|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,479
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,479 |
I'm looking for a light weight, low power scope for a .45-70. I see that Midway sells a Leupold variable 1-4x20mm for $229 and a fixed 2.5x-20mm for $269. I've noticed this kind of thing for other manufacturers as well.
Why do fixed scopes often cost more than comparable variable power scopes? It seems like something with a moving part should cost more.
???
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,000 |
Likely due to volume of sales.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,122
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,122 |
Leopold makes several different 1-4X20 variable scopes and they are of differing quality. The 2.5X20 is a VX2. If you look at the VX2 1-4X20 it is $379. The VX1 1-4X20 is much cheaper but you can't compare a VX1 to a VX2.
Shod
The 6.5 Swede, Before Gay Was Ok
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,863 Likes: 4 |
Fixed power models are FX series.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 15,878 Likes: 11
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 15,878 Likes: 11 |
For your needs, you may want to look at the Weaver V3 1-3x20. It is a variable, but a very compact one, and it looks right at home on lever guns.
Also the glass is quite good, as it comes from LOW in Japan.
Lots of images on Google of the V3 on various bolt and lever guns.
Price is excellent for the quality of scope you get.
THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL. The Tikka T3 in .308 Winchester is the Glock 19 of the rifle world. The website is up and running!www.lostriverammocompany.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,079 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,079 Likes: 1 |
I use the Leupold VX-1 1-4x20mm, VX-2 1-4x20mm and the Weaver V-3 1-3x20mm scopes on my coyote hunting guns and for the money the best deal is the VX-1 and if you look around you can usually find them at $199 including shipping. The V-3 is a good scope and I'm not going to dump the ones I have but you might have to look a a couple of them as I've gotten some with a lot of fisheye on 1x that I returned. VX-1 on my drilling Weaver V-3 on a combo, this one now wears a VX-2 1-4x and the Weaver is on a Marlin 1894C in 218 Bee. I really like the 1-4 vs the fixed 2.5 just for the considerably larger FOV on the bottom end.
Last edited by erich; 06/23/15.
After the first shot the rest are just noise.
Make mine a Minaska
Heaven has walls and rules, H-ll has open borders
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
Why do fixed scopes often cost more than comparable variable power scopes? It seems like something with a moving part should cost more.
One reason is the extremely low sales volume compared to like variables, there's always cost savings with high volume. Another reason is that very few people people other than "purists" buy fixed power scopes any more. Those type of people will pay more than the average shooter. Take a look at Schmidt & Bender's lineup. Their fixed power scopes are universally cheaper than their comparable variables. S&B fixed power scopes get universal praise so it's not like they're lower quality than their variables, they just cost less to produce so S&B prices them accordingly. That tells me that companies like Leupold charge what they do for their fixed power scopes because they can get it, not because it has anything to do with the production costs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,836 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,836 Likes: 8 |
Long ago, I read that the best deals in scope were the 3-9x40s due to volume. Whether or not that's still true in today's world of infinite choices, twisty turrets, AO etc. is hard to say.
A good 3-9 is still not a bad choice for ordinary folks, nor a bad deal.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,836 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,836 Likes: 8 |
The best thing about the fixed compact 2.5 is the long eye relief. The 6.5oz weight ain't bad either.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,884 |
Leopold makes several different 1-4X20 variable scopes and they are of differing quality. The 2.5X20 is a VX2. If you look at the VX2 1-4X20 it is $379. The VX1 1-4X20 is much cheaper but you can't compare a VX1 to a VX2.
Shod This was the correct pragmatic answer. The 2.5x is an FX2, with better coatings.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,891
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,891 |
I too question the cost of fixed power scopes and being an accountant with experience in mfg and lean mfg techniques I also question the small volume argument.. I do however agree with the fact than today's market is primarily a variable world and fixed powers no matter how good or cheap will never dominate the market. Still as I mentioned in the recent what would you like to see from Leupold thread I would like to see a redfield fixed 4 and maybe a 2 1/2 at a $150 price point.
People that have grown up the past 20 yrs using variables and have limited exposure to fixed 4x scopes really under estimate their capabilities and grossly over estimate the need for high magnification for hunting big game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,660
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,660 |
The VX1 1-4X20 is much cheaper but you can't compare a VX1 to a VX2.
