Home
Saw posted on their website that they have four new models in 10mm coming out in their M&P product line! I personally really enjoy the 10mm and am happy to see them get back in with some 15-round capacity offerings!

Mark in GA
It's awesome. Saw the notice posted another gun forum. FBI 10mm's were S&W's and Smith offered 10mm in a revolver but for some reason, they thought it best not to offer a modern/plastic semi-auto 10mm while the rest of the US gun companies filled the demand. So glad to see them back in the 10mm game. I think they should have offered a 4" and 5", not a 4" and 4.6", but other than that I think they look good. I'd put on adjustable night sites on the 4" model and consider a red dot on the longer barrel model. I'm 50/50 on the manual safety.
A long slide to compete with the g40 would have been cool.

But I might have to pick one up regardless
Wish they would make one in .38 super.
I would like to see them go retro: bring back the 1006 by way of the Performance Center. Give it the same treatment they did the 4506 to make the 945: Single action only with 1911 controls. I have a 945…it would be a great platform for the 10mm.
Rather have a 1006 but may be interested in a MP 10mm?
Time for the 10mm Rimmed / .400 S&W on a 686 frame. Moon clips for 10mm Auto. You heard it here first.
Originally Posted by shootem
Time for the 10mm Rimmed / .400 S&W on a 686 frame. Moon clips for 10mm Auto. You heard it here first.



Smith has offered the 610 for while now. Mooned clipped 10mm. It’s 686 styled but on a N frame, not K frame.
While I am a fan of the 3rd generation Smith’s I’m glad to see all the M&P 10mm models. The CORE Pro looks very interesting.
Just put in my order for a 4” without the safety and a couple extra Mags with my local dealer. Hopefully the wait won’t be too long. At least S&W is not like Ruger used to be where they would announce something and then may or may not come out with it eventually
I've never shot a 10mm, but it must have something power wise going for it in a semi-auto handgun. I'm not sure what the two cowboys on the TV Mountain Man show use, but I sure suspect that it is a striker fired 10mm. Last week they had an episode where one of them rode his horse along side a running buffalo and gunned it with his semi-auto. Then later in the week they showed the same guy knocking off a bear with that handgun as it ran up a hillside. Impressive.
Originally Posted by pacecars
Just put in my order for a 4” without the safety and a couple extra Mags with my local dealer. Hopefully the wait won’t be too long. At least S&W is not like Ruger used to be where they would announce something and then may or may not come out with it eventually


Sounds like a great choice.

With 15+1 rounds and at 27.8 oz empty that is a great woods gun. I was wondering if the M&P Shield would ever be chambered in the 10mm.....if so I'm a buyer. However I was out with my 45ACP Shield ver 1 yesterday testing some middle of the road reloads 230g and noticing that this shooter lets me know when I touch it off. I think I'll revisit tomorrow with some hot 45ACP reloads and see how it behaves. I think I'll find out why it probably won't be offered in a Shield format for 10mm. Nuts.
FBI 10mm's were S&W's and Smith offered 10mm in a revolver but for some reason, they thought it best not to offer a modern/plastic semi-auto 10mm while the rest of the US gun companies filled the demand.




Plastic guns are junk and dangerous.
Smith payed Glock big money for saying that.
Then they payed Glock big money for ripping off their design.
Which was the Sigma!😂😂😂 Stole a greast design to build a POS!🤧🤧🤧

10mm is hot right now. They want in. It's bidness.
Originally Posted by MarkinGA
Saw posted on their website that they have four new models in 10mm coming out in their M&P product line! I personally really enjoy the 10mm and am happy to see them get back in with some 15-round capacity offerings!

Mark in GA






Got an email about it this morning.
They copied the Glock trigger safety on this one. They would have sold me if not for that. If I wanted a Glock, I'd buy a Glock.
Originally Posted by FreeMe
They copied the Glock trigger safety on this one. They would have sold me if not for that. If I wanted a Glock, I'd buy a Glock.


Lol. Right. So you do not buy Springfield, Savage, Taurus, Ruger, CZ, FN, Canik, HK, Walther, Steyr…just to name few. Cross off all the plastic frame pistols too, Glock made that mainstream. While I like 1911’s and Colt SAA’s, times change.
M&P are a great line of pistols, I've gotten rid of all my glocks and now have several M&Ps.
I have sold all but 2 of my Glock and gone to M&P as well. I just shoot the M&P better.
well , I am dissapointed Smith put that big doongle thing on the trigger and with the goofy extra high sights

I was waiting for a SW 10 mm but count me out on this one
You can replace the trigger, and those suppressor sights are for optics which are the new hotness. I am trying to justify this new gun to myself and I am almost convinced my life will be unhappy till I have one. The Glocks, and I'm a fanboy didn't do it for me with the 10mm. Neither did the Springfield. The 1911's just didn't hold enough ammo. I think S&W will sell everyone they make.
The 10mm makes for a pretty practical field gun. For a good many people who do not shoot on a frequent basis it is on the upper limit as far as what they can handle when it comes to shooting quickly with any sort of decent accuracy. It has proven to be a fairly effective round in the Rockies and AK.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Plus the fact that popular 10mms such as the Glock are fairly light as compared to a more traditional N Frame revolver or Ruger Redhawk, it is understandable why S&W jumped on the opportunity to cut into this market.
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
The 10mm makes for a pretty practical field gun. For a good many people who do not shoot on a frequent basis it is on the upper limit as far as what they can handle when it comes to shooting quickly with any sort of decent accuracy. It has proven to be a fairly effective round in the Rockies and AK.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Plus the fact that popular 10mms such as the Glock are fairly light as compared to a more traditional N Frame revolver or Ruger Redhawk, it is understandable why S&W jumped on the opportunity to cut into this market.

Stark testimony to the round's effectiveness and reputation. The bear took one look at that 10mm and shat himself...



wink
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
The 10mm makes for a pretty practical field gun. For a good many people who do not shoot on a frequent basis it is on the upper limit as far as what they can handle when it comes to shooting quickly with any sort of decent accuracy. It has proven to be a fairly effective round in the Rockies and AK.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

Plus the fact that popular 10mms such as the Glock are fairly light as compared to a more traditional N Frame revolver or Ruger Redhawk, it is understandable why S&W jumped on the opportunity to cut into this market.



Mackey,
what's your ideas of the 10 vs hot 45/45 Super?

Especially in something like the G21/29 that can run Super with just
spring changes?
With some more splendid pixels please.
Dillon.

I think most people do not recognize/understand the capability of the .45. Part of that has to do with the fact that outside of custom manufacturers, there is almost no ammo available for the .45 ACP that is allowing it to be used to its full potential.

The 10mm is recognized for its ability, and it has a well deserved reputation. That said people really do not know much about the capabilities of a proper .45 load. Oddly enough, as this is being written, I am loading what I consider to be the ideal .45 ACP load that is appropriate for .45s in proper working order/properly maintained, with good springs.

That is a 250 grain hard cast flat point at a shade past 950 FPS.

In a bunch of testing the load averaged 956 out of 5" barreled 1911s.


People associate powerful .45 loads with revolvers, not autos...

Many recognize the power of the excellent .45 Colt.




John Linebaugh wrote the following:


I have personally taken about 10 antelope and 1 mule deer with a .45 Colt. My boys have taken around 6 antelope and 5 mule deer with their .45 Colts. They use a 4 3/4" Colt SA and the handload is a 260 Keith cast at 900 fps. This load will shoot lengthwise of antelope and mule deer at 100 yards.

A 45 caliber 260grain hardcast @ 900 FPS has a well deserved reputation as an excellent game stopper. Using the standard USPSA power factor formula of bullet weight x velocity divided by 1K you get a power factor of 234.

In .the same 45 caliber (this time a semi auto platform) we are launching a 250 grain bullet at 956 for a power factor of 239.

Basically you are getting the same type of power, simply in a much easier to shoot semi auto platform.

Personally I don't care much about "formulas", I just use it as an easy reference for folks to compare.

The fact is that a hot, heavy hardcast .45 ACP is a rather formidable setup, and one that I carry often in the mountains.




[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

I spent a lot of time in Grizzly country this year and I packed a 1911, loaded with this load more often than not this year.

Frankly, 10mm or hot .45 ACP, I think you are good either way. I think many are simply not aware of what is available with the .45.



[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
I wish that Glock would upsize the G36 and chamber it in 10mm for those of us who find the 20/21 grip just a little too big. A 8-9 shot would be ideal with at least a 4.25in barrel. I know it's futile but I can wish...
Thanks Mackey.

You pretty much confirmed my thoughts, and I've been watching
you ammo threads. Saw that load.

I've got bunches of 255 for the 45 colt, and a Springfield RO.

Pondered some warm loads after maybe fitting a flat bottom pin stop.

If nothing else, just for grins.


Uphiker,
Just thinking, don't let my thought hurt you.

The G30s came from people putting a 36 slide on a 30.

So...could one put a 29 slide on a 36?
Magazines. That might be the wrinkle.
Originally Posted by Mountain10mm
Originally Posted by FreeMe
They copied the Glock trigger safety on this one. They would have sold me if not for that. If I wanted a Glock, I'd buy a Glock.


Lol. Right. So you do not buy Springfield, Savage, Taurus, Ruger, CZ, FN, Canik, HK, Walther, Steyr…just to name few. Cross off all the plastic frame pistols too, Glock made that mainstream. While I like 1911’s and Colt SAA’s, times change.


Don't be an idiot. It's the trigger I don't like on the pistol, and I was perfectly clear about that. And not all those you named are even the same.
10mm is for girls.

Thanks for the fyi. I was going to get the wife a XD, but now I'll try to find the Smith instead.
More firearm models in 10mm is great. I love my G29 and G40, though I wish the triggers were more like a rifle. Hopefully this carries some interest over into the .41 Magnum spectrum as well. Both the 10 and .41 are perhaps the finest cartridges IMO, but I only consider "ethical for mule deer and up" type rounds unless it's a 22LR.
Mackay, where did you find that 950 fps load data?
Originally Posted by pabucktail
Mackay, where did you find that 950 fps load data?


I fired the loads through the two chronographs that I use for testing. I learned that a number of ballisticians with a bunch of letters behind their name will often use two chronos when trying to achieve the most accurate/reliable data. Normally it is more important for rifle testing, but when I do initial testing in the T&E phase I will do the same thing and compare the numbers. Sometimes chronos can be affected by sunlight (actually they are greatly affected by sunlight). Shadows will affect them, even a slight tilting of a sensor can give an inaccurate reading.

Using the two chronongraphs at the same time is a pretty simple way to confirm that the numbers are valid.
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
Originally Posted by pabucktail
Mackay, where did you find that 950 fps load data?


I fired the loads through the two chronographs that I use for testing. I learned that a number of ballisticians with a bunch of letters behind their name will often use two chronos when trying to achieve the most accurate/reliable data. Normally it is more important for rifle testing, but when I do initial testing in the T&E phase I will do the same thing and compare the numbers. Sometimes chronos can be affected by sunlight (actually they are greatly affected by sunlight). Shadows will affect them, even a slight tilting of a sensor can give an inaccurate reading.

Using the two chronongraphs at the same time is a pretty simple way to confirm that the numbers are valid.



Overcast days give the most accurate readings 📚
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
Originally Posted by pabucktail
Mackay, where did you find that 950 fps load data?


I fired the loads through the two chronographs that I use for testing. I learned that a number of ballisticians with a bunch of letters behind their name will often use two chronos when trying to achieve the most accurate/reliable data. Normally it is more important for rifle testing, but when I do initial testing in the T&E phase I will do the same thing and compare the numbers. Sometimes chronos can be affected by sunlight (actually they are greatly affected by sunlight). Shadows will affect them, even a slight tilting of a sensor can give an inaccurate reading.

Using the two chronongraphs at the same time is a pretty simple way to confirm that the numbers are valid.


I've got an ugly old Beta Master that the stickers fell off of long ago. I'd replace it but it works fine and more importantly, I have used it long enough to know how, when and in what light to use it to get consistent, predictable results. It's also never been shot, primarily because when friends and family want something chronographed, I do the shooting.
Originally Posted by UPhiker
I wish that Glock would upsize the G36 and chamber it in 10mm for those of us who find the 20/21 grip just a little too big. A 8-9 shot would be ideal with at least a 4.25in barrel. I know it's futile but I can wish...


This is a very interesting idea. I don't have a problem with the G20 grip, but the slimmer lines with a 4.25" barrel would be nice for the carry option. Less bulk...even though it's not a lot...is always nice when carrying. 8 shots would be good for a woods gun.
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush


Using the two chronongraphs at the same time is a pretty simple way to confirm that the numbers are valid.


Not to mention the potential for an "I shot my chrony" story that tops anybody else's.
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
Originally Posted by pabucktail
Mackay, where did you find that 950 fps load data?


I fired the loads through the two chronographs that I use for testing. I learned that a number of ballisticians with a bunch of letters behind their name will often use two chronos when trying to achieve the most accurate/reliable data. Normally it is more important for rifle testing, but when I do initial testing in the T&E phase I will do the same thing and compare the numbers. Sometimes chronos can be affected by sunlight (actually they are greatly affected by sunlight). Shadows will affect them, even a slight tilting of a sensor can give an inaccurate reading.

Using the two chronongraphs at the same time is a pretty simple way to confirm that the numbers are valid.



Sorry, I meant to ask where did you find the specific data for powder charges with that bullet? You're correct about the two chrony idea. I friend and I used to do that. We discovered his chrony was a bit of a "liar".
PA,

The load data I am using for that load, which is a load I sell commercially, is not in any books. That said, if you research information on +P and .45 Super both here and elsewhere you will find lots of excellent information.

That particular load was designed to be used in guns that have been properly maintained and are in safe working order, yet still kept in stock form. In other words (using a 1911 as an example) not putting in flat bottom firing pin stops, changing magazine springs, etc.

You would be surprised how many people have no clue about maintaining a firearm and assume that if their semi auto is functioning then the recoil spring is totally fine and they don't need to replace it. That is like saying, "I have 100K miles on these tires, and they have never popped, so they are totally fine!"
BTW,


here is an excerpt from a gent (after being told that his recoil spring is quite obviously badly worn out) advised the other person that he has been loading 50 years and... well you can get the rest:

By the way one of my glock 22s and my glock 23 have at least 20k on them and i wouldnt doubt the 23 has double that and the same recoil spring glock put in it at the factory is still going strong and ive NEVER had to replace a spring in a glock magazine. Ive had to fart with them in the cheap aftermarket mags but NEVER a glock factory mag. Ill add to that every mag i have in the house is stuffed full and left that way till its used and put away loaded when im done.

So this gent who has been handloading for 50 years and refuses to learn, has a .40 caliber Glock with at least 20,000 rounds on the recoil spring. A recoil spring that should be replaced at an interval of every 3-5K rounds.

But when he blows something up, it will be something else's fault. Not his own...
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
PA,

The load data I am using for that load, which is a load I sell commercially, is not in any books. That said, if you research information on +P and .45 Super both here and elsewhere you will find lots of excellent information.

That particular load was designed to be used in guns that have been properly maintained and are in safe working order, yet still kept in stock form. In other words (using a 1911 as an example) not putting in flat bottom firing pin stops, changing magazine springs, etc.

You would be surprised how many people have no clue about maintaining a firearm and assume that if their semi auto is functioning then the recoil spring is totally fine and they don't need to replace it. That is like saying, "I have 100K miles on these tires, and they have never popped, so they are totally fine!"








The HK USP will handle 45 Super will handle without any mods. But I had to put a new stronger spring in the magazine to feed correctly.
Who makes Glock 19 spring replacement kits? Or rebuild kits? I need to lay in a stash of these.
I change recoil springs in semi auto pistols about every 5K rounds, need it or not. It is such an easy and inexpensive preventative maintenance thing to do that I can't see not doing it.
Originally Posted by David_Walter
Who makes Glock 19 spring replacement kits? Or rebuild kits? I need to lay in a stash of these.
What Generation? Glockstore and Glockmeister have Gen4-5 in stock.
Originally Posted by MOGC
I change recoil springs in semi auto pistols about every 5K rounds, need it or not. It is such an easy and inexpensive preventative maintenance thing to do that I can't see not doing it.

Originally Posted by David_Walter
Who makes Glock 19 spring replacement kits? Or rebuild kits? I need to lay in a stash of these.



Wolff Gunsprings supply almost all of the big name brand outfits. Most are simply re-packaging Wolff springs. I buy their 10 packs and then always have them on hand. Plus if you buy the 10 packs of trigger return springs, recoil springs, magazine springs, etc, when there is a major crisis and everybody is buying up every part out there, and there are no parts to be had, you already have everything you need safely tucked away.

I like to joke that I can easily rebuild 20 Gen 3 Glock 9mms or one Gen 3 Glock 20 times. Plus when you are diagnosing a problem gun, you simply start by getting rid of all the aftermarket crap on it until the thing runs right. It is amazing how often that solves the " My gun won't run right" problems.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Originally Posted by Mountain10mm
FBI 10mm's were S&W's and Smith offered 10mm in a revolver but for some reason, they thought it best not to offer a modern/plastic semi-auto 10mm while the rest of the US gun companies filled the demand. So glad to see them back in the 10mm game. .


Because they were on the tip of the .40 S&W spear ... Would have been blasphemy to admit inferiority by chambering the 10mm Auto in ANY of their pistols .
Speaking of 10mm

Some Dude whistle


Has some 200 grain bear/predator defense type ammo in the classifieds for those who are looking.


Cheers all!
Those were the days...

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Only 10mm Ive shot is a Delta Elite.
Supposedly w hot ammo.
Shot good but wasnt impressed.

The 4.6" Smith w a reflex looks interesting.
Wish it was a little longer though.
Wish HK did a P30L in 10mm
Originally Posted by EdM
Those were the days...

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]


Damn, I thought the 610’s all came with a non fluted cylinder for some reason.
Originally Posted by Mackay_Sagebrush
PA,

The load data I am using for that load, which is a load I sell commercially, is not in any books. That said, if you research information on +P and .45 Super both here and elsewhere you will find lots of excellent information.

That particular load was designed to be used in guns that have been properly maintained and are in safe working order, yet still kept in stock form. In other words (using a 1911 as an example) not putting in flat bottom firing pin stops, changing magazine springs, etc.

You would be surprised how many people have no clue about maintaining a firearm and assume that if their semi auto is functioning then the recoil spring is totally fine and they don't need to replace it. That is like saying, "I have 100K miles on these tires, and they have never popped, so they are totally fine!"






few years ago i pulled the recoil springs from about six WWII 1911's and compared the lengths to a new wolf 45acp spring. they were all considerably shorter, and while retaining the original springs,those being shot got new springs.
Ron,

I am jealous for the fact that you have SIX World War II 1911s to pull springs from!!!


Wilson recommends a 20# spring if you are going to be extensive shooting of loads with a high power factor (using the old USPSA/IPSC formula of velocity times weight divided by 1K). For example the 10mm bear/predator loads I produce run in the 230 power factor range, and while the load was specifically designed to function perfectly fine with a stock gun and fresh springs in the gun and magazine, when I do a bunch of shooting, I run a 20# spring in my Glock.

Wolff has a spring kit complete with guide rod and when installed you can definitely tell a difference in terms of recoil control when shooting fast, controlled pairs.




[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]




[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Highly unlikely I know but I'd love a single stack/narrower Glock in 10mm. I love my 20 and 29 but for most of my 10mm use something not as bulky would be perfect.
Has anyone seen the new Smith and Wesson 10mm M&Ps in person yet?
© 24hourcampfire