

I hope that is as far as it goes.

I don't want to lose Sessions as AG





No one should bash you for posting this. I was going to post it before discovering your post.

1. The Dems/media had this in this back pocket and are now using it to take Trumps wonderful speech off the front page. It's Sessions turn to dodge the slings and arrows.

2. Sessions is too smart for such child' play offered by the Dems/media. Franken asked about meting with the Russians under the color of a campaign issue.

3.The Dems are on suicide watch and the longer this goes the larger the chance is that they do something even more stupid.

4. The Dems/media are psychologically driven by the Russian "hacking". Yet they haven proof of any overt or covert action from Russia. We know they hacked Hillary and the DNC - to what end did that effect the outcomes of the section?

The story about Sessions meeting with Russian officials to discuss campaign issues that's got Socialist Al Franken all fired up came from CNN. Of course CNN got the story from "unnamed sources" in the government.
Confirmation on what has been said oft he real reasons for the left's ire.

https://patriotpost.us/posts/47752

Posted By: poboy Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Al Franken is a comedian.
Trump, Sessions & the GOP in total need to quit responding to any BS about this subject.

They've said all they need to say.

Tell all the media to FO & stonewall any more discussion on the matter & don't allow Sessions to be bullied into resigning over nothing.

The DemonRats are never going to stop with thier tales of mystery & imagination not are they ever going to let business go on as it should.

Next week will surely bring more of something...............fu^ck 'em.

MM
Originally Posted by KFWA
for the life of me I don't understand why Sessions lied to congress about meeting with a Russian ambassador - if what is being said is true.
He didn't lie. The context of the question was the Trump campaign. Naturally he spoke to the Russians in the context of his position as US Senator as a member of the Armed Services Committee. His answer was that he had no contacts with the Russians while part of the Trump team, or pertaining to the Trump campaign.

The left is full of crap on all this stuff. The rabid anti-Russian stuff is coming from the (((rulers of our national government))), and is not organic to American interests. They are determined to stop and destroy Trump and his administration because, among other things, he's not hostile toward Russia. The (((rulers of our national government))) require hostility towards Russia because Putin managed to partially short-circuited their efforts at stripping Russia of her national wealth after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Trump, Sessions & the GOP in total need to quit responding to any BS about this subject.

They've said all they need to say.

Tell all the media to FO & stonewall any more discussion on the matter & don't allow Sessions to be bullied into resigning over nothing.

The DemonRats are never going to stop with thier tales of mystery & imagination not are they ever going to let business go on as it should.

Next week will surely bring more of something...............fu^ck 'em.

MM



THIS!

We OWN the ball now, and we call the game.
Originally Posted by poboy
Al Franken is a comedian.


And a damn pisspoor one at that.
Paul B.
Posted By: tzone Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by poboy
Al Franken is a comedian.


Not much of one.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Someone PLEASE show me just ONE single page of anything even remotely proving that Russia had anything to do with our elections.

Just one.

Or STFU.

Facts..?? shocked

What you talking about, what's that got to do with politics...? blush

DF
Sessions did nothing wrong, and did not "cover it up" in any fashion. His meetings and responses are public record. There wasn't any leak of anything, simply someone checked the records.

The Democrat death throes are awfully ugly to watch. But for the sake of a healthy country, it would be a lot better if they were actually better at being the opposition party. Right now, they are endangering the republic.

Hopefully this is just another childish tantrum, but at some point they need to come up with something realistic to worry about and get back to governing.
It is all about bringing down Trump!
Ok...so if Sessions said..."Good Morning" to the Russian ambassador he's lying!!

GMSIAAFB!!
Originally Posted by TBREW401
It is all about bringing down Trump!


And any other conservative.

Pelosi and the other Demwits have already called for impeaching Trump, and getting rid of his entire cabinet, or anyone that supports them.

Nothing more than a ploy to mire down the entire administration in controversy.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by TBREW401
It is all about bringing down Trump!


And any other conservative.

Pelosi and the other Demwits have already called for impeaching Trump, and getting rid of his entire cabinet, or anyone that supports them.

Nothing more than a ploy to mire down the entire administration in controversy.


All of the above goes hand in hand with the Obama/Jarret threads.
We were[and actually are] still very close to losing what most of us here consider our country to be.
Winning in November was THE START, a skirmish or battle, NOT THE FINISH!
Now Chaffetz and McCarthyare jumping on Sessions
Quote
I never met with any Russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign.

I doubt there's any way they can prove otherwise because even if they prove he met with someone, they can't prove what was discussed. But the truth doesn't even matter because the Democrats will just fabricate a reality that works for them, and then the media will run with it until the conspiracy has a life of it's own. That's there game. And honestly, they have no other play right now. They're outnumbered in every direction. Their chances are slim to none in 2018 of picking up seats. So, they have to play these normal Democrat virtual reality games to inject a narrative in the minds of their millions of useful idiots.
Posted By: KFWA Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Now Chaffetz and McCarthyare jumping on Sessions


I heard Chaffetz give an interview on this a few days ago and he was saying he'd call for some action if more came out about the Russians involvement.

He can't walk that back (and probably doesn't want to)
The Republicans better consolidate their feces immediately. Jason Chaffetz and any of the other Republicans bending over backward (and probably frontward) to be "fair" about this need to get a grip on reality RIGHT NOW. If they allow Sessions to be pushed out over this 'fake news' they will not recover. Get them lined up and overcome this failure to communicate.
Just curious, does anyone know why the Russian Ambassador was at the GOP convention? Seems very odd.
Obvious the Republican Whip is not getting his sht together. Why would Mr cant get sht done but btch about Clinton even say anything at all about the matter. This Chaffetz guy is useless . Spent millions of tax payer money trying to get something to stick to Hillary and failed. Not winning, get off the island....
IMO, the Whip needs to get every last one of them away from the cameras until further notice.
Chaffetz has always been a snake.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Chaffetz has always been a snake.


Beyond that, he had Criminal Hillary in a noose and let her out.

None of those GD "hearings" has ever produced anything but a bunch of hot air.
The first thing everyone needs to understand is that the whole Russia "thing" is a lie and the Democrats know it's a lie.

Everything the left pushes is a lie.

The left's agenda is to damage America.

The leftist Communists will be coming up with one thing after another forever. Just wave it off and move forward.
Why hasn't Hillary been charged with lying to congress and destruction of evidence??? If the republicans would sack up and go on offense vs. defense, them stupid ass holes might stop with these stupid ass games.
All of this is a distraction technique to try and siphon off momentum from Trump's speech a couple days ago. They KNOW it was an effective speech and they KNOW they can't block the agenda if Congress actually plays ball. So this is all they have- smoke and mirrors and stalling.
Posted By: Toddly Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by DakotaDeer

The Democrat death throes are awfully ugly to watch. But for the sake of a healthy country, it would be a lot better if they were actually better at being the opposition party. Right now, they are endangering the republic.

I disagree. The democratic death throes are beautiful to watch. It's like Christmas every day!
Originally Posted by poboy
Al Franken is a comedian.
...he thinks...
Posted By: RickyD Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Quote
for the life of me I don't understand why Sessions lied to congress about meeting with a Russian ambassador - if what is being said is true.
What does cnn and msnbc say? The opposite is true.
Posted By: RickyD Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by Redneck
Originally Posted by poboy
Al Franken is a comedian.
...he thinks...
Only if he's swinging on a rope. I'd laugh at him then.
Originally Posted by shootem
The Republicans better consolidate their feces immediately. Jason Chaffetz and any of the other Republicans bending over backward (and probably frontward) to be "fair" about this need to get a grip on reality RIGHT NOW. If they allow Sessions to be pushed out over this 'fake news' they will not recover. Get them lined up and overcome this failure to communicate.
Indeed. These are the Republicans doing business as they have in the past. The Democrats make an accusation, and the Republicans cave to the accusation, not stand up for the truth. Governing by newsbyte. Sessions did not speak of the campaign to the Russians. The Russians did not affect the outcome of the election. Grow a damn set, Republicans. You're too used to getting your butts violated by the left. Shep Smith is busily pontificating about Sessions lying, by judiciously leaving out any verbage that clarifies exactly what the questions were, and what the answers were. Stand up, say they are wrong, you're NOT recusing yourself, elections have consequences, and Democrats need to get used to disappointment.
At best, Sessions answered truthfully in the context of the questions. At worst, he is a dumbazz for not being more specific in his answers.

Keep Russia and Putin on a short leash with current sanctions, quit jumping through these congressional hoops, and move the fugg forward.

