Home
Posted By: rockinbbar No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
According to DOJ.

Anyone surprised?
Posted By: 308ld Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20


Nope, no surprise, just reported on FOX NEWS....no criminal charges for McCabe
Posted By: boatammo Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Stinking rotten gov't NOT TO BE TRUSTED EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is going to have to start and soon. The tree needs to be refreshed.
Posted By: FatCity67 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Honestly it was a flimsy case from the beginning. Doesn't mean though it wasn't used to get his testimony on other ongoing investigations.

I bet the biggest tell will be how hard Trump hits it on the Twitter.
Posted By: boatammo Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Flimsy my butt. He lied under oath more than once. and they want to put Stone away for the rest of his life. Give me a frikken break. Our gov't and pretty much everyone who works in it are THE PROBLEM.
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by FatCity67
Honestly it was a flimsy case from the beginning. Doesn't mean though it wasn't used to get his testimony on other ongoing investigations.

I bet the biggest tell will be how hard Trump hits it on the Twitter.



He was recommended for prosecution awhile back.

And they want to give Stone 9 years in the federal pen for the same thing...

The double standard continues.



We have permanently LOST Equal Justice Under the Law. mad mad
Posted By: Springcove Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Banana Republic
Posted By: shaman Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
This is just a guess. This might be signs of a backdoor plea deal. What I mean is that Andy was in the middle of it. If they need him to testify and rat out the rest of the jerks, the DOJ can write this letter with no visible sign of quid pro quo. Then Andy is free to spill his guts behind the scenes.

I'm not saying this is truth. I'm saying it fits with what we know. Someone was going to roll. Andy is a big enough fish to know how high this went, who all the players were, and who did what when.
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
For once, I may agree with the hypocrats...

Barr may need to go.
Posted By: shaman Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Another note: At the same time the McCabe news was hitting the fan at FOXNEWS, Q put up a new drop

Check out # 3862. This may have some bearing on all this.
Posted By: Paddler Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
There never was anything on McCabe. Firing him the day before he would get his pension was nothing but chickensh*t, and one more in a long list of reasons to despise POS. Stone should get the maximum.
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
There never was anything on McCabe. Firing him the day before he would get his pension was nothing but chickensh*t, and one more in a long list of reasons to despise POS. Stone should get the maximum.



You have no place in threads that I start, Dumbass.

Get the fugg out.

The grown ups are talking.
Posted By: Raeford Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
There never was anything on McCabe. Firing him the day before he would get his pension was nothing but chickensh*t, and one more in a long list of reasons to despise POS. Stone should get the maximum.

One word: PERJURY
Posted By: Fireball2 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
[

The gown ups are talking.


Freudian slip? LOL
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Fixt.

Thanks
Posted By: Paddler Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by Paddler
There never was anything on McCabe. Firing him the day before he would get his pension was nothing but chickensh*t, and one more in a long list of reasons to despise POS. Stone should get the maximum.



You have no place in threads that I start, Dumbass.

Get the fugg out.

The F*ckups are talking.


I post wherever I please, Dumbass. Get over yourself.
Posted By: Raeford Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
So Perjuring oneself is 'nothing'?
Paddler?
Posted By: jaguartx Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by shaman
This is just a guess. This might be signs of a backdoor plea deal. What I mean is that Andy was in the middle of it. If they need him to testify and rat out the rest of the jerks, the DOJ can write this letter with no visible sign of quid pro quo. Then Andy is free to spill his guts behind the scenes.

I'm not saying this is truth. I'm saying it fits with what we know. Someone was going to roll. Andy is a big enough fish to know how high this went, who all the players were, and who did what when.


This is disappointing, but I'm going to withhold judgement until we hear what Barr reports on Mar 31. The cabal may have just stepped into a trap.

I figure McCabe would sell his soul to the devil to save his ass, and be may have made a deal to do just that by hanging Comey, Yates, Lynch, Ohr, Hillary and Zero.

