Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
Hell, my take on that was that Tulsi made up a lot of crap and in general I would have supported Kamela. But I certainly would not vote for either one of them.
Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
I would donkey punch her and leave...
But I would never vote for a democrat.
Lol!!
No doubt in my mind that we ALL get the point you were trying to make.
Almost spit out the fresh homemade Neopolitan cookies that just came out of the oven.
Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
I would donkey punch her and leave...
But I would never vote for a democrat.
Lol!!
No doubt in my mind that we ALL get the point you were trying to make.
Geno
Hey Renegade, Don't be coy. Stop sugarcoating it and tell us what you really feel about her!
Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
I would donkey punch her and leave...
But I would never vote for a democrat.
Lol!!
Wife gets home, what this Thursday??
hahaha
Crap, don't tell me rengade has the nekkid workout video and that's where he's gettin' his ideas while Khan wife is away.
Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
I would donkey punch her and leave...
But I would never vote for a democrat.
Lol!!
You've ran this scenario through your head once or twenty times!
Tulsi is hot.... I would rail the schitt outta her and would love to see the shock waves traveling up her buns into her lower back while pulling back on her hair making her talk dirty to me. After i busted my nut.
I would donkey punch her and leave...
But I would never vote for a democrat.
Lol!!
Wife gets home, what this Thursday??
hahaha
Tommorow afternoon...... Fugg.......
Gotta clean the cat box.... fuggg.... Gotta clean the kitchen floor..... fuggg..... Haul the laundry that has been done up the stairs..... fuggg..... Bout half an hour of HB1 ( house bitch 1 ) schitt.
Not much. Firm believer in the Clean as you go schitt....
Ye who would make jest...Fear the Tulsi. She is featured in Reason magazine this month (me and probably 4 other people read this magazine) being interviewed by John Stossel. As a veteran, she makes some of the strongest anti war, anti intervention arguments I have ever heard. When she starts listing the last ten or so interventions and regime changes...and the net result of our interventions, an intelligent person just can't rebut her conclusions. On other issues, she is still a play now, pay later big government socialist. But we better hope she doesn't gain any traction in her own party. Her on a debate stage with the Donald? Not good for our man.
That's the scary thing about her. She's a smooth talker and sounds good, but we all know she's for every Leftist scheme that comes down the pike. I hope people on the Mainland don't get fooled.
Ye who would make jest...Fear the Tulsi. She is featured in Reason magazine this month (me and probably 4 other people read this magazine) being interviewed by John Stossel. As a veteran, she makes some of the strongest anti war, anti intervention arguments I have ever heard. When she starts listing the last ten or so interventions and regime changes...and the net result of our interventions, an intelligent person just can't rebut her conclusions. On other issues, she is still a play now, pay later big government socialist. But we better hope she doesn't gain any traction in her own party. Her on a debate stage with the Donald? Not good for our man.
If I recall, that Reason magazine is a "libertarian" rag, no?
Makes sense for them to interview her given her anti-interventionist position.
When I heard her in the first debate I had to look up her platform. Upon reading it, and seeing as how she appeared the "smartest" of the crowd on the debate stage, I hoped she wouldn't be the Dems pick.
She would likely tear up The Donald....................he'd likely end up calling her a [bleep] or some other silliness in his post debate tweets, which would please many but lose him votes otherwise.
As with my comment re: Kamala Harris..........................Let's hope she's not still in the running in 2024.
Ye who would make jest...Fear the Tulsi. She is featured in Reason magazine this month (me and probably 4 other people read this magazine) being interviewed by John Stossel. As a veteran, she makes some of the strongest anti war, anti intervention arguments I have ever heard. When she starts listing the last ten or so interventions and regime changes...and the net result of our interventions, an intelligent person just can't rebut her conclusions. On other issues, she is still a play now, pay later big government socialist. But we better hope she doesn't gain any traction in her own party. Her on a debate stage with the Donald? Not good for our man.
Actually it is quite easy to refute major portions of her claims...
