24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 833
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 833
Thanks!

This is great information, keep the outpouring of results and facts coming!



Monster Whitetails are Awesome!!!
GB1

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 606
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 606
Originally Posted by 1234567
My .270 has a 22 inch barrel, and regardless of what the loading manuals state, and regardless of the loading tables listed in several magazines, I have never been able to get 3000 FPS with a 130 grain bullet. I could get close, in the high 2900s, but never to 3000.

I don't have a way to check for pressure, other than miking the case head, but I never went beyond the max loads listed, but the loads claiming 3000 and beyond never got there in my rifle.

I have often wondered where some writers got their ballistic info. In my experience, it seems there is 100 to 200 FPS of imagination tacked onto the top end. I Have also wondered if the velocities quoted were actual chronographed velocities, or were copied from some one else's tests, which were copied from someone else's test who can't even spell chronograph.

The only load I ever chronographed that gave higher velocity than listed in the factory ballistics chart was a 139 grain bullet from a 7 m/m Weatherby factory load. It gave a few more FPS than factory charts show, about 50 FPS, to the best of my memory.


Have you ever measured any factory 130gr across your kronijeraph? grin

BTW don't tell the deer your loads don't make 3K and it won't make any difference, 2900 is plenty...


You need to call it. I can't call it for you.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
For whatever this is worth and it might not be much I will relate yesterdays chronograph experience. I noticed in this thread comments regarding fiddling with the chronograph to get whatever velocity you want. I just got anew ProChrono and I have been working on some 25 WSSM loads. I had the factory 120 PEP ammunition which chronographed at 2,880 out of both a Browning A Bolt and a Winchester 70. I started by fiddling with the angle of the bore and its relationship to the surface of the chronograph. They need to be parallel when the trigger is squeezed. I ran a couple of shots with the chronograph angled sharply away from my shooting position. The bullet was pretty close to the fron sensor and quite aways. maybe 18" or so from the rear sensor. The two shots I fired this way read 4,549 and 4,555. Obvoiusly these two shots have no relation to reality. What it illustrates is, that the above posters who remarked that you can fiddle with your chronograph and alter your data are right. Be sure you keep the plane of the bore parrallel to the plane of the chronograph sensors or your result may be full of stuffing. It wouldn't take much of an angle change to induce a reading of 150 fps that were not there.

Steve


Steve

Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,085
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,085
Originally Posted by 1234567
My .270 has a 22 inch barrel, and regardless of what the loading manuals state, and regardless of the loading tables listed in several magazines, I have never been able to get 3000 FPS with a 130 grain bullet. I could get close, in the high 2900s, but never to 3000.

I don't have a way to check for pressure, other than miking the case head, but I never went beyond the max loads listed, but the loads claiming 3000 and beyond never got there in my rifle.

I have often wondered where some writers got their ballistic info. In my experience, it seems there is 100 to 200 FPS of imagination tacked onto the top end. I Have also wondered if the velocities quoted were actual chronographed velocities, or were copied from some one else's tests, which were copied from someone else's test who can't even spell chronograph.

The only load I ever chronographed that gave higher velocity than listed in the factory ballistics chart was a 139 grain bullet from a 7 m/m Weatherby factory load. It gave a few more FPS than factory charts show, about 50 FPS, to the best of my memory.


On the other hand I have not one, but two 270s, a Husqvarna with a 22" barrel and an FN with a 24" that get more than the velocity shown in the reloading manuals with the loads listed.

The really amazing thing is that the 22" Husqvarna is only a few feet shy of matching the FN with its longer barrel.

Ted

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,320
1
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
1
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,320
Ruger280, somehow, the deer figured it out. The 130 grain was Sierra pointed soft points. On deer in the 100 pound range, I never had one penetrate on a broadside shot. Most deer in the area I hunt are shot at 30 to 50 yards, and none dropped in their tracks. They didn't go far, and there was usually no blood trail at all.

I just followed in the direction they went, and luckily, they didn't go far. Now, I use 140 grain Nosler partition, and they do penetrate. I don't know the velocity. The deer still run a few yards, 40 or 50 usually, (I don't try for neck or head shots. Just the heart-lung area.) but usually there is a small blood trail.

You might think that a deer going 40 or 50 yards is no big deal, and a lot of times, it isn't, but in the area where I hunt, it is so thick a deer can be out of sight in one or two leaps. That is why I want complete penetration, and as much of a blood trail as I can get.

Strange that you ask about testing the 130 grain factory load. Actually, I never even thought about it because I haven't shot a factory load in that rifle in over 40 years. I don't even have any.