Shod Sure you can. Compared to the VX2, the VX1 is worse.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,660
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,660 |
Take a look at Schmidt & Bender's lineup. Their fixed power scopes are universally cheaper than their comparable variables. S&B fixed power scopes get universal praise so it's not like they're lower quality than their variables, they just cost less to produce so S&B prices them accordingly. That tells me that companies like Leupold charge what they do for their fixed power scopes because they can get it, not because it has anything to do with the production costs.
A big +1. I've never undertood the high prices of Leupold's and others fixed power scopes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,512 |
Simple - Leupold thinks about how deep they can get in your pocket - First and foremost.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,482
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,482 |
Could some of the cost be associated with the lifetime warranty? Not in manufacturing myself but it would seem warrantying a product for the life of it regardless of whether you bought it new or not could get expensive. I doubt they separate out their warranty costs from model to model.
Life can be rough on us dreamers.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,836 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,836 Likes: 8 |
I too question the cost of fixed power scopes and being an accountant with experience in mfg and lean mfg techniques I also question the small volume argument.. I do however agree with the fact than today's market is primarily a variable world and fixed powers no matter how good or cheap will never dominate the market. Still as I mentioned in the recent what would you like to see from Leupold thread I would like to see a redfield fixed 4 and maybe a 2 1/2 at a $150 price point.
People that have grown up the past 20 yrs using variables and have limited exposure to fixed 4x scopes really under estimate their capabilities and grossly over estimate the need for high magnification for hunting big game. I use the high power for range work and invariably set my scopes on 2x or 3x in the woods. The middle ranges are largely unused unless I set up over a clearcut or other open area. Then, the extra power helps pick out openings in vegetation and making sure there's nothing else in my field of fire. Certainly, the cost of the full, unconditional warranty is factored into the selling price of the scopes. I cannot see how setting up a factory for a small run of fixed-power scopes and then back again to the regular models wouldn't incur additional expense, but even if that's true, any company is going to sell their products for what the market allows, not necessarily to reflect a fixed percentage of profit. "Extra" profits from specialty items may help keep the price of more popular items more competitive. For me, the question is not, "how much are they making on this", but instead, "am I willing to pay this much for what I'm going to get". I'm just glad to have so many choices.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,668
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,668 |
You guy are hilarious. Leupold scopes are FAR cheaper than S&B scopes, regardless as to wether they are fixed or variable. Odviously S&B doesn't care what their scopes cost. Leupold does. E
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 591
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 591 |
People that have grown up the past 20 yrs using variables and have limited exposure to fixed 4x scopes really under estimate their capabilities and grossly over estimate the need for high magnification for hunting big game.
+1 You sure got that right.
"The 257 Roberts, some people like to call it the “.257 Bob.” I think these people should be hung in trees where crows can peck at them." - David Petzal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,156 |
People that have grown up the past 20 yrs using variables and have limited exposure to fixed 4x scopes really under estimate their capabilities and grossly over estimate the need for high magnification for hunting big game.
+1 You sure got that right. Need has nothing to do with it. I've shot plenty of deer with open sights, or a bow for that matter. I could do perfectly well the rest of my life with a 4X scope, but there are better options out there that enhance my enjoyment of shooting and hunting so that's what I choose. Just like I could function just fine driving a 20 year old nissan sentra, I choose not to because I like something else better and I can afford to do it. In the end, these sports of hunting and shooting are luxury pasttimes. There's no need involved so discussions of getting by with just what you need are beside the point. I don't "need" a half MOA rifle to hunt either, but I sure spend a lot of time and money making my rifles shoot that way. That brings me pleasure, that's the only real need involved. Every year I drive 1200+ miles each way to shoot rats in a field with my more-accurate-than-needed rifles and bigger-than-needed scopes not because it serves any any kind of need whatsoever other than it's a hell of a lot of fun and it makes me happy. So I chuckle any time someone throws out the "need" canard. If need had anything at all to do with this pasttime I'd quit it all together and just use the money to buy meat in a supermarket.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,453 |
Odviously S&B doesn't care what their scopes cost. Leupold does. E Closer to the truth is that their customer base doesn't care what they cost. Folks who want the very best are willing to pay the price of admission, or at least they feel that S&B's are the very best. Hard to argue that they are wrong.
|
|
|
|
675 members (16gage, 01Foreman400, 160user, 12344mag, 10ring1, 16penny, 64 invisible),
3,046
guests, and
1,314
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,618
Posts18,492,662
Members73,972
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|