Igloo, judging from your responses to those that do not recommend brakesā¦..it appears that youāve already made your decision.
Perhaps, someone can provide you with the answer that you desire! Perhaps you should delete/erase the last sentence of your OP! memtb
Perhaps not, because that would make no sense at all.
Well, yes, I've already made my decision. That's why the question isn't "do you think a hunting rifle should have a brake" or "should I put a brake on my rifle" or some such. Within that very easily understandabe context one would think answers suggesting no brake at all are useful as teats on a boar hog, no? Especially after its been posted several times already.
But then, I overestimate people lol.
I have a couple of hunting guns with brakes. All are the Miculek style. If I hunt with these guns, I am hunting pigs or coyotes and want the possibility of a quick follow up shot,or prairie dogs and want to spot impacts. I wear hearing protection if I use a brake in the field.
They won't break the bank and reduce recoil well.
I use Ross Schuler brakes on my PRS rifles, which I do hunt with from time to time. The ability to easily keep the target in the scope transcends to hunting in my opinion. Staying on target with the glass is a key element of beating the clock on a PRS stage. If I'm hunting with one of those rifles, and I don't have time to stuff a foam ear plug in my ears, then I'm in a situation more appropriate for my stable of leverguns, which will never see a brake.
Whoa, hold up. You guys are making way too much sense lol