Home
Maybe someone else will find this info useful or helpful. Some of the info is available on manufacturer’s website, but not all so o thought I’d share.

Hawkins SA M5 Oberndorf
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Action screws and pillars included with above bottom metal.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

TriggerTech Special w/pins from Defiance
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Wyatt’s Extended SA mag box
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Wyatt’s SA follower
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Wyatt’s SA follower spring
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Hawkins LR Hybrid Rings, Low, 30mm, with screws and recoil lugs/pins
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Defiance AnTi SA (medium according to defiance definitions)
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
I like it!
Defiance crf LA with TT 34 oz

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Good thread - I have probably posted these before but will ad them to this post:

Short action Defiance Rebel sheep port:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]

Bartlein carbon wrapped #4 contour barrel chambered & crowned @ just under 22 3/4" - 7MM barrel:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
Those defiance actions make me want to build a rifle just cuz
Originally Posted by Oregonmuley
Good thread - I have probably posted these before but will ad them to this post:

Short action Defiance Rebel sheep port:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]

Bartlein carbon wrapped #4 contour barrel chambered & crowned @ just under 22 3/4" - 7MM barrel:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]


Ahh, yes. A handy piece of informatIon to have.
Based upon some info I received from Bartlein as to the weight of their various CF bbls, based on contour and finish length, it looks like the OPs bbl shed almost 6oz in the chamber, threading and crowning process. ((Bartlein suggests 3.15# (50.4oz) as the raw weight of a #4, finishing at ~23"))

Originally Posted by Oregonmuley

Bartlein carbon wrapped #4 contour barrel chambered & crowned @ just under 22 3/4" - 7MM barrel:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]



Originally Posted by WiFowler
Based upon some info I received from Bartlein as to the weight of their various CF bbls, based on contour and finish length, it looks like the OPs bbl shed almost 6oz in the chamber, threading and crowning process. ((Bartlein suggests 3.15# (50.4oz) as the raw weight of a #4, finishing at ~23"))

Originally Posted by Oregonmuley

Bartlein carbon wrapped #4 contour barrel chambered & crowned @ just under 22 3/4" - 7MM barrel:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]





That is Oregon Muley’s barrel and I’m guessing he had a good chunk of shank lopped off of blank before chambering and threading.
Originally Posted by drano 25
Originally Posted by WiFowler
Based upon some info I received from Bartlein as to the weight of their various CF bbls, based on contour and finish length, it looks like the OPs bbl shed almost 6oz in the chamber, threading and crowning process. ((Bartlein suggests 3.15# (50.4oz) as the raw weight of a #4, finishing at ~23"))

Originally Posted by Oregonmuley

Bartlein carbon wrapped #4 contour barrel chambered & crowned @ just under 22 3/4" - 7MM barrel:
[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]





That is Oregon Muley’s barrel and I’m guessing he had a good chunk of shank lopped off of blank before chambering and threading.

Yup, Shaen aka Shooter71 here on the fire did chop off almost an inch of the shank - see picture. I had sent a PM to Frank Green @ Bartlein asking him about chopping the shank on the CF barrels and he said no problem unless doing it on a big magnum and then maybe not a great idea. He said for a girly 7MM-08 it was fine. So far though it hasn't blown up on my but does seem to kill stuff grin

aalf also had a thread sometime last year comparing a CF wrapped barrel to I believe it was the Bart 2b barrel. I f I remember right the #4 CF weighs about the same as a 2b once chambered if comparing equal finish lengths.

[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
Very useful. I didn't know those actions were so light.

By comparison, a stripped Remington 700 stainless short action (including bolt and recoil lug, but without trigger) I weighed was about 27 ounces. I think I weighed a Model 7 that I thought would be lighter, but it was pretty close to the 700 short action.

Stripped Win 70 classic short (WSM) stainless action and bolt was 31 ounces, no trigger or bolt release.

As far as light barrels go, at a 22" finish length, the Remington M7/mt rifle contour barrels I have weighed all came in around 30-31 ounces.

