24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,662
Likes: 5
E
efw Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,662
Likes: 5
I have a chance to get a Leupold rangefinder at a great discount and wondering what opinions are from those who have experience with them?

I know there are better choices out there, but the one I have currently isn't great and I think it may be time for an upgrade. To keep cost manageable I'm thinking about a Leupold RX-1200i with DNA or RX-1200i TBR/W with DNA.

I'd be using it in the field and need accurate readings on game out to 500 yds or so.

Any experience w/ either of these would be helpful!

Thanks,

efw

GB1

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,662
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,662
I have the 1000i TBR DNA and it's done for me what you state you need one to do.

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,082
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,082
Originally Posted by pointer
I have the 1000i TBR DNA and it's done for me what you state you need one to do.


+1


Those who must raise their voice to get their point across are generally not intelligent enough to do so in any other way.
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 5
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 5
Cabelas had the RX-1200i TBR with DNA on sale for $279 a few weeks ago. I have an older Leica bought used that may have been a good unit new, but the Leupold is much better.

I've only played around with it a few times, but it seems to work very well out to 400-500 yards. It may take a few tries and everything has to be just right past 500. I've been able to get readings out as far as 700, but not always.

I've not tried using the bullet drop feature. In fact would have rather not had that feature, but the version without it was not on sale.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,662
Likes: 5
E
efw Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,662
Likes: 5
Excellent thanks for that feedback gentlemen!

How do the TBR/Mil readings translate to come-ups in MOA?

Has anyone used that feature at all?

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,981
L
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
L
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,981
I bought an RX-1000/TBR a couple of years ago. Not 100% reliable and got erratic or no readings in extreme cold.

The fifteen year-old Nikon that I gave away was a more reliable instrument. In defense of the Leupold, it's considerably smaller than the Nikon, for what that's worth.

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,682
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,682
Originally Posted by TATELAW
Originally Posted by pointer
I have the 1000i TBR DNA and it's done for me what you state you need one to do.


+1

+2

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 485
H
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
H
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 485
I shopped the same sale and bought the same rangefinder. I haven't had enough time in the field to give it a full test--and it hasn't seen below zero weather yet. Still, all I wanted was a good number inside of 500 yards and it seems capable of doing that. I also was replacing a Nikon that was at least 12 years old. It was clunky, but reliable as sin. It will go into the gear bag as a backup.

One more note, the most important thing to me is getting a quick reading under a wide range of conditions... and not fussing around. I'm not going to sweat +/- a few yards in terms of accuracy, not shooting a rig that will toss a bullet accurately at a quarter mile. Just my perspective.


Hunting success is 90 percent hunter, 10 percent weapon.
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 257
R
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
R
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 257
I have owned most of the others including the 3 "Alpha" rangefinders.

Sold all of them.

My RX1000 TBR DNA and it has done everything I have asked it to do. I have loaned to pals several times and no-one has had anything negative to say. Most who have used it have asked for it a second or third time.

I'd buy another should I have a need.




Roger

NRA Life

CRPA Life
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,662
Likes: 5
E
efw Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 29,662
Likes: 5
Excellent thanks everybody for the feedback! I think I'm gonna buy one and I'll let you know how I like it!

IC B3

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
L
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,612
The Leupolds I have used, including the RX1200, struggled to get past 500, and even that was a gamble depending on the scenario.

The Sig Kilo and the Bushnell 1m are both much better units.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,396
Likes: 1
7
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24,396
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bufaf
Originally Posted by TATELAW
Originally Posted by pointer
I have the 1000i TBR DNA and it's done for me what you state you need one to do.


+1

+2


Mine too.
Have checked it quite a bit on various objects at various distances using Google Earth, seems very accurate.


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

230 members (204guy, 24HourCampFireGuy50, 10gaugemag, 1_deuce, 300_savage, 17Fan, 32 invisible), 2,322 guests, and 1,094 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,193,078
Posts18,501,585
Members73,987
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.147s Queries: 38 (0.014s) Memory: 0.8474 MB (Peak: 0.9119 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-10 05:14:24 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS