|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,585
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,585 |
I have a question I shoot blackhorn 209 Which I believe is a great powder but...
Is there a reason that they suggest measuring blackpowder and BP substitutes by volume instead of weight? I was thinking most guys may not have a scale and this makes it easy but if you have a scale would it be more exact?Or its just just good the way it is?
Hank
Thank You Lord for another day,Help my Brother along the way
When you mature,you realize hospitals and schools are businesses,and the Beatles were geniuses
Live Like A Champion Today
NRA EndowmentLife Member,My Daughter is also a Life Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,110
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 19,110 |
What I saw way back was not a suggestion, but a warning to measure not weigh. miles
Look out for number 1, don't step in number 2.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,732 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,732 Likes: 1 |
Is the Blackhorn 209 worth the price? iv been thinking of useing it in my Knight, Iv always mes. by Volume !
Deer Camp! about as good as it gets!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 624
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 624 |
They suggest volume over weight for two reasons.
1) to get you to buy their own plastic measurer. 2) because volume measurers are what 95% of ML shooters use.
Measuring by scale is more accurate. Just be sure to use the correct transfer figures in your calculation. Refer to the Blackhorn website for more information.
Last edited by Triple_Se7en; 12/02/15.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,550
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,550 |
Yeah, the problem with weighing is that too many people will weigh 100 grains of the substitutes rather than the 70% or so that they actually weigh. By volume is not quite as accurate, but is safer for Bubba.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,460 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,460 Likes: 2 |
Right .. most of the substitutes are designed to be replaced volume for volume, not weight for weight, and their densities are often less than real BP.
Example ... my old .58 Big Boar TC shot 120 grains of FFg under a 560 grain conical. (ouch) To use pyrodex (ick) I'd just set the measure to the same 120 grain increment, pour, load, and shoot.
The actual weight of that pyrodex that replaced the 120 grains of FFg was about 96 grains if I recall correctly.
It's perfectly fine to weigh out 96 grains (or whatever it was) of Pyrodex to replace 120 grains of FFg, but don't WEIGH 120 grains of Pyrodex, that's the equivalent of about 150-ish grains of FFg, quite beyond what the gun maker calls maximum.
So ... the difference is in the density of the propellant. Load-by-volume is the simplest approach because that's how the propellant was designed to be used. The only reason I'd go by weight is with something lumpy / inconsistent in granule shape like Pyrodex RS (Pyrodex Select is MUCH better and other substitutes may be even MORE better) that volume-measured charges are not THAT consistent.
FWIW, my old Hodgdon manual, #25, I think, has a section on loading Pyrodex and BP, charts, etc which I found fairly useful and informative.
Tom
Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.
Here be dragons ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 185
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 185 |
Weighing is fine boatboy, so long as (as others have said) you understand the conversion process. This may help you understand the history behind the volume/weight thing. http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bla...standing-powder-loads-muzzleloaders.html
My wife says I'm totally nuts, but I think I'm Semisane.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,585
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,585 |
Is the Blackhorn 209 worth the price? iv been thinking of useing it in my Knight, Iv always mes. by Volume ! Hey John I think it is I hunt zone 3 so we use muzzies for both firearm seasons I was slow to change,my buddies did it well before I did. Pellets were easy when I ran out about 4 or 5 years ago I moved to it first its less sensitive to moisture Most important when you shoot its not like a rifle but you can see what happens to the game and not looking at a huge cloud of smoke I am on board with it and see no reason to use anything else Hank
Thank You Lord for another day,Help my Brother along the way
When you mature,you realize hospitals and schools are businesses,and the Beatles were geniuses
Live Like A Champion Today
NRA EndowmentLife Member,My Daughter is also a Life Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,550
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,550 |
Is the Blackhorn 209 worth the price? iv been thinking of useing it in my Knight, Iv always mes. by Volume ! Blackthorn is well worth the cost. Even though it is $30 or so for 10 ounces, it still equates well with the cost of pellets. I get about 70 shots per jug, so that would be equivalent to 140 pellets. I like the fact that Blackthorn is much easier to clean up. I actually left my muzzleloader barrel dirty for a week just to see how it looked. Of course I looked at it every day. At the end of the week, it cleaned up with no corrosion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,463
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,463 |
I weighed my BH 209 with a scale. 71.5 grains is what's most accurate in my rifle.
Then I poured that weighed charge in my old brass volume measure and adjusted it until the weighed charge filled the measure. I taped up the brass volume measure with electrical tape so the adjustment stays where I want it.
Now I just fill the brass powder measure knowing it's at 71.5 grains of BH 209.
Dan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 979
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 979 |
Dantheman, your method is sound but I seriously doubt you are getting 71.5 grains from that measure at each loading.
WHUT?
|
|
|
|
592 members (12344mag, 16penny, 10gaugeman, 1234, 160user, 17CalFan, 56 invisible),
1,882
guests, and
1,098
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,876
Posts18,497,684
Members73,980
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|