MSM is of course ecstatic, just as they were when Stone, Manafort and Pappadopilous, were arrested and when Mueller was going to report on Trump and when Hillary was in for the win. Remember the same on them destroying Flynn. whistle

As usual, the MSM reports and the suckers schiett their shorts.
Posted By: FatCity67 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by FatCity67
Honestly it was a flimsy case from the beginning. Doesn't mean though it wasn't used to get his testimony on other ongoing investigations.

I bet the biggest tell will be how hard Trump hits it on the Twitter.



He was recommended for prosecution awhile back.

And they want to give Stone 9 years in the federal pen for the same thing...

The double standard continues.

We have permanently LOST Equal Justice Under the Law. mad mad


Easy there bigman don't let these scumbags raise your blood pressure anymore.

Different cases but yeah there is no excuse for the prosecutorial hypocrisy.

I will say though that Stone did himself no favors.

McCabe just might be the little fish that catches the big one.

Again whats Trump saying?
Originally Posted by Raeford
So Perjuring oneself is 'nothing'?
Paddler?


I'm sure he felt the same way about Bill Clinton
Posted By: MontanaMan Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by jaguartx

The cabal may have just stepped into a trap.



That's been used as an excuse for far, far too long since there's never really been even one significant prosecution.

MM
Posted By: ftbt Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Only Republicans get convicted of crimes in today’s Justice system.
Posted By: Coyotejunki Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
yea I am waiting on Brenner and Clapper to be charged for lying under oath. Like the swamp will ever do that.
Posted By: mtnsnake Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by ftbt
Only Republicans get convicted of crimes in today’s Justice system.

+1
Posted By: jaguartx Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by FatCity67
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by FatCity67
Honestly it was a flimsy case from the beginning. Doesn't mean though it wasn't used to get his testimony on other ongoing investigations.

I bet the biggest tell will be how hard Trump hits it on the Twitter.



He was recommended for prosecution awhile back.

And they want to give Stone 9 years in the federal pen for the same thing...

The double standard continues.

We have permanently LOST Equal Justice Under the Law. mad mad


Easy there bigman don't let these scumbags raise your blood pressure anymore.

Different cases but yeah there is no excuse for the prosecutorial hypocrisy.

I will say though that Stone did himself no favors.

McCabe just might be the little fish that catches the big one.

Again whats Trump saying?


Trump is educating the folks to the truth of the double standard and the truth in his statement, "The swamp was a whole lot bigger than what I originally thought".
Posted By: ftbt Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
[F]UCKING WEENIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF (IN)JUSTICE:

[Linked Image from zerohedge.com]
Posted By: JamesJr Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Typical Washington, don't know why anyone is upset.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Ft, I'm wondering if the cabal investigators sprung this without notifying Barr to try and put a chokehold on him.
It would put Barr in a tight spot if he rescinded this news.
Posted By: Morewood Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
"Based on the totality of the circumstances.."

What the hell does that mean?
Posted By: reivertom Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by Morewood
"Based on the totality of the circumstances.."

What the hell does that mean?


That means... "He's one of us, so laws don't apply".
Posted By: ironbender Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by ftbt
[F]UCKING WEENIES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF (IN)JUSTICE:

[Linked Image from zerohedge.com]

Incorrect wording. Should read:

We are pleased to announce...
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by shaman
Another note: At the same time the McCabe news was hitting the fan at FOXNEWS, Q put up a new drop

Check out # 3862. This may have some bearing on all this.



They've only dropped the investigation arising from Horowitz's 2018 referral.

This has nothing to do with Durham's investigation which is still ongoing.


And yes Shaman, that drop has bearing on it.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
And don't forget................McCabe is going down for FISA, not for lying about leaking.
Posted By: MontanaMan Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by K22
that drop has bearing on it.


Post it up so we can all read it.

MM
Posted By: sse Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by shaman
Another note: At the same time the McCabe news was hitting the fan at FOXNEWS, Q put up a new drop

Check out # 3862. This may have some bearing on all this.



They've only dropped the investigation arising from Horowitz's 2018 referral.

This has nothing to do with Durham's investigation which is still ongoing.


And yes Shaman, that drop has bearing on it.

you're gonna look pretty foolish when that one fizzles, too
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Here you go................

https://qmap.pub/read/3862
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Time to think guys, not react.
This was a leak to turn the Public against Barr.............again. They fall for it time and time again. crazy It's no wonder we lost the country. They pull a string and we jump, believing it to be true.

