Yeah right Charles, and the Benghazi attack was a spontaneous response to a video.
Because O'Reilly said someone is behind these demonstrations, as in funding and organizing. Krauthammer insisted, to the contrary, that these are spontaneous demonstrations. Krauthammer offered to prescribe O'Reilly a psychotropic drug to help him get over his conspiracy theories. Who is Krauthammer covering for?
It is known that Soros funds these groups. That is common knowledge. First, I would like to know how funding anarchists is not criminal, and secondly, how Krauthammer can be blind to Soros's involvement. I simply think he's lying, and thinks were stupid enough to buy it.
