You guys got nutin' on my dinkage abilities. I've been accused of passing up several Boone and Crockett bucks in order to shoot a dink. Of course these stories were in direct proportion to the amount of rocket fuel consumed the previous night. All I can remember was that I was forever associated with the Legend of the Green Toothed Hag, otherwise known as the barmaid. I'm sure she had at least 3 teeth, but as for the green part, well that's another story for another time. Just give me the title now-cuz if there's one button buck left in the state of Minnesota, you can bet I'll be the one to shoot it. "Jeez, it sure looked bigger than that before I shot it-the worst case of shrinkage I've ever seen!"
I've perfected the art of ground shrinkage... and I purposely hunt for a calf on antlerless elk hunts... spots are good... milk on the lips the pinnacle...
Beware the dude that owns just half a gun, he shoots half sized dinks... just say'n
Anybody too embarassed to enter a photo of their dink can avoid doing so by having their "trophy" measured by a B&C, P&Y or SCI measurer, and submitting the score sheet.
Dunno if that will really help the embarassment, though.
Hell, I will even try to get in on this years contest.
The dink I shot last year wasn't even known to me that it was a buck. I thought I was shooting a decent sized doe. It wasn't until I got him back and strung him up on the pole that I realized the plumbing wasn't right. You could barely feel two nubs under the hide on his skull.
this will be my entry for contest purposes. i may rethink that before opening day, as it might be considered unfair to the other contestants. maybe there should be a handicap system instituted?
will there be points deducted if i kill it with a bow?
1. Broken horns don't count. 2. Button heads don't count (to easy) the antlers must measure at least 1". 3. Pictures of you and the deer are required for entry.
The Judge (please note the capital J) hereby accepts:
1) Spots count. I dunno how much, will have to see 'em. (there's an old tradition in Europe that the general conformation of the "trophy" counts for a subjective something--and shooting dinks is definitely a tradition over there).
2) You must be able to "hang a ring" on one antler. This was the old standard, before B&C got into our heads and muddled things up with their 1" stuff.
3) Size matters--not only of antlers, but of the overall deer. I know this is a foreign concept to "score" hunters, but it's also an old tradition. Only recently has a 160 B&C Texas buck field-dressing 97 pounds been considered BIGGER than a 150 B&C Maine buck field-dressing 297 pounds.
4) A photo of hunter with deer must be submitted--and if the weight requirement is a consideration, then the height and weight of the hunter must also be provided.
And NO photos of the hunter well in front of the dink deer, especially taken with a wide-angle lens. We have all seen the effect of standing well behind the deer in hunting magazine shots, which used to be called the PHP ("Petersen's Hunting pose"), in order to exaggerate the size of the antlers. The hunter must be pretty much beside the deer, or be subject to a Lee24 BS allowance.
The Judge will hear amendment suggestions, and probably accept them if they are accompanied by a fifth of good whisky, of any nationality.
Anybody too embarassed to enter a photo of their dink can avoid doing so by having their "trophy" measured by a B&C, P&Y or SCI measurer, and submitting the score sheet.
Good hunting, Mule Deer (Da Judge)
I accept this, and all your rules set forth for the Dinkothon.....
Indeed, as you are well aware, I green scored mine last year...he grossed 13....and netted 11
If only the contest was retroactive... sigh... I have a veritable deer kindergarten hanging out in my shop (aka, the "Wall of Dinks").
I shot a button buck in the head with a .358 last year that was the size of a German shepherd. The meat was like veal. I put both boned-out "shoulders" in the crockpot just a couple days ago. Really.
With my chitty luck, I'll nail a bruiser this year.
I think the size and quantity of the spots should be measured. This is a definite indicator of true dinkology. I'm really liking my chances here. Question to the judges-if I accidentally shoot a small dog, or any pit bull, can they be measured, scored, and dinkisized?
Mr. Barsness, is there a career achievment award for sad sacks who can provide photographic evidence of lots of DAMN small horns? I'm just.... uh... asking for a friend.
Mr. Barsness, is there a career achievment award for sad sacks who can provide photographic evidence of lots of DAMN small horns? I'm just.... uh... asking for a friend.
but did you pick it up with one hand, while the other was giving your buddies the finger????
And NO photos of the hunter well in front of the dink deer, especially taken with a wide-angle lens. We have all seen the effect of standing well behind the deer in hunting magazine shots, which used to be called the PHP ("Petersen's Hunting pose"), in order to exaggerate the size of the antlers. The hunter must be pretty much beside the deer, or be subject to a Lee24 BS allowance.
