Originally Posted by okie
Originally Posted by Snyper
Originally Posted by SShooterZ
Saw this article and immediately thought, "How can she get away with that?".

From the article:
Quote
“If you own this gun, or you condone the ownership of this gun for private use, you may no longer enter either of my restaurants, because the only thing I want to teach my children is love,” Ms. Verrill wrote, including a picture of what appeared to be an AR-15, similar to the Sig Sauer MCX that Omar Mateen used to kill 49 people at a Orlando gay club over the weekend, the Portland Press Herald reported.


How in the world would you A) enforce this and B) legally be able to discriminate against legal firearm owners? Is this not the exact same thing the Sweet Cakes By Melissa did and they were sued successfully for $135,000?

It's not even remotely the same thing.


This is her direct quote...

“I cannot, in good conscience, accept anyone inside of my restaurants who believes that this is OK.” end of quote
She also used the word "condone". It is exactly the same.

Repeating a fantasy won't make it true.
Saying you won't allow gun owners is not the same as discrimination based of sex or religion.

You people talk a lot about "rights" and "freedom" but only want them for yourselves and those who agree with you.

It's her business, and she can do this if she wants.
If you don't like it, don't eat there.


One shot, one kill........ It saves a lot of ammo!