Originally Posted by MadMooner
At best, Sessions answered truthfully in the context of the questions. At worst, he is a dumbazz for not being more specific in his answers.

Keep Russia and Putin on a short leash with current sanctions, quit jumping through these congressional hoops, and move the fugg forward.

You mean the sanctions that Obama put in place in the last days of his presidency in order to throw a money wrench into Trump's plans for improved US/Russian relations? Yeah, let's keep those in place. crazy
The video of the exchange between Franken and Sessions is available from a great number of sites this morning. Watching links from a number of different sites is a good place to start.
Posted By: byc Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Hate to say this but I fear Attorney General Sessions is history!

I pray not but….And of course, we all know who their next target is.
Originally Posted by WyColoCowboy
HELLOOO! He was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He met with over 30 Ambassadors last year. Shocker.

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.

https://www.senate.gov/general/committee_assignments/assignments.htm
Originally Posted by byc
Hate to say this but I fear Attorney General Sessions is history!

I pray not but….And of course, we all know who their next target is.


I think somebody needs to do some digging...I'll bet it would be interesting to find out how many times Obama or one of his cabinet or one of his "surrogates" (democrat officials) met with Russian "Officials" during both of his campaigns...as far as that goes, start checking Hillarys "surrogates"....laughin here...this is nothing but more "white noise" coming from left field...Hell, just question Houma under oath...I'm pretty sure the FBI should be able to leverage some good info there.

Them slimey pos republicans could fug up a free lunch!!!!!! But my biggest beech is that they want the same thing the demorats want, Trump gone. That way they can have the same chit we've had for years. Pence has been what the bastages wanted all along. They were never with Trump. He is just the vehicle to bring in Pence. Hope Trump has eyes in the back of his head, he'll need them. They are all one of the same. Hope the forgotten people don't allow it to happen, With out a real fight. it's becoming more and more obvious voting don't work. Sure hope I'm wrong.





Take care, Willie
May as well stop defending what Sessions did or said. He has already surrendered to the liberal demands.
Originally Posted by LostHighway

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.


So come out with it.

Are you saying that Jess Sessions conspired with Russia to give the election to Trump?

I'll answer for you.

"No",....you don't believe that. But you're like every fuggin' liberal I've ever met. You'll tell any lie you feel is necessary to advance your agenda.

There's some truth for you to chew on.

I'm sure it won't taste familiar.
Originally Posted by LostHighway
Originally Posted by WyColoCowboy
HELLOOO! He was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He met with over 30 Ambassadors last year. Shocker.

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.

https://www.senate.gov/general/committee_assignments/assignments.htm


Hey look it's the lying cock sucker who failed to hold up his end of the bet.

[Linked Image]

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/11831079/1
LMAO




Take care, Willie
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by LostHighway

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.


So come out with it.

Are you saying that Jess Sessions conspired with Russia to give the election to Trump?

I'll answer for you.

"No",....you don't believe that. But you're like every fuggin' liberal I've ever met. You'll tell any lie you feel is necessary to advance your agenda.

There's some truth for you to chew on.

I'm sure it won't taste familiar.


Are you saying what he posted was false? What part?
Posted By: djs Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by Redneck
IMHO, he didn't lie...


He denied (under oath) meeting or communicating with Russians during his confirmation hearings. His denial might have been: 1) a carefully crafted response (e.g., Slick Willie's define sex" statement), 2) He forgot meeting with Russians (I certainly remember each of several of my meetings with Soviet diplomats, including a car purchase - each were reported), or 3) He concealed the information (perjury). Take your pick - anyway yo call it, his time is limited.
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by LostHighway

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.


So come out with it.

Are you saying that Jess Sessions conspired with Russia to give the election to Trump?

I'll answer for you.

"No",....you don't believe that. But you're like every fuggin' liberal I've ever met. You'll tell any lie you feel is necessary to advance your agenda.

There's some truth for you to chew on.

I'm sure it won't taste familiar.


Are you saying what he posted was false? What part?


The entire premise that the Trump administration conspired with Russia to win the election is not only false. It's treasonous.

I have no patience with anyone who makes the attempt to push that narrative nor anyone who defends them for doing so.

There's no fence riding on this matter.

Everyone has to choose a side.

