Originally Posted by Snyper
Originally Posted by okie
Originally Posted by Snyper
Originally Posted by okie

Whose rights do you think are being violated?

Figure it out.
It's pretty obvious.


I am quite aware of who has had their rights trampled.

I simply asked you to make your expressions here a little more clear. If your expressive limits have been reached Bless your heart...

They are as clear as they need to be for one of average intelligence to understand.



Scotus got the Sweet cakes decision wrong.

Your wrong in believing there is no discrimination by the lady who is against AR owners. That discrimination is is just as real and blatant as Sweet Cakes was toward the militant LGBT couple.

I personally am an equal opportunity discriminator and believe that the LGBT's should be discriminated against just as equally as the AR owners and business owners can choose who they want to do business with.

The only real difference is queers are a protected class and AR owners aren't. I believe that neither class should be protected as one class far outnumbers the other and through the element 82 option can protect itself quite well.

I also am thoroughly convinced that you are a d#$k with ears...

One man with courage makes a majority....

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~