|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,915 Likes: 13
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,915 Likes: 13 |
And BTW, ANYONE who would try to tell me they would rather spend time at a reloading bench rather than shooting is a damn liar
Then I am a Damned Liar... I enjoy both equally...
I enjoy working with my hands and reloading allows me to do that...I find it more enjoyable than sitting on my fanny in front of the TV...
Plenty of times a week, I may end up going out to the reload bench and load up 10 to 20 rounds just to 'take a break' from the day to day...
some guys like working on engines, and modifying a vehicle, more than just getting in it and drive to Walmart to pick up something for the wife.....
some of you guys pay big bucks for what you consider recreation... me, I live where I can get recreation outdoors just around the corner... and when it is the evening, I enjoy some more recreation by just going out in the garage and playing at the reload bench...
so I guess that "makes me a liar" and I have no problem with that accusation...
testing all that ammo I load up, shooting 250 to 500 rounds a month is nothing really unusual....and that is centerfire, not rimfire...
rimfire, I just get the urge, and will go down and buy a box, and go shoot it...
"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC
“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/10/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Mesa
|
11/10/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
VarmintGuy
|
11/10/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
vbshootinrange
|
11/11/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/11/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
264wm
|
11/12/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Dave_Skinner
|
11/12/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/12/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
L_Killkenny
|
11/12/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
bea175
|
11/12/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Blackheart
|
11/12/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
264wm
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
DoubleUp
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
drover
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
drover
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
drover
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
drover
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
264wm
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
TDMax
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
drover
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
drover
|
11/15/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/16/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
264wm
|
11/16/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/16/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/16/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/16/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
DoubleUp
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
DoubleUp
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Bowman44
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Bowman44
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Hogeye
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
L_Killkenny
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
DoubleUp
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
L_Killkenny
|
11/18/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/19/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
K22
|
11/19/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Blackheart
|
11/21/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/21/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
264wm
|
11/22/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
tmax264
|
11/27/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
DoubleUp
|
11/19/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
264wm
|
11/21/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/21/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
jim62
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
Seafire
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
L_Killkenny
|
11/14/11
|
Re: 22 mag vs 204, the economics?
|
ConradCA
|
12/08/11
|
|
|
582 members (1badf350, 10gaugemag, 16gage, 06hunter59, 1lessdog, 1minute, 54 invisible),
2,956
guests, and
1,267
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,955
Posts18,519,375
Members74,020
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|