Home
Not sure what the hell happened yesterday at the gun show but now I own a Ruger MK II .270win RSI International. smile It's was made in May 1993. It has never been fired. It's truly beautiful. I wish it was a .308 or a 7x57 but for some reason I just had to have it. Has an 18 1/2 inch barrel and I'm wondering how much velocity I should expect to loose. Accuracy issues? Thanks to all that reply!
What, no pics? smile
So I'm guessing from your comments you would have preferred a 7x57. Everything I have read states you gain 25 to 30 fps per inch in the 270 win so 6" is approx 150 fps. Get some 160 grain partitions you should be able to get to 2700 pretty easily. That's 7x57 territory the only difference is .007 of an inch frontal diameter you can get probably gain some velocity over the old European round with your new rifle.

The way I see it you actually bought the 7mm by 64. 7mm is actually .276. Your 18.5" 270 will be able to handle anything a 24" 7x57 will. Some pic's would be nice. I have an RSI in .308 win and the biggest deer and bear I have harvested was with it.

Make sure whatever you put on it for a sling that the screw in the sling if there is one cannot contact the stock. If it does it will damage the stock.

Good luck and shoot straight y'all.
Originally Posted by Shag
Not sure what the hell happened yesterday at the gun show but now I own a Ruger MK II .270win RSI International. smile It's was made in May 1993. It has never been fired. It's truly beautiful. I wish it was a .308 or a 7x57 but for some reason I just had to have it. Has an 18 1/2 inch barrel and I'm wondering how much velocity I should expect to loose. Accuracy issues? Thanks to all that reply!


I have the same rifle. Anything better than 2 MOA is winner. Mannlicher stocked rifles are stalking rifle, the one-piece full-length stocks aren't conducive to MOA or better accuracy.

How do you know what month it was made in?

I know that mine was made in 2003, SN 789-987XX, but I don't recall seeing a production date table that showed any data other than the serial numbers at the beginning of the year that the Ruger firearm was made.

EDIT: IMO, the long action Ruger 77 RSIs have noticeably better balance than their short action brothers, but they don't balance quite as well as the Husqvarna mannlichers with longer barrels.
[Linked Image]





.260remguy...... I called Ruger today. Gal told me may 1993. 1-10" twist..
I like that!
My friend!! I got box of Remmington 150gr Corelokt Factory Ammo and Winchester 150gr Powerpoint ammo with it. I'm damn happy to say it put the 150gr Corelokt's right at MOA today! It did not like the Factory Winchester ammo. I've no doubt I can get it sub MOA... smile Thank god after all I've read. smile Totally pumped! Now I need to decide what scope it will end up with. The scope shown is a VX 2 3x9x40 cds. But I'd like lower rings and I'm thinking a FX-II 6x36mm LR Duplex might be just right... I'd love to know what scopes others are using on this style rifle.
Boy that's a dandy shag!!! Grats
I really appreciate that bud! After i snagged it I got home and started to see all the reviews. I'm extremely thankful it's gonna be a MOA or less shooter! Spring bear and November whitetail are gonna die! haha! Looks like we can bait bear in 10A now bud... smile
Originally Posted by scottishkat
So I'm guessing from your comments you would have preferred a 7x57. Everything I have read states you gain 25 to 30 fps per inch in the 270 win so 6" is approx 150 fps. Get some 160 grain partitions you should be able to get to 2700 pretty easily. That's 7x57 territory the only difference is .007 of an inch frontal diameter you can get probably gain some velocity over the old European round with your new rifle.

The way I see it you actually bought the 7mm by 64. 7mm is actually .276. Your 18.5" 270 will be able to handle anything a 24" 7x57 will. Some pic's would be nice. I have an RSI in .308 win and the biggest deer and bear I have harvested was with it.

Make sure whatever you put on it for a sling that the screw in the sling if there is one cannot contact the stock. If it does it will damage the stock.

Good luck and shoot straight y'all.



