|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
Whoops, wrong date...
I was wrong, the pistol is right, of course...
Like mine, too.
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,059
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,059 |
The throats on this 45 are perfect. Could someone please help me out with the specifics of this pistol? The way I load nowadays, I can tell little difference between the performance of the two cartridges. My days of pushing the outer limits of are in the rvm. So when I’m picking it is usually done because of the platform rather than the cartridge. I do rather enjoy the S&W N frames and wish they produced more variety in 45colt, but it is what it is. So when I’m looking at DA it is usually 44mag when SA it is generally 45colt. That being said I do have a dandy 25-5 that I have owned for over 30 years and I covet mightily. AJD Actually, the N Frame S&W you are looking at there, owned by my friend, Jim, is an S&W 25-7 in .45 Colt. There were only 2,000 made according to my understanding. They came with came with a 5" barrel, unfluted cylinder, and were inscribed with "Model of 1987" on the side. I have one as well, and also know of one that was mutilated and turned into a snubby, so that only leaves 1,997 possibly left in the world for you to find..... Very accurate, and a pleasure to shoot with my loads of 250 RNFP at about 1,100 fps Thanks for the response/heads-up. I really like my 25-5 and that looks like it would be a great one to have and use. My 25-5 is a 6" and I always thought a 5" would be one to have. Sounds like you are correct, a tough one to find. I have a Classic 44Mag with the 5" barrel, it was a special run, IDK 20 or so years ago, but it has the full length underlug. I don't much care for the full length under-lug. So I am trying to stay away from that. I also have a 686+ that was a stocking dealer special about 10 or so years ago. It has the 5" barrel with the short lug. I like it, IMO the way a S&W is supposed to be. I've never seen any others like it.
Last edited by AJD; 02/25/16.
There is no accounting for taste.
Experience is a great thing as long as one survives it.
Generally, there ain't a lot that separates the two however, Barely making it is a whole lot more satisfying than barely not making it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 69,612 Likes: 38
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 69,612 Likes: 38 |
I love both Calibers and own several handguns in both .44 mag & 45 Colt. If I didn't handload, my first choice would definitely be the .44 magnum.
But for everyday carry working here at the Ranch, I'm usually packing a Ruger Flattop in 45 Colt with 250 gr WFN cast bullets loaded to 1100 FPS. If I'm packing one of my .44mag revolvers, it's usually loaded with a .44 special load consisting of 260 gr WFN cast bullet at about the same velocity. About 10 grains of Unique or Herco works orders with either load.
In my experience, I've found that a good hard cast lead bullet with a wide flat meplat at 1100 fps will kill anything I need to shoot at the Ranch. And that's counting up to and including 500 lb feral hogs. Although most of our hogs will go only 350 lbs or less.
JMHO, for whatever it's worth.
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
Last edited by Dirtfarmer; 02/25/16.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124 |
Starting Loads....................................................Maximum Loads
Bullet Powder Grs. Vel. CUP Powder Grs. Vel. CUP 310 cast H-110 21.5 1109 24,400 H-110 23.5 1316 32,000 310 cast H 4227 21 1016 24.900 H 4227 22.5 1164 30,000 310 cast #2400 17 1013 24.400 #2400 19 1172 29,400 310 cast HS-6 12.5 994 25.000 HS-6 13.5 1043 29,800 Since we're still stuck on pressure, let's look at what that extra 6000-10,000psi actually yields you. With the .44, you can drive bullets the same sectional density (330gr .44 vs 360gr .45) 150fps faster and get a little more penetration. Or you can drive the same weight bullet (330gr .44 vs 335gr .45) at the same velocity and get a lot more penetration.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,698
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,698 |
Isn't the 45 Colt brass the limiting factor in how hot you can load your ammunition? I thought that the 44 magnum brass was stronger. I load my 629 with Lyman #429421 22bhn at 1200 fps from a 4 inch barrel. That seems like plenty to me. If not I know where I can find a rifle. whelennut
I like to do my hunting BEFORE I pull the trigger! There is only one kind of dead, but there are many different kinds of wounded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124 |
Good .45Colt brass is good to at least 50-55,000psi. Dick Casull used it developing the .454. Think 260's at 2000fps.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,750
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,750 |
Skipped over most of the gibberish but still stand by my original reply. Terry wants to kill Texas whitetail and hogs. Pretty simple task to ask of a sixgun. Just don't think the noted game will know the difference. I have a 44 SBH. I want a 45 LC cause at 54...I'm still a "saturday morning western" cowboy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 366
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 366 |
Isn't the 45 Colt brass the limiting factor in how hot you can load your ammunition? I thought that the 44 magnum brass was stronger. I load my 629 with Lyman #429421 22bhn at 1200 fps from a 4 inch barrel. That seems like plenty to me. If not I know where I can find a rifle. whelennut The 45 cylinders are often oversized. That lets the brass expand more and has to be worked over more during reloading. According to John Linebaugh, that's why Elmer Keith didn't like the 45.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,698
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,698 |
Can anyone tell me why Model of 1989 was so important to S&W that they named a handgun for it?
I like to do my hunting BEFORE I pull the trigger! There is only one kind of dead, but there are many different kinds of wounded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
Isn't the 45 Colt brass the limiting factor in how hot you can load your ammunition? I thought that the 44 magnum brass was stronger. I load my 629 with Lyman #429421 22bhn at 1200 fps from a 4 inch barrel. That seems like plenty to me. If not I know where I can find a rifle. whelennut The 45 cylinders are often oversized. That lets the brass expand more and has to be worked over more during reloading. According to John Linebaugh, that's why Elmer Keith didn't like the 45. Elmer's .45's were SAA's. If he had .45 Ruger Bisley's, etc. he may have had a different opinion. Regarding the 1989 significance, I would also like to know the answer to that one. DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124 |
Isn't the 45 Colt brass the limiting factor in how hot you can load your ammunition? I thought that the 44 magnum brass was stronger. I load my 629 with Lyman #429421 22bhn at 1200 fps from a 4 inch barrel. That seems like plenty to me. If not I know where I can find a rifle. whelennut The 45 cylinders are often oversized. That lets the brass expand more and has to be worked over more during reloading. According to John Linebaugh, that's why Elmer Keith didn't like the 45. Elmer's .45's were SAA's. If he had .45 Ruger Bisley's, etc. he may have had a different opinion. Regarding the 1989 significance, I would also like to know the answer to that one. DF If Keith had not experimented with the .44Spl, which led to the .44mag, which led to the large frame Ruger single action, there never wouldn've been a .45 strong enough for "Ruger only" loads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000 |
this is a little off topic, but this thread made me think of it. I have a hybred, 44special. Hibred, in that it started life as a model 28, was rebarreled to 44special, and not sure about the cylinder other than it accepts 44special. Not that i would want to do it, but i wonder how much pressure it could accept? This was done back in the 70's i think often called a Skeeter conversion. i cast the lyman 429421 bullet and have used in this gun but kept velocities down under 1000fps.
Last edited by RoninPhx; 02/26/16.
THE BIRTH PLACE OF GERONIMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,124 |
It should be fine for the Keith load.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,249 Likes: 14 |
Isn't the 45 Colt brass the limiting factor in how hot you can load your ammunition? I thought that the 44 magnum brass was stronger. I load my 629 with Lyman #429421 22bhn at 1200 fps from a 4 inch barrel. That seems like plenty to me. If not I know where I can find a rifle. whelennut The 45 cylinders are often oversized. That lets the brass expand more and has to be worked over more during reloading. According to John Linebaugh, that's why Elmer Keith didn't like the 45. Elmer's .45's were SAA's. If he had .45 Ruger Bisley's, etc. he may have had a different opinion. Regarding the 1989 significance, I would also like to know the answer to that one. DF If Keith had not experimented with the .44Spl, which led to the .44mag, which led to the large frame Ruger single action, there never wouldn've been a .45 strong enough for "Ruger only" loads. Great point and very true... DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,852 Likes: 21
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,852 Likes: 21 |
this is a little off topic, but this thread made me think of it. I have a hybred, 44special. Hibred, in that it started life as a model 28, was rebarreled to 44special, and not sure about the cylinder other than it accepts 44special. Not that i would want to do it, but i wonder how much pressure it could accept? This was done back in the 70's i think often called a Skeeter conversion. i cast the lyman 429421 bullet and have used in this gun but kept velocities down under 1000fps. It should be at least as good, pressure wise, as the M25-2 45 ACP so 21 kpsi.
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 16,000 |
all this talk of 45colt/44 made me pull out a model 25-5 i have. original owner let it get some spots of rust on it, which i have been working on off and on. with that 270 grain rcbs bullet, especially in the hollowpoint configeration, i can't think of much i would run into that it couldn't handle. I still don't think hyper velocity is all of it. and i have handguns between 41 and 45 that will all push a 250grain something at 1000fps or over which i think in reality does it.
Last edited by RoninPhx; 02/26/16.
THE BIRTH PLACE OF GERONIMO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,286
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,286 |
When faced with this dilemma, I chose a .45 Blackhawk convertible. Since then however, I have come to the conclusion that, from a purely practical standpoint, I simply have no real world use for that much horsepower on tap.
The medium bores just seem to fit better for what I need from a handgun. There are no big bears or moose in this part of the country and I've yet to see a hog that a 170-210gr., .357-.41 caliber bullet, at reasonable speeds couldn't kill.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,703 Likes: 3 |
Can anyone tell me why Model of 1989 was so important to S&W that they named a handgun for it? I'm nearly sure it was a distributor run, that's all.
"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them." -Master Chief Hershel Davis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 39,301
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 39,301 |
Isn't the 45 Colt brass the limiting factor in how hot you can load your ammunition? I thought that the 44 magnum brass was stronger. I load my 629 with Lyman #429421 22bhn at 1200 fps from a 4 inch barrel. That seems like plenty to me. If not I know where I can find a rifle. whelennut The 45 cylinders are often oversized. That lets the brass expand more and has to be worked over more during reloading. According to John Linebaugh, that's why Elmer Keith didn't like the 45. Elmer's .45's were SAA's. If he had .45 Ruger Bisley's, etc. he may have had a different opinion. Regarding the 1989 significance, I would also like to know the answer to that one. DF If Keith had not experimented with the .44Spl, which led to the .44mag, which led to the large frame Ruger single action, there never wouldn've been a .45 strong enough for "Ruger only" loads. Great point and very true... DF You could say the same thing if Elmer had started with the 45 Colt. Tighten the cylinder bore and strengthng the frame and there might never have been a 44 mag. Both required modifications to existing firearms. Both are good at their job and I see little advantage of one over the other.
The first time I shot myself in the head...
Meniere's Sucks Big Time!!!
|
|
|
|
567 members (06hunter59, 10gaugeman, 12344mag, 10gaugemag, 10Glocks, 1234, 53 invisible),
13,589
guests, and
990
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,195,123
Posts18,542,275
Members74,057
|
Most Online21,066 May 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|