Why The News About McCabe Means Nothing

"I already see a lot of you losing your [bleep] over this. Take a step back, calm down, and listen to me. You need to take headlines with a grain of salt and actually read the article. If you do, you might notice this little gem:

"This means that no charges will be brought against him based on the facts underlying the Office of the Inspector General’s April 2018 report..”

Based on the OIG report from 2018. We also didn't have indictments from the recent OIG report, either. But you know what? NEITHER HAS ANY BEARING ON DURHAM OR HIS INVESTIGATION.

The [bleep] OIG reports are limited in scope to begin with, DURHAM'S INVESTIGATION IS NOT.

Those reports have to be done as a matter of course, and don't think that they don't play any role in the big picture. They do two things: tell the public about the corruption in an official capacity, buttress the predication for an investigation such as Durham's.

Everybody chill. The media, left or right, is designed to get you worked up. These articles leave out important things like that which I just mentioned.

If Durham lets people skate, then we'll have cause to be pissed. But this article and its version of the story as it is currently means nothing."
Posted By: jaguartx Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by mtnsnake
Originally Posted by ftbt
Only Republicans get convicted of crimes in today’s Justice system.

+1


Iirc, Barr previously reported that Durhams investigation would not be complete until late spring/early summer and they would not cut corners and would do it right, collecting enough evidence and doing it in the right way.

How soon we forget what the wheels say and jump on what the MSM says.
Posted By: BLG Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Perjury is one thing, but deliberately lying to the FISA courts multiple times, may be a bigger issue with bigger charges and bigger fish to catch.


JMO


Clyde
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
https://qmap.pub/read/3865

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1228389237688590336
Posted By: Toddly Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
This has nothing to do with the FISA warrants. I’ll wait for Durham. I think the tell in the letter is “arising from the office of the OIG”.
Posted By: 22250rem Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
But always remember : "NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW !!"............ And that's still true. It's just that some people just don't get prosecuted. After all; there are some cases "that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue"........... Sound familiar ?
Posted By: Toddly Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
There never was anything on McCabe. Firing him the day before he would get his pension was nothing but chickensh*t, and one more in a long list of reasons to despise POS. Stone should get the maximum.

I see our resident douchenozzle is letting his emotions get the best again.
Posted By: rockinbbar Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by Toddly
This has nothing to do with the FISA warrants. I’ll wait for Durham. I think the tell in the letter is “arising from the office of the OIG”.



Why can't he prosecuted for both?


If YOU were caught with stolen property in your stolen car, would YOU not be prosecuted for both?
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by Toddly
This has nothing to do with the FISA warrants. I’ll wait for Durham. I think the tell in the letter is “arising from the office of the OIG”.



Why can't he prosecuted for both?


If YOU were caught with stolen property in your stolen car, would YOU not be prosecuted for both?


I would not think that would apply here. Obstruction of Congress vs Treason is what hangs over his head. I would say the difference is apples to oranges.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by MontanaMan
Originally Posted by jaguartx

The cabal may have just stepped into a trap.



That's been used as an excuse for far, far too long since there's never really been even one significant prosecution.

MM

BINGO!
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
McCabe will not escape.
I remember when many said nothing was going to happen to Smollet, too? Hows that working out for him. LOL
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by sse
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by shaman
Another note: At the same time the McCabe news was hitting the fan at FOXNEWS, Q put up a new drop

Check out # 3862. This may have some bearing on all this.



They've only dropped the investigation arising from Horowitz's 2018 referral.

This has nothing to do with Durham's investigation which is still ongoing.


And yes Shaman, that drop has bearing on it.

you're gonna look pretty foolish when that one fizzles, too


Too late!
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by Toddly
This has nothing to do with the FISA warrants. I’ll wait for Durham. I think the tell in the letter is “arising from the office of the OIG”.



Why can't he prosecuted for both?


If YOU were caught with stolen property in your stolen car, would YOU not be prosecuted for both?