Thank you man... I like that post...
I have removed the rear sights on all of my 77 RSIs and I like 2-7x28 Leupolds because they are proportional sized to the rifles that they are installed on. These are rifles that I look at as they hang on the wall of my gun room and rarely shoot on the range, not rifles that I hunt with any longer.
Right on... Appreciate that. and understand that! Really I do..I plan on hunting the piss outta this thing.
Most of the rifles that I own don't gets used very often or very hard.
I'd look at the Leupold 2.5-8x36 or 2-7x33 for a permanent scope. My M77 Mk II RSI in .308 wore a Monarch 2-7x32 for several years until I found a good deal on a Kahles AH 2-7x36, which IMO may be the best 2-7 ever made. The RSI's, to me, call for smaller compact scopes. Mine does 1.25" with the first load I ever worked up. Haven't bothered with working up another, yet.
very nice rifle you got ! i have a Ruger #1 in a mannlicher 257 Roberts with a Zeiss 3x9 scope this rifle shoots 3/4 inch groups your rifle will too .
Originally Posted by magshooter1
I'd look at the Leupold 2.5-8x36 or 2-7x33 for a permanent scope. My M77 Mk II RSI in .308 wore a Monarch 2-7x32 for several years until I found a good deal on a Kahles AH 2-7x36, which IMO may be the best 2-7 ever made. The RSI's, to me, call for smaller compact scopes. Mine does 1.25" with the first load I ever worked up. Haven't bothered with working up another, yet.


I've used the 2.5-8x36 Leupold on a short action 77. I'm not sure how I'd like one on a long action 77 like the OP's.
Good looking rig, Shag. Enjoy it!
Very nice, much better than a stinky old 7x57 or 308 whistle

The 160 gr Partition mentioned earlier is a favourite of mine and has been very accurate in both of the 270's I have owned. I really like the 150 gr Ballistic Tip too in my curent 270 Win for deer. Those two bullets can cover anything in North America.
I have the original M77 ultra lights and the original international full wood, I like them better as I like the tang safety.
That’s a nice rifle. It makes me wish I had one like it.
If I purposely was out looking for a rifle chambered in .270 Winchester, it would have to have a 24" barrel. But if I saw a special rifle like that and I wanted it I wouldn't care what cartridge or barrel length it was. With a shorter barrel it's probably not your long range rifle anyway. Just load it with a faster powder such as IMR or Hodgdon 4895, IMR 3031, or IMR 4064 and get as much velocity as you can safely get out of it with the bullet weight of your choice.
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
I have removed the rear sights on all of my 77 RSIs and I like 2-7x28 Leupolds because they are proportional sized to the rifles that they are installed on. These are rifles that I look at as they hang on the wall of my gun room and rarely shoot on the range, not rifles that I hunt with any longer.


I pulled the rear site on mine and stored it with the screws a business card and some electrical tape to keep them all together. Blank screws in the holes the front site stayed on. The Ruger rings are 2 different sizes as I recall so watch that. I have one of the old Zeiss conquest 3.5-10x44 on mine and can't see the front site in it. I had a Leupold 1.5-5x20 on it at one time and I could see the front site on 1 power. Call Ruger and ask them about the rings.

My RSI has always been pretty well an MOA shooter with reloads maybe a little better. There's plenty of Mannlicher stocked rifles that shoot just as well as traditional IME. Mine has a red recoil pad and that's an age identifier JB told us what age that was when they switched I can't remember it was one of the first rifles I bought new for myself I think it was the first year they came out with them. I've hunted with it probably near 40 years not as much as I used to though. Shot a decent buck with it last year still getting it done.

Good luck and shoot straight y'all

I have a Hawkeye version 77RSI in 270. I haven't shot any handloads in it, I just feed it these and it likes them. I have a Meopro 6x42 with a German #4 reticle mounted on it. I'm a sucker for the full stocked rifles.

I have a few RSI's and they are all better than 2moa rifles, for the first 2-3 shots.

[Linked Image]
Nice rifle!

I have owned quite a few full-length stocked hunting rifles, and in general have found them to shoot very well. In fact one was a Sako .222 Remington than would regularly put five shots into 1/2 with a couple of loads. In big game chamberings have gotten just about the same accuracy as with wood-stocked rifles of the same make with standard stocks. May have just been lucky, but I can think of at least half-a-dozen rifles that shot that way, including a "Stutzen" CZ 550 in 9.3x62.

Your rifle was manufactured after Ruger started hammer-forging their own barrels. The first No. 1 I owned with those barrels was a 1B in .300 Weatherby Magnum, which regularly put 5 shots (not just 3) into an inch at 100 yards.

I like to store my removed/surplus parts in zip lock bags. Small parts like the 77 RSI rear sights fit nicely into 2"x4" zip lock bag that Wal-Mart sells in the craft section for around $2 per 100.

If I have the original box, I store the removed/replaced original parts in it, so that I can pass them on to the next owner or reinstall them before passing the firearm on to the next owner.
Originally Posted by Filaman
If I purposely was out looking for a rifle chambered in .270 Winchester, it would have to have a 24" barrel. But if I saw a special rifle like that and I wanted it I wouldn't care what cartridge or barrel length it was. With a shorter barrel it's probably not your long range rifle anyway. Just load it with a faster powder such as IMR or Hodgdon 4895, IMR 3031, or IMR 4064 and get as much velocity as you can safely get out of it with the bullet weight of your choice.


Loading it that way will cut down on muzzle blast and recoil, but it won't get you more velocity.
Might check out the Sig Whiskey 3 2-7x32. I think it has a slightly longer tube than the Leupolds. Would make mounting for proper ER easier. Or go vintage with a used Zeiss Diavari 3-9x36. Slightly less vintage would be a used Conquest 2-8x32.
I have current scope as far forward as possible (3x9x40) leaving just enough room for a Buttler Scope cap clearance on the rear sight. I've no intention of removing rear sight as [bleep] could go south someday and I'll need it to keep on the hunt.... Half temped just to go Steelhead's route and stick with a factory load just because. I gotta tell ya I'm not feeling the whole muzzle blast thing as shooting it the other day, I was like this is a breeze. Ear plugs were shoved to the core of my brain, but I could shoot it all day long. Recoil was nothing. I go stepping on a special load that might change.. It does shoot the Deadliest Mushroom in the woods MOA . hmm
Dear Lipsey,

Please make the RSI in 9.3x62.
Man that would be something!
If it only had a butter knife bolt handle, that would be sweet. Nice rifle
I have seen then but never hunted with a BK bolt handle.. Functionality any good?
Originally Posted by Shag
I have seen then but never hunted with a BK bolt handle.. Functionality any good?


No
Not ideal, but they're still a handle, which works fine if you practice.

Have two rifles with 'em, a 6.5x54mm Mannlicher-Schoenauer carbine and an "around World War One" custom 8x57. Working the bolt fast isn't exactly like a "tactical" rifle with a 4-inch handle almost a big around as a can of corn, but with a little practice you can shoot again, pretty quickly.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by Shag
I have seen then but never hunted with a BK bolt handle.. Functionality any good?


No



That's what I figured..
Lipsey is thinking about a .223 Rem order of the 77 RSI. How do I know I requested it and they told me it was on there list of future special orders. I think it would make a Great walking and calling Varmint Rifle. I'm thinking 1.75x5 for a scope.
I was like you and wanted a 7x57. But got a .270 at a great price. Mine shots bug holes with 57.5 gr of Rel 19 and 130 gr Ballistic tip. I get 2800 fps. So you will loose some velocity. But the Deer don't seem to notice. There is some muzzle blast in low light. The 18 1/2" barrel is great in a blind.
The worst modern, post-WW2, butter-knife bolt handle that I've seen were those that Interarms put on some of their mannlicher stocked Mark Xs. They had a higher lift than the standard bolt handles, so that the lowest ring height that you could use were medium height to allow the bolt handle to clear the ocular lens bell of most, maybe all, 1", 26mm. and 30mm scopes. That negative attribute was compounded by the butter-knife style that Interarms used which had a narrow/sharp front edge that could be uncomfortable to use with a bare hand.

EDIT: Although I'm not a fan of the Mossberg 800, specifically their plastic trigger assemblies, the butter-knife style bolt handles that they put on their 800 mannlichers were well designed and didn't share any of the negative attributes of the Mark X mannlichers.
Originally Posted by NEBHUNTER
I was like you and wanted a 7x57. But got a .270 at a great price. Mine shots bug holes with 57.5 gr of Rel 19 and 130 gr Ballistic tip. I get 2800 fps. So you will loose some velocity. But the Deer don't seem to notice. There is some muzzle blast in low light. The 18 1/2" barrel is great in a blind.


Thanks for that info!
Originally Posted by SU35
Dear Lipsey,

Please make the RSI in 9.3x62.


YES PLEASE!!

Great score! That’s a pretty RSI! Good luck with it!
© 24hourcampfire