Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by jim62
To all the "Ziess sluts" here..

Comparing 3-9 Zeiss to a Leupold 3.5-10 is also Bullschit.

Zeiss makes a 3-10 Conquest at $589.

THAT is the one you should be comparing to the 3-10 VX3s if you were AT ALL interested in a fair comparision.

But then, that would not suit your agenda, would it?

Like I said guys, if you want to compare APPLES TO APPLES, then have at it.

Otherwise, it's just a lot of noise.




You probably preffer Leupy's beacause of the super hard coatings.




Originally Posted by Eremicus
They are a first class scope. They feature coatings made from diamonds, which are ten times harder than other coating compounds. This means the light transmitting ability, and image quality of the scope, will not degrade from tiny scratches on the lenses, that occur even with the best of care, at anything like the rate of other scopes.




Actually.. if you look at this thread, I NEVER said I prefered the Leupold..

I just think if these guys are going to argue a point between the two brands, they should compare the same basic models.


That's all.

To all gunmaker critics-
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.."- Teddy Roosevelt