whenever there is a mass shooting people lose their minds
and its become a vicious circle. AR-15 is now synonymous with mass shootings and so if some whacko wants to shoot up a place, that's going to be gun of choice
but there is no correlation in banning a specific type of gun and eliminating mass shootings.
Seldom if ever, does someone intent on executing a mass shooting go to the scene with a single weapon, nor do they arrive with just the standard capacity of the weapon.
If the AR-15 is banned, we'll just have mass shootings of people using semi-auto handguns with hi cap magazines, they'll bring 5 of them to site with 20 clips.
This is why I'm lost on the logic.
They aren't trying to prevent mass shootings, they're trying to prevent the effectiveness of a mass killer.
People are given a survey that asks - do you agree that we should take steps to prevent terrorists from buying guns and the solution they derive from this is not to identify terrorists but to place more obstacles in the way for every person to purchase a gun - yet we know this guy was interviewed by the FBI twice. His co-workers knew he was a violent minded nutjob - and its gun background checks that are going to save us from him?
Last edited by KFWA; 06/19/16.
