|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,005
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,005 |
Hatred for Obamacare, like global warming, is a religion not a science. Facts are for fools in such discussions.
"I'm gonna have to science the schit out of this." Mark Watney, Sol 59, Mars
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994 |
The idea that what I pay for health insurance will be raised and raised and raised based not upon my health, or my risk to the system, but based upon the fact that I have assets and can "afford" to pay more.
Being penalized for being fiscally prudent sucks. Being penalized for staying healthy sucks.
Overall, it sucks. This is a pretty concise summary that I can agree with. We have yet to see the worst that Obamacare can do to folks. If Obama doesn't push the Employer Mandate back again, we're going to see a huge outcry in the New Year when the huge pool of workers who are under employer plans get hit with the same cost increases and coverage decreases the Individual Mandate imposed. The "death panels", IRS seizures of assets for end-of-life medical expenses, etc, have not yet come to pass. But if this legislation isn't corrected in some meaningful way in 2017, they quite possibly will. It's a Charlie Foxtrot in any case. This will be a big issue in 2016...
Leo of the Land of Dyr
NRA FOR LIFE
I MISS SARAH
“In Trump We Trust.” Right????
SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,568 Likes: 5
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,568 Likes: 5 |
My premiums have gone up 40% in the last 3 years. I now am on a high deductible plan with an HSA. (health savings account). Funny how my premiums started to go up just as soon as o care started. I'm paying $5200.00 a year for a $2600 deductible. Plus I put $200 a month toward the HSA. There are 4 of us under the plan. I haven't hit the deductible in any year yet. Basically, I pay everything out of pocket (HSA contributions) and get nothing from the insurance. It is basically there for a catastrophic illness or injury. My max out of pocket is $5000. That's why I have the HSA. At least it rolls over every year. Basically, I'm spending over $7000 a year for insurance, and getting only 1 annual visit per person covered for free.
Clyde
The liberal mind is an endless black hole of stupidity.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,184 Likes: 3
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,184 Likes: 3 |
My premiums have gone up 40% in the last 3 years. I now am on a high deductible plan with an HSA. (health savings account). Funny how my premiums started to go up just as soon as o care started. I'm paying $5200.00 a year for a $2600 deductible. Plus I put $200 a month toward the HSA. There are 4 of us under the plan. I haven't hit the deductible in any year yet. Basically, I pay everything out of pocket (HSA contributions) and get nothing from the insurance. It is basically there for a catastrophic illness or injury. My max out of pocket is $5000. That's why I have the HSA. At least it rolls over every year. Basically, I'm spending over $7000 a year for insurance, and getting only 1 annual visit per person covered for free.
Clyde Bullchit... You can keep your doctor and your premiums will fall by $2500... (heavy sarcasm - in case anyone missed it..)
Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69 Pro-Constitution. LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,604 Likes: 5
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,604 Likes: 5 |
The idea that what I pay for health insurance will be raised and raised and raised based not upon my health, or my risk to the system, but based upon the fact that I have assets and can "afford" to pay more.
Being penalized for being fiscally prudent sucks. Being penalized for staying healthy sucks.
Overall, it sucks. This is a pretty concise summary that I can agree with. We have yet to see the worst that Obamacare can do to folks. If Obama doesn't push the Employer Mandate back again, we're going to see a huge outcry in the New Year when the huge pool of workers who are under employer plans get hit with the same cost increases and coverage decreases the Individual Mandate imposed. The "death panels", IRS seizures of assets for end-of-life medical expenses, etc, have not yet come to pass. But if this legislation isn't corrected in some meaningful way in 2017, they quite possibly will. It's a Charlie Foxtrot in any case. That and the fact that everyone is mandated (under financial penalty) to purchase government specified insurance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580 |
That and the fact that everyone is mandated (under financial penalty) to purchase government specified insurance.
