Originally Posted by beretzs
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
A good trigger goes a long way buddy. I'm wondering if the newer MOA was a benefit when I shot the other day. It just seems to break smoother with no creep as compared to the pre 64. The weight of pull is about the same, but as much as I hate to admit it, the MOA is smoother blush


BSA, have you ever put a smooth and flat India stone against your Pre64 triggers? I polished mine just enough to erase the tool marks that were left behind on the Pre64 and a few Classics. Seemed to really help with everything, pull weight and any creepiness. It really doesn't take much at all and they are as smooth as my Ernie's sprung MOA trigger was.



Yes Scotty. Mine are polished out, but there's no denying the mechanical advantage the MOA has over the old trigger. Trust me, I like the old one better because of the simplicity and better reliability. I call chit how I see it. That day I had 1 of the best examples of pre 64 fwt, a 5 digit classic stainless, and a 2008 limited edition. Fired 40 rounds from each rifle (35 from 30-06). All of my triggers are polished, just one of the things I do to get better accuracy..


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA