Home
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

Rep. Tom Suozzi made the remark to constituents at a town hall last week, saying that folks opposed to Trump might resort to the “Second Amendment.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the second amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says “The second amendment is the right to bear arms.”

The spectators laughed — some nervously. Republicans were not amused.

“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,” said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.
Remember that agenda driven politics AND "friend for a day" foreign policy both originated in the progressive itinerary...
Dumbocrats are desperate!
Not good. If they did that, what do they think would happen to them? Hard time. And if they (almost impossibly) succeeded, what do they think would happen if an Obamunist got elected again. Not good.

Incidentally some presidents actually have gone counter to court rulings. Andrew Jackson and Abraham Lincoln come to mind.
They're so scared of Trump, that they want to take up arms against him? They want to impeach him? So, who will take his place if they do......VP Pence, who by all accounts, is a much greater threat to the Democrats than Trump will ever be.

Nothing but a bunch of dummies.
The Dimmies are vocal about hating Trump...

But, it's not so much Trump they hate, as it is anyone that's not a commie, liberal, globalist, that agrees with their agendas.

They want us all dead.

But they have to take our guns first.

Good luck with... We'll give them to them a few grains at a time. wink
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

Rep. Tom Suozzi made the remark to constituents at a town hall last week, saying that folks opposed to Trump might resort to the “Second Amendment.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the second amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says “The second amendment is the right to bear arms.”

The spectators laughed — some nervously. Republicans were not amused.

“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,” said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.



That wee little snippet should land that fellow in a Federal holiday house post-haste.
I was thinking the same thing, JSTUART.
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
I was thinking the same thing, JSTUART.


Yup, lets not forget the dimwits love to make hundreds of millions off guns in their movies too, they then can afford a HEAVILY ARMED PROFESSIONAL security staff! crazy
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,”[/b] said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.


The Republican response is EXACTLY wrong - as that was the original reason for the 2d - protection from runaway govt.
The spokesman should have phrased that differently.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
The Dimmies are vocal about hating Trump...

But, it's not so much Trump they hate, as it is anyone that's not a commie, liberal, globalist, that agrees with their agendas.

They want us all dead.

But they have to take our guns first.

Good luck with... We'll give them to them a few grains at a time. wink


Fact. 30% of the people who voted for Trump are democrats.
Originally Posted by mark shubert
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,”[/b] said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.


The Republican response is EXACTLY wrong - as that was the original reason for the 2d - protection from runaway govt.
The spokesman should have phrased that differently.


Not when it comes from a sitting member attempting to incite.
Those that would have you disarmed, will never disarm themselves.
Originally Posted by mark shubert
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,”[/b] said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.


The Republican response is EXACTLY wrong - as that was the original reason for the 2d - protection from runaway govt.
The spokesman should have phrased that differently.


Completely agree. It ought to have said that we’re excited to see that a leftist can and does not only see the original intent of 2A but embraces it, even if we don’t agree on his timing.

We have to avoid looking like those we oppose by only favoring rights when it’s people like us exercising them.

This guy was using hyperbole and his presuppositions re: juridical supremacy are a fatal flaw in his logic but I am happy to hear anyone in gov say that We The People and our arms are all that stand against an oppressive government.
Originally Posted by mark shubert

The Republican response is EXACTLY wrong - as that was the original reason for the 2d - protection from runaway govt.
The spokesman should have phrased that differently.



I agree for the most part.

But, we have had a runaway govt for awhile.

This administration is way better than the previous one that was successful in weaponizing the entire govt, and all it's agencies against citizens.

We will get the opportunity again though. I have no doubt. The question is...."Will we?"
Originally Posted by efw
Originally Posted by mark shubert
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,”[/b] said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.


The Republican response is EXACTLY wrong - as that was the original reason for the 2d - protection from runaway govt.
The spokesman should have phrased that differently.


Completely agree. It ought to have said that we’re excited to see that a leftist can and does not only see the original intent of 2A but embraces it, even if we don’t agree on his timing.

We have to avoid looking like those we oppose by only favoring rights when it’s people like us exercising them.

This guy was using hyperbole and his presuppositions re: juridical supremacy are a fatal flaw in his logic but I am happy to hear anyone in gov say that We The People and our arms are all that stand against an oppressive government.

It's not his timing that is at issue, it's his purpose: the overthrow of a legally elected administration and seditious lies regarding that administration. Both things are treason and a violation of his oath of office. He needs to be removed, tried and convicted. Many do.
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
The Dimmies are vocal about hating Trump...

But, it's not so much Trump they hate, as it is anyone that's not a commie, liberal, globalist, that agrees with their agendas.

They want us all dead.

But they have to take our guns first.

Good luck with... We'll give them to them a few grains at a time. wink

We still haven't gotten an explanation for all the FEMA camps. Have we?
Originally Posted by JamesJr
They're so scared of Trump, that they want to take up arms against him? They want to impeach him? So, who will take his place if they do......VP Pence, who by all accounts, is a much greater threat to the Democrats than Trump will ever be.

Nothing but a bunch of dummies.



Yes, but they see Pence as beatable in 2020, and figure RBG and Kennedy hold onto to their court seats that long.

Pence's abortion stance really has them on edge. The Dems that have enough forethought want no part of President Pence, and will tell you so.

So is assignation really a possibility? I certainly hope not, but should Trump survive to become re-elected, I have no problem believing some Leftist would try.
"We still haven't gotten an explanation for all the FEMA camps. Have we?"

Those are for all us older folks who went to school and were taught civics and about how the government should be. Wasn't it Oprah that said something about killing older white people?
Paul B.
These ($@%^*)#&@ people are insane.
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

Rep. Tom Suozzi made the remark to constituents at a town hall last week, saying that folks opposed to Trump might resort to the “Second Amendment.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the second amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says “The second amendment is the right to bear arms.”

The spectators laughed — some nervously. Republicans were not amused.

“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,” said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.



That wee little snippet should land that fellow in a Federal holiday house post-haste.



Trust me when I tell you that absolutely, positively nothing is going to happen to him in any way form or manner.

MM
Meh........sounds like the same schit everybody jumped on Trump for saying about Hillary.
Originally Posted by ltppowell


Fact. 30% of the people who voted for Trump are democrats.

Very true. I am a registered Democrat, so are my wife and three adult kids. I've never voted for a Democrat for president, and neither my wife or kids have. We do vote for some in local and state elections. Also there are plenty of pro 2nd amendment Democrats. Any anti 2nd Dem does not get our vote.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by ltppowell


Fact. 30% of the people who voted for Trump are democrats.

Very true. I am a registered Democrat, so are my wife and three adult kids. I've never voted for a Democrat for president, and neither my wife or kids have. We do vote for some in local and state elections. Also there are plenty of pro 2nd amendment Democrats. Any anti 2nd Dem does not get our vote.



WTF? Registered democrat? Why on earth?



As to the 30% number, sounds like "alternative facts" to me. For sure the union vote gave Trump the election, but still,....30%?

Where'd you get that number?
Can you imagine the outcry from the media if some Republican politician had made the same comment about Obama? shocked
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by ltppowell


Fact. 30% of the people who voted for Trump are democrats.

Very true. I am a registered Democrat, so are my wife and three adult kids. I've never voted for a Democrat for president, and neither my wife or kids have. We do vote for some in local and state elections. Also there are plenty of pro 2nd amendment Democrats. Any anti 2nd Dem does not get our vote.



WTF? Registered democrat? Why on earth?


In most of the south it was almost akin to treason to be a republican until about 50 years ago due to long held memories of the civil war. That all changed when the dems went full bore leftist nutcase with the likes of Johnson etc. Even now there are remnants of those memories where most local officials are Democrats, you couldn’t get elected as a Republican. FWIW, I’m a bit younger and have NEVER voted for a democrat.
Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

Rep. Tom Suozzi made the remark to constituents at a town hall last week, saying that folks opposed to Trump might resort to the “Second Amendment.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the second amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says “The second amendment is the right to bear arms.”

The spectators laughed — some nervously. Republicans were not amused.