Ban assault weapons; require universal background checks In Congress, Gabbard has co-sponsored bills that would ban assault weapons and require background checks for all gun purchases, including closing what is known as the "gun-show loophole." Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls , Jan 14, 2019
Advocate for sensible gun control Tulsi has a consistent record of advocating for sensible gun control. She has long called for reinstating a federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high capacity clips, requiring comprehensive pre-purchase background checks, closing the gun-show loophole, and making sure that terrorists are not allowed to buy guns. Tulsi is focused on building bipartisan solutions that can actually be passed into law, rather than using the issue as a partisan political football.
Tulsi Gabbard on gun control measures: H.R. 1565 & H.R. 1217: To ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System H.R. 2380: Gun Show Loophole Closing Act: To require criminal background checks at gun shows. H.R. 226: Keeping Guns from High Risk Individuals Act H.R. 1745: Support Assault Firearms Elimination and Reduction: a tax credit for surrendering to authorities certain assault weapons.
Ban assault weapons; require universal background checks In Congress, Gabbard has co-sponsored bills that would ban assault weapons and require background checks for all gun purchases, including closing what is known as the "gun-show loophole." Source: PBS News hour on 2020 Presidential hopefuls , Jan 14, 2019
Advocate for sensible gun control Tulsi has a consistent record of advocating for sensible gun control. She has long called for reinstating a federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high capacity clips, requiring comprehensive pre-purchase background checks, closing the gun-show loophole, and making sure that terrorists are not allowed to buy guns. Tulsi is focused on building bipartisan solutions that can actually be passed into law, rather than using the issue as a partisan political football.
Tulsi Gabbard on gun control measures: H.R. 1565 & H.R. 1217: To ensure that all individuals who should be prohibited from buying a firearm are listed in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System H.R. 2380: Gun Show Loophole Closing Act: To require criminal background checks at gun shows. H.R. 226: Keeping Guns from High Risk Individuals Act H.R. 1745: Support Assault Firearms Elimination and Reduction: a tax credit for surrendering to authorities certain assault weapons.
She is really the only one who can threaten Trump. For some reason, moderates look right past how far left she leans. I like her as a person. Quite a bit. Her political views are too far left though.
Yep, the geezer vote. My late father in law would vote for any female he thought was attractive. And he thought Hillary was attractive. He wanted Laura Bush to run. Dirty old men might put Tulsi over the top. A big percent of the conservative vote doesn't care much about gun rights.
She is really the only one who can threaten Trump. For some reason, moderates look right past how far left she leans. I like her as a person. Quite a bit. Her political views are too far left though.
Her whole track record and proposal schema is left-wing. I can't see a single thing I agree with her on and a whole bunch like "Eliminate the Electoral College" that are there simply to make sure that we never have a conservative as president again.
She is really the only one who can threaten Trump. For some reason, moderates look right past how far left she leans. I like her as a person. Quite a bit. Her political views are too far left though.
Her whole track record and proposal schema is left-wing. I can't see a single thing I agree with her on and a whole bunch like "Eliminate the Electoral College" that are there simply to make sure that we never have a conservative as president again.
I really don't get her appeal to moderates. But it's undeniably there. I think she would beat Trump. I know a lot of more moderate types who have said they could get behind her. Figuratively speaking of course. She has that polite but no BS demeanor and doesn't come off as a kook. All one needs to do is look at that link to see how objectionable she is politically.
Yes that was the turning point for Kamala. Kamala was the shining star of the Dems for months and looked like there was a good chance she would take the nomination. Tulsi attacked her at that debate, and it has been all downhill ever since.
Yes that was the turning point for Kamala. Kamala was the shining star of the Dems for months and looked like there was a good chance she would take the nomination. Tulsi attacked her at that debate, and it has been all downhill ever since.
Mr Sitka deer, I am willing to be schooled on the success of our military and/or CIA interventions, regime changes, or outright meddling since WW II. From my viewpoint they have been disasters for us, in blood and treasure, and disasters for the people in the countries we intended to "help''. We have a military presence in 80 countries, last count. Why? You can call me a peacenik, but I believe we should have the strongest military in the world, but use it sparingly, no more loved ones names on a marble wall in DC, no more gold star moms, squandering lives fighting wars in which the final goal remains undefined. Sending our best to war should require: clear and present danger to out homeland (notice I didn't use the phrase, US interests), a clearly stated mission and objective, NO rules of engagement, overwhelming force, and clearly defined victory and exit strategy (no more occupations).