I've chosen mine.
Well said. They have no bottom, in any sense of the word.


mike r
Posted By: djs Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by LostHighway

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.


So come out with it.

Are you saying that Jess Sessions conspired with Russia to give the election to Trump?

I'll answer for you.

"No",....you don't believe that. But you're like every fuggin' liberal I've ever met. You'll tell any lie you feel is necessary to advance your agenda.

There's some truth for you to chew on.

I'm sure it won't taste familiar.


Are you saying what he posted was false? What part?


The entire premise that the Trump administration conspired with Russia to win the election is not only false. It's treasonous.

I have no patience with anyone who makes the attempt to push that narrative nor anyone who defends them for doing so.

There's no fence riding on this matter.

Everyone has to choose a side.

I've chosen mine.


"The entire premise that the Trump administration conspired with Russia to win the election is not only false. It's treasonous."

I don't believe that the Trump Campaign actually conspired with Russia, but it is certain that Russia has meddled in Western elections, according to Secretary of Defense Mattis.

see: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-doubt-moscow-meddling-in-elections.html
Originally Posted by djs
Originally Posted by Redneck
IMHO, he didn't lie...


He denied (under oath) meeting or communicating with Russians during his confirmation hearings. His denial might have been: 1) a carefully crafted response (e.g., Slick Willie's define sex" statement), 2) He forgot meeting with Russians (I certainly remember each of several of my meetings with Soviet diplomats, including a car purchase - each were reported), or 3) He concealed the information (perjury). Take your pick - anyway yo call it, his time is limited.


Jesus you're f*cking retarded. But that's what happens when brother knocks up sister. But don't let that hold you back.

Originally Posted by KFWA
here are the two questions.

Actually I think Sessions is going to be OK

----------------------

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.
SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
DATE: January 10
--------------------------

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY: Several of the President-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?" the Vermont Democrat asked in a questionnaire.
SESSIONS: No.
See here:

Obama administration reportedly rac...ct between Russians and Trump associates
Its par for the course comrade djs

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/
These corksuckers are grabbing for the nuts here. The Republicans better learn to man up, and do battle. Really sick of these idiots doing a half azzed job. Hell, they backed off Hillary, who is CLEARLY guilty.
Originally Posted by djs


I don't believe that the Trump Campaign actually conspired with Russia,


That's what the Democrats/Communists are implying when they start questioning Trump's appointees about it.

They also said that the Russians hacked Hillary's illegal server and gave her illegal correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal to Wikileaks.

At this point, there's absolutely no reason to believe anything the Democrats/Communists have to say about anything.

When they tell the truth, it's an accident.

Originally Posted by poboy
Al Franken is a comedian.
That is not what I see. He is a joke!
A professional politican will disappoint you every time. Hope Trump learns this lesson soon.
Hard to find one with anything like a spine.
The funniest thing about all these fugking idiots blathering on the news (the same fugking idiots that claimed Trump couldn't win the primary) is that not one, single Trump voter gives a fugk.

Not a one.




Dave
Originally Posted by djs
Originally Posted by Redneck
IMHO, he didn't lie...


He denied (under oath) meeting or communicating with Russians during his confirmation hearings. His denial might have been: 1) a carefully crafted response (e.g., Slick Willie's define sex" statement), 2) He forgot meeting with Russians (I certainly remember each of several of my meetings with Soviet diplomats, including a car purchase - each were reported), or 3) He concealed the information (perjury). Take your pick - anyway yo call it, his time is limited.


Within the context of questioning he answered accurately. This wasn't an "ever in your life" search. It was specifically related to him being a power within the Trump campaign and his contacts with Russian representatives concerning the election. He had no such contacts. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions at the time of his confirmation hearing was considered by some to be as high up as the top five power brokers in Washington and served as nearly as I could find as follows:

Jefferson “Jeff” Sessions sits on the following committees:

Senate Committee on Armed Services. Chairman, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. ...
Senate Committee on the Judiciary. ...
Senate Committee on the Budget.
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. ...
United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control

As such, and given his longstanding presence in Washington, he would be acting in official capacity when in contact with a wide variety of foreign representatives. He didn't resign his duties as an elected and appointed official just because he chose to support Donald Trump for POTUS. Read some of his record to see why this really continues:

HERE
Even Joe Manchin, a Democrat, said this was stupid.
Originally Posted by bigfish9684
Originally Posted by djs
Originally Posted by Redneck
IMHO, he didn't lie...