“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,” said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.



That wee little snippet should land that fellow in a Federal holiday house post-haste.



Trust me when I tell you that absolutely, positively nothing is going to happen to him in any way form or manner.

MM

I don't trust you to believe that because I can't and won't, but I absolutely trust you to say that everytime!
If a private citizen had published that, he would have FBI agents and NSA guys up his a$$ so far he would need an enema.
Originally Posted by MadMooner



WTF? Registered democrat? Why on earth?



As to the 30% number, sounds like "alternative facts" to me. For sure the union vote gave Trump the election, but still,....30%?

Where'd you get that number?

Every time I ever thought about registering Republican they would do something stupid. Like putting up Bobby Jindal or David Vitter. We have had two very honest conservative and pro 2nd amendment Democrat governors (Kathleen Blanco and John Bel Edwards) and some real disasters that were Republican (mainly Jindal). I don't care to hear about Ms. Blanco's failings during hurricane Katrina, because nobody could have done more. She inherited New Orleans that is a 3rd world s---hole and declared a state of emergency when the storm was 3 days away. If looters want to ignore a mandatory evacuation there is nothing anyone can do.
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Or at least for an armed response to Trump...

Quote
A Democratic congressman from Long Island implied that Americans should grab weapons and oppose President Trump by force, if the commander-in-chief doesn’t follow the Constitution.

Rep. Tom Suozzi made the remark to constituents at a town hall last week, saying that folks opposed to Trump might resort to the “Second Amendment.”

“It’s really a matter of putting public pressure on the president,” Suozzi said in a newly released video of the March 12 talk in Huntington. “This is where the Second Amendment comes in quite frankly, because you know, what if the president was to ignore the courts? What would you do? What would we do?”

A listener then blurts out, “What’s the second amendment?”

The left-leaning Democrat says “The second amendment is the right to bear arms.”

The spectators laughed — some nervously. Republicans were not amused.

“This video is incredibly disturbing. It’s surreal to watch a sitting member of Congress suggest that his constituents should take up arms against the President of the United States,” said National Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Chris Martin.


The thing is, I wouldn't put it past them. In fact, I expect attempts.



That wee little snippet should land that fellow in a Federal holiday house post-haste.

yup, if it was a republican !
Originally Posted by Crow hunter
Originally Posted by MadMooner
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by ltppowell


Fact. 30% of the people who voted for Trump are democrats.

Very true. I am a registered Democrat, so are my wife and three adult kids. I've never voted for a Democrat for president, and neither my wife or kids have. We do vote for some in local and state elections. Also there are plenty of pro 2nd amendment Democrats. Any anti 2nd Dem does not get our vote.



WTF? Registered democrat? Why on earth?


In most of the south it was almost akin to treason to be a republican until about 50 years ago due to long held memories of the civil war. That all changed when the dems went full bore leftist nutcase with the likes of Johnson etc. Even now there are remnants of those memories where most local officials are Democrats, you couldn’t get elected as a Republican. FWIW, I’m a bit younger and have NEVER voted for a democrat.



That's something that the Yankees don't understand. My part of Kentucky was very pro-Confederate in it's politics, and there was nothing much worse than being labeled a Republican. I was a registered Democrat for many years, and though I voted Republican, I couldn't bear the thought of belonging to same party as Abraham Lincoln did. Eventually, I tired of the way the local Democrats would support the national Democrat candidates, and I changed to the GOP. That may soon change to, as I may go Independent because the Republicans are starting to pizz me off as well.
The left is steeped in Marxist Bolshevik ideology, the are violent and dangerous. If they disarm the right they will slaughter us like sheep.

These recent mass shooters are all left wing nuts, if a single one was conservative, Republican or an NRA member it would be on the news non stop for months.

The left ALWAYS accuses others of what they are and do!
Originally Posted by jnyork
Can you imagine the outcry from the media if some Republican politician had made the same comment about Obama? shocked

They would already be in federal custody.
A bigger question for the congressman might be what should be done when the federal courts ignore the Constitution. Would be interested in his answer.
© 24hourcampfire