She would get a lot of vote that Hillary didn't get and all that she did get.
I wouldn't bet the farm on that line of thinking...A lot's changed since 2016....IMHO, the lunacy, lies and lock step partisan voting along party lines is gonna come back big time and bite democrats squarely on the ass in 2020....she may come across as moderate, but it's a given that she would support EVERY radical piece of legislation that crossed her desk....same with every GD democrat in the country.....I have no idea where these "polls" get their data (maybe college campuses?) But there's no way the republicans and president aren't picking up massive support from not only the registered independents but moderate democrat voters as well....the lies being spewed by democrats and the MSM are something you'd expect to see in an episode of "The Twilight Zone".....and most of America ain't buying it....
Gabbard, a Democrat from Hawaii who has called for the breakup of big tech companies, was among the top search topics on Google during and after the debate. Gabbard’s campaign decided after the debate that “now is the time we can get our message out there by buying search ads,’’ said attorney Brian Dunne, who is representing Gabbard. But “just as her Google traffic was spiking, her Google ad account was taken offline,’’ he said.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, who didn't qualify for Thursday night's presidential primary debate, says the Democratic National Committee’s qualification system could be sowing distrust among voters.
My post pointed out that she was omitted from the second debate because her opening statement in the first debate was almost completely dedicated to ending America's perpetual wars in the Middle East.
There's very powerful people in America who want to keep America's military in the Middle East.
,...but at least you impressed Bayou Rover (Maser),......so congratulations.
Gabbard doesn't have one chance in a million of getting the nomination.
As mentioned,...that's a given. You can't be anti war and get nominated to be a Presidential candidate.
Trump got elected partly because of his anti war rhetoric. But he was forced to back off of it,....just as he's been forced to back off sealing the border.
There's at least two actions that the deep state won't allow a President to perform.
Trump campaigned on ending the wars in the Middle East. That's been watered down to him flying to Afghanistan and feeding the troops there a turkey dinner.
Trump campaigned against illegal immigration. That's been watered down to Trump exclaiming during his State of the Union address that he wanted more legal immigration than ever before.
It appears that Trump's plan to end illegal immigration is to make the illegals, "legal"
That's not what the people who voted for him had in mind.
Who among us would pound her like a 16 penny nail in dry hardwood?
That is a given, but does not equate to political support.
The problem is, many would vote for her based on her appearance alone. And let's face facts, she doesn't come across at all crazy so the voter could feel justified in misplacing their trust in her.
Who among us would pound her like a 16 penny nail in dry hardwood?
That is a given, but does not equate to political support.
The problem is, many would vote for her based on her appearance alone. And let's face facts, she doesn't come across at all crazy so the voter could feel justified in misplacing their trust in her.
Who among us would pound her like a 16 penny nail in dry hardwood?
That is a given, but does not equate to political support.
The problem is, many would vote for her based on her appearance alone. And let's face facts, she doesn't come across at all crazy so the voter could feel justified in misplacing their trust in her.
That is a serious problem.
She scares the hell outta me.
I agree. She seems by far the most reasonable on the left and the only one with any chance of winning over any Trump voters.
Murray here, I was truly shocked that you were that for gone in your delusions. It has been obvious for some time that you had become an easily manipulated prole but thought that you were a little sharper than old r. white and trh. My mistake.
Mr Sitka deer, I am willing to be schooled on the success of our military and/or CIA interventions, regime changes, or outright meddling since WW II. From my viewpoint they have been disasters for us, in blood and treasure, and disasters for the people in the countries we intended to "help''. We have a military presence in 80 countries, last count. Why? You can call me a peacenik, but I believe we should have the strongest military in the world, but use it sparingly, no more loved ones names on a marble wall in DC, no more gold star moms, squandering lives fighting wars in which the final goal remains undefined. Sending our best to war should require: clear and present danger to out homeland (notice I didn't use the phrase, US interests), a clearly stated mission and objective, NO rules of engagement, overwhelming force, and clearly defined victory and exit strategy (no more occupations).
I wish I had written this. I believe our troubles began with the Spanish-American war and we've been on the road to national and moral bankruptcy ever since.
Gabbard is anti-gun, which means wannabe tyrant. But I'm very glad that she was around to shut down Harris. That pos would have been real trouble if she'd got rolling