I read the article....all of it.
Ok and your thoughts?
OldElk: Well....first off, I think they were both designed to be solid, dependable "working" rifles the average guy could afford.
My accuracy results would be opposite Sweeneys.
Put it this way....had there been no pre 64 M70,I would have taken a Ruger Hawkeye (the "best M77" IMHO) ,had a good smith bed it in a good after market synthetic,tune it to be sure it "worked", mounted a scope in Leupold rings(I hate the Ruger rings),and killed every animal in every place and under every circumstance that I have with any M70.
Did I answer the question?