Could probably hit that weight in a #1 contour at 24" with a short shank.
Originally Posted by TX35W
Very useful. I didn't know those actions were so light.

By comparison, a stripped Remington 700 stainless short action (including bolt and recoil lug, but without trigger) I weighed was about 27 ounces. I think I weighed a Model 7 that I thought would be lighter, but it was pretty close to the 700 short action.

Stripped Win 70 classic short (WSM) stainless action and bolt was 31 ounces, no trigger or bolt release.

As far as light barrels go, at a 22" finish length, the Remington M7/mt rifle contour barrels I have weighed all came in around 30-31 ounces.

Could probably hit that weight in a #1 contour at 24" with a short shank.


Thanks for the additional info. It is very useful when planning a build.

The AnTi actions shave weight for sure. I believe the only non-steel component is the aluminum shroud. You can see the areas on the receiver where they kill away some material, and the bolt handles are hollow. It is competitive in weight with some of the titanium actions.

I’m using a Rock Creek barrel cut to Bartlein #2 contour. My estimate is it will be 41ish oz when threaded, chambered and cut to 22” length. It’ll be several weeks yet before I can confirm how good, or bad, my math is. I’ll post it here when I do though.
A Pierce CrMo short action (bolt, no trigger) weighs 733gm or 25.85oz

A Pierce Ti short action (bolt, no trigger) weighs 525gm or 18.52oz.


I would gladly go with the short AnTi at 20.2oz rather than the titanium at 18.5oz.

That “extra” 1.7oz gets you far superior material. No more Ti actions for me and I have had 4 Rem, 3 Lone Peak, two from some outfit in Ohio.
Originally Posted by drano 25

Thanks for the additional info. It is very useful when planning a build.

The AnTi actions shave weight for sure. I believe the only non-steel component is the aluminum shroud. You can see the areas on the receiver where they kill away some material, and the bolt handles are hollow. It is competitive in weight with some of the titanium actions.

I’m using a Rock Creek barrel cut to Bartlein #2 contour. My estimate is it will be 41ish oz when threaded, chambered and cut to 22” length. It’ll be several weeks yet before I can confirm how good, or bad, my math is. I’ll post it here when I do though.


Definitely report back on that Rock Creek.

I've mostly drifted over to Benchmark and Lilja bc they both build skinny stainless barrels. Still use Barts or whatever Bugholes has in stock for heavier contour stuff.
Winchester Classic Stainless Standard Action with 22 inch #2 Hart Barrel and Sunny Hill Bottom Metal= 5lbs 5oz

Bedded Brown Precision Stock, 14 LOP= 21 oz
Manners UC if we are adding stocks - that’s with studs and 1/2” recoil pad.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
So you got one!
Originally Posted by kingston
So you got one!


It took a while .
More barrel weights:

Winchester classic featherweight barrel, .270 at 20" : 31.5 oz. (taken off a 1990's New Haven Stainless BOSS rifle)

Winchester classic 338 Win Mag barrel at 24": 38.5 oz (another 1990's New Haven Stainless rifle)

Winchester classic 7mm WSM barrel at 24": 42.5 oz (early 2000's New Haven Stainless rifle). Appears to be same contour as the 338 above.

Remington 700 sporter contour .243 at 24": 43.7 oz.
Recoil pad weights:

The Cervetelli microcell pads in the 0.9" thickness weigh 1.9 ounces, about 3.5 oz less than a decelerator, and they are about as soft.

The 0.59" Cervetelli pads are around 1.5 oz. Manners either uses these or a very similar pad on the UC stock.

I wouldn't pull a decelerator off if its fitted, but putting a microcell pad on a stock knocks a fair amount of weight off and will also shift the balance forward on the rifle, which might or might not be good.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
I like it!
Defiance crf LA with TT 34 oz

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


That’s the picture that got me!

Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Manners UC if we are adding stocks - that’s with studs and 1/2” recoil pad.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


And I like the looks of that! Any chance of comparing it to the Shrike?
Originally Posted by TX35W
Recoil pad weights:

The Cervetelli microcell pads in the 0.9" thickness weigh 1.9 ounces, about 3.5 oz less than a decelerator, and they are about as soft.

The 0.59" Cervetelli pads are around 1.5 oz. Manners either uses these or a very similar pad on the UC stock.

I wouldn't pull a decelerator off if its fitted, but putting a microcell pad on a stock knocks a fair amount of weight off and will also shift the balance forward on the rifle, which might or might not be good.


Thanks TX35W.

Years ago I bought decelerator's that did not have the steel plate in them from MPI stocks, could not find them anywhere else. You do not need the steel plate unless you are screwing it to a stock. Unfortunately I no longer have the weight of those.

Jerry
Adding a couple more component weights.

AG Composites Privateer, inletted for Hawkins M5 and Brux #2, 24.8oz. Advertised weight is 25oz.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Defiance aluminum picatinny rail, withs screws and pins, 1.6oz.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Is that Pearce long or short and is it Ti bolt or stainless? FYI: A Barrett Fieldcraft is 17.5 oz. (.308 sized). Impressively light weight on that Pearce.
SA; ti bolt.

It’s impressive what Barrett was able to do for the cost.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Dang, that is light!
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]


Are you gonna marry that Pearce with the UC Manners stock? If so, would love to see photos and weights when you're finished. Been wanting a rifle with that combo of action and stock for awhile. I have a Manners UC (short action) with a glassed in mag well (installed a thin carbon fiber plate) and it weighs 17.4 oz. Love the Manners UC. It was designed by John Vest.
That’s the plan. Need to decide on barrel and chambering. I’m not rushing into this marriage …
😬
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Stock weights : Sorry this isn't up to date.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
The weights above for the pounder, wildcat, and hi tech (Bansner) are for unfinished blanks - or at least sans pad. And that edge weight is optimistic for a finished stock as well.
I don’t think the McMillan hunter will be 24 ounce. My last edge fill mountain rifle was 26 and that’s a much slimmer stock. The McMillan hunter is my favorite pattern but it he lightest.
Originally Posted by Kaleb
I don’t think the McMillan hunter will be 24 ounce. My last edge fill mountain rifle was 26 and that’s a much slimmer stock. The McMillan hunter is my favorite pattern but it he lightest.
You aren’t wrong.

Some of those weights are just incredibly optimistic.
I’ve only weighed a few hunters edge that weighed less than 24 ounces, and those were usually with half inch pads - and made years ago, before they got fat.
In fairness,I'm guilty of having more than (1) rifle,but when connecting mechanical dots...rebarreling a Fieldcraft as per whim,sure makes a LOT of fhuqking sense. Hint.

Or simply nab one in 7-08. Hint.................(grin)
Originally Posted by Big Stick
In fairness,I'm guilty of having more than (1) rifle,but when connecting mechanical dots...rebarreling a Fieldcraft as per whim,sure makes a LOT of fhuqking sense. Hint.

Or simply nab one in 7-08. Hint.................(grin)

It does. A bit scarce in 7-08 though. I finally stopped looking for one and started buying parts.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
That’s the plan. Need to decide on barrel and chambering. I’m not rushing into this marriage …
😬
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Any idea what barrel contour you'll go with?
Likely a montana dupe or a #1.
A Bartlein 2B (or similiar) fills the barrel channel nicely on the UC (per Manners). I have a Lothar Walther medium sporter with a muzzle diameter of .650" at the 22" muzzle and deeply fluted. I wish it filled the barrel channel a tad more, but it only weighs 2 lbs 6 oz., so there is that.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
That’s the plan. Need to decide on barrel and chambering. I’m not rushing into this marriage …
😬
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

I love that ultra classic stock! Show us the rifle when you get it complete!
Will do.
Hope you are patient.
smile
© 24hourcampfire