Let's be clear. NOBODY has "insurance" anymore in the US when it comes to health care. It ceased to be insurance when they made it mandatory to cover pre-existing conditions. Like I've said before: try calling State Farm the day AFTER your cabin burns down and buying fire insurance that completely covers your loss. THAT is exactly what a pre-existing conditions is. Insurance, by definition, doesn't cover them. We can call it insurance until the cows come home, but, if it was really insurance, someone like myself, who is 45, has a healthy BMI, exercises, and qualified for an awesome term life-insurance rate would pay a whole lot less than someone who is 45, obese, smokes, and has chronic illnesses that they are seen for quite often. Insurance is about spreading risk with a pool of others that have a similar risk as you. No accidents? Car insurance is less. Live in a flood plain? Flood insurance is more, or unavailable.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 96,121 Likes: 1 |
It's akin to your wife buying life insurance on you 3 days after you died.
"Dear Lord, save me from Your followers"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 114
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 114 |
[quote=kwg020]The ACA was never designed to succeed. It always has been and always will be about power and control over a large and important percentage of the American economy. AND to finally - once and for all - to have the gov't be the single-payer for all health care.. Only the foolish believe otherwise.
kwg That.. [/quote/] Obuttheadcare will not be a success until they get the single payer. It's the end game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 46,965 |
Not a fan at all, but am I the only one in the US that has not been affected by Obamacare? It'll trickle down. Like tsunami.
We may know the time Ben Carson lied, but does anyone know the time Hillary Clinton told the truth?
Immersing oneself in progressive lieberalism is no different than bathing in the sewage of Hell.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,910 Likes: 8
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,910 Likes: 8 |
The idea that what I pay for health insurance will be raised and raised and raised based not upon my health, or my risk to the system, but based upon the fact that I have assets and can "afford" to pay more.
Being penalized for being fiscally prudent sucks. Being penalized for staying healthy sucks.
Overall, it sucks. This is a pretty concise summary that I can agree with. We have yet to see the worst that Obamacare can do to folks. If Obama doesn't push the Employer Mandate back again, we're going to see a huge outcry in the New Year when the huge pool of workers who are under employer plans get hit with the same cost increases and coverage decreases the Individual Mandate imposed. The "death panels", IRS seizures of assets for end-of-life medical expenses, etc, have not yet come to pass. But if this legislation isn't corrected in some meaningful way in 2017, they quite possibly will. It's a Charlie Foxtrot in any case. Imagine that, we have some posts of people in the field that just may know more than some that post, like Doc, or Goalie, so it is not a hatred of the man, but the truth of his bad policy.
"The 375HH is the greatest level of power you can get for the investment in recoil." (JJHack) 79s and losttrail, biggest waste of air.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,738
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,738 |
I expect democrats will do nothing to prevent its demise because the aftermath is what they want - single payer government control. I also expect some R's agree with this eventuality as well.
My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675 Likes: 1 |
Decent articles but I didn't see anything really new in there. And I still don't see people talking about what a scam the whole thing is for insurance companies. "The poor" are getting "free healthcare" paid for by the taxpayers and other users of the system. But here's the catch. The "free healthcare" isn't really free for the "poor" guy; he still has very high co-pays and deductibles. So the "poor" guy quickly finds he can't afford to use his "free" healthcare. So now the HMO's have us paying for millions of people who can't afford to us it; that's called a government mandated windfall. It's a freaking scam. Takeaways... Single payer is coming; mark my words. And between the two parties and how they fight each other, they're making it to where a government administered single payer will be the only option. Invest in healthcare for the foreseeable future; those are stocks that are out-performing most every other business sectors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,392
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15,392 |
obama's saving Ed for last. More than doubtful though I will be fine, one way or another. Yes Ed. When they came for the uninsured, you didn't care because you were insured. When they came for the underinsured, you didn't care because your insurance was adequate. When they came for the insured, you didn't care, because you still had your *better* insurance. But they'll come for you eventually, or if not, for your children, and you don't care, cause *you're* OK. The gov't has shifted the collection for medical care from a civil debt to an *IRS*-type one. In other words, if your terminal care costs more than you have, which it will under O'Buckwheat care, the IRS can take your house, savings, retirement, and every other F'ing asset you could possibly pass down to your progeny, to pay for losers that won't work. But hey, you're good, no problem. ED....was just taken to the woodshed....!lol. This fellow spanked u ed .....