Ah, you mean no Reverse Craig Boddington photos allowed! I think he is the acknowledged master of the "hunter 20 yards behind the dead critter" picture...
I think we should limit the contest to deer-only, as otherwise we will be dinking around with a whole menagerie of tiny animals, including bear cubs.
Ironeagle, please look at the rules a few posts before your question. They plainly state that weight will be a consideration, as long as your own height and weight are revealed and you're posed correctly next to your dink. The photo you posted is perfect for that purpose.
What do people think about allowing sub-categories for deer taken where there's a minimum legal tine-count?
I'm pulling for my buddy Ingwe... kinda like the Arnold Palmer of dinkdom... so much history and tradition.
Kent
Kent, that kind of show of support leaves me all chokey..( sniff, sniff...)
Thanks dude...really......
As for a sub-category for those in antler restriction areas...I say do the best with what you have to work with.....if it is a four point restriction...then just state that when you post your pic...
Oh.....and Scenarshooter can completely forget about entering.....
In answer to some posts: What do people think about allowing sub-categories for deer taken where there's a minimum legal tine-count?
Originally Posted by DINK
There has to be a sub-categorie for those us with those damn point restrictions. I plan on winning the 4 points on one side division... Dink
I've pondered this since this thread started. Coming up with an equitable solution could get complicated - multiple categories to be judged for the entry that is closest to the respective minimum legal buck.
Also, I want to confirm that no one gets favorable consideration just because they have a screen name particularly suited to this contest! What safeguards are in place to assure the independence of the judging authority??
No safeguards at all. The entire contest is subject to whims and corruption.
In that case let's go back to your four types of kills; Does number one have to be killed by my vehicle, or can I use someone else's vehicle (I'm trying to avoid the use of the word roadkill here)?
Can a bigger deer be turned into a dink if a very large caliber super high velocity framenting bullet is used and in particular with a close range rear shoulder shot?
Can't enter it since I shot it last year but here's a head-only shot of my antlered WT last year. I guess not a contender for dink since SHE was a full-grown doe! I don't think she ever would have lost that velvet.
If I could have gotten my truck stopped on highway earlier today there was a contender on the shoulder of the roadway....Damn it.
Dink
i had to put one down last year. the OSP trooper couldnt pull the trigger on a fawn some guy hit and left to die in the road. i was dragging it off the road when he stopped and asked me if i could shoot it. it couldnt have weighed more than 30 pounds.
I can see now the confusion and disappointment in State Game agencies nationwide when they realize that the average age for harvested bucks dropped 3 years in 2010.
This one was so dinky, I didn't even know he was a buck. The one little stub is all he had. I dunno if he even knew he was a buck.....
Better yet, I managed to kill him with a Pac-nor barreled "blue" rifle in a wildcat chambering, spinning turrets, and shooting a moly-coated Accubomb that "failed".
Purchasing such equipment should have guaranteed me a page in the B&C book. I think that all the cool gear had given me such an unfair advantage that the good Lord decided to humble me......
I am secretly hoping that the complete disregard for large antlered critters will bring them to me in droves this year.
I will persevere and shoot for the spots and try no to damage the "milk teeth" in the process. Besides, it is getting to be chilli time and my freezer is full of fish, so a deer that fits into the crock pot whole will work for the time being.
I officially submit my entry form....Ingwe my "checks in the mail"
J.B. I humbly submit a plane ticket to visit my cousin in Dufftown, Scotland at the Glenfiddich factory with an envelope full of nonsequential multidinominational bills in local currency for consideration as an offering for "the Judge".
I humbly submit that it is easy to kill the small dinks. O.K. easier for some than others. Having said that, young bucks with limited nutrition can't get any better than that.
How about we try something really hard for a side competition. Smallest antlers on the largest bodied buck? What could be harder than to find a 200+ pound buck with less than 10 inches of antler? That way we could compare our cull bucks and leave the unproven bucks be?
I just hate to take what could be a good buck so young. With limited buck tags it is hard to burn one.
I'm in & I'd also like to suggest, to JB, that all rifles must be adorned in blue tape at the muzzle, dink must be shot while hunter is wearing blue jeans & denim jacket, with contrasting hunter orange vest & ball/knit cap.
Mine'll have to have spots to compete, everybody knows Canadian deer are bigger !
I might award style points for blue tape, Elmer Fudd hats, biggest difference between weight and antlers, whether or not shooting out a window is involved, etc.
As noted in an earlier post, some of the criteria will be subjective.
I'm in & I'd also like to suggest, to JB, that all rifles must be adorned in blue tape at the muzzle, dink must be shot while hunter is wearing blue jeans & denim jacket, with contrasting hunter orange vest & ball/knit cap.
Mine'll have to have spots to compete, everybody knows Canadian deer are bigger !
Paul.
See, right there... rules... automatic disqualify...
Dink hunting is not for siss'ies...
It's all day trash... all day talk... all the time...
Bring it on...
I plan on winning this even though I won't kill a dink... how... well, no one's beaten my submitted bribe yet... here it is again.
Kent, you seem to have forgotten that John is a happily married man, supported by a wife that is far more famous & makes much more mulla than he does !
I'm betting your ante of "girl/girls" will have no bearing on JB. He seems like a sensible guy.
Hence, my own offer of a barrel of the worlds oldest Scotch Whiskey.
"Each bottle will be beautifully presented in a tear-shaped hand-blown crystal decanter with an elegant silver stopper. The decanter nestles in a stylish silver base and is framed in a handmade Brazilian Rosewood box, created using wood from Forest Stewardship Council (FS C) Certified sources.
Mortlach 70 Years Old was matured in a Spanish oak, ex-bodega sherry hogshead cask, which yielded 54 full-size and 162 small decanters bottled at cask strength (46.1% ABV). The recommended retail price in the UK is �10,000 per 70cl decanter and �2,500 for the 20cl version."
It's a good thing I put down the bottle of Bell's Brewery 25th Anniversary Ale before opening this thread. There would certainly be spewage on the monitor. Too funny!
After giving your question full and dutiful consideration, no. The TSX would way-over-penetrate. Style points will be awarded for bullets that end up under the hide on the far side.
On the other hand, if you killed multiple dinks with one way-over-penetrating TSX then...?
After giving your question full and dutiful consideration, no. The TSX would way-over-penetrate. Style points will be awarded for bullets that end up under the hide on the far side.
On the other hand, if you killed multiple dinks with one way-over-penetrating TSX then...?
I was just happy to learn that...er...my friends weren't alone. I, on the other hand have never shot a dink... I always let them go to grow bigger. Yeah, that's it.
John Moses I'm in and I plan on winning the Damn thing! I'm not letting Ingwe continue to embarass us. Some of us have some pride. Please put my entry fee on my MASTER CARD br549. powdr
That definitely counts in the "vehicle" category, and apparently is the first entry in the Ingwe Dink-O-Thon. Thanks for the ballistic details, which may be part of the final judging.
So far we haven't discussed the cut-off date for this year's IDIOT (I-ngwe DI-nk O T-hon). As THE JUDGE, I declare it will continue until the last legal season ends this winter, even for road-kill.
Almost had one this morning. Could not see a fork in the horn but I am 90 percent sure it was there. His rack did not clear his ears. My hunting partner was moving to much and he bailed before I could crank my scope up to see the fork.
Is there extra points if you have to shoot them in self defense? Killed this one as he charged my ground blind a few years ago - yeah, I waited until I was sure he wasn't kidding. Got a tower blind now to avoid his revenge minded relatives, but could take the ground blind out again...
So far we haven't discussed the cut-off date for this year's IDIOT (I-ngwe DI-nk O T-hon). As THE JUDGE, I declare it will continue until the last legal season ends this winter, even for road-kill.
I LIKE the Acronym!
But you guys might as well sit back...hunting season doesnt start here for a couple weeks, and the Master has yet had a chance to work his Magic.....
I'll throw my hat in the ring,but season for me won't start for three more weeks. Just too much growing time 'tween now and then. Maybe I could trap a small one and starve him till black powder season.
1. Broken horns don't count. 2. Button heads don't count (to easy) the antlers must measure at least 1". 3. Pictures of you and the deer are required for entry.
The horse power to dink ratio has to count for extra credit. Ie. A half dozen rounds of 338 Lapua at 15 yards, including one or two in the paunch and one in the arse.
I have encountered a problem in competing in the Dink-a-thon. The state of Minnesota, in it's infinite wisdom, has chosen to jeopardize my chances of winning this prestigious title by not giving me a doe tag. Will there be a separate class for the smallest legal spike buck? There should be for those of us not legally able to shoot true dinks.
