AB2506;
Top of the morning to you sir, I hope the day's a tad warmer on your side of the big hills and that this finds you and yours well.
While you might be aware of some of the details now coming to light regarding the Nova Scotia shooting, I thought I'd relay them here in the event that others might be interested.
Yesterday the RCMP confirmed twice that the shooter DID NOT have a firearms licence and WAS NOT in possession of firearms legally. They still have not elaborated as to what was used, but no mention of AR/AK variants which is telling if you ask me.
There were a couple reports that the RCMP fired shots into at least one building where the shooter was nowhere near or had never been in. One was a fire hall apparently.
That coupled with the fact that the US Consulate was letting US citizens living in Nova Scotia know what was going on before the RCMP did anything other than Twitter doesn't have particularly good optics for the RCMP Command out there.
One source which I would deem credible, said that the killer came to one house, was beating on the door demanding to be let in and this chap somehow knew something was afoot and so announced that he had a loaded arm on his side of the door as well. The killer left, but the person involved is reluctant to come forward for fear of repercussions from the law or media.
Can't say I blame him as currently I don't perceive the media or RCMP giving an armed citizen a fair shake, you know?
In one of his many news briefings from home, Prime Minister Dressup was asked how his proposed new gun legislature would have been effective in light of the fact that the gunman did not possess any legal firearms. Characteristically, PM Shiny Pony stuttered no less than 3 times and said "Ah" or "Um" no less than 6 times in 3 sentences which contained no answers.
Once again, Bill Blair looked either drunk or at very least hungover and offered no answers either...
Second last item, whenever the "experts" are called on to either TV or radio news, they're not sure if any of the RCMP had their C7 "Patrol Carbines" out that night and could not explain why after spending all that time, energy and funding that might be the case.
Speaking of mainstream media nomenclature, it torments my soul to distraction when the same arm is a "patrol carbine" if it's in the hands of Canadian LEO, but becomes an "assault rifle made to kill people" if I own it!!!
Should one be looking for current examples of schizophrenic behavior...
Lastly, I'll say to anyone who cares to listen that the folks who talk about "reasonable gun control" want them all. They do not want us, the unwashed in rural areas to have so much as a single shot Cooey shotgun or .22. We cause them terror for a variety of reasons and they believe in their heart that if we're disarmed completely that we'll be somehow less frightening.
The fact that the Canadian government made us register the AR/AK/FNFAL variants means that they absolutely are able to take them because they know where most of them are at - I say that because realistically they run only 90% when looking for registered restricted firearms here...
So yes folks, registration can absolutely lead to confiscation and anyone telling you otherwise is either lying or hasn't been paying close attention to much in life.
While I suppose I should be a good Canadian and apologize for the less than charitable "rant", hopefully the gentle reader can perceive my frustration with those in power - who less than 35% of us wanted by the way......
All the best to you folks AB2506 and stay well.
Dwayne