I work harder than a ugly stripper....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,951 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,951 Likes: 1 |
Decent articles but I didn't see anything really new in there. And I still don't see people talking about what a scam the whole thing is for insurance companies. "The poor" are getting "free healthcare" paid for by the taxpayers and other users of the system. But here's the catch. The "free healthcare" isn't really free for the "poor" guy; he still has very high co-pays and deductibles. So the "poor" guy quickly finds he can't afford to use his "free" healthcare. So now the HMO's have us paying for millions of people who can't afford to us it; that's called a government mandated windfall. It's a freaking scam. Takeaways... Single payer is coming; mark my words. And between the two parties and how they fight each other, they're making it to where a government administered single payer will be the only option. Invest in healthcare for the foreseeable future; those are stocks that are out-performing most every other business sectors. "Health Care Law Recasts Insurers as Obama Allies"
“Insurers and the government have developed a symbiotic relationship, nurtured by tens of billions of dollars that flow from the federal Treasury to insurers each year,” said Michael F. Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute.
So much so, in fact, that insurers may soon be on a collision course with the Republican majority in the new Congress. Insurers, often aligned with Republicans in the past, have built their business plans around the law and will strenuously resist Republican efforts to dismantle it. Since Mr. Obama signed the law, share prices for four of the major insurance companies — Aetna, Cigna, Humana and UnitedHealth — have more than doubled, while the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index has increased about 70 percent.
“These companies all look at government programs as growth markets,” said Michael J. Tuffin, a former executive vice president of America’s Health Insurance Plans, the main lobby for the industry. “There will be nearly $2 trillion of subsidized coverage through insurance exchanges and Medicaid over the next 10 years. These are pragmatic companies. They will follow the customer.”
The relationship is expected only to deepen as the two sides grow more intertwined.
Consumers are already hearing the same messages from insurance companies and the government urging them to sign up for health plans during the three-month enrollment period. Federal law requires most Americans to have coverage, insurers provide it, and the government subsidizes it.
“We are in this together,” Kevin J. Counihan, the chief executive of the federal insurance marketplace, told insurers at a recent conference in Washington. “You have been our partners,” and for that, he said, “we are very grateful.”
Full article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/18/u...obama-and-insurers-into-allies.html?_r=1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,691 |
Not a fan at all, but am I the only one in the US that has not been affected by Obamacare? It is nowhere near fully implemented. The taxation that is meant to pay for the majority of it has not been implemented and will not come into effect until after Obama is out of office. kciH: Would you please stop spouting falsehoods. Every O-care tax increase is now in effect except one---a 2.5% tax increase on high income earners due to take effect in 2016. As of 2015 every single provision of O-care is now fully implemented (even though half or more are failing). In short, the law is fully implemented. Get your facts straight, please. Jordan The 40% excise tax on high value health plans doesn't go into effect until 2018.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." TJ
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". EB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041 |
Not a fan at all, but am I the only one in the US that has not been affected by Obamacare? It is nowhere near fully implemented. The taxation that is meant to pay for the majority of it has not been implemented and will not come into effect until after Obama is out of office. kciH: Would you please stop spouting falsehoods. Every O-care tax increase is now in effect except one---a 2.5% tax increase on high income earners due to take effect in 2016. As of 2015 every single provision of O-care is now fully implemented (even though half or more are failing). In short, the law is fully implemented. Get your facts straight, please. Jordan The 40% excise tax on high value health plans doesn't go into effect until 2018. You are correct on that one. My error. Sorry. However, my understanding is that the 40% tax only affects a small number of Cadillac plans (mostly Union). So, that and the 2.5% surtax on wealthy folks are the only to taxes or provisions not yet fully implemented. O-care is failing badly regardless.
