|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 114
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 114 |
Dear Guys,
I am looking at an 1894, with an octagonal barrel. The serial number on the rifle demonstrates a 1905 production. This rifle is a beautiful looking shooter, not a collector. The barrel has been cut down to 22 inches, reblued, and recrowned. The rifling and bore are VG+.
My question is this. I would only be shooting modern Remington ammo, corelokts. However, I have often read on the internet (myth?) that the early production 1894s had soft barrels, and that a steady diet of jacketed bullets will "wash out" the rifling.
Does anybody have any firm information or experience on this topic? Is a 1905 rifle considered one of the "early" 1894s? Wasn't 1905 steel pretty darned good? (I mean, it was the golden age of Dreadnaught Battleship production.)
Any and all info would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mannyrock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,938
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,938 |
What you have done is not nearly as important as how you have done it!!! The Old Fart 2008 A.D.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,966
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,966 |
what caliber? No expert, but I've always heard early 1894s in .32-40 and .38-55 were softer steel, and all .25-35, .30-30 & .32 WS were nickle steel for jacketed bullets. Some were marked "Nickel Steel Barrel Especially for Smokeless Powder".
Charter Member Ancient order of the 1895 Winchester
"It's an insecure and petite man who demands all others like what he likes and dislike what he dislikes." szihn
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,938
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,938 |
II have heard the same for the 38-55 but I have an early 30-30 rapid taper that is marked under the forarm ns if memory serves.
What you have done is not nearly as important as how you have done it!!! The Old Fart 2008 A.D.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 114
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 114 |
Thanks for all of the info.
The barrel is marked Nickel Steel- especially for black powder.
Caliber is .30 WCF.
So, I guess that jacketed bullets won't wash it out?
Thanks for any additional info.
Mannyrock
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 114
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 114 |
OOps. I am an idiot. The barrel says "especially for smokeless powder" not black powder.
Mannyrock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 43
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 43 |
Nickel steel barrels were made for smokeless. You can shoot all you want out of it. The early 1894 rifles in .32/40 and .38/55 were a little less forgiving of jacketed bullets as has been said. But for hunting I wouldn't worry about excessive wear. Later in production 1910-1930 most of the barrels were nickel steel even in the original black powder chamberings. The old ones still deserve to get out in the woods in my opinion. I don't think there has ever been a rifle built that is better balanced and easier to carry in the woods.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,796
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,796 |
John browning was contacted by Winchester to design a lever action for the new smokeless powder....he presented them with the mos 1894..all ammo it within pressure limits of the original rifles....
|
|
|
|
548 members (1badf350, 160user, 1minute, 1moredeer, 10ring1, 60 invisible),
2,248
guests, and
1,220
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,012
Posts18,500,284
Members73,986
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|