He denied (under oath) meeting or communicating with Russians during his confirmation hearings. His denial might have been: 1) a carefully crafted response (e.g., Slick Willie's define sex" statement), 2) He forgot meeting with Russians (I certainly remember each of several of my meetings with Soviet diplomats, including a car purchase - each were reported), or 3) He concealed the information (perjury). Take your pick - anyway yo call it, his time is limited.


Jesus you're f*cking retarded. But that's what happens when brother knocks up sister. But don't let that hold you back.

Originally Posted by KFWA
here are the two questions.

Actually I think Sessions is going to be OK

----------------------

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.
SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
DATE: January 10
--------------------------

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY: Several of the President-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?" the Vermont Democrat asked in a questionnaire.
SESSIONS: No.



THIS^^^^. djs=dumb jack [bleep].
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by djs


I don't believe that the Trump Campaign actually conspired with Russia,


That's what the Democrats/Communists are implying when they start questioning Trump's appointees about it.

They also said that the Russians hacked Hillary's illegal server and gave her illegal correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal to Wikileaks.

At this point, there's absolutely no reason to believe anything the Democrats/Communists have to say about anything.

When they tell the truth, it's an accident.





Exactly.
This^^^^.
Posted By: Pat85 Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by deflave
The funniest thing about all these fugking idiots blathering on the news (the same fugking idiots that claimed Trump couldn't win the primary) is that not one, single Trump voter gives a fugk.

Not a one.




Dave


No Russian had to persuade me to vote for Trump.
Originally Posted by LostHighway
Originally Posted by WyColoCowboy
HELLOOO! He was on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He met with over 30 Ambassadors last year. Shocker.

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.

https://www.senate.gov/general/committee_assignments/assignments.htm


Im waiting for my $2400/year cut in insurance premiums you pos scumbag.

If i had to bill myself for my freaking eye care I couldnt afford to be treated by my own self.

"We live in the greatest nation on earth, help me to change it. "

YOU TRIED, CHICKENCHITT.
Fake news and a lack of balls on Republicans.
Sure hope you are not called to a deposition.

I learned at a early age to answer the question the way it was asked.

Ever since then and after having several lawyers for friends,i think that they do not ask a question without knowing the answer before hand.

Ne answered the question as asked,it's plain and simple even a caveman could see it.


Sheese!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Huntz Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by KFWA
for the life of me I don't understand why Sessions lied to congress about meeting with a Russian ambassador - if what is being said is true.

At this point based on the released information and confirmed by multiple news outlets. - nevermind if its not related to the presidential campaign or not, he told them he never met with one.

That leaves us with 3 choices.

1. The media/spooks are lying and Sessions never met with them. At this point I guess its possible given our News but I doubt they are. It would be a huge credibility stain to release this without backing it up.

2. Sessions felt that the "spirit" of the question was did you meet with them on behalf of Trump. I can sort of buy that, but this is the guy stepping into the role of AG. There are no nuanced answers when you are asked point blank did you meet with a Russian official. Its yes or no

3.Sessions lied

you guys can bash away at me for posting this, that's fine, but you can't have a double standard. We can't lamblast Eric Holder for hiding information, etc

and then shrug your shoulders about Sessions just because he's on our side.

for the record, I don't think Sessions should resign, but I also didn't think Flynn should resign either.

But I'm frustrated that Sessions felt he needed to lie about this, especially in light of knowing that Obama holdovers are going to release any and all information they can to sabotage this administration.


Quit buying the Democratic MSM lies. shocked
Posted By: djs Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by watch4bear


Your cold frigid Alaska nights must be freezing your brain. You'll note that the citation was from FOX news, not CNN. The FOX news report referred to a statement that General Mattis (Trump Secretary of Defense) made, not some unnamed liberal source.

Do you trust FOX news and General Mattis, or not? Or, have they turned too liberal for you?
DC swampers and the elite media have from the beginning underestimated Trump. And, they've been wrong time after time.

They just don't seem to get it, to understand what just happened. Either they're real slow learners or they're in an advanced state of denial, maybe some of both.

Anyone who can excel/prosper in the Manhattan real estate swamp isn't someone to be triffled with.

The DC swamp is just another challenge, another property that needs work.

DF

Originally Posted by djs
Originally Posted by watch4bear


Your cold frigid Alaska nights must be freezing your brain. You'll note that the citation was from FOX news, not CNN. The FOX news report referred to a statement that General Mattis (Trump Secretary of Defense) made, not some unnamed liberal source.

Do you trust FOX news and General Mattis, or not? Or, have they turned too liberal for you?


Hurry up and get back to yelling "Trump is Hitler!" before it goes out of style.
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
Even Joe Manchin, a Democrat, said this was stupid.



Joe Manchin is trying to keep his neck out of a noose.
Quote
The FOX news report referred to a statement that General Mattis (Trump Secretary of Defense) made, not some unnamed liberal source.



Whats your point comrade? Don't believe super powers try to influence elections? Even the democrats dig up the dead in hopes of changing results. grin
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
The FOX news report referred to a statement that General Mattis (Trump Secretary of Defense) made, not some unnamed liberal source.



Whats your point comrade? Don't believe super powers try to influence elections? Even the democrats dig up the dead in hopes of changing results. grin

That's what got their tails under the rocking chair rungs.

They couldn't steal enough votes, vote enough illegals often enough, vote enough dead folks to take the election.

Trump ran away with the Electoral College.

The Dem popular vote advantage comes mostly from those centers of corruption where their skullduggery takes place.

DF
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by LostHighway

He was not a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Members of that committee routinely meet with ambassadors. He was on the Senate Arm Services Committee. Members do not as a matter of routine meet with ambassadors. Of the more than 20 members he was the only one to have contact with Russian officials.


So come out with it.

Are you saying that Jess Sessions conspired with Russia to give the election to Trump?

I'll answer for you.

"No",....you don't believe that. But you're like every fuggin' liberal I've ever met. You'll tell any lie you feel is necessary to advance your agenda.

There's some truth for you to chew on.

I'm sure it won't taste familiar.


Are you saying what he posted was false? What part?


The entire premise that the Trump administration conspired with Russia to win the election is not only false. It's treasonous.

I have no patience with anyone who makes the attempt to push that narrative nor anyone who defends them for doing so.

There's no fence riding on this matter.

Everyone has to choose a side.

I've chosen mine.


Oh. I thought you disagreed with his post.
Originally Posted by Dirtfarmer
Originally Posted by watch4bear
Quote
The FOX news report referred to a statement that General Mattis (Trump Secretary of Defense) made, not some unnamed liberal source.



Whats your point comrade? Don't believe super powers try to influence elections? Even the democrats dig up the dead in hopes of changing results. grin

That's what got their tails under the rocking chair rungs.

They couldn't steal enough votes, vote enough illegals often enough, vote enough dead folks to take the election.

Trump ran away with the Electoral College.

The Dem popular vote advantage comes mostly from those centers of corruption where their skullduggery takes place.

DF


It's just political quid pro quo horsechit. The Democrats are just getting Trump and the R's back for all the "Lock her up!!!!!" yammering during the election. They're gonna jump at every chance and swing at every softball they're given........and I've a hunch there is gonna be more than a few.

Gonna be an exciting four, or even eight, years!
Originally Posted by MadMooner


Oh. I thought you disagreed with his post.


I disagree with all of the lies I hear these days.

It's becoming apparent that you've spent so much time in the PNW that you're having trouble recognizing them.

It's understandable.
5 members of Trump's staff meeting with Russians, when they categorically denied ever seeing them (some under testimony)...is a bit confusing huh ?
Originally Posted by MadMooner


It's just political quid pro quo horsechit. The Democrats are just getting Trump and the R's back for all the "Lock her up!!!!!" yammering during the election. They're gonna jump at every chance and swing at every softball they're given........and I've a hunch there is gonna be more than a few.

Gonna be an exciting four, or even eight, years!


And it appears that you're going to be cheering them on every step of the way.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner


Oh. I thought you disagreed with his post.


I disagree with all of the lies I hear these days.

It's becoming apparent that you've spent so much time in the PNW that you're having trouble recognizing them.

It's understandable.


Lol. He made 5 claims in his post. You said he was lieing and I simply asked which claim you were referring to.

It reads like this:

Me-Bristoe, what does 2+2=?