Communists: I still hate them even after they changed their name to "liberals". ____________________
My boss asked why I wasn't working. I told him I was being a democrat for Halloween.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,285 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,285 Likes: 6 |
The ACA was never designed to succeed. It always has been and always will be about power and control over a large and important percentage of the American economy. Only the foolish believe otherwise.
kwg With all due respect, you're spouting nonsense. Effectively you are arguing that Obama and the Dems instituted O-Care so their legacy would be one of failure, not success. That is insane. It is perfectly accurate to say the program's detractors are being proven right. It is also accurate to say the program gave the masses a much greater degree of control over individuals than existed previously. It is complete nonsense however to say it was always and only about control and power for the sake of achieving those ends only and that Obama and his dupes deliberately and intentionally instituted a program they knew would fail so they could enjoy a legacy of failure. No offense, but to make that assertion is just plain stupid beyond words. Perhaps, however, it affords one the luxury of not having to actually analyze the program's failures. No? Jordan Believe what you want. It is a power grab plain and simple. The democrats who voted for it were played by nancy, harry and Obama's power brokers like a cheap guitar. It will come back to haunt them and many democrats in the future. And, rightfully so for being so willfully taken in by the "leadership". kwg
For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,041 |
The ACA was never designed to succeed. It always has been and always will be about power and control over a large and important percentage of the American economy. Only the foolish believe otherwise.
kwg With all due respect, you're spouting nonsense. Effectively you are arguing that Obama and the Dems instituted O-Care so their legacy would be one of failure, not success. That is insane. It is perfectly accurate to say the program's detractors are being proven right. It is also accurate to say the program gave the masses a much greater degree of control over individuals than existed previously. It is complete nonsense however to say it was always and only about control and power for the sake of achieving those ends only and that Obama and his dupes deliberately and intentionally instituted a program they knew would fail so they could enjoy a legacy of failure. No offense, but to make that assertion is just plain stupid beyond words. Perhaps, however, it affords one the luxury of not having to actually analyze the program's failures. No? Jordan Believe what you want. It is a power grab plain and simple. The democrats who voted for it were played by nancy, harry and Obama's power brokers like a cheap guitar. It will come back to haunt them and many democrats in the future. And, rightfully so for being so willfully taken in by the "leadership". kwg I agree with every word you said just now. My only issue was with the assertion that "[t]he ACA was never designed to succeed." The logical implication of that statement is that not only did the Dems intend for O-Care to be a policy disaster from day one, they intended for O-Care to create electoral disasters for their party as a consequence (that is what policy disasters do, by definition---create electoral disasters). That assertion is utterly stupid, plain and simple. There is no doubt O-care will be a disaster and we should be very happy it is imploding so soon. There is also no doubt that there was very good reason from the beginning to believe the premises on which the program was initiated were also highly unsound, if not false. But saying the Dems intended it to fail (and that by necessary implication they intended to create an electoral disaster for themselves as a consequence, which necessarily follows from your statement) is utterly silly. That was my point. Jordan
Communists: I still hate them even after they changed their name to "liberals". ____________________
My boss asked why I wasn't working. I told him I was being a democrat for Halloween.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,580 |
It was intended to need "tweaks."
Those tweaks turn it into single-payer. The election fallout is almost non-existent, as now they create even more "takers" to vote for them, leaving those of us who are actually productive members of society screwed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994 |
Obamacare is so bad it is taking any socialistic hope of any single payer healthcare plan down the tubes with it. After the last election, there were not enough single-payer supporters left on the Hill to save it in the coming election. Sticker price shock will keep this issue front and center.
Conservatives need a positive game plan as to what to replace Obamacare with and not go back to all the problems with what we had before. The candidates have several proposed plans out there, so hash it out in the primaries and debates. The voters are more than ready.
Leo of the Land of Dyr
NRA FOR LIFE
I MISS SARAH
“In Trump We Trust.” Right????
SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."
|
|
|
|
572 members (219DW, 1Longbow, 10ring1, 204guy, 1beaver_shooter, 10Glocks, 65 invisible),
2,670
guests, and
1,207
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,476
Posts18,529,590
Members74,033
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|