Home
Not that you'd necessarily want to under normal circumstances. Morgan is a Brit, and an Old School classic liberal. He's not a progressive and he's not a communist by nature, but a classic liberal. I occasionally watch him to see what drives the minds of the Left. The problem both Morgan and I have is that the Left has gone so far off the rails that Morgan now looks like a sightly Left leaning Moderate. That doesn't help me read the New Left, and that leaves Morgan without a home. There is no classic liberal movement anymore.

Morgan hates guns. He's a Brit, so go figure. Beyond that, he's the Liberal that wants to "reasonable".

Lately, he has been ripping the American Press and the Democrat Party for their hypocritical and overt attacks on Trump. Shocking to see from such Liberal and totally out of character compared to any American pundit from the Left. I'm not saying I'm becoming a fan, but it is refreshing to see someone on the Left actually speak the truth and not Leftist talking points. In other words, I'm shocked to find Morgan being objective. Never see that from the Left anymore.

Now that I've said that, I have to backtrack. I NEVER thought I'd see Alan Dershowitz as objective, and I saw that during the Senate Trial.

Trump has made these times "interesting" for sure.
Last thing I heard from Morgan, he was ripping the Dems for getting beat by Trump.

"Donald Trump? Donald fricken Trump?!? Well no wonder, look at your candidate. Hillary Clinton, really? Get a better candidate!"
I was speaking with a classical liberal the other day, and she agreed that if the Dems had run somebody like Biden in 2016, the other side of the country would not have felt pressured to run a candidate like Trump. Putting Hillary in there as the candidate created the need for Trump.
I think Obama created the need for Trump, not so much Hillary.
The sucker makes a lot of money for being a dumbass who couldnt see this coming, but then, a lot of folks out there cant see hell coming.
Originally Posted by JPro
I was speaking with a classical liberal the other day, and she agreed that if the Dems had run somebody like Biden in 2016, the other side of the country would not have felt pressured to run a candidate like Trump. Putting Hillary in there as the candidate created the need for Trump.


I agree. Trump was the antidote for Hillary. If the Dems had run Biden, or reused John Kerry or even Al Gore (remember, he was just a few votes from being Prez), the GOP would have picked Kasich or Rubio or Jeb.
Which stance is going to pay ole Piers better today?
Not too surprising that once the bus goes over the cliff, someone inside voices concern. ;-{>8
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
Not too surprising that once the bus goes over the cliff, someone inside voices concern. ;-{>8



Priceless!

Jim, Morgan is such a confident prick I don't think he's driven by which way the wind blows as much as whatever he's passionate about today and damn what everbody else thinks. Not saying he won't "shop" his opinion. Morgan is certainly one who thinks he's smarter than the room.
No, the name does not even ring a bell.
The last time I thought I heard Morgan I realized it was a fart resonating in the bowl of the throne.
Originally Posted by KFWA
I think Obama created the need for Trump, not so much Hillary.

I agree. But as many people went to the polls to vote against Hillary, as those who went to vote against Obama policies.

Without those anti Hillary votes, Trump might have lost.
Originally Posted by JPro
I was speaking with a classical liberal the other day, and she agreed that if the Dems had run somebody like Biden in 2016, the other side of the country would not have felt pressured to run a candidate like Trump. Putting Hillary in there as the candidate created the need for Trump.


Your friend is a typical delusional libtard idiot.

8 years of George Bush and Dick Cheney is why REPUBLICAN primary voters pushed Trump. We made a concious decision to drive a stake through the heart of the Bush politcal " Dynasty' and the politcal establishment it represented. It is why "JEB! "was finished by Spring.

And 8 years of the Magic Negro was why swing voters broke for Trump in the General.

We basically wanted to set fire to the swamp vis a vi Trump.

And it is still burning
.:)

No thanks to "Classic liberals".
Piers Morgan has improved so much, Jeremy Clarke would not have to punch him out today.
Wasn't Morgan the fool who committed a felony by having a 30 round magazine in his possession in Washington DC during an interview- - - - - -and got away with it? Last night he was being interviewed on Fox News. That speaks volumes about him, the DC police, AND Faux News!
Jerry
Enough people finally woke enough to realize that the republicans had already annointed Jeb. Couple that with the realization that another Bush administration might very well mean the end of our country as we know it. When the republucans force fed us Bush I on the coatails of Reagan, they got a little too confident and it has given them Trump. I still believe they are conniving night and day to find a way to rid themselves of Trump without getting blamed. This next election is not a slam dunk for Trump.
Morgan was on one of the FOX shows last night or the night before........... he actually made sense...

WAY too soon to tell if he has come to his senses though!

Takes a while to start trusting a big swing party switcher... IMHO
Piers Morgan has been anti-gun since day one. He is dead to me. I couldn't care less about anything else he has to say.

Being a liberal Brit (and in the U.S.), he is on the downside of a tidal wave.
I'm not sure I believe this:

Politically, Morgan identified as a supporter of the Conservative Party in a 1994 interview.[1] (WIKI)

Wonder what is considered conservative over there?
© 24hourcampfire