Ingwe.....I have one scouted out that will give you a run for the title this year. He MIGHT be a legal buck, but it doesn't matter, because have an antlerless tag (less than 3" antlers - nothing) and I've seen him on two occasions now.
Ingwe.....I have one scouted out that will give you a run for the title this year. He MIGHT be a legal buck, but it doesn't matter, because have an antlerless tag (less than 3" antlers - nothing) and I've seen him on two occasions now.
Dang you T-Zone! That's just not fair! I know that just because I don't have a doe tag I'll be seeing dinks so small I'll have the turn the scope up to 9X just to make sure they're not chihuahua's!
You shouldn't be draggin nuthin at Chicknebuck man...there is those two young boys, that 19 year old one looks like he could pull the cabin if we needed him to, and all those wimmin folk around there, jeesh, you wouldn't think we'd even haffta open our own beer.
Cut your teeth of the biggest deer you can "throw hands on".
Dedicated dink drilling takes much effort. Lots of scouting, frayed nerves, blurred vision, sore feet, etc. Only the real masters know that scouting for a place to shoot them close to the road on the uphill side of a steep one can be excruciatingly difficult and a very delicate task.
You are much too young to have to suffer these indignities.
Find the six pointer and shoot him well. Then post pics.
The rules have us Wisconsin boys at a disadvantage. Bucks have to have a 3 inch spike to be legal. We can put a doe tag on a buck with less than 3 inches if we have one.
There are about 20 buck only units this year so anyone that hunts those units would be SOL.
How big a bribe does Mule Deer want to look the other way?
The rules have us Wisconsin boys at a disadvantage. Bucks have to have a 3 inch spike to be legal. We can put a doe tag on a buck with less than 3 inches if we have one.
There are about 20 buck only units this year so anyone that hunts those units would be SOL.
How big a bribe does Mule Deer want to look the other way?
I thnk it was said a few pages back that dinkdom would be graded upon the minimum restrictions fo the area being unted. ie - a 3" minimum with no doe tag = 3.5" dink is a mighty fine contender depending on how much "style" was employed in the harvesting method.
You guys are doing it wrong. You have to plan it out so you kill the deer (no matter the size) where you can get to it with a tractor with a bucket. I've killed three BIG old deer in handy spots where you could drive right up to them, roll them into the bucket, drive to the pickup and drop them right in the bed. That's how it's done in farm country! I'd never, ever lie about such matters, either. Witness this old thing, shot in 2004, I think it was. I popped him within a quarter-mile of my stepbrother's shed, where he keeps his tractor. THEN I GOT HIM OUT OF BED TO HELP ME LOAD UP THE DEER. (we gutted and washed out the carcass while we had it hanging from the bucket). I hardly laid a hand on him. It isn't quite a dink, but it was a fine old 5x5 buck. Huge for our part of Missouri.
I have to confess to cheating anyway, as the pics are not from this year...
Actually Muntjac are tough little buggers and the bucks are often quite badly scarred up from fighting.
The bucks and the does will often turn the table on a dog if they get cornered, and its not unusual for a dog to get badly gashed on the flank and stomach during such encounters...
And I should add Muntjac excellent to eat, although they are a bugger to skin as the skin is alomost bonded direct to the muscle underneath, with no airspace/membrane seperating them as with most other species of deer...
Pete,all kidding aside you're a GOOD sport about all the ribbin !!!Just wondered do they taste like venison or something else??
Wouldn't have posted them if I couldn't take some ribbing!
As to taste, they are definitely "venison" although I wouldn't say they are as strong as say Red deer. But taste is very difficult to describe and very subjective.
I read so many people hear taking about different ways to get rif of the "gamey" flavour ie leaving the carcass in ice water for a few days..I find that a bit odd as I like by venison to taste of venison and not to be bland like supermarket bought beef..
For instance, I always found Roe venison just "ok", but quite bland. On a recommendation from somebody I hunt with, I started hanging them for 7 to 10 days rather than my usual 3 to 5, and the difference was marked and the flavour much better.
These days I prefer to hang a carcass for 10 to 14 days (or longer if its possible without the risk of loosing it)
Another species we have, but I've never taken, is Chinese Water Deer, and the venison from those is said to have a taste and texture approaching lamb, but less fatty...