I would not think that would apply here. Obstruction of Congress vs Treason is what hangs over his head. I would say the difference is apples to oranges.

Obstruction of Congress isn’t even a crime.

Punch up the US Code for Obstruction or Congress if you don’t mind.
I agree nothing is going to happen. For crying out loud we have lawyer inside the FBI that purposely edited information to that totally changed the meaning of information that was used to spy on carter page. The democrat appointed horowitz even pointed this out. GUESS WHAT HE IS STILL WALKING FREE. If that isn't a crime I don't know what is. The statute of limitations is going to run on these crimes and nothing will be able to be done anyways. What I think is happening is many people in the DOJ know what happened but they simply don't want to deal with the media mess and firestorm it will create. They just wanna be good public servants and go to work and be left alone. let me repeat nothing is going to happen.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
Don't hold your breath.
Posted By: baldhunter Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/14/20
If nothing happens to them after Durahm's investigation,it's over.I still have faith,but the fact that the Democrat run intelligence is picking and choosing who's gonna lead this Country does not set well with me.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Trump needs to FIRE Barr, ASAP.
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by baldhunter
If nothing happens to them after Durahm's investigation,it's over.I still have faith,but the fact that the Democrat run intelligence is picking and choosing who's gonna lead this Country does not set well with me.


How many investigation are we going to sit and wait for. Horowitz (2), Congress (X), Huber, with absolutely nothing, not a single indictment, are we that stupid to think that Durham is going to be any different?

Wake up people.
Posted By: Paddler Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by ftbt
Only Republicans get convicted of crimes in today’s Justice system.


Maybe they should stop thinking they're above the law.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Clue 1: Who said there was illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign?

Clue 2: Who called in an outside prosecutor to review the case against Flynn?
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by K22
Don't hold your breath.


I won't.

You are just like the Democrats, puke out "crimes" that aren't even crimes.

Obstruction of Congress is a made up term by the Democrats, nice to see you are in that same boat.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by K22
Don't hold your breath.


I won't.

You are just like the Democrats, puke out "crimes" that aren't even crimes.

Obstruction of Congress is a made up term by the Democrats, nice to see you are in that same boat.


Ah gee Stevie, Lying to Congress then.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by baldhunter
If nothing happens to them after Durahm's investigation,it's over.I still have faith,but the fact that the Democrat run intelligence is picking and choosing who's gonna lead this Country does not set well with me.


How many investigation are we going to sit and wait for. Horowitz (2), Congress (X), Huber, with absolutely nothing, not a single indictment, are we that stupid to think that Durham is going to be any different?

Wake up people.



Maybe you should reword that.
Posted By: Paddler Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.
Posted By: OSU_Sig Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by steve4102
Trump needs to FIRE Barr, ASAP.

No.
This ain't over. Not by a long shot.
Posted By: bowmanh Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
There was information about this a couple of months ago. This is just the official announcement.

We don't know that the feds tried to indict him. They may have concluded that they didn't have a strong enough case to be sure of a conviction in Washington DC where the juries tend to lean very left. It's hard to tell. But Durham is still doing his investigation and we will have to wait for the results of that.

It's clear that the Democrats are trying to delegitimize Barr before Durham announces the results of his investigation.
Posted By: 257heaven Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Total bullshit.
Posted By: jaguartx Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by OSU_Sig
Originally Posted by steve4102
Trump needs to FIRE Barr, ASAP.

No.
This ain't over. Not by a long shot.


This^^^. Amen.
Posted By: stevelyn Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
The only justice we are ever going to see is what we take ourselves. Hopefully there will be a day when a true patriot finds himself sitting next to him at a traffic light.
Posted By: BayouRover Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by steve4102
Trump needs to FIRE Barr, ASAP.


There is pure horse puckey between your ears if you actually believe that..........
Posted By: Santiam Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Posted By: steve4102 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by K22
Don't hold your breath.


I won't.

You are just like the Democrats, puke out "crimes" that aren't even crimes.

Obstruction of Congress is a made up term by the Democrats, nice to see you are in that same boat.


Ah gee Stevie, Lying to Congress then.

Lying to Congress is no longer a crime, just ask McCabe and company.