IC B2

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 148
C
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 148
This past year I picked up a Tikka T3 Lite in 270 WIN (22" bbl). During my load developement, I immediately found that my tried and true "pet loads" that developed for my Rem M700 in 270 WIN (22" bbl) were WAY TO HOT for the Tikka.
With the M700 I settled on a load that was giving me 3025 fps with a Seirra 130gr SPBT.
With the T3 I found that the sweet spot load was 2950 fps using the same bullet. My conclusion with the Tikka was that it had a tigher chamber and/or bore as compared to the Remington.
I would recomend that you not fuss over an extra 150 fps, choosing instead to develope a load that will litterally drive tacks.
Good luck and enjoy your time on the range.

Last edited by Chopaka81; 12/18/07. Reason: spelling error corrected

-----

Chopaka
Snohomish Co, WA
NRA Life Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 606
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 606
Originally Posted by 1234567
Ruger280, somehow, the deer figured it out. The 130 grain was Sierra pointed soft points. On deer in the 100 pound range, I never had one penetrate on a broadside shot. Most deer in the area I hunt are shot at 30 to 50 yards, and none dropped in their tracks. They didn't go far, and there was usually no blood trail at all.

I just followed in the direction they went, and luckily, they didn't go far. Now, I use 140 grain Nosler partition, and they do penetrate. I don't know the velocity. The deer still run a few yards, 40 or 50 usually, (I don't try for neck or head shots. Just the heart-lung area.) but usually there is a small blood trail.

You might think that a deer going 40 or 50 yards is no big deal, and a lot of times, it isn't, but in the area where I hunt, it is so thick a deer can be out of sight in one or two leaps. That is why I want complete penetration, and as much of a blood trail as I can get.

Strange that you ask about testing the 130 grain factory load. Actually, I never even thought about it because I haven't shot a factory load in that rifle in over 40 years. I don't even have any.


I hear you. The partition is a great bullet at most any velocity. I was really getting at the velocity being the variable not the bullet. Shoot that 140gr partition at some muzzle velocity between 2600 and 3000fps into the boiler room and there won't be a hill of beans difference in the end. Except maybe at extreme ranges.

I'm with you on the factories....I have never personally bought factory loaded ammo for a rifle believe it or not. Never intend to either.


You need to call it. I can't call it for you.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 833
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 833
I was able to get better velocity with 150 gr bullets; close to below from Alliant:http://www.alliantpowder.com/reloaders/RecipePrint.aspx?gtypeid=2&weight=150&shellid=64&bulletid=181&bdid=1302

Speer 150 gr BTSP; Reloder 26 67.6 3,113FPS


Monster Whitetails are Awesome!!!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,581
Unless you are doing the development yourself you just don't know what is up.

I once loaded some 140 270's for a fellow who wanted the 3,150 fps. At that time I had no 270's I loaded for, but had some 140 bullets that were in the way. He gave me some brass and I loaded them.

I worked up the load as if I were doing it for myself, but using his rifle. The safe point was just under 3,000. Ran some factory 7mm RM over my chrono. Those loads ran about 3,150. Took a picture of the readout on the display, loaded them up, labelled them as 3,150, included the photo. He was happy as a clam.


Steve

Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Another vote for R26.
From the Alliant data in a 24" barrel:
270 Win. Sierra 150 gr SBT Federal 3.23 24 Fed 210 Reloder 26 60.2 3,037 -
270 Win. Nosler 150 gr Partition Federal 3.23 24 Fed 210 Reloder 26 60.8 3,022 -
270 Win. Speer 150 gr BTSP Winchester 3.2 24 Fed 210 Reloder 26 60.4 3,034 -

Looks like R26 could get close or at least to 3,000 with the 140s and a 22" barrel.


"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 911
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 911
Quickload shows R26 will get you closest. It shows approx 3130 @ 66k psi. The next closest powders are R25 and MRP at approx 3100.

If you're trying to get as much as you can safely, start low with R26 and work up to what is max for your setup.

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
Your mate from the range with the 22" bbl is closer to 70k PSI than he is to 65k.

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
L
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,278
yes WSM or ROY....Win=kaboom!

LC

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

543 members (10gaugemag, 1936M71, 1beaver_shooter, 16penny, 1234, 17CalFan, 58 invisible), 2,274 guests, and 1,302 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,389
Posts18,488,664
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.380s Queries: 41 (0.008s) Memory: 0.8697 MB (Peak: 0.9611 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 14:21:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS