I call bullshit...everyone knows that new Remington 700s 1: don't shoot worth a damn. 2: the bolts fall apart right out of the box
Yeah, bolts fall off, extractors/ejectors need to be replaced, they go off accidentally all the time, the triggers need replaced, and yeah..they don;'t shoot. But the clearance price was right!
Oh...and I've found you have to replace the barrel about every 12,000 shots, depending on chambering. What pieces of schitt !
you should have said replace the trigger twice
- I concur.
I love Ruger 77’s, and Sako 85’s. But at the end of the day if you replace the 2-3 faults in a remy (trigger, MAYBE the bolt handle, and if you want the extractor) you can make them shoot like a $2000 custom action.
Why the extractor is not all a bad thing -
not to mention they are the safety action for “over pressure” out there with the 3 rings of steel ... as your gunsmith how much bolt nose to barrel gap there is in a Model 70 with the extractor cut..
Sako’s, Rugers, even Bat’s bolt faces have web of the brass slightly exposed (up to 20 thousands, unless you have an extractor cut in the barrel, then it’s much more). Remy bolts cover that with thier recessed barrel cut and extending barrel face and if it blows they pressure seal it together.
I used to hate Remington 700’s until I became a smith... Now I bought 2 of them “clearance” 700’s , an an extra stripped stainless action for building Pdog /deer rifles ... it still irks me that they will be much safer than my Sako 85’s in an over pressure situation.
BTW - Remy just before the bankruptcy FINALLY upgraded their machinery so the latest 700’s coming off the line were built (straightness anyway) much, much better than in previous years.