Bristoe- Cat! Ya commie fugg!

Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner


It's just political quid pro quo horsechit. The Democrats are just getting Trump and the R's back for all the "Lock her up!!!!!" yammering during the election. They're gonna jump at every chance and swing at every softball they're given........and I've a hunch there is gonna be more than a few.

Gonna be an exciting four, or even eight, years!


And it appears that you're going to be cheering them on every step of the way.


It ain't cheering. Just watching the carnival and all the barkers stroll by.
Posted By: broomd Re: Sessions....I don't get it. - 03/02/17
Originally Posted by RWE
Originally Posted by KFWA
here are the two questions.

Actually I think Sessions is going to be OK

----------------------

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.
SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
DATE: January 10
--------------------------

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY: Several of the President-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?" the Vermont Democrat asked in a questionnaire.
SESSIONS: No.


Exactly,

both questions directly related to the campaign, and his visits with Russian and other ambassadors were in regards to his subcommittee work.

Again, Pelosi and the rest of the bitches can FOAD.

THIS...^^^^^

Complete hoesesh!te to distract from the MAGA speech the other night.
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Originally Posted by MadMooner


It's just political quid pro quo horsechit. The Democrats are just getting Trump and the R's back for all the "Lock her up!!!!!" yammering during the election. They're gonna jump at every chance and swing at every softball they're given........and I've a hunch there is gonna be more than a few.

Gonna be an exciting four, or even eight, years!


And it appears that you're going to be cheering them on every step of the way.


It ain't cheering. Just watching the carnival and all the barkers stroll by.


You don't know what's going on.

The globalists aren't just playing political games.

I suggest you look at what Merkel has done to Germany and then consider that Hillary said that Merkel is her most admired foreign leader,..and Hillary was just the globalist representative du jour.

Just *maybe* you can then get a clue as to what's at stake.

Trump's election success started a globalist full court press.
1...I like Sessions and think he's going to be a great AG.

2...I don't think he is really guilty of anything

3...The Democrats are grasping at straws

4...The GOP would be doing the same thing if they'd lost the election.
My assessment of the current state of the democrat party is:

* The party is in complete disarray and is panicked.

* The party has no bench and suffers from a lack of leadership. Look at who the candidates were to lead the DNC and look who they elected. Is this expected to reclaim lost dem votes?

* The party, in large part, refuses to accept the fact that since obama took office, the party has lost over 1,500 seats of government; local, state and Federal.

* The only way to combat and hopefully slow down the Trump success is by throwing as much crap as possible against the wall and hope something sticks.

* The party has yet to realize the voters are tired of this and are moving on. This could possibly result in catastrophic losses in 2018 and a Trump landslide re-election in 2020, with Pence waiting in the wings for 2024.
It's all white noise, think about it. Everyone was saying how presidential trump's speech was. He was turning hearts and the Dems could not stand it. They wanted to change the topic and continue to attack. Worst part of it all is those damn Rino's seem to step in.
Originally Posted by kingfisher
It's all white noise, think about it. Everyone was saying how presidential trump's speech was. He was turning hearts and the Dems could not stand it. They wanted to change the topic and continue to attack. Worst part of it all is those damn Rino's seem to step in.

It's a new playbook and they don't have a copy...

RINO's don't have a copy, either. Everyone is in panic mode, establishment R's and D's. Those two starting to look more and more alike...

It's a much bigger fight than party. It's nationalism vs. globalism. Brexit was just a sample of what's brewing. Trump was Brexit on steroids. It's gonna get interesting. Libtards are in full panic mode. Even a rabbit will bite you if you pin him up in a corner. Not so much if you club him first... grin

DF
Seeing the same tactics we saw in the election.

Character assassination without basis of fact.

No proof. No evidence. Only lies and innuendo.

The problem is, the the press uses it as the news now. In fact, it's about ALL they use.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Seeing the same tactics we saw in the election.

Character assassination without basis of fact.

No proof. No evidence. Only lies and innuendo.

The problem is, the the press uses it as the news now. In fact, it's about ALL they use.


Pretty much how it is.^^^^
sad, really.
Originally Posted by Bwana_1
5 members of Trump's staff meeting with Russians, when they categorically denied ever seeing them (some under testimony)...is a bit confusing huh ?


How's the weather in Australia today?
© 24hourcampfire