Well, at least not for members of the Deep State and the Obama Administration.
Posted By: Mannlicher Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
I keep saying there won’t be charges for any of the bad actors involved with the attempted coup.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I Krupp saying there won’t be charges for any of the bad actors involved with the attempted coup.


Have the sealed indictments been leaked?
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.



Read it again Pad.

" lying to investigators".................
Posted By: Paddler Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.



Read it again Pad.

" lying to investigators".................


Why don't you read it again, dipshit? Did you see the "allegedly"? What a moron..... or maybe you were trying to deceive. Either way your credibility is zilch, your character despicable.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/15/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.



Read it again Pad.

" lying to investigators".................


Why don't you read it again, dipshit? Did you see the "allegedly"? What a moron..... or maybe you were trying to deceive. Either way your credibility is zilch, your character despicable.


And that proves my point even more shill.
Posted By: Paddler Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.



Read it again Pad.

" lying to investigators".................


Why don't you read it again, dipshit? Did you see the "allegedly"? What a moron..... or maybe you were trying to deceive. Either way your credibility is zilch, your character despicable.


And that proves my point even more shill.


No, it does not. The WH tried to pressure the prosecutors to indict an innocent man because he testified truthfully. That's essentially what the judge said. We are not a banana republic, he said. Put up or shut up, he said. And that's what I say to you, [bleep]. You got nothing, and know even less.
Posted By: bigsqueeze Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.



Read it again Pad.

" lying to investigators".................


Why don't you read it again, dipshit? Did you see the "allegedly"? What a moron..... or maybe you were trying to deceive. Either way your credibility is zilch, your character despicable.


And that proves my point even more shill.


No, it does not. The WH tried to pressure the prosecutors to indict an innocent man because he testified truthfully. That's essentially what the judge said. We are not a banana republic, he said. Put up or shut up, he said. And that's what I say to you, [bleep]. You got nothing, and know even less.
........................Hellooooooo Mr. GarbAAAAAAge Man........Well Piddles...Your gods within the deep state, WHO SOME did weaponize their office and positions of power in order to try an ATTEMPTED coup against Trump WHICH FAILED,,,, are NOT out of the woods.........Durham report is coming, you lawless, IGNORANT of the law and the Constitution, HYPOCRITE and LIAR......
Posted By: Bristoe Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
No deep state operatives will be charged.
Posted By: Springcove Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Poor Piddler you are such a loser. Just like your democrat douche bags.

Trump 2020 MAGA
Posted By: bigsqueeze Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Originally Posted by Bristoe
No deep state operatives will be charged.
...........................If after the Durham report comes out and no charges/indictments are filed, then I will share your sentiment.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Originally Posted by bigsqueeze
Originally Posted by Bristoe
No deep state operatives will be charged.
...........................If after the Durham report comes out and no charges/indictments are filed, then I will share your sentiment.


Well said.
Many have broken crystal balls.
Posted By: K22 Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
Originally Posted by K22
Originally Posted by Paddler
So, the Grand Jury would not return an indictment, which means that McCabe was more innocent than a ham sandwich. The transcripts of conversations between the judge and the prosecutors were released today under a FOIA request. They show the judge very critical of those "at the top of our government" trying to influence who gets prosecuted, saying we are not a banana republic. Just more BS from Trump and Barr:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-against-former-fbi-acting-head-n1137066

You guys really need better news sources.



Read it again Pad.

" lying to investigators".................


Why don't you read it again, dipshit? Did you see the "allegedly"? What a moron..... or maybe you were trying to deceive. Either way your credibility is zilch, your character despicable.


And that proves my point even more shill.


No, it does not. The WH tried to pressure the prosecutors to indict an innocent man because he testified truthfully. That's essentially what the judge said. We are not a banana republic, he said. Put up or shut up, he said. And that's what I say to you, [bleep]. You got nothing, and know even less.


Nope. Read it again Pid.
Posted By: bigsqueeze Re: No Charges for McCabe - 02/16/20
Piddle Paddle Paddler only can comprehend what he (maybe a she?) wants to, which is very very little.

The epitome of a fools fool.
© 24hourcampfire